Bitcoin Forum
November 16, 2024, 08:03:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: A new ASIC is coming  (Read 6528 times)
Bitcoinorama
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 08:23:40 AM
 #81

Oh man.. projects like these are going to push the difficulty 200M+ within one year :|

Dude 200M Difficulty is loooong gone within a year!!

Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful Smiley BTC Address --->
1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
one4many
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 516
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 08:35:26 AM
 #82

65nm asic,

I am not asking for pre-orders or money.   I am Just letting the community know that  a MASSIVE volume has been ordered.  The order is not mine either so don't ask me if I will sell you chips or units Cheesy.  I'm just a worker bee in the bee-hive.

65 mm² Rain Drop,

I am not asking for pre-orders or money. I am just letting the community know that a MASSIVE rain shower has been forcasted. The water is not mine either so don't ask me if I will sell you umbrellas or rain coats Cheesy. I'm just another clown from a random circus.

GO HOME!!! Come back with some real news and don't waste everybody's lifetime!
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007


View Profile
July 03, 2013, 11:14:17 AM
 #83

5 pages already with no real useful information. Ok someone just made a 1 mil custom ASIC chips order. We don't know the lead time, we don't know if the chip is working as intended etc. Miners need prices, time and performance. If you want to stop pre-orders from the other companies then give us more information.

FlappySocks
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 11:18:28 AM
 #84

Now if you had come along as said the end-user is a government department, or a bank, or Paypal then that would be a real story.   <gulp>.
67152398
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 03, 2013, 12:28:18 PM
 #85

Wait....... Wink
TheSwede75
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 02:29:16 PM
Last edit: July 03, 2013, 03:54:46 PM by TheSwede75
 #86

Considering the producing foundry, producing partners, technology used (65 nm) and order size in the millions of units I have to say that if the screencap is accurate (and I believe it to be) we could be taking about at least 1000s of TH.

No matter the end user this is a damn significant amount of possible hash rate. Of course, more info would babe great.

I do however not believe anyone needs to worry about a 51% attack. With only projected hash rate by year end from KNC, BFL (without ramping up production speed), Bitfury and already sold Avalon chips + ASICMINER we are prob looking at a network hash OVER 20 Petahash by year end anyway. And I consider that a low estimate.
asically
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 02:54:01 PM
 #87

Probably the twins.

I guess they're more trustworthy than Vleisides.
Teka
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 03:00:50 PM
 #88

Probably the twins.

I guess they're more trustworthy than Vleisides.

Those guys try to be in the centre of attention, I doubt they would allow this kind of shoddy pr. How big is the company in terms of revenue?
TheSwede75
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 03:09:47 PM
 #89

Probably the twins.

I guess they're more trustworthy than Vleisides.

Those guys try to be in the centre of attention, I doubt they would allow this kind of shoddy pr. How big is the company in terms of revenue?

The production contract states only manufacturing parties, the end-customer is listed as 'non disclosed'.
cardcomm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 03:10:08 PM
 #90

RESERVED

What's up with you, greaterninja? You've been acting very RESERVED lately?

Easily see your cgminer status with my cgminerLCDStats app:  http://cardcomm.github.io/cgminerLCDStats/
Did my post help you or make you laugh? Let me know with Bitcoins at: 1CQfpMHQ5zVuZ5i9uxSHSSx4J8ZhehSjn3  Smiley
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1227


Away on an extended break


View Profile
July 03, 2013, 03:38:51 PM
 #91

I confirm that greaterninja does indeed seem to work in the IC industry. (via a company email I confirmed)
He has requested that I confirm there are at least 3, IC companies involved, but at the request of the OP, that information is confidential.

Thanks,
John
SirWizz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 03, 2013, 03:44:16 PM
 #92

Considering the producing foundry, producing partners, technology used (65 nm) and order size 1.05 million units I have to say that if the screencap is accurate (and I believe it to be) we could be taking about at least 8.000 TH.

No matter the end user this is a damn significant amount of possible hash rate. Of course, more info would babe great.

I do however not believe anyone needs to worry about a 51% attack. With only projected hash rate by year end from KNC, BFL (without ramping up production speed), Bitfury and already sold Avalon chips + ASICMINER we are prob looking at a network hash OVER 20 Petahash by year end anyway. And I consider that a low estimate.

Could you perhaps elaborate on that?  Huh I don't know how that can be a low estimate, the estimates I have seen so far are 1000 TH by fall and maybe 2000-3000 TH by year end. To me 20000 TH sounds a bit much, not on the low end. But perhaps I have less information than you do on the quantities of chips that are supposed to be out there in the wild by year end.
dentldir
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 333
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 03:52:09 PM
 #93

Seems these chips might be born with non zero counter party risk due to non-disclosure agreement violations.

Interesting nonetheless.

1DentLdiRMv3dpmpmqWsQev8BUaty9vN3v
TheSwede75
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 03:56:56 PM
 #94

Considering the producing foundry, producing partners, technology used (65 nm) and order size 1.05 million units I have to say that if the screencap is accurate (and I believe it to be) we could be taking about at least 8.000 TH.

No matter the end user this is a damn significant amount of possible hash rate. Of course, more info would babe great.

I do however not believe anyone needs to worry about a 51% attack. With only projected hash rate by year end from KNC, BFL (without ramping up production speed), Bitfury and already sold Avalon chips + ASICMINER we are prob looking at a network hash OVER 20 Petahash by year end anyway. And I consider that a low estimate.

Could you perhaps elaborate on that?  Huh I don't know how that can be a low estimate, the estimates I have seen so far are 1000 TH by fall and maybe 2000-3000 TH by year end. To me 20000 TH sounds a bit much, not on the low end. But perhaps I have less information than you do on the quantities of chips that are supposed to be out there in the wild by year end.

You do the math:

100s of KNC 400 gh/s miners
At least 340 Bitfury 120 gh/s miners
1000s of 5-60 gh/s BFL miners
100+ orders of 10k Avalon 300mh/s chips

If at least 50% of these miners/chips deliver.. Well... You can see for yourself

Fiyasko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001


Okey Dokey Lokey


View Profile
July 03, 2013, 03:59:24 PM
 #95

Is it just me or is a thread where this user can Boost thier activity count by slapping in ALOT of posts that contain nothing other than
RESERVED
Seriously theres like ten of them

http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=DingoRabiit&sign=ANY&type=RECV <-My Ratings
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.0 GAWminers and associated things are not to be trusted, Especially the "mineral" exchange
Bitcoinorama
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 04:04:50 PM
 #96

This sounds similar to the warning of Yifu Guo's greatest fear at Bitcoin2013;

Unown private entities...Embarrassed

Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful Smiley BTC Address --->
1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
greaterninja (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 03, 2013, 04:09:52 PM
 #97

This sounds similar to the warning of Yifu Guo's greatest fear at Bitcoin2013;

Unown private entities...Embarrassed

My offer to help Team Avalon still stands.    I am here to help whoever as long as they are respectful.
hackjealousy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 04:12:45 PM
 #98

Is it just me or is a thread where this user can Boost thier activity count by slapping in ALOT of posts that contain nothing other than
RESERVED
Seriously theres like ten of them

RESERVED
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007


View Profile
July 03, 2013, 04:14:11 PM
 #99

This sounds similar to the warning of Yifu Guo's greatest fear at Bitcoin2013;

Unown private entities...Embarrassed

My offer to help Team Avalon still stands.    I am here to help whoever as long as they are respectful.

What offer?  Just tell us when will you release another important announcement and let's stop this stupid game.

Paladin69
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 03, 2013, 04:48:58 PM
 #100

ASIC centralizing abusers are starting to feel like that kid in school who kept sticking gum under the desk, making it so nobody in class can chew gum now.

Gavin may have to exclude ASIC from being able to mine with them if groups of people try to centralize ASIC too much.  The point of Bitcoin was to keep it decentralized and as spread around as much as possible.  A lot of people could be left holding useless ASIC's if large groups abuse this and a future version needs to exclude them.

BFL has stated that they will give people a discount if we have to fall back to FPGA's.  GPU miners I'm sure would be happy.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!