BitcoinTalk++ script - v0.2.96

[Mitchell]

Here is the Dutch list. I will let you know when I change something on that list:

Donations can be made to the donation address in my signature.

Thanks a lot
There's not enough money on the BT++ address to donate to translators
I'll put them in the donation page though

Thanks dude, but you don't have to if you don't want to. A donation address is just as it is, a donation address. I don't expect you to donate something, nor do I expect it from anyone else. Just wanted to add that sentence in case someone wishes to donate.

I think this is an error. Why have it twice?

I really think theymos modified the html because I definitely never saw such a thing (though I do now)
I'll repair this soon

I never got it before, so I really don't know how it happened. Just wanted to let you know.

[jackjack]

Here is the Dutch list. I will let you know when I change something on that list:

Donations can be made to the donation address in my signature.

Thanks a lot
There's not enough money on the BT++ address to donate to translators
I'll put them in the donation page though

Thanks dude, but you don't have to if you don't want to. A donation address is just as it is, a donation address. I don't expect you to donate something, nor do I expect it from anyone else. Just wanted to add that sentence in case someone wishes to donate.

I think this is an error. Why have it twice?

I really think theymos modified the html because I definitely never saw such a thing (though I do now)
I'll repair this soon

I never got it before, so I really don't know how it happened. Just wanted to let you know.

I know but it was planned, that's the least I can do! It would be rather unfair to put translations but not their authors.

As for the bug I know what happened: the trigger for "Put the smileys block" is the text "you can use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post" (ie the small text next to the Quick Reply form)
And as I wrote this exact text in one of my post to tell you I want it translated, the script sees it in the Preview page whereas it doesn't in "normal" thread
Well, I'm not sure I'm clear but the bottom line is that I'll solve that

[Mitchell]

Thanks dude, but you don't have to if you don't want to. A donation address is just as it is, a donation address. I don't expect you to donate something, nor do I expect it from anyone else. Just wanted to add that sentence in case someone wishes to donate.

I really think theymos modified the html because I definitely never saw such a thing (though I do now)
I'll repair this soon

I never got it before, so I really don't know how it happened. Just wanted to let you know.

I know but it was planned, that's the least I can do! It would be rather unfair to put translations but not their authors.

As for the bug I know what happened: the trigger for "Put the smileys block" is the text "you can use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post" (ie the small text next to the Quick Reply form)
And as I wrote this exact text in one of my post to tell you I want it translated, the script sees it in the Preview page whereas it doesn't in "normal" thread
Well, I'm not sure I'm clear but the bottom line is that I'll solve that

Well, non-the-less it's very kind of you.
And oh god, that is one very funny bug xD

[jackjack]

Funny and solved now!
I think some similar bugs are still there though but well we'll see that later

By the way, about the "go to last page" link, I meant "go to last read post"...

[Mitchell]

Funny and solved now!
I think some similar bugs are still there though but well we'll see that later

Yeah. Already thought so because I saw the "*". If I see anything else I will let you know.

I do have an idea by the way, I don't know if it's possible but whatever.
How about creating an option to set a signature for PM's. I haven't found the option on BitCoinTalk (I could be blind) and I think some people (like me) would have great advantage of it. I don't like that I need to sign my PM's constantly.
You could check if someone pressed the "Send Message" button and just append it to the body of the text.
An on/off option for this would be useful too

[jackjack]

I just made the thread links pointing to the last read post by default because I read several times this behavior was wanted. If you don't want it you can still change the corresponding setting.

I do have an idea by the way, I don't know if it's possible but whatever.
How about creating an option to set a signature for PM's. I haven't found the option on BitCoinTalk (I could be blind) and I think some people (like me) would have great advantage of it. I don't like that I need to sign my PM's constantly.
You could check if someone pressed the "Send Message" button and just append it to the body of the text.
An on/off option for this would be useful too

I'll see what I can do. Though I'm sure that I don't want to mess with data once people hit Send!
I can add something like what is currently done for posts: "Text automatically added in your posts (default=)"

[Mitchell]

I just made the thread links pointing to the last read post by default because I read several times this behavior was wanted. If you don't want it you can still change the corresponding setting.

I do have an idea by the way, I don't know if it's possible but whatever.
How about creating an option to set a signature for PM's. I haven't found the option on BitCoinTalk (I could be blind) and I think some people (like me) would have great advantage of it. I don't like that I need to sign my PM's constantly.
You could check if someone pressed the "Send Message" button and just append it to the body of the text.
An on/off option for this would be useful too

I'll see what I can do. Though I'm sure that I don't want to mess with data once people hit Send!
I can add something like what is currently done for posts: "Text automatically added in your posts (default=)"

That would be a great alternative!

[jackjack]

I just made the thread links pointing to the last read post by default because I read several times this behavior was wanted. If you don't want it you can still change the corresponding setting.

I do have an idea by the way, I don't know if it's possible but whatever.
How about creating an option to set a signature for PM's. I haven't found the option on BitCoinTalk (I could be blind) and I think some people (like me) would have great advantage of it. I don't like that I need to sign my PM's constantly.
You could check if someone pressed the "Send Message" button and just append it to the body of the text.
An on/off option for this would be useful too

I'll see what I can do. Though I'm sure that I don't want to mess with data once people hit Send!
I can add something like what is currently done for posts: "Text automatically added in your posts (default=)"

That would be a great alternative!

Done
+
The "current: " text in settings updates itself as soon as you validate the new value
+
The '*' below links to this thread (last read post)

[Mitchell]

I'll see what I can do. Though I'm sure that I don't want to mess with data once people hit Send!
I can add something like what is currently done for posts: "Text automatically added in your posts (default=)"

That would be a great alternative!

Done
+
The "current: " text in settings updates itself as soon as you validate the new value
+
The '*' below links to this thread (last read post)

That are some great updates! Now I just have to wait until auto-update kicks in.

[jackjack]

That are some great updates! Now I just have to wait until auto-update kicks in.

I'm glad this pleases you


Is it better to make the list of voters public or private?

[Mitchell]

That are some great updates! Now I just have to wait until auto-update kicks in.

I'm glad this pleases you


Is it better to make the list of voters public or private?

What do you mean with voters? If you mean the +1 or -1 thingy's, I am still for public.

[jackjack]

That are some great updates! Now I just have to wait until auto-update kicks in.

I'm glad this pleases you


Is it better to make the list of voters public or private?

What do you mean with voters? If you mean the +1 or -1 thingy's, I am still for public.

Nope, this vote is closed and those lists will stay hidden
I mean just publishing the name of the voters, like this:

Code:

jackjack
bitcoininformation
escrow.ms
etc...

Maybe we're not enough (20) to do this though

[Mitchell]

That are some great updates! Now I just have to wait until auto-update kicks in.

I'm glad this pleases you


Is it better to make the list of voters public or private?

What do you mean with voters? If you mean the +1 or -1 thingy's, I am still for public.

Nope, this vote is closed and those lists will stay hidden
I mean just publishing the name of the voters, like this:

Code:

jackjack
bitcoininformation
escrow.ms
etc...

Maybe we're not enough (20) to do this though

Well I don't care if my name gets published. I only give ratings when I think someone deserves it.

[HeroC]

That are some great updates! Now I just have to wait until auto-update kicks in.

I'm glad this pleases you


Is it better to make the list of voters public or private?

What do you mean with voters? If you mean the +1 or -1 thingy's, I am still for public.

Nope, this vote is closed and those lists will stay hidden
I mean just publishing the name of the voters, like this:

Code:

jackjack
bitcoininformation
escrow.ms
etc...

Maybe we're not enough (20) to do this though

Do it anyway. It is neat to see.  No objections.

[Evolyn]

at the moment its easy to assign hashs (i didn't check to simply hash usernames because i guess they're salted) to users (at least i'm thinking this, just tried for two ^.^)

just check someones stats and habbits where someone gains activity/posts and compare what users appear in these threads :x guess when more users use this script, it becomes more difficult but still possible with enough effort and time.

i did not look into the source to check if there are other easy ways to pull the informations.

imho you can show usernames (if someone wants to know the user(s), he can with a bit of effort) or hide even the censored list.

[Mitchell]

When I get an error while sending an PM and go back to edit my PM or wait until I can send it, my message disappears. This happens most likely because you replace the text inside the field.
It might be a good idea to check if the field is empty and if not append it to the end / not add it at all.

[jackjack]

When I get an error while sending an PM and go back to edit my PM or wait until I can send it, my message disappears. This happens most likely because you replace the text inside the field.
It might be a good idea to check if the field is empty and if not append it to the end / not add it at all.

It's already only adding and not replacing
Could you describe how you manage to get this?

[Mitchell]

When I get an error while sending an PM and go back to edit my PM or wait until I can send it, my message disappears. This happens most likely because you replace the text inside the field.
It might be a good idea to check if the field is empty and if not append it to the end / not add it at all.

It's already only adding and not replacing
Could you describe how you manage to get this?

Wanted to send an PM to Boelens, pressed the send button, got an message that I recently posted something and have to wait, pressed the back button, I saw the original text for a fraction of an second and then it disappeared and the standard message appeard.

[HeroC]

know any good Firefox mobile script managers?

[jackjack]

When I get an error while sending an PM and go back to edit my PM or wait until I can send it, my message disappears. This happens most likely because you replace the text inside the field.
It might be a good idea to check if the field is empty and if not append it to the end / not add it at all.

It's already only adding and not replacing
Could you describe how you manage to get this?

Wanted to send an PM to Boelens, pressed the send button, got an message that I recently posted something and have to wait, pressed the back button, I saw the original text for a fraction of an second and then it disappeared and the standard message appeard.

The problem is that in that case it's your browser that put your old PM in the form, the server didn't send anything at all. So even if the script checks what the server sends it won't see anything.
There's nothing I can do... I can add an 'add signature' button instead of putting it automatically though.

know any good Firefox mobile script managers?

I thought it was impossible. I asked Google and it gives me that: http://code.etiviti.com/firefox/fennec-greasemonkey-script-compiler/
This create an xpi from a userscript
I created this test xpi: http://speedy.sh/6UsDn/btofm.xpi
It should print a hello popup on every bitcointalk page.
Please someone give it a try and tell me if it works
If so there's some hope to see BT++ on Firefox mobile