mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
|
February 13, 2012, 07:26:25 AM |
|
Being able to sort the input addresses would be nice.
|
1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
|
|
|
kwukduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1937
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 16, 2012, 06:16:46 PM |
|
Am i right in saying that this feature will not be supported by the official client?
Anyway, i thought it would be nice to have an additional feature that makes use of the new import/export keys command in 0.6rc1. If we could just rightclick the address from the anonymity tab and select export. And a new button to import a key.
|
14b8PdeWLqK3yi3PrNHMmCvSmvDEKEBh3E
|
|
|
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 8808
|
|
February 17, 2012, 06:27:33 AM |
|
Am i right in saying that this feature will not be supported by the official client?
I expect it to be at some point.
|
|
|
|
viper1092
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
February 17, 2012, 07:45:14 AM |
|
This is the one reason I've been looking for alternative clients. I like the idea of controlling where it sends from. If this makes into the official build, I'd be totally convinced. Any chance of a patched OS X binary?
|
|
|
|
HendrikJan
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
February 17, 2012, 08:31:55 AM |
|
This is an eye opener for me and i hope it will make it into the official version. I will follow this.
|
|
|
|
BrightAnarchist
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 853
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 15, 2012, 08:38:51 PM |
|
Are you going to provide a patched build based off of Bitcoin 0.5.3? many thanks can't wait until they just merge this into the main tree! Also, have you heard of this? From facebook group "Bitcoin P2P Cryptocurrency": "Efforts are underway to make bitcoin transactions more anonymous. Right now transactions are viewable using the blockchain. However, the protocol could be changed such that an a anonymous transaction (not pseudo-anonymous) can prove it is valid by providing cryptographic proof of the validity of previous transactions. If the developers succeed there will be no way to track bitcoins and it will be strongly anonymous." http://wbl.github.com/bitcoinanon.pdf
|
|
|
|
BrightAnarchist
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 853
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 15, 2012, 08:39:52 PM Last edit: March 16, 2012, 04:33:16 PM by BrightAnarchist |
|
Also, please post a donation address so I can send you some btc for this feature - it has been extremely useful!
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
|
March 17, 2012, 01:03:16 AM |
|
any chance of a 5.3.1 binary?
|
1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
|
|
|
wyager
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
March 17, 2012, 02:51:11 AM |
|
This is exactly what I was looking for! I'll try to get this running on OS X.
ETA:I'm a Github noob, how do I download the source?
|
OTC-WoT: 1BWF66DuVqBCSFksUgkLtdYmHucpBgPmVm
|
|
|
jjjrmy
Member
Offline
Activity: 221
Merit: 10
|
|
March 17, 2012, 04:04:26 AM |
|
Amazing!
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 17, 2012, 01:48:29 PM |
|
So isn't just going to the address level not quite enough? e.g. shouldn't it be the transaction level for selecting inputs not just the address level? Or does it already do that and I missed that comment somewhere?
|
|
|
|
wyager
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
March 17, 2012, 08:47:45 PM |
|
OK, got it working! Very cool patch. Quick tip for OSX users who can't get it to compile: change the makefile.osx so it looks like this: #CFLAGS=-mmacosx-version-min=10.5 -arch i386 -O3 \ LDFLAGS="-arch x86_64" CFLAGS=-mmacosx-version-min=10.5 -arch x86_64 -O3 \ I don't think my install of Boost works with i386. Which function do I use to check which accounts are tied together by transactions?
|
OTC-WoT: 1BWF66DuVqBCSFksUgkLtdYmHucpBgPmVm
|
|
|
dooglus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
|
|
March 18, 2012, 04:50:58 PM |
|
Is there a branch that merges cleanly to the official git master branch? I get merge conflicts when I try.
|
Just-Dice | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | Play or Invest | ██ ██████████ ██████████████████ ██████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████ ██████████████ ██████ | 1% House Edge |
|
|
|
phelix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
|
|
March 20, 2012, 09:13:55 AM |
|
If you're on WINDOWS please use the new 0.5.3.1 build which has the patch for the recent vulnerability. https://github.com/coderrr/bitcoin/downloadsIf you use a previous version on WINDOWS you are in danger of being hacked and getting your wallet stolen. does it work for everyone else? for me the anonymity tab does not show up with this version
|
|
|
|
ptshamrock
|
|
March 20, 2012, 09:51:54 AM |
|
works for me..check if u enabled it in settings of the qt client..isn`t called anonymity anymore..something with coinxxxx..
|
"Money needs to be depoliticized, and the time has come for the separation of money and state to be accomplished."
|
|
|
phelix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
|
|
March 20, 2012, 11:43:51 AM |
|
works for me..check if u enabled it in settings of the qt client..isn`t called anonymity anymore..something with coinxxxx.. oops, I completely forgot about that. thanks, pt! is there any particular reason why it is not activated by default?
|
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
March 25, 2012, 05:49:38 AM |
|
As has been mentioned before and I mentioned in here recently (but got ignored), just going to address level is insufficient. Selecting the source for a txn should be to transaction level.
|
|
|
|
phelix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
|
|
March 25, 2012, 09:18:19 AM |
|
As has been mentioned before and I mentioned in here recently (but got ignored), just going to address level is insufficient. Selecting the source for a txn should be to transaction level. is it not possible to achieve the same with coin control and a separate address for every transaction?
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
|
March 25, 2012, 07:43:26 PM |
|
It would be nice to be able to sort by clicking the Address, Label, Balance, etc buttons. Should be a simple option of your using the standard controls.
|
1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
|
|
|
|