So apparently, many of people here don't read or follow the news or even 3 pages of discussion here, allow me to make a few points a little bit clear:
1. I am newbie but I know bitcoin does not have a co-founder. I meant co-founder of bitcoin.com, and I made it clear a few post later!
Yes,
a few posts later. Lovely. Do you know the FUD effect your original post may have, when idiots see it? Whatever your intentions, that was an extraordinary mistake.
For my part, I quoted your correction in my post; thus, it’s clear that I did read the discussion up to that point. I also provided a link to Satoshi’s discussion of why he didn’t have the bitcoin dot-com domain name, back in March of 2010. I presume you had not seen that; most people haven’t. (
N.b. that as far as I know, the domain has changed hands since then—and has never been in the hands of any decent Bitcoiner.) When I wrote my reply, as you must surely understand, I did not write only it to you; I covered the topic adequately for you, and for anybody else who might read through this thread.
But I must here give you a friendly tip: If you expect for people on Internet forums nowadays to actually
read anything before shooting their mouths off, prepare to be disappointed. I know that I am, seemingly in perpetuity.
Edit: P.S.: I suggest that edit your original post to add a note like this one, appending the correction to your original post. That way,
people numbskulls who only read the first post will actually see your self-correction—with more graceful results all around. I do not recommend editing the substance of your post. Not only would that be dishonestly rewriting history; but it would also make you look like a fool, since your original post is fully quoted in multiple other posts in the thread for anybody to see.
