[ANN][BWK] BULWARK | NO ICO | Masternodes | Accelerated PoW | Seesaw PoS/MN

[Eatbatterys]

i using windows wallet and i want move it to another computer

how i can generate private keys to restore wallet at other device?

Two ways.

1:  NOT RECOMMENDED: You can type "dumpprivkey" in the wallet console

2:  RECOMMENDED: Go to File -> Backup Wallet and use a USB drive to take the wallet.dat file to the new device and unlock the wallet using your password

i will asked to set up password when i will try backup wallet, right? then i should use same password at other desctop?

It would be whatever encryption password you used.

[ra213]

i using windows wallet and i want move it to another computer

how i can generate private keys to restore wallet at other device?

Two ways.

1:  NOT RECOMMENDED: You can type "dumpprivkey" in the wallet console

2:  RECOMMENDED: Go to File -> Backup Wallet and use a USB drive to take the wallet.dat file to the new device and unlock the wallet using your password

Ad Variante 2: Make sure you create a new backup each time you generate a new address.

[Bender957]

It would be whatever encryption password you used.

ok, i just download wallet an run it and received some coins

i not perform any procedures with wallet yet

what steps would you suggest for maximum security?

as far as i understand first i should go to Settings -> Encrypt wallet...

after this i can do File -> Backup Wallet...

is there anything else recommended to do for better wallet security?

[Bender957]

anyone mining at UMINE pool?

looks like there is problems or pool hacked

no payments past 6 hours, there was 6 coins total about a hour ago, i just check now and there is only 3 coins left but no payments made

any ideas?

[deebosch]

anyone mining at UMINE pool?

looks like there is problems or pool hacked

no payments past 6 hours, there was 6 coins total about a hour ago, i just check now and there is only 3 coins left but no payments made

any ideas?

Same problem, balance decreased. I wrote to support, now am waiting for their answer.

[mrbill2u]

I was watching the blocks roll in as it happened.  Something happened on their pool this morning that caused them to believe they had mined dozens of blocks they had not.  The blocks were marked as new on umine, but if you checked the blockchain explorer they were paid to other addresses.  The profitability doubled for an hour or so... then for a few hours they did not make payments.  When they finally paid out the amount was closer to what i would have expected for my hashrate rather than the crazy double rate.  The mystery blocks disappeared after they paid out and my balance decreased accordingly.  Umine appears to be working normally now.

[deebosch]

I was watching the blocks roll in as it happened.  Something happened on their pool this morning that caused them to believe they had mined dozens of blocks they had not.  The blocks were marked as new on umine, but if you checked the blockchain explorer they were paid to other addresses.  The profitability doubled for an hour or so... then for a few hours they did not make payments.  When they finally paid out the amount was closer to what i would have expected for my hashrate rather than the crazy double rate.  The mystery blocks disappeared after they paid out and my balance decreased accordingly.  Umine appears to be working normally now.

Thanks for the info. Now its a bit more clear.

[startsts]

We finally could find our first BWK block at CryptoHub

https://cryptohub.online/pools/BWK/

You can join now

[RealSwissMiner]

Nethash went up big time - not so profitable to mine this one currently. I hoped to position myself to host a MN but looks like it won't happen.

[deuce9]

Too much hash coming in from nicehash at this point.

[raffff]

huge difficulty and nethash increase. Indeed probably nicehash, hope they get hacked again.

[Bender957]

huge difficulty and nethash increase. Indeed probably nicehash, hope they get hacked again.

lol, why we need ASIC resistant algo when there is nicehash?

[raffff]

something is definitely happening. All the major pools today are hit by large influx of hash for 30 minutes which then disappears.
The difficulty rises during the 30 minutes, but when the hash disappears difficulty does not go down fast enough.

So smaller miners who stay on the pools are hurt bad, my mining return is very bad today.
Difficulty going up and down from 32000 to 42000 to 31000 within 30 minutes is not normal

If this continues BWK is no longer viable to mine. The algo seems not to adjust to hashrate peaks well.

Just look bsod.pw, umine.org and unimining.net. They cover around 80% of total hashrate but all 3 no blocks found last 20 minutes, just after a big hashrate peak.
Difficulty is now down from 42000 to 27000, soon we see the hashrate spike again. (nethash down from 1.8 Th/s to 970 Gh/s)

[Eatbatterys]

something is definitely happening. All the major pools today are hit by large influx of hash for 30 minutes which then disappears.
The difficulty rises during the 30 minutes, but when the hash disappears difficulty does not go down fast enough.

So smaller miners who stay on the pools are hurt bad, my mining return is very bad today.
Difficulty going up and down from 32000 to 42000 to 31000 within 30 minutes is not normal

If this continues BWK is no longer viable to mine. The algo seems not to adjust to hashrate peaks well.

Just look bsod.pw, umine.org and unimining.net. They cover around 80% of total hashrate but all 3 no blocks found last 20 minutes, just after a big hashrate peak.
Difficulty is now down from 42000 to 27000, soon we see the hashrate spike again. (nethash down from 1.8 Th/s to 970 Gh/s)

That's just how difficulty retargeting works. Short of being able to adjust difficulty mid-block, massive hash spikes are going to slow things down briefly considering a significantly lower amount of hash is attempting to solve for a block with a significantly higher difficulty. Once that block is hit, difficulty retargets to normalize block times until the next massive hash spike comes in and drives difficulty up again.

Another way to help this would be to spread the hash rates around more evenly so they're not localized in one or two pools. This, unfortunately, is something entirely beyond our control. People are going to go flock to the pools with the highest hash rates no matter what evidence you give them that it's healthier for mining as a whole either way.

[wacko]

Another way to help this would be to spread the hash rates around more evenly so they're not localized in one or two pools. This, unfortunately, is something entirely beyond our control.

Would it actually help in any way in the current situation (with large nicehash orders hitting the BWK network several times a day)? Does it make any difference whether miners spread their hashrate over several pools or not? When a nicehash user comes, it can come to any pool, including their own private pool. And no matter which pool they use, the total network diff goes up (and then doesn't go down for a while, after they leave). I understand how it's good for any crypto to spread the hash over multiple nodes in general, but I don't see how it helps against large nicehash buyers coming and going.

[Eatbatterys]

Another way to help this would be to spread the hash rates around more evenly so they're not localized in one or two pools. This, unfortunately, is something entirely beyond our control.

Would it actually help in any way in the current situation (with large nicehash orders hitting the BWK network several times a day)? Does it make any difference whether miners spread their hashrate over several pools or not? When a nicehash user comes, it can come to any pool, including their own private pool. And no matter which pool they use, the total network diff goes up (and then doesn't go down for a while, after they leave). I understand how it's good for any crypto to spread the hash over multiple nodes in general, but I don't see how it helps against large nicehash buyers coming and going.

It certainly doesn't help against that. It also doesn't help when the nicehash orders get lobbed onto a pool that already has 70% of the nethash. I'd much rather they hit private pools so the rest can get caught up and get things moving along faster once they pull out.

Ultimately, only way for this to stop being a mining issue across all of crypto is for nicehash competitors to start showing up and split that power up some more. As it stands now, there's really nothing anybody can do about it so I guess time will tell.

[sundownz]

Saw a nice spike to $8 today =) Good stuff.

[Shodo]

Whats happening with poolofd32th.club? It shows my hashrate totally wrong (in fact close to zero). Don't know yet about payments, must wait for couple of hours to check. Anyone can confirm?

[tmt226]

What a impressive and potential statistics for such a young coin like Bullwark!
https://masternodes.pro/stats/bwk

[sundownz]

What a impressive and potential statistics for such a young coin like Bullwark!
https://masternodes.pro/stats/bwk

Question... can this amount go DOWN if the value of the coin does *not* go down ?

I am very interested in setting up a master-node assuming it has limited down-side potential (assuming coin price doesn't crash at least).