Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2022 Q2)

[Timelord2067]

I don't understand how to write a report here, I hope you guys can do further investigation

Hi,

thanks for posting in the known alts thread, there's a form in the OP, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0 if you copy that code to your post you can add the information into the relevant sections and your post will be uniform with everyone elses.  There's some tutorials in the second and third posts on how to archive information etc.

@coinlocket$ is a whiz with ETH transactions, hopefully he'll stop by and take a look.

Hope to see you back soon.

[crush.empire]

I don't understand how to write a report here, I hope you guys can do further investigation

Hi,

thanks for posting in the known alts thread, there's a form in the OP, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0 if you copy that code to your post you can add the information into the relevant sections and your post will be uniform with everyone elses.  There's some tutorials in the second and third posts on how to archive information etc.

@coinlocket$ is a whiz with ETH transactions, hopefully he'll stop by and take a look.

Hope to see you back soon.

yes I have talked with him maybe he will check it out when he has time
thanks

[Timelord2067]

Literally you won't get tagged until you are cheating same campaigns with multiple accounts.

What's the source of this information before you mislead someone into doing this and end up getting all account red tagged. From what I read theymos only meant for opinions that users don't want associated with their main account. Participating in different campaign with alt account isn't that abuse of the system since you're taking advantage of alt account and can possible lead to spamming the forum just to meet up posts counts?

You want source?

One of the global moderator hilariousandco wearing signature for stake.com and his alt account hilariousetc is in the Chimixer campaign,so he is participating in two different campaigns because it is allowed.

Theymos never mentioned about multiple accounts in signature campaigns but if you go through rules of every campaign you can find that

No alt accounts allowed. If you've been found out of enrolling with an alt you'll be removed without payment.

which is untrustworthy behaviour and DT members will tag you for that.

So it means you can participate on different campaigns with your two different campaigns.

http://archive.fo/5czSU#selection-557.0-861.3
http://archive.fo/y0yk2#selection-571.0-911.21

[coinlocket$]

Part 4 of the same wallet

8+Accounts connected

JbB5KhiLPSawywl, cpretty, rencontreacqu, docsinghvinod, lhkomana, walid_holligans, an.ir2007, hubert.silguarde.


Proof:

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/00aa80168ec5b228/addresses
            
Wallet [00aa80168]

http://loyce.club/other/survey-entries.html
               
Related Addresses:

Code:

3LpGWnWimYYyyCu2LsQQtdD1VhoXKuEhaH
3QXtivpzLhQ7EDyZSKRGJXcrweQhSEQMuz
3NyNMtUNDhqrY44LuQJZwur56ykv1YcXdV
3M8xpKLi6mZ438KqdTxE18n9iVaJVvuGPM
3MNoquUvp7yskhtEqQFevt2HAhkHT957Vx
3LmFY3mo4aTetNSFLPcGufKVwoSKvkTFmx
3Mru52AYtqqyjVUkuQajKDYkPPpR93caPT
3Nz8E3GbiGF3KHf1XXVgFYkxtCV4F1VKF2

Miscellaneous:

_________________________________________	_____________________	________________________________________________	___________________
BTC	ACCOUNTlink	BTC on forum	ARCHIVE
3LpGWnWimYYyyCu2LsQQtdD1VhoXKuEhaH	JbB5KhiLPSawywl	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050824.msg47840050#msg47840050	http://archive.fo/zohKt#selection-5151.25-5148.3
3QXtivpzLhQ7EDyZSKRGJXcrweQhSEQMuz	cpretty	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050824.msg47829044#msg47829044	http://archive.fo/17PIO#selection-6331.25-6331.59
3NyNMtUNDhqrY44LuQJZwur56ykv1YcXdV	rencontreacqu	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050824.msg47839444#msg47839444	http://archive.fo/9hYZ2#selection-4263.25-4263.59
3M8xpKLi6mZ438KqdTxE18n9iVaJVvuGPM	docsinghvinod	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050824.msg47843226#msg47843226	http://archive.fo/4eVdi#selection-3289.25-3286.3
3MNoquUvp7yskhtEqQFevt2HAhkHT957Vx	lhkomana	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050824.msg47838987#msg47838987	http://archive.fo/CdxIc#selection-2731.25-2731.59
3LmFY3mo4aTetNSFLPcGufKVwoSKvkTFmx	walid_holligans	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050824.msg47834600#msg47834600	http://archive.fo/q2ZEV#selection-4943.25-4940.3
3Mru52AYtqqyjVUkuQajKDYkPPpR93caPT	an.ir2007	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050824.msg47834839#msg47834839	http://archive.fo/W4LV4#selection-4499.25-4496.3
3Nz8E3GbiGF3KHf1XXVgFYkxtCV4F1VKF2	hubert.silguarde	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050824.msg47834972#msg47834972	http://archive.fo/ksw3j#selection-2363.25-2360.3

Abusing Survey with alts.
Addresses on the same wallet.

Maybe I've found his Hero main account, will investigate more later.

[Master of Shitcoins]

2 Accounts Connected:

sham100899, hisori


Proof:

Proof of being alts:

Both accounts are using the Bitcoin address 3PJdNRCtsd2jfY82JunoCz5vYC8nLj2dtv several times to apply for bounties:  

hisori: http://archive.is/CQJck
sham100899: http://archive.is/KTidw


Proof of violating rules:

Abused ICOforums signature campaign -both accounts enrolled:

hisori
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4898414.msg44111770#msg44111770
http://archive.is/wpTjd#selection-6829.0-6829.6

sham100899
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4898414.msg44111489#msg44111489
http://archive.is/wpTjd#selection-5385.0-5385.10



Related Addresses:

Code:

3PJdNRCtsd2jfY82JunoCz5vYC8nLj2dtv

Miscellaneous:

Cheating bounties with alts.

EDIT 1:

Looks like there is much more abuse, I just checked BPIP and hisori received his Merit from fakegurutu, who sent also 3 Merit to sham100899 and received 5 Merit from sham100899.
BPIP fakegurutu  https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=fakegurutu
BPIP sham100899  https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=sham100899
BPIP hisori  https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=hisori

Merit history of fakegurutu:



EDIT 2:

fakegurutu and sham100899 both applied to join BitBlender signature campaign (only 5 minutes difference between posts):

sham100899: http://archive.is/PiQH6#selection-3915.0-3915.10
fakegurutu: http://archive.is/PiQH6#selection-5285.0-5285.10

[Timelord2067]

2 Accounts Connected:

sham100899, hisori

Hi @Master of Shitcoins and welcome to our corner of the forum, nice catch there BTW.

I'm a little uncertain about mutual merits that are for one merit point per perit instance given.  Why I say that is because I've read threads where an issue has been discussed and persons with green trust have given each other merits for posts.  You'd have to go back and read through their mutual merits and see if they were for Shit Posts ^TM or not. (same goes for trust wall posts)

OTOH as read in conjunction with the other evidence it certainly helps give a clearer picture.

[coinlocket$]

Adding final note on https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/00aa80168ec5b228/addresses

Missing those address

Code:

331LqiHEwbuntaHhUVVrEWzbupe4X8rFSi
33S67irVZCsZiJSMMBfE9FyB17heF6GgP8
34Gf1JtHM6eGNB5Q7DGSs5W5KzMao8GBzs
34Vm5KrGK5humogUiJp46vmmCAQnJQgdB5
34Y2JLedXk1NhLugqd4aYQm9KZj1nX4AwU
36jbcrMfc5cWGokRjXwX2hG5siJ3uzkNnr
37FYaJKXW4HfFbqkGcG1xPGVTe4CZJLwGd
37K1kEEzjcMurBqVVDKYmahz38CGGV2DVn
38LVUoUWieDUYCTxDv86nPn4rs2puPTWJa
363HmJ5u61kd4Zer3RfZo8b1qQmpfTuoN8
356TRdkYM9ixe4BEDR7pVqWoiTQDiLcEwg
35XwbgqFo4rjRrFCzoLDg6MSY6Ke7nWnzx
35dcipFB29m62cYDSmVq2J2AnD1REyfNYc
3AxSvTPNATsKCh2VDc7xjrRAf9r3Hs8AWR
3Bhwy56w2sYVMjyhHXAwjyR2vYsSkM2VUU
3C6PpThwQcLuFaLP9GQhfDckfk6cmWqJmi
3DDLEpn7rwd3qWsHr8Pagk3RNEpWWzDWgi
3DmPtDDXMNW3wrPYVdEkLCPZoN2xFBWBGi
3E4geZcU4U4ycqcSj2DZmMe1JMBu1eVyYS
3EBD4tWRV8RNhdJHmpYzt13Uwb9wjt33HG
3EWK4crEv5WWVyzQofrDFX1nXAcrYyV66D
3EWvJwjJK3ZcQbfVpkQcvURKUBrzTVj5yV
3F38NzYYWGsP84A7dyyC2u2vtQZLpa1Ro4
3JwTcU77ngTazC9BiqwUKLGzTL7BUgCgms
3Lc2AoCjQ6vmvvWykiy1HYVyCLfqYYTSqN
3L5AXwPfszfTduHmzAwCXdSqE884ahziLT
3KfCjqvuvB38jL2b6P8pTY2i3GweeSsCv5
3JwTcU77ngTazC9BiqwUKLGzTL7BUgCgms
3QCeNEHdkCmjqn4xJWfjxGDUEFGByEyBvw
3QNnznht3VbrEvegCvjAP6HhEZsmsHfCcz
3QTRgtcA8fkcYgoMxyPd4e6ygP4TyD9Fco
3QesyspBrUrbumgp5fcJsq1EqjAKEm4ATa
3Qj7z1AJoDXHdWJzPSQjXLkeV5xbG3pJgZ
3Qt6hryx9Mvh117cz2uPvSB4uGbJydWsLH
3M43zK3E6SmYDm4MonpEZYjjzCyuk7rGsK
3Lc2AoCjQ6vmvvWykiy1HYVyCLfqYYTSqN

Most of them are from banned accounts However I think I found the main account of this wallet, The owner probably have more accounts since even the hero account has last activity on the same day of this storm.

75 Accounts connected, main account is

mrayazgul

Proof:

_________________________________________	_____________________	________________________________________________	___________________
BTC	ACCOUNTlink	BTC on forum	ARCHIVE
3NxbzoHfNHJBcXm6oz7uBtsdwfLKojsHG4	mrayazgul	https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5050824.msg47835967#msg47835967	http://archive.fo/VAeHv#selection-3783.25-3780.3

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/00aa80168ec5b228/addresses
            
Wallet [00aa80168]

http://loyce.club/other/survey-entries.html
               
Related Addresses on the wallet:

Code:

32QQeQzTxqmjHqtB2ZHVtyZYQ8KjqawCdT
32wJDYYTkxyLPK1sdhoGkEdpLT4LY8dUmW
32wJY5PF3W6PB2bAnEPExMSFotWpkwKfC3
32xFax2X2ot5kYZb2iUo9bSHLuGiVKMTf9
33xqTHwMoDknxpJo5V8Cyqg1aGWWZCTeb6
34FRJ15ewYFBV8R6zDJVPdwBxB9E3qVmby
34b8TdXA5NgpuabL17uae6wWwxaLwaBvhA
34m2azZ8SjjGaUqbuWQ7JvYEiQ8Pwbh1vi
34pnJsyVHwetotPBFfbX6qctq3CbapSfaW
34r2jFwNtAtpGuUGLJt5roaXNC3KNwYu9W
35ZAz5S6tHFrhWKHJPxewpDh96WCmFU93a
3A4HZceVM1bornhVutBvg1u6JbRwM5wRKH
39WyrMeaqR1KntwLpyMxVkUFcyjfKL4ARV
35n5jJKQkDnncHFULfqMQswb5qwLz9AFep
36BX9CdonKGCXRHP3ycuTK34koddPMosy4
38WDfLEo8fmzbFteXZREoyHgUE3Qi8zNcT
36DAptgi7s6GoKbT9NMd3A3mpmM2bFhUME
3Ad35LKPXPaAq3D8nU6JPsCHEnGpoMYDUX
35JHRpoesEzDzgpoipdLAm7u3yrEzxLKNk
39J4jzBsnd9tARCa2ccE8EpWBK3M89kGum
3FJp5zL7ySPb6UM9tuRYn62KroqFSZq9LR
3KqSzfNtpPsKbqkSrJbkTLLRHNExumSWVz
3AsMV9g6BThqe5PEz5eDEd4XnLGCAWYxoV
3BzvbK74Vm7HeFXZ8iLDTPg81b6KC5sFQP
3AguRbNEfpiBUMS8bxZpvJ5tVJdtqSW1PD
3CbfVNmmigQ5TjvVipjFyeEXHh1vzRinZn
3LEViqRgAZPvXJd1UCHBvXuDEvcPtbPBoT
3JzqMtYvC1WGeJ11CHWCaJxRDaM4KAxn2h
3FMRjWFucLgSCipNBcUzSZ2uUSJk3G5KJj
3E1KsoETZr9BZV9dpFvj1dMujFbawZwvwz
3LpGWnWimYYyyCu2LsQQtdD1VhoXKuEhaH
3QXtivpzLhQ7EDyZSKRGJXcrweQhSEQMuz
3NyNMtUNDhqrY44LuQJZwur56ykv1YcXdV
3M8xpKLi6mZ438KqdTxE18n9iVaJVvuGPM
3MNoquUvp7yskhtEqQFevt2HAhkHT957Vx
3LmFY3mo4aTetNSFLPcGufKVwoSKvkTFmx
3Mru52AYtqqyjVUkuQajKDYkPPpR93caPT
3Nz8E3GbiGF3KHf1XXVgFYkxtCV4F1VKF2

Miscellaneous:

Abusing Survey with alts.

[Master of Shitcoins]

Hello and thanks for your comment.

I'm a little uncertain about mutual merits that are for one merit point per perit instance given.  Why I say that is because I've read threads where an issue has been discussed and persons with green trust have given each other merits for posts.  You'd have to go back and read through their mutual merits and see if they were for Shit Posts ^TM or not. (same goes for trust wall posts)

Yes, I'm not sure if it's enough evidence to give fakegurutu a red tag for Merit trading and theymos said once it's only safe to tag them if there is a strong evidence. Shasan found out that the Merit transfer was done only in 7 minutes: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5102614.msg49438635#msg49438635

fakegurutu sent 3 merit to sham100899 at 6/6/2018 4:29:58 AM and
sham100899 sent 2 merit to fakegurutu 6/6/2018 4:36:41 AM That means merit exchanged only within 7 merits.
Both are using the same platform of bitcoin wallet. sham100899 and fakegurutu

Merit was sent for these posts (no ShitPosts):
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5031516.msg45851205#msg45851205
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3469010.msg36047535#msg36047535
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4415002.msg39312832#msg39312832
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3344170.msg34996088#msg34996088

Of course, he could have given the Merits for the best post to avoid meriting ShitPosts, but looks like a red tag is only deserved yet for sham100899, hisori (hard proof: enrolling multiple account in the same bounty), and not enough proof to tag fakegurutu for Merit trading and being an alt of the other ones.
Or how would you decide?

[Timelord2067]

Or how would you decide?

I'm of the opinion that if A, B, C and D are alts, even if only A and C are found to have scammed, then I'll give A, B, C and D Red Paint TM for being alts of each-other who are known to have scammed.

I started this thread a while ago, some comments worth considering: When leaving trust for known Alt's of other users feel free to vote too)

[Master of Shitcoins]

Or how would you decide?

I'm of the opinion that if A, B, C and D are alts, even if only A and C are found to have scammed, then I'll give A, B, C and D Red Paint TM for being alts of each-other who are known to have scammed.

I started this thread a while ago, some comments worth considering: When leaving trust for known Alt's of other users feel free to vote too)

Thanks, I've submitted my vote. 

I agree that all accounts should be tagged if it's proven that they are scammers and connected. But the issue between sham100899, hisori and fakegurutu is, that we have only a clear evidence (BTC-address) for sham100899 and hisori but no real clear evidence to tag fakegurutu.

And I did some more research:

Both accounts edited their messages 30 minutes later:

originally posted:

sham100899:    January 22, 2019, 03:01:52 AM
fakegurutu:      January 22, 2019, 03:06:36 AM

less than 5 minutes difference

last edited:

sham100899:    January 22, 2019, 03:34:39 AM
fakegurutu:      January 22, 2019, 03:33:45 AM

less than 1 minute difference

[Timelord2067]

And I did some more research:

Both accounts edited their messages 30 minutes later:

originally posted:

sham100899:    January 22, 2019, 03:01:52 AM
fakegurutu:      January 22, 2019, 03:06:36 AM

less than 5 minutes difference

last edited:

sham100899:    January 22, 2019, 03:34:39 AM
fakegurutu:      January 22, 2019, 03:33:45 AM

less than 1 minute difference

It'll be interesting to see if the DT manipulators scoff at your research, or decide to cherry pick you off of their totem poll.

[Chris!]

I haven't been keeping up the best, but glad to see you kept things alive Timlord2067. It's always been a pleasure working with you and if I have spare time in the future I won't hesitate to help find those pesky alt accounts.

I always loved picking a shitposter at random and doing a quick search for all of their posted bitcoin addresses. My general rule of thumb was: if there's one shitposter there's usually a whole swarm of accounts owned by said shitposter. It's sad how often it was true.

If you're out on the prowl I'd suggest looking through bounty threads, signature campaign threads, basically anything where you can earn some pocket change for spamming on any medium. I had my favourite threads that I would check, which if you look at my previous posts it would be pretty obvious which ones I followed.

Good luck on this never-ending journey. Some day they'll have AI that can link up 1000 accounts a second, but for now we'll stick with good old fashioned detective work.

[Timelord2067]

@Chris! Thanks for your good wishes, I've always found the currency exchange section is a laugh scam a minute barrel of laughs.  When my spider senses start to tingle (bet you didn't know us Timelord's had spider senses - we got them from the Planet of the Spiders Metebelis Three) I can sniff out a scammer and the proof fairly quickly, it's the writing the reports up that takes an hour or more to archive and submit.

[VINSIN]

@Chris! Thanks for your good wishes, I've always found the currency exchange section is a laugh scam a minute barrel of laughs.  When my spider senses start to tingle (bet you didn't know us Timelord's had spider senses - we got them from the Planet of the Spiders Metebelis Three) I can sniff out a scammer and the proof fairly quickly, it's the writing the reports up that takes an hour or more to archive and submit.

@timelord you're like a great working bee. but please don't steal the forum as it happened here: The bee world lol

[Timelord2067]

@timelord you're like a great working bee. but please don't steal the forum as it happened here: The bee world lol

Don't bee silly, bees aren't from another planet... (not all of them)...

[Master of Shitcoins]

It'll be interesting to see if the DT manipulators scoff at your research, or decide to cherry pick you off of their totem poll.

What does that mean? All of them are not tagged yet, can you tag them if you think the evidence is clear enough?

[Avirunes]

It'll be interesting to see if the DT manipulators scoff at your research, or decide to cherry pick you off of their totem poll.

What does that mean? All of them are not tagged yet, can you tag them if you think the evidence is clear enough?

Right now I am looking at the evidence and will tag the accounts according to the valid proofs mentioned in the case. At the same time I will try to find a link between fakegurutu and these accounts.

[The Cryptovator]

2 Accounts Connected:

sham100899, hisori


Proof:

Proof of being alts:

Both accounts are using the Bitcoin address 3PJdNRCtsd2jfY82JunoCz5vYC8nLj2dtv several times to apply for bounties:  

hisori: http://archive.is/CQJck
sham100899: http://archive.is/KTidw


Proof of violating rules:

Abused ICOforums signature campaign -both accounts enrolled:

hisori
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4898414.msg44111770#msg44111770
http://archive.is/wpTjd#selection-6829.0-6829.6

sham100899
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4898414.msg44111489#msg44111489
http://archive.is/wpTjd#selection-5385.0-5385.10

Tagged both of them,
Archived hisori: http://archive.is/7DGJI
Archived sham100899:  http://archive.is/zb5TJ

Don't archived post history next time, just direct archive post link.

I don't understand how to write a report here, I hope you guys can do further investigation

3 account connected

restumaulana : 0xFAd4Bd3Ac7F05d7fC658bbc772aD64D916f14b57
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1070643

almiani : 0x935A7911dAdC5901ACb98477a638aF1c7F32da9e
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1064221

markalis : 0x69BD5d61b90a7f365c33DAf4c4f920B73D555839
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1076649

proof:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/11UaVKxmGp0QpaOnXU3DVBTgoRSvOziW7_RY189suX24/edit#gid=1537991244

they are in line 42 , 43 , 44 in signature bounty

it looks like their address is connected when they move the BWT token to the same address destination
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x2713dc9c488c5d4e3797c4e37d9ac6bbf248e2f1a5d88ecce03e407c80e83b8d
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xb753d7a605e298ee025a4923ed9132a36023814dd9cf06fb458e3761d58fb71c
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xaaac9c89b2ff34df3a9bd46011204d222736d68177acf8cbecb826c7ff92f9b8

https://etherscan.io/address/0x36672b98c79Ca7e84B3589e072737d8e538f7D79#tokentxns

Tagged , rest isn't clear to me.

[Master of Shitcoins]

Right now I am looking at the evidence and will tag the accounts according to the valid proofs mentioned in the case. At the same time I will try to find a link between fakegurutu and these accounts.

Thanks for looking into it. I didn't check the whole post history of fakegurutu, maybe you'll find some clear evidence.

Tagged both of them,
Archived hisori: http://archive.is/7DGJI
Archived sham100899:  http://archive.is/zb5TJ

Thanks for checking that.  
And thanks for the Merit.

Don't archived post history next time, just direct archive post link.

Got it, next time I'll archive direct post link.

[Timelord2067]

It'll be interesting to see if the DT manipulators scoff at your research, or decide to cherry pick you off of their totem poll.

What does that mean? All of them are not tagged yet, can you tag them if you think the evidence is clear enough?

I always advocate that the person submitting a known alts submission form should be the one who does the primary tagging and if any other person wishes to reinforce the tagging with their own is welcome to do so.

Right now I am looking at the evidence and will tag the accounts according to the valid proofs mentioned in the case. At the same time I will try to find a link between fakegurutu and these accounts.

Thanks for the update.