Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 01:43:26 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Calling top at $16500 (New speculation: Guess the price 19 Feb 2021!)  (Read 24295 times)
mikeywith
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2226
Merit: 6367


be constructive or S.T.F.U


View Profile
November 10, 2020, 03:10:51 PM
Merited by Krubster (2), JayJuanGee (1)
 #761

Finally to those that still use the "BSV shill" phrase - I'm not suggesting anyone buy BSV. It makes no difference to me if people buy it, because if the price goes up for speculative reasons thats meaningless (that person will want to sell it).

Every asset is speculative in nature unless you can't store it, there is no such thing as "true value" or "fair value" if people didn't buy gold for speculative reasons it wouldn't be worth a fraction of what it's worth now, only a small percentage of that gold is actually used.

People look for scarcity, a hedge against other means of assets that are highly inflated, they only do that in an attempt to be able to sell/exchange that asset for a larger value in the future, if people didn't buy BTC or any other crypto for that matter just to be able to exchange them for more, none of those coins would have existed in the first place.

I understand that there are some people who MIGHT be in it " for the technology", I would bet against their existence, or in the worst case, I am sure they are a minority, and the minority doesn't drive the market, it's the majority.

On the other hand, more adoption doesn't always lead to more value, we could have double the adoption with 99% less value, if tomorrow everyone and their grandmother start using bitcoin there is no absolute certainty that price/value will go up, but if they buy it as a store of value instead - price will increase without a doubt.

I do think you are smart, I enjoyed reading your comments, however, the problem with your logic (and most of the BSV, Bcash) supporters is that you seem to think that "useability" and "value" are related, which is NOT the case, the proof is, BSV has much more daily transactions and it's almost free to transact, in fact, BTC is one of the slowest (if not the most)and the most expensive to use, but BTC has 100,000% more value than BSV.

Have you ever thought about the possibility that cryptocurrencies might never beat the old system? what makes you think that a blockchain which is bottlenecked by so many factors will beat a single high-end server in terms of speed and price? maybe the majority of people don't plan on using crypto for their daily payments? if speed and cheap fees are the only two things bitcoin can offer then it's worthless, we already have fast and cheap means of payments.

Maybe if you think about it this way, you will understand that BTC derives its value from "consensus", not only miners' consensus, investors, the average joe, and joe's grandmother, the MAJORITY of people agree on BTC, they have no problem with the blocksize (they probably don't even know what that is), they just know it's a scarce asset, has very low and known inflation rate, secured by tens of thousands of nodes and millions of mining gears, those factors alone have been more than enough to keep BTC as strong as it is today.

The block size debate has been milked a thousand times before, so there is no need to go over it again, and as far as the price expectation, I won't say I am certain that you are completely wrong, I know that the next few months will most likely be bullish across all markets and then soon after that the stock 11-year-old bubble will burst, that will be the first burst with BTC around, we don't know how will crypto market as a whole react to that, it could take it to the moon, or it could drag it down for a multi-year bear market, we shall see.


 




█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
1714959806
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714959806

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714959806
Reply with quote  #2

1714959806
Report to moderator
1714959806
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714959806

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714959806
Reply with quote  #2

1714959806
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2982
Merit: 7974



View Profile WWW
November 10, 2020, 09:08:22 PM
 #762

...Short of an extinction-level event...

"We have such sights to show you" Wink

When? You have until Feb 19th of next year before you are tarred and feathered, run out of town for heresy.

"Everyone can be right about anything given a long enough time frame." - nutildah

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
sgbett (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 1087



View Profile
November 12, 2020, 10:12:26 AM
Merited by Wexlike (1), Krubster (1)
 #763

Finally to those that still use the "BSV shill" phrase - I'm not suggesting anyone buy BSV. It makes no difference to me if people buy it, because if the price goes up for speculative reasons thats meaningless (that person will want to sell it).

Every asset is speculative in nature unless you can't store it, there is no such thing as "true value" or "fair value" if people didn't buy gold for speculative reasons it wouldn't be worth a fraction of what it's worth now, only a small percentage of that gold is actually used.

People look for scarcity, a hedge against other means of assets that are highly inflated, they only do that in an attempt to be able to sell/exchange that asset for a larger value in the future, if people didn't buy BTC or any other crypto for that matter just to be able to exchange them for more, none of those coins would have existed in the first place.

I understand that there are some people who MIGHT be in it " for the technology", I would bet against their existence, or in the worst case, I am sure they are a minority, and the minority doesn't drive the market, it's the majority.

On the other hand, more adoption doesn't always lead to more value, we could have double the adoption with 99% less value, if tomorrow everyone and their grandmother start using bitcoin there is no absolute certainty that price/value will go up, but if they buy it as a store of value instead - price will increase without a doubt.

I do think you are smart, I enjoyed reading your comments, however, the problem with your logic (and most of the BSV, Bcash) supporters is that you seem to think that "useability" and "value" are related, which is NOT the case, the proof is, BSV has much more daily transactions and it's almost free to transact, in fact, BTC is one of the slowest (if not the most)and the most expensive to use, but BTC has 100,000% more value than BSV.

Have you ever thought about the possibility that cryptocurrencies might never beat the old system? what makes you think that a blockchain which is bottlenecked by so many factors will beat a single high-end server in terms of speed and price? maybe the majority of people don't plan on using crypto for their daily payments? if speed and cheap fees are the only two things bitcoin can offer then it's worthless, we already have fast and cheap means of payments.

Maybe if you think about it this way, you will understand that BTC derives its value from "consensus", not only miners' consensus, investors, the average joe, and joe's grandmother, the MAJORITY of people agree on BTC, they have no problem with the blocksize (they probably don't even know what that is), they just know it's a scarce asset, has very low and known inflation rate, secured by tens of thousands of nodes and millions of mining gears, those factors alone have been more than enough to keep BTC as strong as it is today.

The block size debate has been milked a thousand times before, so there is no need to go over it again, and as far as the price expectation, I won't say I am certain that you are completely wrong, I know that the next few months will most likely be bullish across all markets and then soon after that the stock 11-year-old bubble will burst, that will be the first burst with BTC around, we don't know how will crypto market as a whole react to that, it could take it to the moon, or it could drag it down for a multi-year bear market, we shall see.

Thanks for taking the time to write this detailed response. I understand your position as I have had similar thoughts in the time I have spent learning about Bitcoin, however in this time my opinions have changed. 

I've held the speculative vs utility value belief for many years and I still do. I think that eventually utility value will dwarf speculative price action as Bitcoin matures. Whilst I can see the comparison to gold wrt store of value, I don't think that is the same as thing as speculative use we see now in BTC (and other tokens). Store of value is "number doesn't go down", whereas speculation (as I am using it) is "number goes up".

I believe that deviating from Bitcoin's original design where 'it doesn't really hit a scale ceiling" was a mistake and that the sigmoid "adoption" curve was significantly set back - remember as companies adopted BTC for payments (MS,CEX,Steam etc) and then slowly over the years walked back that position. I see this as a direct result of BTC no longer being useful as digital cash. Digital cash needs boundless scale.

Since the original Gox spike I would suggest that all price action on BTC has been purely speculative based on FOMO. I don't think that is the same as gold. This explains the price differential. BSV is the ugly duckling and so has virtually no speculative value (perhaps even negative!?). This is due to the still widespread belief that crypto is designed to 'beat the system' (yes I did once think that was its purpose), and BSV being clearly in opposition to this. So the whole crowd on Bitcointalk and in Cryptotwitter are dead against it. I was in this camp, now I'm not. Now I understand the power of SCRIPT and what it enables, why bitcoin is not anonymous, why the protocol has to be fixed (and can be.. SCRIPT is your '2nd layer').

The reason I think (now, more so then ever) that utility will dwarf speculative value is because I can now clearly see just how big (tx throughput) Bitcoin can be. I see big companies that are well underway implementing massive scale operations that were previously unthinkable, both due to lack of scale and lack of functionality - Bitcoin fixes this Wink . As this plays out, then those tiny sub-cent fees add up to A LOT. That's what will drive miners to move hash rate. That's what snowballs and leads to chain death. That's your extinction event.

Satoshi had all this figured out and once you see how it all fits together it's incredible. Knowing what is coming is enough for me, when I posted this thread it was based on price action from gox and "all things being equal" things have changed a lot so I can handle being tarred and feathered Smiley

Enjoy your price pump! I know what its like, the euphoria, the disbelief at it making new highs, more euphoria ... good times Smiley and don't let it mess you up too much. I'll sit this one out, feels kind of peaceful for a change Smiley

"A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution" - Satoshi Nakamoto
*my posts are not investment advice*
UnDerDoG81
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2179
Merit: 1201


View Profile
November 12, 2020, 10:37:43 AM
 #764

Every time we have a price movement, this thread comes up. I hope we pass $16.5k soon and so this thread can RIP...
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3013


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
November 12, 2020, 11:09:04 AM
 #765

Every time we have a price movement, this thread comes up. I hope we pass $16.5k soon and so this thread can RIP...

I'm sure this thread will get the occasional necro bump in the future, either to gloat or when it hits $2483 billion per coin. Or $24.83. One to add to future hair raising reading for new arrivals either way.

No matter what it's turned into, the initial call was certainly on point and delivered at the right time.
criptix
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145


View Profile
November 12, 2020, 03:08:40 PM
 #766

wait, you are still a BSV believer sgbett?  Undecided

                     █████
                    ██████
                   ██████
                  ██████
                 ██████
                ██████
               ██████
              ██████
             ██████
            ██████
           ██████
          ██████
         ██████
        ██████    ██████████████████▄
       ██████     ███████████████████
      ██████                   █████
     ██████                   █████
    ██████                   █████
   ██████                   █████
  ██████
 ███████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████
 ████████████████████████████████████

                      █████
                     ██████
                    ██████
                   ██████
                  ██████
                 ████████████████████
                 ▀██████████████████▀
.LATTICE - A New Paradigm of Decentralized Finance.

 

                   ▄▄████
              ▄▄████████▌
         ▄▄█████████▀███
    ▄▄██████████▀▀ ▄███▌
▄████████████▀▀  ▄█████
▀▀▀███████▀   ▄███████▌
      ██    ▄█████████
       █  ▄██████████▌
       █  ███████████
       █ ██▀ ▀██████▌
       ██▀     ▀████
                 ▀█▌
 

             ▄████▄▄   ▄
█▄          ██████████▀▄
███        ███████████▀
▐████▄     ██████████▌
▄▄██████▄▄▄▄█████████▌
▀████████████████████
  ▀█████████████████
  ▄▄███████████████
   ▀█████████████▀
    ▄▄█████████▀
▀▀██████████▀
    ▀▀▀▀▀
dragonvslinux
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 2204


Crypto Swap Exchange


View Profile
November 13, 2020, 02:04:19 PM
 #767

It's ironic how this thread now makes me wonder whether we've topped out for now, and may need a deeper correction before continuing higher.
There might be something still relevant about $16.5K based on current short-term pull-back from this level, as well as previous rejection level.


█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3710
Merit: 10212


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
November 13, 2020, 03:51:06 PM
 #768

It's ironic how this thread now makes me wonder whether we've topped out for now, and may need a deeper correction before continuing higher.
There might be something still relevant about $16.5K based on current short-term pull-back from this level, as well as previous rejection level.



Yes, $16.5k is relevant.  It is within about 16% of the previous ATH... and it is relevant because it represents about a 65% increase in our latest mini-bullrun from September 3-ish to present.... so of course, a correction could happen at any time (as is always the case when the price goes up without meaningful corrections along the way), but still does not mean that such hypothesized correction will happen.

TLDR:  There is something to it.  If any of us keep predicting down, sooner or later some kind of down is going to happen.   Wink Wink  Just like it did in December 2017 when sgbett made his so "insightful" Roll Eyes Roll Eyes prediction, even if this time around such correction will likely resemble either the correction that took place in mid 2016 from nearly $800 to $300 (not as likely) or the one in March 2017 from nearly $1,300 to $900 (more likely, though a mere possibility than a likelihood) rather than the one that took place in late 2017 from $19,666 to $3,124.

1) Self-Custody is a right.  There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
Dave1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 522



View Profile
November 14, 2020, 10:54:35 PM
 #769

^^ Just for the record though, the "March 2017 from nearly $1,300 to $900" was due to the supposedly ETF filing by the twins and the hope that it will get approved by SEC, but it was rejected, hence the price goes down abruptly. As for the "late 2017 from $19,666 to $3,124", we are already in the bubble phase.

But currently @16,500 it was not even the top, so bitcoin being a speculative asset, we still have a lot of leg room to wiggle so I would say that it is still not the top price that we have seen.  Grin

R


▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄▄
████████████████
▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█████
████████▌███▐████
▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄█████
████████████████
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▀
LLBIT
  CRYPTO   
FUTURES
 1,000x 
LEVERAGE
COMPETITIVE
    FEES    
 INSTANT 
EXECUTION
.
   TRADE NOW   
exstasie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1521


View Profile
November 14, 2020, 11:48:28 PM
 #770

^^ Just for the record though, the "March 2017 from nearly $1,300 to $900" was due to the supposedly ETF filing by the twins and the hope that it will get approved by SEC, but it was rejected, hence the price goes down abruptly.

That's just an after the fact rationalization. Bad news just catalyzes corrections that were going to happen anyway, which is why you see the 2016-2017 market littered with 30-40% corrections throughout. If it wasn't the ETF rejection in March, it would have been something else. That spike through the 2013 ATH and crash back below was likely to happen regardless. Very typical move in a bull market at resistance. Nobody should be surprised to see similar action in the $20K area next time around either.

philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7851


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
November 15, 2020, 02:07:46 AM
Last edit: November 15, 2020, 10:34:44 PM by philipma1957
Merited by nutildah (1)
 #771

I still  say we correct in the 25-30k price range. in jan 2021


dropping to 12-14k in summer.

with the big run close to 75-99k dec 2021.

after that all bets are off.

as for bsv or bch nope 👎

doge and ltc cover the cash idea pretty well.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
Wexlike
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1473
Merit: 1086



View Profile
November 15, 2020, 11:30:25 PM
 #772

^^ Just for the record though, the "March 2017 from nearly $1,300 to $900" was due to the supposedly ETF filing by the twins and the hope that it will get approved by SEC, but it was rejected, hence the price goes down abruptly.

That's just an after the fact rationalization. Bad news just catalyzes corrections that were going to happen anyway, which is why you see the 2016-2017 market littered with 30-40% corrections throughout. If it wasn't the ETF rejection in March, it would have been something else. That spike through the 2013 ATH and crash back below was likely to happen regardless. Very typical move in a bull market at resistance. Nobody should be surprised to see similar action in the $20K area next time around either.

Looks that you joined the crypto sphere only after this event, really weird when your post history is so much older. March 2017 was exactly and only because of the ETF deadline. The massive spike happened 15 minutes before the rejection so everybody was thinking - OH SHIT, it's insiders trading on the approval - and then crashed so hard and so fast that everybody who was sitting in front of their computers and buying in on that spike up was on the wrong side of the trade. (Eventually I somehow managed to trade back in the green after selling a few more at 1200$ and buying everything around 950$)

The seemingly easy spike through the old ATH was my moment of realizing: This is it, the bull arrived.

Curious if I catched the bottom at 872€.  Roll Eyes
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2982
Merit: 7974



View Profile WWW
November 16, 2020, 01:02:52 AM
 #773

No matter what it's turned into, the initial call was certainly on point and delivered at the right time.

His "initial call" was off by over 15% and the market was long overdue for a correction at that point, so I'm not particularly impressed. In addition, he's been wrong every step of the way since Jan 2018. He's carried the rest of this thread with attitude and pretension, and somehow people were once again suckered into believing confidence = wisdom. In this case, "wisdom" infers:

1. fighting the effects of massive inflation created by the Federal Reserve, and
2. losing a shitload of money to affinity scam forks (twice).

Some people just enjoy being wrong I suppose.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
exstasie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1521


View Profile
November 16, 2020, 01:10:25 AM
 #774

^^ Just for the record though, the "March 2017 from nearly $1,300 to $900" was due to the supposedly ETF filing by the twins and the hope that it will get approved by SEC, but it was rejected, hence the price goes down abruptly.

That's just an after the fact rationalization. Bad news just catalyzes corrections that were going to happen anyway, which is why you see the 2016-2017 market littered with 30-40% corrections throughout. If it wasn't the ETF rejection in March, it would have been something else. That spike through the 2013 ATH and crash back below was likely to happen regardless. Very typical move in a bull market at resistance. Nobody should be surprised to see similar action in the $20K area next time around either.

Looks that you joined the crypto sphere only after this event, really weird when your post history is so much older. March 2017 was exactly and only because of the ETF deadline. The massive spike happened 15 minutes before the rejection so everybody was thinking - OH SHIT, it's insiders trading on the approval - and then crashed so hard and so fast that everybody who was sitting in front of their computers and buying in on that spike up was on the wrong side of the trade.

Like I said, such news events catalyze corrections. Maybe consider looking up that word. Pointing out that the market reacted to the ETF rejection doesn't disagree with what I said.

Bad news does not however cause the underlying supply/demand conditions that facilitate deep crashes. They do not determine the magnitude, which is a function of the preceding rise and also existing market liquidity. You really think BTC would have crashed 34% in March 2017 if it hadn't risen 82% in the 2 months directly prior? That is the literal definition of a bull market correction!

It's like when people say the Mt. Gox collapse in 2014 caused the 87% bear market decline in 2014-2015. Of course it didn't. It just triggered a selloff that was already going to happen, in the middle of a full blown bear market that followed a bubble pop.

You seem to think if bad news doesn't happen, that price would never, ever, drop. That's just naive. Price doesn't go up in a straight line. You can claim that news events caused all the corrections along the way, or you can be realistic and acknowledge that those corrections were going to happen no matter what, because that's what happens during bull markets: pullbacks. Bad news is nothing more than a trigger.

STT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3906
Merit: 1414


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile WWW
November 16, 2020, 01:18:15 AM
 #775

Quote
Quote
^^ Just for the record though, the "March 2017 from nearly $1,300 to $900" was due to the supposedly ETF filing by the twins and the hope that it will get approved by SEC, but it was rejected, hence the price goes down abruptly.

That's just an after the fact rationalization. Bad news just catalyzes corrections that were going to happen anyway,

I agree with both but I remember that sell and it was a hold anyway because of the action in Feb prior was too bullish to let go of, closing weekly prices being most important in conclusion it was surely tested.    The ETF getting turned down was predictable, my own bank refuses to let me deal some ETF types half the time because they must protect me.   BTC is TNT in regulators mind certainly back then and probably not far from that now, widows and orphans and all that.     I think government debt is TNT, its perfectly arguable its a failed system just examine the average term to repay and they've done the equivalent of buying a house with an overnight rolling overdraft.
   Such mass destruction of money makes the OP wrong and also right, in that volatility will be gigantic if debt blows up or swings out of control.   He can be correct on his bearish calls but overall its hard to agree with.

Quote
Every time we have a price movement, this thread comes up. I hope we pass $16.5k soon and so this thread can RIP...

It wont be proven by a nominal number being passed, perhaps that figure is significant in why the market is hitching back and forth here right now not sure.   That'd be bullish because nominal figures dont mean anything beyond face value.  
  The modern Russian Rouble is exchangeable for 10,000 old Russian Roubles and so they never defaulted perhaps they might argue, awesome.  The 2020 Venezuelan Bolivar is not the same as the 2019 Bolivar and the 2020 US dollar used in any country is no longer the same Dollar we exchanged when this thread first started, its something else now.  I'm not arguing we made a ratio of 10,000 to 1 from 'modern' Dollar to the 2005 US dollar or 2000 whenever it peaked recently but obviously its a similar kind of default, a trick.    We're all trying to count in units which arent equal or stable, its easy for alot of nonsense to occur.


Quote
if people didn't buy gold for speculative reasons it wouldn't be worth a fraction of what it's worth now, only a small percentage of that gold is actually used.
The gold is used while being unused and its why I dont think BTC and gold compete because I do expect BTC to be used actively where as gold is purely a fixed asset.  Quite alot of gold sits still in the same vault for the last century even if the owner changes theres never much point to altering something that provides value from being inert.    I think my main take on gold is that the ultimate worth of money is in security not luxury or wealth (this is why capitalism works imo) and so if other factors change in an economy towards instability then the value in that available security rises.   Security also enables trade which makes value indirect in whichever enables thats trade, comparative advantage and all the efficiencies globally we rely on for modern prosperity.  ie. gold is not a relic much as I like technology its not being superseded by greater utility elsewhere

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
UnDerDoG81
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2179
Merit: 1201


View Profile
November 16, 2020, 05:41:41 PM
Merited by philipma1957 (1)
 #776

$16.5k passed, can we move on now? Nobody can predict Bitcoin. Yet people claim they can.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7851


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
November 16, 2020, 05:46:24 PM
 #777

Op just lock the thread and make a new one use different numbers and moderate it.


https://www.coinbase.com/price


top is 16700+


so you have a losing title.

How about  we will not get to 19900 and correct to 7777 sell sell sell?

Don't be a Donald and deny deny deny.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
exstasie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1521


View Profile
November 16, 2020, 06:35:16 PM
 #778

$16.5k passed, can we move on now?

The OP was referring to $16.5K in 2017. Technically it was passed 3 years ago. Tongue

He should update it but leaving the thread title is his humble brag for calling the top within 20% in 2017.

Nobody can predict Bitcoin. Yet people claim they can.

Yep, not a big fan of predicting myself, especially long term. I think the best we can do is react to obvious technical breakouts and failures, after the fact.

I can say this though: when the 2017 ATH breaks with authority, the subsequent gains from there will be exponential, just like they were in 2013 and 2017. I don't know why so many people think it would stop at $50K or $70K, etc. I'm willing to predict it will go a lot further than that. Topping at $300-$400K is way more likely than at $50K, in my mind.

buwaytress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2800
Merit: 3443


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
November 16, 2020, 07:08:40 PM
 #779

with the big run close to 75-99k dec 2021.

after that all bets are off.
My "bets are off was exactly at the end of 2021, back when I first pretended to predict in 2016 and 2017. That was the earliest I would ever consider looking at what to do with holdings (timeframe wise) and I never thought we would even get 5 figures then, never mind 6.

as for bsv or bch nope 👎

doge and ltc cover the cash idea pretty well.

True story. Still making cash payments in doge and ltc even in 2020. Actually have BCH "tips" in some platforms but nobody wants them.

██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
... LIVECASINO.io    Play Live Games with up to 20% cashback!...██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
STT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3906
Merit: 1414


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile WWW
November 16, 2020, 08:26:41 PM
 #780

300k a coin with 18,538,368 circulating supply makes for 5.5 trillion in US dollar supply.    If it happens so are alot of other things in the world, thats not an event that occurs in isolation.   TA is probabilities not absolutes

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!