Bitcoin Forum
July 16, 2024, 03:54:35 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][NMC] Namecoin Wallet (QT) with integrated Name Registration v3.75  (Read 78513 times)
snailbrain (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020



View Profile
June 27, 2013, 04:14:34 PM
 #101

if anyone would like to donate for the work done on the QT, it would very much appreciated :

NMC: N5Nw4uk8NNd3UcoJ9jPD5Towdxr9wyGuN6
BTC: 19wDA8D9fnYdp71DhQygWYktHnmW4ygTN9

illpoet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 341
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 10:00:28 PM
 #102

this is really nice and a long damn time coming imo. lol i found this thread bc i was thinking of offering a bounty to anyone making a wallet! namecoin donation incoming guys great work! least i can do is bump this thread!

Tym's Get Rich Slow scheme: plse send .00001 to
btc: 1DKRaNUnMQkeby6Dk1d8e6fRczSrTEhd8p ltc: LV4Udu7x9aLs28MoMCzsvVGKJbSmrHESnt
thank you.
bucktotal
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 11:21:21 PM
 #103

if anyone would like to donate for the work done on the QT, it would very much appreciated :

NMC: N5Nw4uk8NNd3UcoJ9jPD5Towdxr9wyGuN6
BTC: 19wDA8D9fnYdp71DhQygWYktHnmW4ygTN9


ok. thank you snailbrain. i sent a bit of both.





marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 11:22:34 PM
 #104

snailbrain: tested latest release on linux. builds, launches, connects ACCEPT blocks, etc ... only minimally tested the "Manage Namespace" tab new functions for editing name configuration ... seems to work ok. No major freezes, errors, etc.

It sent a TX to change the name field successfully. Have NOT tested all the specific DNS and IP and SSL fingerprint forms for correct functionality. I'll leave that up to all those guys chomping at the bit to set-up their new TLS/SSL .bit enabled domains Wink

snailbrain (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 01:02:19 AM
 #105

thanks for the donations

snailbrain: tested latest release on linux. builds, launches, connects ACCEPT blocks, etc ... only minimally tested the "Manage Namespace" tab new functions for editing name configuration ... seems to work ok. No major freezes, errors, etc.

It sent a TX to change the name field successfully. Have NOT tested all the specific DNS and IP and SSL fingerprint forms for correct functionality. I'll leave that up to all those guys chomping at the bit to set-up their new TLS/SSL .bit enabled domains Wink

thanks Smiley

marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
June 28, 2013, 11:58:27 AM
 #106

snailbrain : on linux namecoin-qt throws this error upon exiting ...
 
Code:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::lock_error> >'
  what():  boost::lock_error
Aborted (core dumped)

favdesu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
June 28, 2013, 12:08:28 PM
 #107

.bit's would be really cool if it wasn't so damn hard to setup. there are no working browser apps and foxy proxy doesn't work either.

I like the idea, but there's really no sense in advertising / building a website on .bit if literally no one has easy access to them.

marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
June 28, 2013, 12:21:53 PM
 #108

.bit's would be really cool if it wasn't so damn hard to setup. there are no working browser apps and foxy proxy doesn't work either.


It really isn't that difficult ... if you want to trust this guy http://namecoin.com/ you can be browsing .bit domains in minutes ... if you don't trust him and want to set up your own it can be done. It is still in development ... no-one said it was going to be easy, put some money up if you must have the tools now ... or wait for the free stuff and mooch like everyone else. But please don't complain about free stuff not coming quick enough.

Foxy proxy does work, I use it all the time.

favdesu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
June 28, 2013, 12:27:31 PM
 #109

.bit's would be really cool if it wasn't so damn hard to setup. there are no working browser apps and foxy proxy doesn't work either.


It really isn't that difficult ... if you want to trust this guy http://namecoin.com/ you can be browsing .bit domains in minutes ... if you don't trust him and want to set up your own it can be done. It is still in development ... no-one said it was going to be easy, put some money up if you must have the tools now ... or wait for the free stuff and mooch like everyone else. But please don't complain about free stuff not coming quick enough.

Foxy proxy does work, I use it all the time.

Chrome app does not work, and it's really unsafe imo.

Same goes for foxy proxy (not working)

snailbrain (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 12:49:06 PM
 #110

thanks for bug report Moa

@favdesu

this method seems to also work flawlessly for me on windows, in any browser, and takes 30seconds to setup
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=205026



you can lookup from the block chain locally (securely)... but it's not such an easy process for most users (atm)..
lookup NMControl by Khal

http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=525

favdesu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
June 28, 2013, 12:58:47 PM
 #111

thanks for bug report Moa

@favdesu

this method seems to also work flawlessly for me on windows, in any browser, and takes 30seconds to setup
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=205026



you can lookup from the block chain locally (securely)... but it's not such an easy process for most users (atm)..
lookup NMControl by Khal

http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=525

thanks, I'll test it!

snailbrain (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 04:14:53 PM
 #112

snailbrain : on linux namecoin-qt throws this error upon exiting ...
 
Code:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::lock_error> >'
  what():  boost::lock_error
Aborted (core dumped)

possibly boost version/ Qt version..

anyone else experience this crash on Linux?

phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 04:54:08 PM
 #113

Did some testing and I must say I am quite impressed. Everything went smoothly.

One important thing: There should be a reasonable txfee set by default. Maybe 0.01. This allows miners to increase fees without disturbing newbies.

On the firstupdate screen: The warning about the 12 blocks should be in red (If people simply turn off the client they might loose the name/domain).

The status of domains with name_new only is not clearly visible. OK, the expires column is empty but maybe it should say "preregistered" or something so that it is clear that you do not yet own the name/domain.

Not important:
name_new from namecoind is displayed as hash/random in the transaction list.
name_firstupdate from namecoind seems to create a duplicate entry

These all worked fine:
sign, verify, dumpprivkey, encryption, name_new, name_firstupdate, wallet encryption (both gui & namecoind)

Waiting for firstupdates and doing some more playing testing...  Grin
snailbrain (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 08:00:30 PM
 #114

Did some testing and I must say I am quite impressed. Everything went smoothly.

One important thing: There should be a reasonable txfee set by default. Maybe 0.01. This allows miners to increase fees without disturbing newbies.

On the firstupdate screen: The warning about the 12 blocks should be in red (If people simply turn off the client they might loose the name/domain).

The status of domains with name_new only is not clearly visible. OK, the expires column is empty but maybe it should say "preregistered" or something so that it is clear that you do not yet own the name/domain.

Not important:
name_new from namecoind is displayed as hash/random in the transaction list.
name_firstupdate from namecoind seems to create a duplicate entry

These all worked fine:
sign, verify, dumpprivkey, encryption, name_new, name_firstupdate, wallet encryption (both gui & namecoind)

Waiting for firstupdates and doing some more playing testing...  Grin

thanks Phelix.. will try to get these sorted..

in namecoind, i think it always showed the hash in transaction list? (not 100% sure, but i think so)..

edit: you are on windows?

phelix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 08:23:58 PM
 #115

Did some testing and I must say I am quite impressed. Everything went smoothly.

One important thing: There should be a reasonable txfee set by default. Maybe 0.01. This allows miners to increase fees without disturbing newbies.

On the firstupdate screen: The warning about the 12 blocks should be in red (If people simply turn off the client they might loose the name/domain).

The status of domains with name_new only is not clearly visible. OK, the expires column is empty but maybe it should say "preregistered" or something so that it is clear that you do not yet own the name/domain.

Not important:
name_new from namecoind is displayed as hash/random in the transaction list.
name_firstupdate from namecoind seems to create a duplicate entry

These all worked fine:
sign, verify, dumpprivkey, encryption, name_new, name_firstupdate, wallet encryption (both gui & namecoind)

Waiting for firstupdates and doing some more playing testing...  Grin

thanks Phelix.. will try to get these sorted..

in namecoind, i think it always showed the hash in transaction list? (not 100% sure, but i think so)..

i meant:
name_new from namecoind is displayed as hash/random in the GUI transaction list.
name_firstupdate from namecoind seems to create a duplicate entry in the GUI tx list

Quote
edit: you are on windows?
yes   Lips sealed
cassini
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10



View Profile
June 28, 2013, 08:59:49 PM
Last edit: June 28, 2013, 10:33:38 PM by cassini
 #116

.bit's would be really cool if it wasn't so damn hard to setup. there are no working browser apps and foxy proxy doesn't work either.
Just wondering why nobody mentioned the easiest and most obvious method for browsing .bit domains.
On a standard Windows 7 or XP or on a Mac it's just a few mouseclicks (in an unrestricted user account, of course):


Windows 7:
Control Panel > Network and Internet > Network and Sharing > Connections: Local Area Connection > Properties > IPv4 > Properties > Use the following DNS server > 178.32.31.41


Windows XP:
right-click the mini icon of your active network connection, then select Status > Properties > TCP/IP > Properties > Use the following DNS server > 178.32.31.41


Mac OS:
System Preferences > Network > Advanced > DNS > DNS Servers: +  > 178.32.31.41



After that you can use any standard browser (not sure about Chrome) for looking up .bit pages.
A few examples of sites with some useful content for a start:
http://dns.bit/
http://nx.bit/
http://bitse.bit/

marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
June 29, 2013, 02:03:09 AM
 #117

Thanks cassini ... I just know that there are so many ways to get browsing .bit I cannot see how anybody could miss all of them ... maybe more spoon-feeding is necessary? Eventually all browsers/OS will be .bit enabled by default ...

forsetifox
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 29, 2013, 02:22:24 AM
 #118


Started up a few times with no errors now I'm getting errors.  Undecided


snailbrain (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1807
Merit: 1020



View Profile
June 29, 2013, 02:37:33 AM
 #119

did you compile yourself?
what os are you on (win7)?

forsetifox
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 29, 2013, 02:59:48 AM
 #120

did you compile yourself?
what os are you on (win7)?

Windows. Your client. Odd, it worked for at least 2-3 start ups and now crashes.

Also when I switched over from using the old version of namcoind to the QT client I had to re-download the
blockchain. I don't recall why.


Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!