Now guys, sgbett was on the verge of having a come-to-Jesus moment and you are prodding him back into the big blocker corner.
It's okay if he was smugly laughing to his inner-self after penning his "concession," finally thinking aloud, "Fools! They thought I am conceding but when I said 'Bitcoin' I actually meant Bitcoin Craig! Hah! Tricked em."
I know that's as good as we're gonna get as far as an apology is concerned, and we should all take it.
Of course, this was slightly embarrassing, written only 6 days ago, which is six days prior to the last ATH:
Ofc if you had a million riding on BTC right now the question would be sell or hold.
Everyone will tell you HODL of course, they are in the same boat.
Id say look at the 250k you actually have vs the paper million you would be about to lose.
Keep watching!
Also this didn't age so well either:
The price of Bitcoin BSV going up because its becoming more and more useful... thats what I am interested in.
The price of BSV has certainly gone up since then (in terms of dollars anyway), but BSV transactions have plummeted by about 50% since then. What happened?
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F6qaf92Z.png&t=665&c=8iLU4RTQ_nb6bQ)
Interestingly, BCH picked up the slack, and as a result, all 3 blockchains average around the same number of transactions per day. The transaction volume is pretty blatantly artificial for 2 of them, however.
So anyway, why did BSV transactions drop off so much during Dec and Jan? My guess is they stopped funding whatever service was generating gigameg block numbers of transactions for them, and that service got hired by BCH.