Bitcoin Forum
November 16, 2024, 03:04:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][SegWit2X] Together we will see a business through.  (Read 53400 times)
crypto6unny
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 28, 2018, 02:43:12 PM
Last edit: January 28, 2018, 02:57:41 PM by crypto6unny
 #1861

Could somebody broadcast my B2X transaction. Don't know why but there's no confirmations and the fee isn't the problem.
Used daemon with command "./bitcoin2x-cli sendtoaddress *address* *value* '' '' true"

The problem is the blockchain is stuck at height 501450.


The actual Block is 518519, the Blockchain is working!
Problem with you client?

Yes, I can see it's working on https://explorer.b2x-segwit.io/ but I'm stuck on height 501450 on daemon and also qt (Ubuntu 16.04) and I think that's the reason why my transaction isn't broadcasted. So if you have working daemon, please broadcast my transaction because my full node isn't working.

I'll give one acceleration (btc) as a bounty to whom will broadcast my transaction.
funminer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 218
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 28, 2018, 02:49:49 PM
 #1862

Yes, I can see it's working on explorer but I'm stuck on 501450 on Ubuntu 16.04. Stuck on daemon and stuck on qt and I think that's the reason why my transaction isn't broadcasted.

Could somebody broadcast my B2X transaction. Don't know why but there's no confirmations and the fee isn't the problem.
Used daemon with command "./bitcoin2x-cli sendtoaddress *address* *value* '' '' true"

The problem is the blockchain is stuck at height 501450.


The actual Block is 518519, the Blockchain is working!
Problem with you client?

You try to add more nodes?
crypto6unny
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 28, 2018, 02:53:32 PM
Last edit: January 28, 2018, 03:16:43 PM by crypto6unny
 #1863

Yes, I can see it's working on explorer but I'm stuck on 501450 on Ubuntu 16.04. Stuck on daemon and stuck on qt and I think that's the reason why my transaction isn't broadcasted. And the fork happened on block height 501451. So awesome. Smiley

Could somebody broadcast my B2X transaction. Don't know why but there's no confirmations and the fee isn't the problem.
Used daemon with command "./bitcoin2x-cli sendtoaddress *address* *value* '' '' true"

The problem is the blockchain is stuck at height 501450.


The actual Block is 518519, the Blockchain is working!
Problem with you client?

You try to add more nodes?


I have deleted peers.dat a couple of times. The problem stays. And all nodes have the right block height.
funminer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 218
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 28, 2018, 04:01:14 PM
 #1864

Yes, I can see it's working on explorer but I'm stuck on 501450 on Ubuntu 16.04. Stuck on daemon and stuck on qt and I think that's the reason why my transaction isn't broadcasted. And the fork happened on block height 501451. So awesome. Smiley

Could somebody broadcast my B2X transaction. Don't know why but there's no confirmations and the fee isn't the problem.
Used daemon with command "./bitcoin2x-cli sendtoaddress *address* *value* '' '' true"

The problem is the blockchain is stuck at height 501450.


The actual Block is 518519, the Blockchain is working!
Problem with you client?

You try to add more nodes?


I have deleted peers.dat a couple of times. The problem stays. And all nodes have the right block height.

My last idea, you can try to repair the Blockchain? or your firewall block something?
crypto6unny
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 28, 2018, 04:45:54 PM
Last edit: January 28, 2018, 05:17:11 PM by crypto6unny
 #1865

Yes, I can see it's working on explorer but I'm stuck on 501450 on Ubuntu 16.04. Stuck on daemon and stuck on qt and I think that's the reason why my transaction isn't broadcasted. And the fork happened on block height 501451. So awesome. Smiley

Could somebody broadcast my B2X transaction. Don't know why but there's no confirmations and the fee isn't the problem.
Used daemon with command "./bitcoin2x-cli sendtoaddress *address* *value* '' '' true"

The problem is the blockchain is stuck at height 501450.


The actual Block is 518519, the Blockchain is working!
Problem with you client?

You try to add more nodes?


I have deleted peers.dat a couple of times. The problem stays. And all nodes have the right block height.

My last idea, you can try to repair the Blockchain? or your firewall block something?

Well, I have been using Bitcoin, Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin Cash, BitcoinX, Bitcore, Superbitcoin and United Bitcoin daemon and qt. Work just fine. Bitcoin2x qt wallet (Ubuntu) uses '.bitcoin' folder and daemon uses '.bitcoin2x' folder.  Huh Lazy ass coding I must say.

Both bitcoin2xd and bitcoin2x-qt stop syncing at block height 501450. Now I deleted everything except 'blocks' folder on '.bitcoin' folder and doing a new sync with bitcoin-qt. So I can get a new chainstate.

(And yes I deleted '.bitcoin' folder before started to sync in the first place. No I haven't been using any other daemons or qt:s since I started to use bitcoin2xd and bitcoin2x-qt. Yes I have the same problem with bitcoin2x-qt and daemon. Yes I have the same 'blocks' folder copied from '.bitcoin2x' to '.bitcoin'. Yes I know what I'm doing)

The only thing I wanted/needed was someone to broadcast my B2X transaction.  Undecided

EDIT:
Was able to broadcast my B2X transaction @ https://explorer.b2x-segwit.io/tx/send
benho
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 29, 2018, 03:57:04 AM
 #1866

I still can not exchange the B2X until now and do not know when It can exchange at Yobit or Hitbtc Sad
Error007
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 29, 2018, 08:17:26 AM
 #1867

QT wallet not sync after 97%,may be some node need it?
niemann
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 29, 2018, 10:10:46 AM
Last edit: January 29, 2018, 10:25:53 AM by niemann
 #1868

QT wallet not sync after 97%,may be some node need it?

Check the peers list in your config file at %appdata%\Bitcoin2X\Bitcoin2X.conf

Here is what I have in it:
Quote
addnode=136.243.147.159
addnode=136.243.111.195
addnode=138.201.122.203
addnode=node1.b2x-segwit.io
addnode=node2.b2x-segwit.io
addnode=node3.b2x-segwit.io
addnode=82.130.103.18
addnode=129.13.252.36
addnode=129.13.252.47
addnode=54.37.84.125
addnode=72.141.219.90
addnode=71.80.204.242
addnode=89.163.216.76
addnode=45.33.95.186
addnode=193.109.61.104
addnode=51.15.185.141
addnode=73.211.239.87
addnode=190.10.10.188
addnode=73.211.239.87
addnode=82.6.12.253
addnode=82.6.12.253
addnode=128.235.40.191
addnode=131.252.12.65
addnode=208.93.126.113
addnode=60.104.52.120
addnode=136.243.147.159
addnode=192.94.173.254
addnode=85.192.167.85
addnode=23.226.131.142
addnode=69.123.138.68
addnode=185.155.77.4
addnode=99.75.171.27
addnode=99.75.171.27
addnode=176.9.85.49
addnode=84.53.228.219
addnode=50.35.12.59
addnode=47.18.102.245
addnode=66.11.122.110
addnode=93.186.110.205
addnode=8.25.156.9
addnode=205.251.23.111
addnode=35.224.21.228
addnode=51.15.50.53
addnode=89.208.203.50
addnode=68.5.11.164
addnode=178.82.163.228
addnode=31.10.144.148
addnode=205.251.23.98
addnode=70.33.168.20
addnode=85.90.151.2
addnode=205.251.23.93
addnode=69.125.223.97
addnode=82.78.237.36
addnode=146.120.209.53
addnode=52.199.163.228
addnode=73.146.157.149
addnode=104.131.61.32
benho
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 29, 2018, 11:15:43 AM
 #1869

QT wallet not sync after 97%,may be some node need it?

add some node. It will work
hardalisas
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 101



View Profile
January 30, 2018, 07:07:59 AM
 #1870

15 dollars! How pathetic it is!
Is there any dev behind this fork?
dlezama
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 17


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 08:11:14 AM
 #1871

15 dollars! How pathetic it is!
Is there any dev behind this fork?
Donna the model/dancer is their business developer. Feel free to contact her.
toogoodtobetrue
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 09:32:42 AM
 #1872

When exchange support B2x wallet?Huh
So long

TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE.
geissenpeter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 11:35:15 AM
 #1873

like with btg
wash out period and than it will go 50-100
as soon as more liquidity comes
madmartyk
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2702
Merit: 1030


Yes I am a pirate, 300 years too late!


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 02:02:23 PM
 #1874

like with btg
wash out period and than it will go 50-100
as soon as more liquidity comes

Keep Dreaming!!

geissenpeter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 02:17:03 PM
 #1875

like with btg
wash out period and than it will go 50-100
as soon as more liquidity comes

Keep Dreaming!!

why? more exchange listings will bring liquidty
and segwit2 is a broad supported, although denated fork
if u look at futures there was wied price fluctuation
why is this not a good thing?
geissenpeter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 02:28:27 PM
 #1876

like with btg
wash out period and than it will go 50-100
as soon as more liquidity comes

Keep Dreaming!!

why? more exchange listings will bring liquidty
and segwit2 is a broad supported, although denated fork
if u look at futures there was wied price fluctuation
why is this not a good thing?


btw wasnt bitmain a supporter of segwit2? de dash miner was never sooo profitable, maybe by purpose it was decided to put segwit on x11 to make the machine more attractive from a return perspective no?
madmartyk
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2702
Merit: 1030


Yes I am a pirate, 300 years too late!


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 02:32:00 PM
 #1877

like with btg
wash out period and than it will go 50-100
as soon as more liquidity comes

Keep Dreaming!!

why? more exchange listings will bring liquidty
and segwit2 is a broad supported, although denated fork
if u look at futures there was wied price fluctuation
why is this not a good thing?


btw wasnt bitmain a supporter of segwit2? de dash miner was never sooo profitable, maybe by purpose it was decided to put segwit on x11 to make the machine more attractive from a return perspective no?

This is not the segwit2 they supported, same with the exchanges, they stole the name...

geissenpeter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 02:41:04 PM
 #1878

like with btg
wash out period and than it will go 50-100
as soon as more liquidity comes

Keep Dreaming!!

why? more exchange listings will bring liquidty
and segwit2 is a broad supported, although denated fork
if u look at futures there was wied price fluctuation
why is this not a good thing?


btw wasnt bitmain a supporter of segwit2? de dash miner was never sooo profitable, maybe by purpose it was decided to put segwit on x11 to make the machine more attractive from a return perspective no?

This is not the segwit2 they supported, same with the exchanges, they stole the name...


ok but how is that possible? prees wise etc it looks like that one, are the parameters of the project so different?
also lead developer is the same person as last year when it did not go through
jaap terlouw
madmartyk
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2702
Merit: 1030


Yes I am a pirate, 300 years too late!


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 02:42:46 PM
 #1879

Read through the whole thread..

geissenpeter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 30, 2018, 02:57:29 PM
 #1880

Read through the whole thread..

i did but these are modtly biased views

every partner to them would risk reputation if it would be stolen etc no?

but you agree that the lead developer is the same guy as it was last year start of the debate?
Pages: « 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 [94] 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!