|
stas
|
 |
August 23, 2013, 06:42:35 PM |
|
thank you for asking:) though I am not a big expert.
I would say that for now, a pool would be an important thing. More people want to mine after it went to exchange and it's getting pretty hard to solo mine. So Memory Coin needs a pool to make easier mining, so more people will join us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FreeTrade (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1030
|
|
August 23, 2013, 06:50:07 PM |
|
Here's another report - this one shows what your vote ended up supporting - or how the preferences were distributed among the different elected candidates - http://21stcenturymoneytalk.org/index.php/topic,57.msg121.html |
Membercoin - Layer 1 Coin used for the member.cash decentralized social network. 10% Interest On All Balances. Browser and Solo Mining. 100% Distributed to Users and Developers.
|
|
|
FreeTrade (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1030
|
|
August 23, 2013, 06:52:12 PM |
|
thank you for asking:) though I am not a big expert.
I would say that for now, a pool would be an important thing. More people want to mine after it went to exchange and it's getting pretty hard to solo mine. So Memory Coin needs a pool to make easier mining, so more people will join us.
I agree with you and this is something I'm working on. Some of the existing pool operators are interested, but aren't ready to commit just yet - I think now that MC is on an exchange and the price and difficulty are rising, we'll get more motivated interest. |
Membercoin - Layer 1 Coin used for the member.cash decentralized social network. 10% Interest On All Balances. Browser and Solo Mining. 100% Distributed to Users and Developers.
|
|
|
|
auctioneeeeer
|
|
August 23, 2013, 07:18:34 PM |
|
Yes! Nice, small but steady steps in the right direction. |
|
|
|
|
ig0tik3d
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 23, 2013, 08:35:39 PM |
|
approximately how much time it takes to generate grant address?
|
|
|
|
|
|
stas
|
|
August 23, 2013, 09:15:39 PM |
|
few hours
|
|
|
|
ig0tik3d
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 23, 2013, 09:18:45 PM |
|
few hours
i generate about 2 hours with 12mkey/s ... still waiting )) |
|
|
|
|
samfisher
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
August 24, 2013, 02:16:59 AM |
|
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Downloaded the qt, added nodes, synced the blockchain, went into console and "setgenerate true -1" and on my i5-3570k at 4.4GHz I'm doing 16h/p/s and 12 hours later my wallet still shows 0. Is my test period too short, or did I miss a step and that 12 hours was wasted, or is 12 hours the usual variance in finding a block?
|
*Link Removed*
|
|
|
|
sixteendigits
|
|
August 24, 2013, 02:41:51 AM |
|
I sent a bunch of coins over to bter, came back hours later to find I was apparently not synced with the blockchain anymore, restarted qt and now my transaction of over 443 coins is sitting at 0 confirmations and they are gone from my wallet. What the hell happened to my coins?
|
|
|
|
|
|
sixteendigits
|
|
August 24, 2013, 03:09:06 AM |
|
I sent a bunch of coins over to bter, came back hours later to find I was apparently not synced with the blockchain anymore, restarted qt and now my transaction of over 443 coins is sitting at 0 confirmations and they are gone from my wallet. What the hell happened to my coins?
transactionID? Double click on transaction.....copy....paste here.... I've noticed that sometimes you need to wait for the first confirmation when sending. Status: 0/unconfirmed Date: 8/23/2013 02:24 To: MMBWC43KSr3L1HEhASimHsBdwBF1FS98qj Debit: -443.465899 MEG Net amount: -443.465899 MEG Transaction ID: b408b6fedc3ca911e269ac13e0c6e66da8733289370acf99b70995f16b65e955 Checked block explorer and nothing shows up |
|
|
|
|
jestronix
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
August 24, 2013, 03:43:19 AM |
|
So far very happy with MEG coin, I dont seem to be having all the problems people speak of, hanging wallets etc, only the crash if you mine before its synced, love to see that fixed, or already fixed ? Some good prices on early trade on Bter, early days yet, and with the 5% drop per week, fair to say in a few months price will increase substantially. Great work FairTrade , youve put a lot of work into it. With a simple wallet app you could have the voting down pat. Bring on the pools  Hopefully they release this at Cryptsy soon, bound to get some traction, hopefully Bter drop their 20 confirms, 10 or 5 is enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
B.T.Coin
|
|
August 24, 2013, 11:01:54 AM |
|
Thanks for your testing - very helpful to know when the errors are occurring. For now it sounds like grant blocks, and maybe when the computer mines a new block is when there are problems.
It seems that now the difficulty has gone up, I get less crashes/hangs. It does hang sometimes but not as much as before. Might be coincidence or maybe related. Hope this info helps ironing the bugs out. |
A fine is a tax you pay for something you did wrong.
A tax is a fine you pay for something you did right.
|
|
|
|
minerapia
|
|
August 24, 2013, 11:30:10 AM |
|
what blockheight is it now ? atm I see atleast 2 different invalid chains at heights 2479 and 2962. Looks a bit like a forked blockchain to me. Tho it could be some obsolete chains ghosting around while im at initial DL.
EDIT: from debug.log -> "receive version message: version 70001, blocks=4407" hmm....
|
donations -> btc: 1M6yf45NskQxWXknkMTzQ8o6wShQcSY4EC
ltc: LeTpCd6cQL26Q1vjc9kJrTjjFMrPhrpv6j
|
|
|
|
B.T.Coin
|
|
August 24, 2013, 12:02:30 PM |
|
what blockheight is it now ? atm I see atleast 2 different invalid chains at heights 2479 and 2962. Looks a bit like a forked blockchain to me. Tho it could be some obsolete chains ghosting around while im at initial DL.
EDIT: from debug.log -> "receive version message: version 70001, blocks=4407" hmm....
Your client probably just got stuck on block 2479 or 2962 while downloading the blockchain. Start the client without mining and wait for the entire blockchain to download before starting the mining process. you can see what block the real blockchain is at here: http://memorycoin.21stcenturymoneytalk.org/ |
A fine is a tax you pay for something you did wrong.
A tax is a fine you pay for something you did right.
|
|
|
|
ajet
|
|
August 24, 2013, 12:29:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
minerapia
|
|
August 24, 2013, 01:06:49 PM
Last edit: August 24, 2013, 01:41:20 PM by minerapia |
|
oh nvm, was thinking of setup a pool, thus I would have had to write miner for it also. At the current state of the coin I didnt see any point pushing this idea forward.
|
donations -> btc: 1M6yf45NskQxWXknkMTzQ8o6wShQcSY4EC
ltc: LeTpCd6cQL26Q1vjc9kJrTjjFMrPhrpv6j
|
|
|
|
spoid
|
|
August 24, 2013, 02:45:58 PM |
|
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Downloaded the qt, added nodes, synced the blockchain, went into console and "setgenerate true -1" and on my i5-3570k at 4.4GHz I'm doing 16h/p/s and 12 hours later my wallet still shows 0. Is my test period too short, or did I miss a step and that 12 hours was wasted, or is 12 hours the usual variance in finding a block?
Should average a block about 13.47 hours at 16 h/s at diff 0.0002217....Hang in there a few more hours. Also, make sure your current block matches the block count at http://memorycoin.21stcenturymoneytalk.orgcan you please provide the formula? |
|
|
|
gym520
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
August 24, 2013, 02:59:52 PM |
|
22:59:30

getmininginfo
22:59:30

{
"blocks" : 4446,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00032724,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
SlyWax
|
|
August 24, 2013, 03:47:05 PM |
|
FreeTrade, I have some question about the votes,
In the log you can see that some address are eliminated on round 2
Those address have a lots off votes (~10,000)
And on round 4 you see others address are eliminated, but they have a much lower number of votes (~1,000 or less)
How come the biggest get eliminated first ?
Is this a bug ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
SlyWax
|
|
August 24, 2013, 05:39:59 PM |
|
As a side question, is the voting pool a manual effort? I saw you got some grants (>150 block ago) and have not seen payments.
It's semi-automatic. I don't want to leave a daemon running for now, so I do it in batch. The thing is, since the coin are on the same address, I have to wait 1 confirmation between each transaction, so it's a pain in the ass... So yeah I won't send it as soon as it mature... |
|
|
|
|
|
