gargavaar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 09:13:54 AM |
|
Guys, why are you even contemplating investment? The tech does not work. In fact there is no tech. Read the whitepaper & the yellowpaper. Not a hint of a real technical implementation. It is all unrelated pictures of lasers and of old appliances with no relation to the text. Seriously it is enough to put "quantum-resistant" and "blockchain" together and you pull out your wallets? Wake up guys.
Back to you regarding the white- and yellow paper, have you actually read it? It is clearly stated that there is already a working quantum key generator that provides the necessary random numbers for key generation. They also provide numbers to back up their claims. If you've ever set foot inside a quantum optics lab you'd know they are just what the pictures show, a maze of lenses and prisms. This project shows great promise imo, the threat of quantum cracking is real and I can promise you that much that the governments are not going to share their quantum secure encryption with the people. This project is very much needed,
|
|
|
|
Etnoy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 09:56:45 AM |
|
Guys, why are you even contemplating investment? The tech does not work. In fact there is no tech. Read the whitepaper & the yellowpaper. Not a hint of a real technical implementation. It is all unrelated pictures of lasers and of old appliances with no relation to the text. Seriously it is enough to put "quantum-resistant" and "blockchain" together and you pull out your wallets? Wake up guys.
Back to you regarding the white- and yellow paper, have you actually read it? It is clearly stated that there is already a working quantum key generator that provides the necessary random numbers for key generation. They also provide numbers to back up their claims. If you've ever set foot inside a quantum optics lab you'd know they are just what the pictures show, a maze of lenses and prisms. This project shows great promise imo, the threat of quantum cracking is real and I can promise you that much that the governments are not going to share their quantum secure encryption with the people. This project is very much needed, I have read the paper, and it (badly) describes a quantum random number generator. I happen to have an almost exact same setup in my own lab (can show pics if you want), and it has nothing to do with protecting against quantum computers and Shor's algorithm. Check my twitter thread for more details: https://twitter.com/Jogenfors/status/956627886496272384
|
|
|
|
quantumcat (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 10:46:45 AM Last edit: January 26, 2018, 11:29:25 AM by quantumcat |
|
We at Quantum1Net would like to bring certain facts to the light regarding Jonathan Jogenfors's recent attack upon us. Jonathan is in the business of creating a product directly competing with ours, a "quantum bitcoin" ( https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.01383) making the motive behind his attacks dubious. In addition, Jonathan have not had any special access our work and is thus unable to make any statement about it's veracity. We have been in contact with Jonathan and offered him to review our work, an offer he refused, instead opting to attack us. Jonathan demanded access to our proprietary research without signing an NDA, and when refused this he attacked us on social media and has made unsourced claims defaming our product and reputation. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FhJ03Lnn.jpg&t=665&c=tkaXIufqoe8HIw) We would also like to point out that Jonathan registered an account on BitcoinTalk solely to attack our product, in addition, his reddit history pertains almost exclusively to cars. This “review” of our ICO is his first foray into that kind of work, which again plays into the fact that our product is in direct competition with his “quantum bitcoin” We will contact our legal advisors and LiU, we also advise Jonathan to do the same.
|
|
|
|
gargavaar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 11:30:08 AM |
|
Guys, why are you even contemplating investment? The tech does not work. In fact there is no tech. Read the whitepaper & the yellowpaper. Not a hint of a real technical implementation. It is all unrelated pictures of lasers and of old appliances with no relation to the text. Seriously it is enough to put "quantum-resistant" and "blockchain" together and you pull out your wallets? Wake up guys.
Back to you regarding the white- and yellow paper, have you actually read it? It is clearly stated that there is already a working quantum key generator that provides the necessary random numbers for key generation. They also provide numbers to back up their claims. If you've ever set foot inside a quantum optics lab you'd know they are just what the pictures show, a maze of lenses and prisms. This project shows great promise imo, the threat of quantum cracking is real and I can promise you that much that the governments are not going to share their quantum secure encryption with the people. This project is very much needed, I have read the paper, and it (badly) describes a quantum random number generator. I happen to have an almost exact same setup in my own lab (can show pics if you want), and it has nothing to do with protecting against quantum computers and Shor's algorithm. Check my twitter thread for more details: https://twitter.com/Jogenfors/status/956627886496272384You actually called me out on your twitter and made fun of me in a most childish way. Shouldn't an actual PhD have a bit more dignity and professionalism? Besides, Quantum1Net appears to have responded to you, your allegations that they refused to comment on your claims are false. How can you claim that their idea is fraudulent if you refuse to even look at their work?
|
|
|
|
Schopenhauer365
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 12:20:35 PM |
|
token unsold will be burn ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) , i always like that concept because make token price will rise and rises. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) there are times that the teams don't burn, they just give to their investors Now a days companies are following some rules, if coin left after the ICO, they are issuing in a dividends ways every month in order to encourage the investors. Some companies are using the burning model in order to control the dumps. both ways are goods, whatever they do it will be fine
|
|
|
|
Etnoy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 12:33:24 PM |
|
Guys, why are you even contemplating investment? The tech does not work. In fact there is no tech. Read the whitepaper & the yellowpaper. Not a hint of a real technical implementation. It is all unrelated pictures of lasers and of old appliances with no relation to the text. Seriously it is enough to put "quantum-resistant" and "blockchain" together and you pull out your wallets? Wake up guys.
Back to you regarding the white- and yellow paper, have you actually read it? It is clearly stated that there is already a working quantum key generator that provides the necessary random numbers for key generation. They also provide numbers to back up their claims. If you've ever set foot inside a quantum optics lab you'd know they are just what the pictures show, a maze of lenses and prisms. This project shows great promise imo, the threat of quantum cracking is real and I can promise you that much that the governments are not going to share their quantum secure encryption with the people. This project is very much needed, I have read the paper, and it (badly) describes a quantum random number generator. I happen to have an almost exact same setup in my own lab (can show pics if you want), and it has nothing to do with protecting against quantum computers and Shor's algorithm. Check my twitter thread for more details: https://twitter.com/Jogenfors/status/956627886496272384You actually called me out on your twitter and made fun of me in a most childish way. Shouldn't an actual PhD have a bit more dignity and professionalism? Besides, Quantum1Net appears to have responded to you, your allegations that they refused to comment on your claims are false. How can you claim that their idea is fraudulent if you refuse to even look at their work? Wrong. I have asked quantum1net several times about technical information. I have received none. I have not refused to look at it. I have refused to sign an NDA. There is an important difference.
|
|
|
|
rokieinvest
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 12:34:44 PM |
|
Guys, why are you even contemplating investment? The tech does not work. In fact there is no tech. Read the whitepaper & the yellowpaper. Not a hint of a real technical implementation. It is all unrelated pictures of lasers and of old appliances with no relation to the text. Seriously it is enough to put "quantum-resistant" and "blockchain" together and you pull out your wallets? Wake up guys.
Back to you regarding the white- and yellow paper, have you actually read it? It is clearly stated that there is already a working quantum key generator that provides the necessary random numbers for key generation. They also provide numbers to back up their claims. If you've ever set foot inside a quantum optics lab you'd know they are just what the pictures show, a maze of lenses and prisms. This project shows great promise imo, the threat of quantum cracking is real and I can promise you that much that the governments are not going to share their quantum secure encryption with the people. This project is very much needed, I have read the paper, and it (badly) describes a quantum random number generator. I happen to have an almost exact same setup in my own lab (can show pics if you want), and it has nothing to do with protecting against quantum computers and Shor's algorithm. Check my twitter thread for more details: https://twitter.com/Jogenfors/status/956627886496272384 do you read both, whitepaper and yellowpaper?
|
|
|
|
bucayboyne
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 12:44:31 PM |
|
Guys, why are you even contemplating investment? The tech does not work. In fact there is no tech. Read the whitepaper & the yellowpaper. Not a hint of a real technical implementation. It is all unrelated pictures of lasers and of old appliances with no relation to the text. Seriously it is enough to put "quantum-resistant" and "blockchain" together and you pull out your wallets? Wake up guys.
they are still working in the project, they didn't launched the presale already
|
|
|
|
Etnoy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 12:48:32 PM |
|
Guys, why are you even contemplating investment? The tech does not work. In fact there is no tech. Read the whitepaper & the yellowpaper. Not a hint of a real technical implementation. It is all unrelated pictures of lasers and of old appliances with no relation to the text. Seriously it is enough to put "quantum-resistant" and "blockchain" together and you pull out your wallets? Wake up guys.
Back to you regarding the white- and yellow paper, have you actually read it? It is clearly stated that there is already a working quantum key generator that provides the necessary random numbers for key generation. They also provide numbers to back up their claims. If you've ever set foot inside a quantum optics lab you'd know they are just what the pictures show, a maze of lenses and prisms. This project shows great promise imo, the threat of quantum cracking is real and I can promise you that much that the governments are not going to share their quantum secure encryption with the people. This project is very much needed, I have read the paper, and it (badly) describes a quantum random number generator. I happen to have an almost exact same setup in my own lab (can show pics if you want), and it has nothing to do with protecting against quantum computers and Shor's algorithm. Check my twitter thread for more details: https://twitter.com/Jogenfors/status/956627886496272384 do you read both, whitepaper and yellowpaper? Yes.
|
|
|
|
Joneskay
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 12:51:27 PM |
|
ICO will start 7 more days and Pre-Sale from January 26, it falls on this day then is there a reward if I succeed in persuading people to buy a quantum token
does the presale start today?
|
|
|
|
heinemannplus
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 12:58:06 PM |
|
Do we have to register for crowdsale?
i don't think so
|
|
|
|
heinemannplus
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 12:58:40 PM |
|
Do we have to register for crowdsale?
i don't think so they said you have to send an email to participate in the privete golden sale, but not for the public one
|
|
|
|
andriyana
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 06:13:00 PM |
|
hallo dev how are you, i am read in my official quantum1net tewitter account about @Jogenfors what's going on, is there a problem with the quantum1net team and who it is @ jogenfors what she to do will drop the quantum1net project this may have an impact on the ICO that will soon begin ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fga8J43S.png&t=665&c=A29jm8Y2-GE4PA)
|
|
|
|
Ali_G007
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 07:28:40 PM |
|
Can US participate in it?
Are you talking about Americans? Yes Americans
|
|
|
|
cryptomoneyresearcher
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 08:54:21 PM |
|
ICO will start 7 more days and Pre-Sale from January 26, it falls on this day then is there a reward if I succeed in persuading people to buy a quantum token
does the presale start today? I think it will start in February, not yet. You have to wait a little.
|
|
|
|
tokenwar
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 09:04:34 PM |
|
ICO will start 7 more days and Pre-Sale from January 26, it falls on this day then is there a reward if I succeed in persuading people to buy a quantum token
does the presale start today? I think it will start in February, not yet. You have to wait a little. In their site it's written that the ICO will start in 6 days from today. But I don't know if it's the private presale or public sale.
|
|
|
|
Tarepa
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 09:46:40 PM |
|
the team had worked before in quantum computers? have they got experience in the sector?
|
|
|
|
Etnoy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 26, 2018, 11:46:13 PM |
|
hallo dev how are you, i am read in my official quantum1net tewitter account about @Jogenfors what's going on, is there a problem with the quantum1net team and who it is @ jogenfors what she to do will drop the quantum1net project this may have an impact on the ICO that will soon begin https://i.imgur.com/ga8J43S.pngHey there. Yes, I have detailed a number of technical issues with the ICO. I advise anyone from investing. Quantum1net has declined to respond to the criticism and are threatening to sue anybody who complains. More info: https://twitter.com/Jogenfors/status/957027125801947138
|
|
|
|
StuFF981
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 153
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2018, 12:00:10 AM |
|
What are the other benefits of owning your token? Does it mean I become a shareholder in some sense? I'm not sure I did understand it right from the WhitePaper.
|
|
|
|
heinemannplus
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 27, 2018, 12:10:11 AM |
|
In their site it's written that the ICO will start in 6 days from today. But I don't know if it's the private presale or public sale.
I can't wait for this moment
|
|
|
|
|