NewLiberty
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
|
|
September 06, 2013, 05:23:08 PM |
|
Nicely done, congratulations for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
monbux
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1024
|
|
September 06, 2013, 08:46:47 PM |
|
Looks great, might buy a few. Doesn't look secure though.
|
|
|
|
KyrosKrane
|
|
September 06, 2013, 10:48:45 PM |
|
I'm curious now. How does Western Union work in the B-B framework, given the principle of non-reversible payments that's desired here, and all the fraud associated with WU money transfers? And more generally, what are the fees and limits associated with using WU to buy or sell BTC?
|
|
|
|
sayulita (OP)
|
|
September 06, 2013, 11:00:33 PM |
|
I'm curious now. How does Western Union work in the B-B framework, given the principle of non-reversible payments that's desired here, and all the fraud associated with WU money transfers? And more generally, what are the fees and limits associated with using WU to buy or sell BTC?
I am happy you asked. The Western Union payment option is a payment made directly to Bitcoin-Brokers as compared to a payment into the seller's account with bank deposits. These WU bitcoin will be sourced from an exchange by Bitcoin-Brokers, and will be sold at current MtGox rates. There will be the normal Bitcoin-Brokers fee of 2%. The buyers will bare the all the associated costs with sending the payment by Western Union. The WU payment option comes at a higher cost to the buyer than any of the bank deposit options. As a result, WU should not come into direct competition with the existing sellers because frankly its not as convenient as the bank method, and it will come at a higher cost by a few points. Hopefully though it will be an attractive option to people living in other countries where purchasing bitcoin isn't as convenient as it is in the USA or Canada.
|
|
|
|
niner
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 189
Merit: 100
You are here ---------> but you're not all there.
|
|
September 07, 2013, 05:14:24 AM |
|
It seems like every other Canadian company that was offering cash bank deposits for coins has rescinded the offer.
What's different about this one?
|
|
|
|
Stephen Gornick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
|
|
September 07, 2013, 07:05:42 AM |
|
What's different about this one?
With an exchange, all deposits are made to the same account number. With Bitcoin-Brokers, cash is deposited directly into the seller's account. The bank has no idea that the cash deposit transaction was Bitcoin-related, so it becomes much harder for them to prevent this activity without scrutinizing all cash deposits (e.g., asking for ID from the person making the deposit). Of course, a large seller will have many cash deposit transactions and that alone might put them in the spotlight but the bank wouldn't necessarily know that the deposits were the result of a Bitcoin sale without doing much more investigative legwork.
|
|
|
|
NewLiberty
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
|
|
September 07, 2013, 09:21:48 AM |
|
What's different about this one?
With an exchange, all deposits are made to the same account number. With Bitcoin-Brokers, cash is deposited directly into the seller's account. The bank has no idea that the cash deposit transaction was Bitcoin-related, so it becomes much harder for them to prevent this activity without scrutinizing all cash deposits (e.g., asking for ID from the person making the deposit). Of course, a large seller will have many cash deposit transactions and that alone might put them in the spotlight but the bank wouldn't necessarily know that the deposits were the result of a Bitcoin sale without doing much more investigative legwork. Yes exactly, so the sellers bear the risk of account closure rather than B 2, and since this risk is distributed across all sellers it is further reduced and also manageable by the individual sellers. For my accounts, (where I get cash deposits from bullion buyers all over as a routine matter), it would be almost indistinguishable from this activity.
|
|
|
|
justusranvier
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009
|
|
September 07, 2013, 07:31:01 PM |
|
The bank has no idea that the cash deposit transaction was Bitcoin-related, so it becomes much harder for them to prevent this activity without scrutinizing all cash deposits (e.g., asking for ID from the person making the deposit). Of course, a large seller will have many cash deposit transactions and that alone might put them in the spotlight but the bank wouldn't necessarily know that the deposits were the result of a Bitcoin sale without doing much more investigative legwork.
Banks are starting to do the investigative legwork. I got a call from Wells Fargo because I had been using my personal account to buy bitcoins from Coinbase. They knew Coinbase was affiliated with Bitcoin, and then asked me if I was buying bitcoins for business or personal use. It could be that Wells Fargo is more alert than other banks because of the Bitfloor incident, but it's still a trend to keep an eye on.
|
|
|
|
FullLife
|
|
September 08, 2013, 03:49:18 AM |
|
The bank has no idea that the cash deposit transaction was Bitcoin-related, so it becomes much harder for them to prevent this activity without scrutinizing all cash deposits (e.g., asking for ID from the person making the deposit). Of course, a large seller will have many cash deposit transactions and that alone might put them in the spotlight but the bank wouldn't necessarily know that the deposits were the result of a Bitcoin sale without doing much more investigative legwork.
Banks are starting to do the investigative legwork. I got a call from Wells Fargo because I had been using my personal account to buy bitcoins from Coinbase. They knew Coinbase was affiliated with Bitcoin, and then asked me if I was buying bitcoins for business or personal use. It could be that Wells Fargo is more alert than other banks because of the Bitfloor incident, but it's still a trend to keep an eye on. I opened business checking accounts with a couple major banks just to use exclusively for bitcoin buying/selling because of the volume of transactions. I'm hoping I won't run into any problems.
|
|
|
|
justusranvier
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009
|
|
September 08, 2013, 05:21:39 AM |
|
I opened business checking accounts with a couple major banks just to use exclusively for bitcoin buying/selling because of the volume of transactions. I'm hoping I won't run into any problems. The account I got a call about has not been used for any third-party bitcoin sales. I've just been depositing dollars into it and buying bitcoins via Coinbase. They seemed to be satisfied when I told them it was personal use and not a business, but I was surprised that they are watching Coinbase so closely.
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2348
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
September 09, 2013, 10:37:21 PM |
|
I opened business checking accounts with a couple major banks just to use exclusively for bitcoin buying/selling because of the volume of transactions. I'm hoping I won't run into any problems. The account I got a call about has not been used for any third-party bitcoin sales. I've just been depositing dollars into it and buying bitcoins via Coinbase. They seemed to be satisfied when I told them it was personal use and not a business, but I was surprised that they are watching Coinbase so closely. "They" are not watching anything ... their systems that are running 24/7 are watching everything, all "they" need to do is ask the systems the right questions.
|
|
|
|
cardcomm
|
|
September 09, 2013, 11:47:48 PM |
|
I'm curious now. How does Western Union work in the B-B framework, given the principle of non-reversible payments that's desired here, and all the fraud associated with WU money transfers? And more generally, what are the fees and limits associated with using WU to buy or sell BTC?
I am happy you asked. The Western Union payment option is a payment made directly to Bitcoin-Brokers as compared to a payment into the seller's account with bank deposits. These WU bitcoin will be sourced from an exchange by Bitcoin-Brokers, and will be sold at current MtGox rates. There will be the normal Bitcoin-Brokers fee of 2%. The buyers will bare the all the associated costs with sending the payment by Western Union. The WU payment option comes at a higher cost to the buyer than any of the bank deposit options. As a result, WU should not come into direct competition with the existing sellers because frankly its not as convenient as the bank method, and it will come at a higher cost by a few points. Hopefully though it will be an attractive option to people living in other countries where purchasing bitcoin isn't as convenient as it is in the USA or Canada. Thanks for the more detailed explanation. As a buyer, I'm pretty happy with the bank deposit option, but it's nice to have choices. One question though: Would the use of WU payments make it possible to purchase bitcoins on the weekend? Not that I'd want Dan or anyone else to have to work weekends But there have been a couple of times it would have been worth some extra cost to be able to buy on Saturday. Just a thought...
|
|
|
|
sayulita (OP)
|
|
September 09, 2013, 11:56:21 PM |
|
I'm curious now. How does Western Union work in the B-B framework, given the principle of non-reversible payments that's desired here, and all the fraud associated with WU money transfers? And more generally, what are the fees and limits associated with using WU to buy or sell BTC?
I am happy you asked. The Western Union payment option is a payment made directly to Bitcoin-Brokers as compared to a payment into the seller's account with bank deposits. These WU bitcoin will be sourced from an exchange by Bitcoin-Brokers, and will be sold at current MtGox rates. There will be the normal Bitcoin-Brokers fee of 2%. The buyers will bare the all the associated costs with sending the payment by Western Union. The WU payment option comes at a higher cost to the buyer than any of the bank deposit options. As a result, WU should not come into direct competition with the existing sellers because frankly its not as convenient as the bank method, and it will come at a higher cost by a few points. Hopefully though it will be an attractive option to people living in other countries where purchasing bitcoin isn't as convenient as it is in the USA or Canada. Thanks for the more detailed explanation. As a buyer, I'm pretty happy with the bank deposit option, but it's nice to have choices. One question though: Would the use of WU payments make it possible to purchase bitcoins on the weekend? Not that I'd want Dan or anyone else to have to work weekends But there have been a couple of times it would have been worth some extra cost to be able to buy on Saturday. Just a thought... At this point, I think it is just going to be offered Mondays-Fridays. If that changes I will make it known here.
|
|
|
|
sayulita (OP)
|
|
September 18, 2013, 03:46:12 PM |
|
The bank has no idea that the cash deposit transaction was Bitcoin-related, so it becomes much harder for them to prevent this activity without scrutinizing all cash deposits (e.g., asking for ID from the person making the deposit). Of course, a large seller will have many cash deposit transactions and that alone might put them in the spotlight but the bank wouldn't necessarily know that the deposits were the result of a Bitcoin sale without doing much more investigative legwork.
Banks are starting to do the investigative legwork. I got a call from Wells Fargo because I had been using my personal account to buy bitcoins from Coinbase. They knew Coinbase was affiliated with Bitcoin, and then asked me if I was buying bitcoins for business or personal use. It could be that Wells Fargo is more alert than other banks because of the Bitfloor incident, but it's still a trend to keep an eye on. I opened business checking accounts with a couple major banks just to use exclusively for bitcoin buying/selling because of the volume of transactions. I'm hoping I won't run into any problems. I think you should be fine.
|
|
|
|
Driice
|
|
September 28, 2013, 09:35:14 PM |
|
I'm a happy customer of a few bitcoin-brokers transactions now. They're a great way to do fast, anonymous btc purchases.
|
|
|
|
sayulita (OP)
|
|
October 08, 2013, 08:31:20 PM |
|
I'm a happy customer of a few bitcoin-brokers transactions now. They're a great way to do fast, anonymous btc purchases.
Much appreciated!
|
|
|
|
btcforall777
|
|
October 09, 2013, 04:58:32 PM |
|
mt gox price plus 2%???
|
|
|
|
bernard75
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 10, 2013, 07:55:42 PM |
|
Chile and no EU?
|
|
|
|
sayulita (OP)
|
|
October 10, 2013, 08:16:21 PM |
|
Chile and no EU? I wish I could assist people in the EU. Chile is the same timezone effectively as the rest of the USA.
|
|
|
|
Trance
|
|
October 14, 2013, 07:51:19 AM |
|
This is fine if you are just starting up but: site is not even https secured? site is not even a real company? can't find info on Mexbill Pay the organization who registered the domain according to these docs. also do real companies use yahoo addresses on their contact info? i'm just trying to prevent anyone from getting scammed until we know the legitimacy of your company. source: http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/results.jsp?domain=bitcoin-brokers.org Domain ID:D168910502-LROR Domain Name:BITCOIN-BROKERS.ORG Created On:09-Jun-2013 18:16:48 UTC Last Updated On:09-Jun-2013 18:16:49 UTC Expiration Date:09-Jun-2014 18:16:48 UTC Sponsoring Registrar:eNom, Inc. (R39-LROR) Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED Status:TRANSFER PROHIBITED Registrant ID:c62ce1fd8b7363bf Registrant Name:Daniel Brown Registrant Organization:Mexbill Pay Registrant Street1:9395 Dolphin Ave Registrant Street2: Registrant Street3: Registrant City:Richmond Registrant State/Province:BC Registrant Postal Code:V6Y1C7 Registrant Country:CA Registrant Phone:+1.7788797659 Registrant Phone Ext.: Registrant FAX: Registrant FAX Ext.: Registrant Email:konaandcooper8@yahoo.com Admin ID:c62ce1fd8b7363bf Admin Name:Daniel Brown Admin Organization:Mexbill Pay Admin Street1:9395 Dolphin Ave Admin Street2: Admin Street3: Admin City:Richmond Admin State/Province:BC Admin Postal Code:V6Y1C7 Admin Country:CA Admin Phone:+1.7788797659 Admin Phone Ext.: Admin FAX: Admin FAX Ext.: Admin Email:konaandcooper8@yahoo.com Tech ID:c62ce1fd8b7363bf Tech Name:Daniel Brown Tech Organization:Mexbill Pay Tech Street1:9395 Dolphin Ave Tech Street2: Tech Street3: Tech City:Richmond Tech State/Province:BC Tech Postal Code:V6Y1C7 Tech Country:CA Tech Phone:+1.7788797659 Tech Phone Ext.: Tech FAX: Tech FAX Ext.: Tech Email:konaandcooper8@yahoo.com Name Server:NS1.BIGCOMMERCE.COM Name Server:NS2.BIGCOMMERCE.COM Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: DNSSEC:Unsigned
|
Some people are so poor ALL they have is money
|
|
|
|