Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2022 Q2)

[Timelord2067]

Here we go again...

2 Accounts Connected:

DarkStar_,  DarkStar_alt,

Ref: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg26112099#msg26112099 (Archive)

That post is probably where DarkStar_ gives me negative DT distrust.

Tavos hasn't been my alt account for at least a year

Proof:

For some weeks now DarkStar_ has given his alt DarkStar_alt positive DT trust.  A couple of weeks ago I commented on TomatoCage giving one of his own alts TomatoCage1 positive DT trust and most people were ok with that. (Archive)

DarkStar_ AND his alt DarkStar_alt have BOTH given Lafu positive DT trust more than a week ago as seen here: http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-23_Sat_05.10h/805820.html (no need to archive because we all trust LoyceV)

Miscellaneous:

DT Trust abuse

(Archive)

Thankfully LoyceV understands what I am referring to and can see the complexities of the problem this can cause the forum.

@DarkStar_

There's been a lot of posts these last few days, which one are you asking me to respond to?

This:

Please explain how adding my alt to DT2 to allow a single neutral on my own account to show up by default is abuse.

DarkStar_ to his credit has seen there can be a perceived conflict of interest (my words not his) and removed the second connection within hours of my first post, hence my confusion what he was asking given he had already taken steps to rectify the situation.


marlboroza and mikeywith are trying to create FUD after the issue has already been resolved (see above in this post) with narratives they have concocted - Who started the narrative that I'd somehow said darkstar_ and Lafu are alts?  There's the post quoted in full - feel free to take a screen shot and add an arrow or five...  

Not sure why the lapdog mikeywith wants to join in the discussion after the fact and marlboroza , well... we all know he wants us to distrust him and so far it seems I'm the closest to respecting his wishes by removing my positive DT trust in him without going that further step and placing negative/distrust on his DT trust.  So I guess marlboroza has just decided to lash out at the world around him and for the moment he's decided to lash out at me probably in the hope I will respect his wishes and give him what he craves - negative trust / distrust on the DT trust.

Sorry marlboroza, your lashing out at me is both amusing and sad at the same time.

So why this witch hunt @Timelord?

Again, an interesting narrative, but not true...  

Those in a position of Trust should expect to be held more accountable and/or up to scrutiny.

...unless of course you've got something to hide?

Are we done here now?

[Timelord2067]

Here we go again...

(snip)

Again, an interesting narrative, but not true...

Those in a position of Trust should expect to be held more accountable and/or up to scrutiny.

...unless of course you've got something to hide?

Are we done here now?

...and before the DT Trolls ^TM collectively think that's a threat, you're wrong (again) it's just something I read online a while ago.

[mikeywith]

Not sure why the lapdog mikeywith wants to join in the discussion after the fact

i am more like a titdog, i sit on your tits and piss in your mouth when you open it to say shit.

OK now back to the topic, when i first saw your topic and how you poorly connect members, i thought that you were not so smart, when i read a bit deeper i came to conclude that you are not even smart, now that i had to interact with you i know for sure that you are super stupid  ,

sometimes it take a bit long to confirm the level of stupidity of someone who has noting better to do than pretend to be Sherlock Holmes.

nothing personal against you tho, no hard feelings.

Please explain how adding my alt to DT2 to allow a single neutral on my own account to show up by default is abuse.

this is because he thinks that by adding your alt to DT2 you give "IT" the right to vote in the DT1 level voting.

but i am pretty certain he won't admit this , because this will show his lack of understanding about the trust system which can be clearly seen.
he even confuses the feedback with the trust list.

sorry Sherlock Holmes this is what you get when you talk about something you don't understand, i suggest you stick to finding similar wallet addresses on both accounts and conclude that they are alts, seems like you don't know how to do anything else better than that.

[marlboroza]

marlboroza and mikeywith are trying to create FUD after the issue has already been resolved

Actually, it was you who said "DT TRUST ABUSE" so how are we creating FUD here? This is still part of your post:

Miscellaneous:

DT Trust abuse

(no need to archive (http://archive.fo/wG8zS#selection-1929.0-2001.1) because we all trust LoyceV)

No comment on this.

Not sure why the lapdog mikeywith

Insults.

we all know he wants us to distrust him

You are making things up over and over again.

Quote me exactly part of my post where I specifically said "I want people to distrust me". What part of "exclude me from DT2" you don't understand?

and so far it seems I'm the closest to respecting his wishes by removing my positive DT trust in him without going that further step and placing negative/distrust on his DT trust.

What is positive and negative DT trust? What do you mean when you say "my DT trust"?

So I guess marlboroza has just decided to lash out at the world around him and for the moment he's decided to lash out at me probably in the hope I will respect his wishes and give him what he craves - negative trust / distrust on the DT trust.

It was actually you who started pointing fingers to irrelevant inactive accounts, taking screenshots and archiving screenshots. I asked you simple question and I still can't see your answer.

and for the moment he's decided to lash out at me probably in the hope I will respect his wishes and give him what he craves - negative trust / distrust on the DT trust.

Stop twisting things.

My only comment in this thread after you said DT TRUST ABUSE was this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg49901881#msg49901881. And your replied with:

@marlboroza

As I replied in your FUD thread:

The one who wants us to distrust him is wondering if those around him are paranoid?

Witch hunt? That's the best you can come up with?

You completely ignored everything I said in that post and replied with what exactly? And then what happened? What's with editing and removing links and this:

Hmm angry kidding yelling "no you didn't!" syndrome...

Those in a position of Trust should expect to be held more accountable and/or up to scrutiny.

So:

Dark Star - very childish response to being caught out abusing the DT trust list with both yourself and your alt.

Miscellaneous:

DT Trust abuse

I am also curious about your opinion why this is DT trust abuse. If you wanted this to be between you and DarkStar_ you could have kept it private but you went public with it and now it is public and when people ask you why this is DT trust abuse you don't want to speak.

...unless of course you've got something to hide?

Try with my password. Don't forget to archive screenshot. Also make archives of archived screenshots in case one archive goes down.

Are we done here now?

Now we are.

[Ridwan Fauzi]

2 Accounts Connected:
ilirenlaz, matrixSS9

Proof:

#Proof Of Authentication
Blog Bounty
Bitcointalk username: ilirenlaz
Bitcointalk profile:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2473716
Link: http://www.enostech.com/azultec-introduces-wizardmachine-300/
ETH:0xC107F49B50178d0FB6ec90Cd2974a83898a4Cf15

archive

Bitcointalk username : matrixSS9
Publication link : https://steemit.com/altcoin/@matrixsm09/tanz
Eth address :0xC107F49B50178d0FB6ec90Cd2974a83898a4Cf15

archive

Related Addresses:
 0xC107F49B50178d0FB6ec90Cd2974a83898a4Cf15

Abusing bounty campaign (azultec) with alts
http://archive.is/HyXWE
http://archive.is/vbvBX

[Timelord2067]

Thanks @Ridwan Fauzi, every last byte of information helps.

[coinlocket$]

@timelord2067 do you remember anything about this case? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5116077.0

You found connections a long time ago and seems the RING is back with new accounts.

[Timelord2067]

@timelord2067 do you remember anything about this case? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5116077.0

You found connections a long time ago and seems the RING is back with new accounts.

Quite an old RING - I'm on the road until late in the week, I'll read up on the old posts and have a look at it Wed/Thur.

[coinlocket$]

2 Accounts Connected:
ilirenlaz, matrixSS9

Those 2 looking also their post history seems to be alts but I don't understand why he is using 2 accounts to join the same campaigns with differents articles.

Do the campaigns have a limit of articles for user, and he is posting with 2 accounts to bypass this limit?

[Timelord2067]

2 Accounts Connected:
ilirenlaz, matrixSS9

Those 2 looking also their post history seems to be alts but I don't understand why he is using 2 accounts to join the same campaigns with differents articles.

Do the campaigns have a limit of articles for user, and he is posting with 2 accounts to bypass this limit?

I think at different tiers users get paid for posting set amounts eg member = ten posts, senior member - twenty posts and so on.

Campaign managers such as @LoyceV would be able to shed some light on the requirements.  At a guess the alt farmer would probably be able to do (example) fifty posts a day, but only has (example) junior members who only need to do ten posts, so five X ten posts = fifty posts.

[DaddyMonsi]

@timelord2067 do you remember anything about this case? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5116077.0

You found connections a long time ago and seems the RING is back with new accounts.

Account Nydiacaskey01 is not connected to Ajrah but account Lemipawa, Nydiacaskey01 and Daddymonsi are all controlled by 1 person. I created Mubadala account so I can communicate with shasan since Lemipawa has a loan and repaid, I was able to borrow BTC from shasan 3x, twice with collateral and 1 non-collateral, all we're paid. Daddymonsi also asked for a no-collateral loan with shasan and it was paid as well.

I use to own Ajrah account but I sold the account to SilverPunk last March 2016 below is the screen shot of the conversation



This is what the signed message contains based in the PM conversation

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
188jEkpbWGV8a6rJShrVsKPCmYarQfJt2D
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
This is daddymonsi and today is March 24 2016 owner of ajrah account is selling this account to Silverpunk for 0.08BTC
H9DJ/QRQQOtBRRynrjnE2Gl0yXS2Y+p5ZOWLSFGm6A3ihQZ73ywbZhu5pr0VlQ5EfTYhtOZouGff9O8DzBCCV4M=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

and here is the Transaction ID

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/26bb9a4fd02b935305d0371984589ccf96772ca0959bf2d1e71b4459b7594276

I use to own scumbag account but later on I sold to jacee, below is a post where you can see she admitted that she bought the account
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1186359.msg12488223#msg12488223

If you are not convinced with the screenshot I posted above, I can allow a trusted user to view my account and look at the back and fort conversation between me and SilverPunk.

I have no plans of joining more than 1 account in a signature campaign granting that it is in their rules, if you notice, Daddymonsi account was not able to join any campaigns for the past few months, same with Lemipawa, I use that account to buy physical Bitcoin.

Links to the Accounts mentioned in this post:
Nydiacaskey01
Lemipawa
Daddymonsi
Ajrah
SilverPunk
Mubadala
scumbag
jacee

I hope this post clears everything and feel free to ask me any question

[shasan]

Snip

Nydiacaskey01 is must connected with Ajrah because they used same wallet address from same account which you can see from: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/00075e8bd8266764/addresses and their used BTC wallet id you can see from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5116077.msg49988365#msg49988365

From your self admitted post I think Nydiacaskey01, Ajrah, Lemipawa, Daddymonsi, Mubadala, scumbag, and Coins168 has been used by the same person. And latter few accounts might be sold.

[Findingnemo]

I think what he wanted to say is he is holding all those accounts but never broke any rules of signature campaign like multiple accounts are not allowed.So he may joined each of his account on different signature campaigns,if this is right they he may not get tagged.

[shasan]

I think what he wanted to say is he is holding all those accounts but never broke any rules of signature campaign like multiple accounts are not allowed.So he may joined each of his account on different signature campaigns,if this is right they he may not get tagged.

Multiple accounts are allowed the base on forum rule. They should be tagged if they break forum rule or make any scam from any of their accounts. And the previous post I have not mentioned they should be tagged or not I have just mentioned they are altered accounts.

[Avirunes]

~snip~

Archived: http://archive.is/TYUXP#selection-10503.1-10525.32

... I have just mentioned they are altered accounts.

No, they are not his alt accounts entirely. The list he mentioned contains accounts which are mentioned in the post.

I received a PM in telegram where he self admitted his alts which are: lemipawa, nydiacaskey01, DaddyMonsi and mubadala. Ajrah was sold to Silverpunk on 24th March 2016 and the connection regarding Zooplus alt was found after it was sold to Silverpunk so I think nydiacaskey01 is not connected to Zooplus ring.

I've removed my rating from nydiacaskey01.

[shasan]

snip

If Ajrah was sold then it was his/her alt account and now that is being operated by another person. But according to the blockchain transaction the account is/was must alt account.

[nydiacaskey01]

~snip~

Archived: http://archive.is/TYUXP#selection-10503.1-10525.32

... I have just mentioned they are altered accounts.

No, they are not his alt accounts entirely. The list he mentioned contains accounts which are mentioned in the post.

I received a PM in telegram where he self admitted his alts which are: lemipawa, nydiacaskey01, DaddyMonsi and mubadala. Ajrah was sold to Silverpunk on 24th March 2016 and the connection regarding Zooplus alt was found after it was sold to Silverpunk so I think nydiacaskey01 is not connected to Zooplus ring.

I've removed my rating from nydiacaskey01.

Thanks and thank you for your time when I am explaining my side through Telegram.

Snip

Nydiacaskey01 is must connected with Ajrah because they used same wallet address from same account which you can see from: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/00075e8bd8266764/addresses and their used BTC wallet id you can see from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5116077.msg49988365#msg49988365

From your self admitted post I think Nydiacaskey01, Ajrah, Lemipawa, Daddymonsi, Mubadala, scumbag, and Coins168 has been used by the same person. And latter few accounts might be sold.

Yes. I don't have the control to accounts Ajrah, scumbag and coins168 anymore since there we're sold already.

[coinlocket$]

Yes. I don't have the control to accounts Ajrah, scumbag and coins168 anymore since there we're sold already.

So every single account of the ring should be tagged for account selling?

[nydiacaskey01]

Yes. I don't have the control to accounts Ajrah, scumbag and coins168 anymore since there we're sold already.

So every single account of the ring should be tagged for account selling?

I am not going to argue with you about account selling, we all know that account selling is allowed but frowned upon by members. That incident happened 2016 when accounts are sold openly in Marketplace and even Auctioned and if we are going back to those days then yes I am guilty of that, but I learned my ways and focused on what is allowed in this forum. If that happened today with all the reminders in this forum that we should stay away from selling accounts then red flag it is.

[Timelord2067]

Yes. I don't have the control to accounts Ajrah, scumbag and coins168 anymore since there we're sold already.

So every single account of the ring should be tagged for account selling?

What evidence is there that the accounts that were sold have then gone on to sell accounts?

I would be tagging the accounts as having changed hands (neutral) and previous transactions can't be relied upon.