Serious question: When people say "$150+ was unrealistic, obvious bubble, a boil on the face of Bitcoin that had to pop & something something pathos rant... $30 is the right price!" Why 30? Is that a point at which 1BTC matches the combined value of SR? I'm serious. What makes 150 "too high" while 30's just right? Seems pretty random.
Think about it this way: Since the start of 2013, how much fundamental growth has occurred? I'd suspect that 100% growth is pretty close. 1000%+, not so much...
I can only guess how much fundamental growth has occurred since the start of the year, SR doesn't publish quarterly financials. If it did, i still wouldn't know quite what to do with the data -- for SR, Bitcoin may simply be a token system, like the tokens used in the NYC subway.
5.4 million people a day ride the subway, at one time mostly paying in tokens. This quickly changed, now the tokens are worthless, magnetic strip cards are the way to go. Was NYC subway fundamental to valuating the tokens? Sure, assuming it continued using those tokens. It didn't.
Luckily, while i used those tokens daily, *i did not invest in them,* so the transition to magnetic strips was relatively painless.
The thing that worries me is after Bitcoin succeeds in making cryptocurrency attractive to the masses. some giant, like Amazon, will simply put its weight behind an altcoin, making Bitcoin as relevant as My Space to its Facebook.