[ANN][pre-ico]WeAre - Revolution in Helping Investors and Founders with ICO

[retricallos]

What qualities a project team should have to be chosen by WeAre?

I think team background + idea + budget.

Don't forget about publications on media.

Why? Everybody with $ can buy them, it is not sign of trust

You should take a closer look to the PROMOTED (do the post have it or not)

As I know you can buy a post even without this mark.

Really? As I know all releases should be published with this.

now - no, you can not differ native advertising from regular publication

What about interviews?

What do you mean? Possibility to buy it?

Exactly  

Take my words back) It can be bought too) This is one of the formats

Yeap) but there are few tips that help to determine is the post promoted or not

for example?

oh, it's a kind of a secret)

[yahman]

Superb concept! When will be ready first version of network?

[GGeorge]

Superb concept! When will be ready first version of network?

It is planned in Q4 (2017) — Q2 (2018).

[yahman]

Superb concept! When will be ready first version of network?

It is planned in Q4 (2017) — Q2 (2018).

It means that till quarter 2 it will be ready?

[GGeorge]

Superb concept! When will be ready first version of network?

It is planned in Q4 (2017) — Q2 (2018).

It means that till quarter 2 it will be ready?

Right 

[lider1971]

Any project can work with the ecosystem? Yes?

[retrend]

Any project can work with the ecosystem? Yes?

In fact, no, all future projects will be pre-screened and pass a certain selection

[lider1971]

Any project can work with the ecosystem? Yes?

In fact, no, all future projects will be pre-screened and pass a certain selection

Really?
And who will evaluate all start-ups who want to be on this platform?

[retrend]

Any project can work with the ecosystem? Yes?

In fact, no, all future projects will be pre-screened and pass a certain selection

Really?
And who will evaluate all start-ups who want to be on this platform?

As far as I understand, this will be done by special people.
And as the project will pass voting among holders of a token

[lider1971]

Any project can work with the ecosystem? Yes?

In fact, no, all future projects will be pre-screened and pass a certain selection

Really?
And who will evaluate all start-ups who want to be on this platform?

As far as I understand, this will be done by special people.
And as the project will pass voting among holders of a token

What kind of vote? How will this pass? 

[retrend]

Any project can work with the ecosystem? Yes?

In fact, no, all future projects will be pre-screened and pass a certain selection

Really?
And who will evaluate all start-ups who want to be on this platform?

As far as I understand, this will be done by special people.
And as the project will pass voting among holders of a token

What kind of vote? How will this pass? 

Among all holders of the token will be voting for projects. And the choice will be taken into account and users will be offered to familiarize themselves with those projects whose sphere is close to them.
Technically I do not know how this will go, maybe there will be a special program, I do not know.

[lider1971]

Any project can work with the ecosystem? Yes?

In fact, no, all future projects will be pre-screened and pass a certain selection

Really?
And who will evaluate all start-ups who want to be on this platform?

As far as I understand, this will be done by special people.
And as the project will pass voting among holders of a token

What kind of vote? How will this pass? 

Among all holders of the token will be voting for projects. And the choice will be taken into account and users will be offered to familiarize themselves with those projects whose sphere is close to them.
Technically I do not know how this will go, maybe there will be a special program, I do not know.

I understand, thanks for the answers! 

[Xelpherpolis]

I do not quite understand why you need to offer token holders to vote for projects.

[retrend]

I do not quite understand why you need to offer token holders to vote for projects.

Why?
They have a full relation to this platform. In fact, they are shareholders, they should have the right to vote, do not they?

[Xelpherpolis]

I do not quite understand why you need to offer token holders to vote for projects.

Why?
They have a full relation to this platform. In fact, they are shareholders, they should have the right to vote, do not they?

Well, to some extent yes, but still.
I believe that such decisions should be made by specialists who understand this. This is more logical than just trusting random people who bought tokens of the company.

[Leather]

I do not quite understand why you need to offer token holders to vote for projects.

Why?
They have a full relation to this platform. In fact, they are shareholders, they should have the right to vote, do not they?

Well, to some extent yes, but still.
I believe that such decisions should be made by specialists who understand this. This is more logical than just trusting random people who bought tokens of the company.

In any case, they will not risk anything

[Xelpherpolis]

I do not quite understand why you need to offer token holders to vote for projects.

Why?
They have a full relation to this platform. In fact, they are shareholders, they should have the right to vote, do not they?

Well, to some extent yes, but still.
I believe that such decisions should be made by specialists who understand this. This is more logical than just trusting random people who bought tokens of the company.

In any case, they will not risk anything

In what sense? What do you mean?

[Leather]

I do not quite understand why you need to offer token holders to vote for projects.

Why?
They have a full relation to this platform. In fact, they are shareholders, they should have the right to vote, do not they?

Well, to some extent yes, but still.
I believe that such decisions should be made by specialists who understand this. This is more logical than just trusting random people who bought tokens of the company.

In any case, they will not risk anything

In what sense? What do you mean?

I mean that token holders do not risk the tokens that they already have. Since new tokens will be issued for each project.

[retrend]

I do not quite understand why you need to offer token holders to vote for projects.

Why?
They have a full relation to this platform. In fact, they are shareholders, they should have the right to vote, do not they?

Well, to some extent yes, but still.
I believe that such decisions should be made by specialists who understand this. This is more logical than just trusting random people who bought tokens of the company.

But it also has a different meaning, users will find out about the new project and may want to invest in it.
It's very cool from a marketing standpoint!

[Xelpherpolis]

I do not quite understand why you need to offer token holders to vote for projects.

Why?
They have a full relation to this platform. In fact, they are shareholders, they should have the right to vote, do not they?

Well, to some extent yes, but still.
I believe that such decisions should be made by specialists who understand this. This is more logical than just trusting random people who bought tokens of the company.

But it also has a different meaning, users will find out about the new project and may want to invest in it.
It's very cool from a marketing standpoint!

It's very cool, it turns out the bounty campaign ceases to have any meaning at all