3phase
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 313
Merit: 251
Third score
|
 |
August 29, 2011, 02:21:35 PM |
|
I am tempted to start a thread "Mining on MMC is now 2x more profitable than mining Solidcoins"  But I guess they will call me a troll... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to be a moderator, report many posts with accuracy. You will be noticed.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
AnnihilaT (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2011, 02:24:15 PM |
|
I am tempted to start a thread "Mining on MMC is now 2x more profitable than mining Solidcoins" But I guess they will call me a troll... lol! that would be funny,... do it for the lulz!!!  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AnnihilaT (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2011, 04:00:43 PM |
|
I love it! Thanks for the laugh! |
|
|
|
|
|
cyberlync
|
|
August 29, 2011, 04:21:19 PM |
|
I am tempted to start a thread "Mining on MMC is now 2x more profitable than mining Solidcoins" But I guess they will call me a troll... Would that not curse the pool? Just like the *coins? They got a huge boost in a few days, and boom.. dead. so... what are you trying to do here?  |
Giving away your BTC's? Send 'em here: 1F7XgercyaXeDHiuq31YzrVK5YAhbDkJhf
|
|
|
|
AnnihilaT (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2011, 11:42:35 PM |
|
I am tempted to start a thread "Mining on MMC is now 2x more profitable than mining Solidcoins" But I guess they will call me a troll... Would that not curse the pool? Just like the *coins? They got a huge boost in a few days, and boom.. dead. so... what are you trying to do here? I think he was just trying to be funny and poke a bit of fun at the shitcoins |
|
|
|
|
|
cyberlync
|
|
August 29, 2011, 11:51:20 PM |
|
I was hoping the smiley would reveal that I was kidding... alas  |
Giving away your BTC's? Send 'em here: 1F7XgercyaXeDHiuq31YzrVK5YAhbDkJhf
|
|
|
|
AnnihilaT (OP)
|
|
August 30, 2011, 12:01:26 AM |
|
I was hoping the smiley would reveal that I was kidding... alas oh i thought it was a worried smiley Oh its shocked ---> |
|
|
|
|
|
Jack of Diamonds
|
|
August 31, 2011, 07:55:02 PM |
|
We got stickied into the top 10! Milestone! Congrats everyone!
This just proves Vladimirs technique works (injecting massive hash rates into startup pools) critics who were doubting the sanity of people who would buy such a service, should rethink their position Top 10 pool in a bit over a month, from absolute zero to near 200ghash/s. |
1f3gHNoBodYw1LLs3ndY0UanYB1tC0lnsBec4USeYoU9AREaCH34PBeGgAR67fx
|
|
|
|
AnnihilaT (OP)
|
|
August 31, 2011, 10:14:59 PM
Last edit: August 31, 2011, 10:26:40 PM by AnnihilaT |
|
All credit should go to AnnihilaT really. Thanks for the kind words, Vladmir! But we've gotten this far together and with the support of the miners who believed in us. All credit goes to all of us in an equal share (thats fitting). Viribus Unitis! This just proves Vladimirs technique works (injecting massive hash rates into startup pools)
critics who were doubting the sanity of people who would buy such a service, should rethink their position
Top 10 pool in a bit over a month, from absolute zero to near 200ghash/s. Thank you for the kind words. I would like to shout this from a rooftop! Vindicated! jk |
|
|
|
|
|
AnnihilaT (OP)
|
|
September 07, 2011, 07:42:27 PM |
|
Just thought i would share some of the new graphs ive been working on and just implemented in the pool. Screenshots below:   More to come... I promised eye candy... well this is the start of it. Login to your account to check these graphs out live. |
|
|
|
|
3phase
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 313
Merit: 251
Third score
|
|
September 08, 2011, 05:41:38 AM |
|
Very nice!!!
I would however suggest that the "effective difficulty in the second chart should be a moving average (so datapoint no. 1 in the chart should be the average of blocks -99 to -50, supposing that block 0 is the latest block, block -1 is the last but one block, and so on). So, even if you don't have data older than 50 blocks behind on the chart, this line should be affected by this older data.
This would normalize the curve, instead of it starting at a low point when the -49 block was a lucky one and starting at a high point when the -49 block was unlucky.
I hope I'm making myself clear.
Also, a bigger y-scale (double it maybe) will show the fluctuations of effective difficulty more pronounced and clear.
Keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|
|
AnnihilaT (OP)
|
|
September 08, 2011, 12:37:48 PM |
|
Very nice!!!
I would however suggest that the "effective difficulty in the second chart should be a moving average (so datapoint no. 1 in the chart should be the average of blocks -99 to -50, supposing that block 0 is the latest block, block -1 is the last but one block, and so on). So, even if you don't have data older than 50 blocks behind on the chart, this line should be affected by this older data.
This would normalize the curve, instead of it starting at a low point when the -49 block was a lucky one and starting at a high point when the -49 block was unlucky.
I hope I'm making myself clear.
Also, a bigger y-scale (double it maybe) will show the fluctuations of effective difficulty more pronounced and clear.
Keep up the good work.
Y scale is now selectable by zoom method... click and drag your mouse on the graph to soom in on the y axis. |
|
|
|
|
|
AnnihilaT (OP)
|
|
September 11, 2011, 10:23:23 AM |
|
Very nice!!!
I would however suggest that the "effective difficulty in the second chart should be a moving average (so datapoint no. 1 in the chart should be the average of blocks -99 to -50, supposing that block 0 is the latest block, block -1 is the last but one block, and so on). So, even if you don't have data older than 50 blocks behind on the chart, this line should be affected by this older data.
This would normalize the curve, instead of it starting at a low point when the -49 block was a lucky one and starting at a high point when the -49 block was unlucky.
I hope I'm making myself clear.
Also, a bigger y-scale (double it maybe) will show the fluctuations of effective difficulty more pronounced and clear.
Keep up the good work.
This questions is furthur addressed here: https://bitcoin.org.uk/forums/topic/214-replies-to-questions-asked-in-other-forums/ |
|
|
|
|
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
AKA: gigavps
|
|
September 12, 2011, 08:57:14 PM |
|
Is there a way to change my username within your website? I signed up a while back to get the 0% fee account and would like to come over and test it out but can't find a way to change the username.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AnnihilaT (OP)
|
|
September 13, 2011, 07:29:25 AM |
|
Is there a way to change my username within your website? I signed up a while back to get the 0% fee account and would like to come over and test it out but can't find a way to change the username.
sent you a pm Also, we are on freenode irc btw: channel #mainframe.nl if anyone ever wants real time support. |
|
|
|
|
|
AnnihilaT (OP)
|
|
September 14, 2011, 09:08:44 AM |
|
twmz added support for MMC today.... looks nice, eh? http://btcstats.net/?mmcGo get yours today before they run out.... first come first served... (raw materials needed to craft banners are getting scarce these days so i wouldnt wait too long on this) They look something like this:  Thanks also to gigavps for help on this.... |
|
|
|
|
brandon@sourcewerks
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
September 14, 2011, 01:14:20 PM |
|
The recent run of good luck at MMC is sweet!  |
|
|
|
|
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
AKA: gigavps
|
|
September 14, 2011, 05:58:20 PM |
|
Is the irc channel now invite only?  |
|
|
|
|
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
AKA: gigavps
|
|
September 15, 2011, 08:14:06 PM |
|
Awesome pool AnnihilaT. Really nice web interface and the pool is rock solid!
|
|
|
|
|
|
