Eatbatterys
|
|
November 16, 2017, 09:29:30 AM |
|
I wonder how it happened, as long as we were measured by our speeds on the CPU, someone used the GPU. How did it happen that the "new" algo is use the old algo in the settings of the miner?
Except it didn't. If you look at hash rates from launch to now, you can clearly see that it was cpu only up until a gpu miner was built to be able to mine it.
|
|
|
|
casey.anthony195
|
|
November 16, 2017, 09:30:07 AM |
|
The focus on decentralization is nice and all, but I don't really see what makes this project all that different from Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
Eatbatterys
|
|
November 16, 2017, 09:32:14 AM |
|
The focus on decentralization is nice and all, but I don't really see what makes this project all that different from Bitcoin.
If you're looking for ground breaking new blockchain tech, this isn't the coin for you.
|
|
|
|
Cobra9100
|
|
November 16, 2017, 09:34:43 AM |
|
P968yhoiVaPmGoiuMx75yfQ5uiiuhg9szS
|
|
|
|
Sam67
|
|
November 16, 2017, 09:39:28 AM |
|
Пoлитикa - гpязнoe дeлo
|
|
|
|
punxsutawneyphil
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 09:41:30 AM |
|
I wonder how it happened, as long as we were measured by our speeds on the CPU, someone used the GPU. How did it happen that the "new" algo is use the old algo in the settings of the miner?
Because I was in a rush, simultaneously fiddling with virtual machine to compile a windows binary -- helping manfromafar with a hashing module for yiimp pool. Take a look at my commit https://github.com/punxsutawneyphil/ccminer/commit/86ed32f7c5929e6ccab7675a7ee58eecfc02cd1e#diff-43e9d1691f560530f3f6aa1869bf0b47It wasnt worth the time when you're in a race against everyone else won't release miner to community, people like sp charging for miners. sib.cu was used as a skeleton. It is indeed, new in the respect that no one has used that particular combination of those 6 hashes. I kinda sorta like it alright, it seems to run reasonably power efficient on my 1080ti cards. I can say pretty easily without a doubt I was the very first GPU on the network. Now, about an hour after I finally got it hashing most efficiently on my cards, a few more GPUs joined the chorus. No clue where they came from. Keep in mind, Nethash was around 75MH/s and just my three cards was half that. If someone was surreptiously mining GPU before I did, it woulda been obvious. Pool has many many users, for GPU to hide in there, it would have had to have been a 750ti LOL
|
|
|
|
Eatbatterys
|
|
November 16, 2017, 09:45:22 AM |
|
I must say I'm pretty surprised there is still so much hash power on the 3% fee MPOS pool considering there is a 0% fee pool out there.
|
|
|
|
punxsutawneyphil
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 09:55:32 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Be light
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 101
In crypto we trust!
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:06:40 AM |
|
Sorry for my stupidity, but waht does mean "ninja launch"? Is it means that anybody dont know about it?)))
|
|
|
|
Eatbatterys
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:09:28 AM |
|
Sorry for my stupidity, but waht does mean "ninja launch"? Is it means that anybody dont know about it?)))
Read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1089206.0Though judging by the definition of ninja launch and the fact that this coin seems to have put PoS out 4.5 years judging by block time and activation height, I'm not sure how it applies.
|
|
|
|
Liss1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:18:54 AM |
|
Miner with CUDA 9 to get compiled? Maybe more hash succeed.
|
|
|
|
Be light
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 101
In crypto we trust!
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:30:39 AM |
|
Read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1089206.0Though judging by the definition of ninja launch and the fact that this coin seems to have put PoS out 4.5 years judging by block time and activation height, I'm not sure how it applies. Thanks, I'll know now. But why is developer salled topic with "ninja" is he stupid or this is for old people, that would immediately know which scheme is planned
|
|
|
|
Eatbatterys
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:31:50 AM |
|
Read this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1089206.0Though judging by the definition of ninja launch and the fact that this coin seems to have put PoS out 4.5 years judging by block time and activation height, I'm not sure how it applies. Thanks, I'll know now. But why is developer salled topic with "ninja" is he stupid or this is for old people, that would immediately know which scheme is planned I'd wager they just used it as a buzzword to assist in hyping up the coin to prospective miners.
|
|
|
|
Epicyclic
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:43:59 AM |
|
Anybody have an idea why i keep pulling masses of invalid shares?
|
|
|
|
stevascha
Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 10
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:49:03 AM |
|
PJK3S4t1RSkS5WQwQdQPU2t9Y2MXumb79S bounty anyway thanks for ccminer
|
|
|
|
Eatbatterys
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:50:58 AM |
|
Anybody have an idea why i keep pulling masses of invalid shares?
Are you using the version of ccminer that was posted in this thread?
|
|
|
|
Epicyclic
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:54:39 AM |
|
yes, i have tried switching algo between x11, sib and poly all same results. this is on the frankenstien pool, i will quickly try another see if results are same.
|
|
|
|
stevascha
Member
Offline
Activity: 312
Merit: 10
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:56:06 AM |
|
Anybody have an idea why i keep pulling masses of invalid shares?
use this
|
|
|
|
Epicyclic
|
|
November 16, 2017, 10:58:55 AM |
|
Ok got it working, thanks guys
|
|
|
|
roboshark
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
November 16, 2017, 11:47:50 AM |
|
Why do you mine this coin? It's a very good start that the dev claimed this going to have a new algo and a fair launch. I wouldn't waste electricity on this. Just my two cents...
|
|
|
|
|