[ANN] GameCoin (GME) - Current version = v0.8.4.2

[ahmed_bodi]

Personally I think tompool should stay off gme and gme should also be removed from coo choose dustcoin and any other profit sites. By doing this it should get rod of the high hash spikes
That keep happening.

[truckythin]

how many gme will i get if i found a block, how do ya know if i so?

[ahmed_bodi]

the pool software will know although i havent yet decided on the bonus

[Petr1fied]

Well it has been a little over 100 blocks but even the current system of looking 576 blocks into the past would work just fine if the coin had a reasonable sized network that was pretty stable. The coin would find it's sweet spot in time.

The real problem is miners chasing the high profitability of whatever the coin of the hour may be. This problem is endemic across the entire market.

I really don't want to hard fork it again as it won't really change anything other than the speed at which it goes from one extreme to the other. I may just leave it as is.

As you say, it may be an idea to ask Sal002 to remove it from coinchoose until the network has time to find it's feet.

[ahmed_bodi]

i agree with bcx for once. another thing which needs to be done is tompool needs to keep off GME. a stable low hash is far better than a 2 min spike in the hash

[darksoft]

Well it has been a little over 100 blocks but even the current system of looking 576 blocks into the past would work just fine if the coin had a reasonable sized network that was pretty stable. The coin would find it's sweet spot in time.

The real problem is miners chasing the high profitability of whatever the coin of the hour may be. This problem is endemic across the entire market.

I really don't want to hard fork it again as it won't really change anything other than the speed at which it goes from one extreme to the other. I may just leave it as is.

As you say, it may be an idea to ask Sal002 to remove it from coinchoose until the network has time to find it's feet.

Since this is the second time this has happened recently, perhaps you still have it looking back too many blocks... look at all the other coins that have had this massive hash rush thru the past weeks and recovered fine... just a thought but I can't think of many coins that have been hamstrung by this problem, and are still a viable coin.

[FinShaggy]

Are there ways to earn this coin without mining, maybe by writing link sharing etc?

[erk]

i agree with bcx for once. another thing which needs to be done is tompool needs to keep off GME. a stable low hash is far better than a 2 min spike in the hash

You realize that tompool is only like 26Mh/s which is tiny. There are people with 10 times that jumping on the coin. There is no way tompool could get the coin up to 3.1 diff that it is at currently. Work it out first before you are critical.

[ahmed_bodi]

i agree with bcx for once. another thing which needs to be done is tompool needs to keep off GME. a stable low hash is far better than a 2 min spike in the hash

You realize that tompool is only like 26Mh/s which is tiny. There are people with 10 times that jumping on the coin. There is no way tompool could get the coin up to 3.1 diff that it is at currently. Work it out first before you are critical.

actually YOU need to work it out before being critical. tompool themselvs have said  on their website that the multipool will occasionally switch to GME aside from the static GME mining,The mulipool should not switch to gme period! its a chain reaction which will only affect gme not benefit it

[FinShaggy]

Are there ways to earn this coin without mining, maybe by writing link sharing etc?

The only thing worse than child molesters or Hydrponica developed coins is POS Spammers.

You've been spamming this crap all over this forum.

Do what all spammers do, put it in your sig and stop this shit.


~BCX~

Whether or not it was in my sig I would still have to come to all the different coins for each group to see it. And I'm not a spammer, I'm just looking for coins that people that can't mine can still get. Way to be hostile though.

[erk]

i agree with bcx for once. another thing which needs to be done is tompool needs to keep off GME. a stable low hash is far better than a 2 min spike in the hash

You realize that tompool is only like 26Mh/s which is tiny. There are people with 10 times that jumping on the coin. There is no way tompool could get the coin up to 3.1 diff that it is at currently. Work it out first before you are critical.

actually YOU need to work it out before being critical. tompool themselvs have said  on their website that the multipool will occasionally switch to GME aside from the static GME mining,The mulipool should not switch to gme period! its a chain reaction which will only affect gme not benefit it

FFS It's pretty obvious that you open your mouth before looking up how many MH/s you need to have before getting to a particular difficulty figure tompool is not capable of achieving more than about 30MH/s

On average it takes (difficulty * 2^32 hashes) to solve each block, so to get to 3.1 diff it means there were 3.1* 2^32 hashes in a 2.5min period, which is many times more than tompool can do.

[ahmed_bodi]

it may be any more than tompool can do, But it does not do GME ANY favours. so it should stay off

[erk]

it may be any more than tompool can do, But it does not do GME ANY favours. so it should stay off

You are nothing but a troll aren't you, you have no idea when tompool was even last on GME, you just want to promote your own pool by trying to discredit the pools that actually helped when the coin was relaunched. Welcome to my ignore list.

[ahmed_bodi]

thanks for putting me on ur ignore list. its appreciated. I have no problem with ortchi or tryion's pool they are both good. reliable and sustainable pools. What i have a problem with is multipool's and tompool is one of them. It's been proven time and time again that they do more bad than good. So THAT is my problem. and for that reason i am saying that they should stay off GME

[ahmed_bodi]

thanks for putting me on ur ignore list. its appreciated. I have no problem with ortchi or tryion's pool they are both good. reliable and sustainable pools. What i have a problem with is multipool's and tompool is one of them. It's been proven time and time again that they do more bad than good. So THAT is my problem. and for that reason i am saying that they should stay off GME

[ahmed_bodi]

i believe harbinger was going to

[bluestang]

Ahmed, your auto payout isn't working.

[ahmed_bodi]

im going to do a guess out of funds but we can see, does auto work?

[ahmed_bodi]

94K GME unconfirmed and only 3k in the wallet atm. so thats why you cant withdraw, try again in 10 mins will transfer some from the cold storage

[elend]

Well it has been a little over 100 blocks but even the current system of looking 576 blocks into the past would work just fine if the coin had a reasonable sized network that was pretty stable. The coin would find it's sweet spot in time.

The real problem is miners chasing the high profitability of whatever the coin of the hour may be. This problem is endemic across the entire market.

yes, agreed! Nothing is going wrong at the moment.

I really don't want to hard fork it again as it won't really change anything other than the speed at which it goes from one extreme to the other. I may just leave it as is.

Bravo! GME is going well atm, no reason to update again.

As you say, it may be an idea to ask Sal002 to remove it from coinchoose until the network has time to find it's feet.

Neither removing from coinchoose nor baning multipools is neccessarry.

Moreover this would be bad for the popularity of the coin and therefore I wouldnt do this.