|
|
|
|
|
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
JorgePasada
Member
 Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
 |
October 24, 2013, 06:23:20 PM |
|
I'd suggest putting "0.25% Fees!!!!!!1!one" in the title.
|
|
|
|
|
Wave
Member
Offline
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
|
|
October 25, 2013, 02:02:20 AM |
|
I've written up some sample cgminer configs and make some new dns round-robin pools for faster failover: http://hhtt.1209k.com/config.phpThis way cgminer can fail away from a failed node much faster than my health checks will pull it. FireDuck, I have many many more pools setup to ensure I am always mining so I do not think the load balance is an option for me. To ensure the best fail over should I set these two as my first two pools? stratum+tcp://set0.hhtt.1209k.com:3333 stratum+tcp://set1.hhtt.1209k.com:3333 Or should I set all of these? If so, in which order is preferred? us-central-1a.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node us-central-1b.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node us-central-2a.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node eu-west-1a.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node Or all 6? Again which order? stratum+tcp://set0.hhtt.1209k.com:3333 stratum+tcp://set1.hhtt.1209k.com:3333 us-central-1a.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node us-central-1b.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node us-central-2a.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node eu-west-1a.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node Thanks! -Wave |
|
|
|
|
|
fireduck
|
|
October 25, 2013, 02:52:51 AM |
|
I've written up some sample cgminer configs and make some new dns round-robin pools for faster failover: http://hhtt.1209k.com/config.phpThis way cgminer can fail away from a failed node much faster than my health checks will pull it. FireDuck, I have many many more pools setup to ensure I am always mining so I do not think the load balance is an option for me. To ensure the best fail over should I set these two as my first two pools? stratum+tcp://set0.hhtt.1209k.com:3333 stratum+tcp://set1.hhtt.1209k.com:3333 Or should I set all of these? If so, in which order is preferred? us-central-1a.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node us-central-1b.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node us-central-2a.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node eu-west-1a.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node Or all 6? Again which order? stratum+tcp://set0.hhtt.1209k.com:3333 stratum+tcp://set1.hhtt.1209k.com:3333 us-central-1a.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node us-central-1b.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node us-central-2a.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node eu-west-1a.hhtt.1209k.com - A single node Thanks! -Wave I recommend using just set0 and set1. The four nodes are in those sets and any new nodes I create will be as well. You don't want to use individual nodes, I might change them at any time. |
Bitrated user: fireduck.
|
|
|
Wave
Member
Offline
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
|
|
October 25, 2013, 02:57:50 AM |
|
Thanks Fireduck!
Come on miners, this is a great pool. If you have any questions on how to get setup let us know and we will do our best to help.
|
|
|
|
|
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
October 25, 2013, 08:12:22 AM |
|
4 blocks in two days, not bad  Anyway, fireduck, do you think you can increase block size? To increase the "lottery" reward for those that find a block. spiccioli |
|
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
|
October 25, 2013, 10:26:51 AM |
|
The block size is a deliberately limited resource. It's not up to Fireduck to change the Bitcoin blocksize.
|
|
|
|
|
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
October 25, 2013, 10:51:06 AM
Last edit: October 25, 2013, 11:05:36 AM by spiccioli |
|
The block size is a deliberately limited resource. It's not up to Fireduck to change the Bitcoin blocksize.
Redacted, in bitcoin.conf you can increase it up to 1 MB right now, I don't know how big it is right now, but from mined blocks I'd say it is at the default value of 250 KB. If fireduck has enough CPU power edit: and bandwidth at his disposal increasing it could give a nice return to miners here. spiccioli |
|
|
|
|
|
vulgartrendkill
|
|
October 25, 2013, 10:56:13 AM |
|
The block size is a deliberately limited resource. It's not up to Fireduck to change the Bitcoin blocksize.
Redacted, in bitcoin.conf you can increase it up to 1 MB right now, I don't know how big it is right now, but from mined blocks I'd say it is at the default value of 250 KB. If fireduck has enough CPU power at his disposal increasing it could give a nice return to miners here. spiccioli Is that really possible??? |
|
|
|
|
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
October 25, 2013, 11:02:13 AM |
|
The block size is a deliberately limited resource. It's not up to Fireduck to change the Bitcoin blocksize.
Redacted, in bitcoin.conf you can increase it up to 1 MB right now, I don't know how big it is right now, but from mined blocks I'd say it is at the default value of 250 KB. If fireduck has enough CPU power at his disposal increasing it could give a nice return to miners here. spiccioli Is that really possible??? Sure, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Running_Bitcoin#Command-line_arguments-blockmaxsize spiccioli |
|
|
|
|
|
fireduck
|
|
October 25, 2013, 02:29:16 PM |
|
The block size is a deliberately limited resource. It's not up to Fireduck to change the Bitcoin blocksize.
Redacted, in bitcoin.conf you can increase it up to 1 MB right now, I don't know how big it is right now, but from mined blocks I'd say it is at the default value of 250 KB. If fireduck has enough CPU power at his disposal increasing it could give a nice return to miners here. spiccioli Is that really possible??? Sure, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Running_Bitcoin#Command-line_arguments-blockmaxsize spiccioli We have been running with 750k limit since around March. |
Bitrated user: fireduck.
|
|
|
|
vulgartrendkill
|
|
October 25, 2013, 05:10:27 PM |
|
just added my 80gh technobit bitfury miners |
|
|
|
|
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
October 25, 2013, 07:49:58 PM |
|
We have been running with 750k limit since around March.
Hi fireduck, I've just controlled all listed found blocks, this is the biggest one at 270KB, a lot of them are at 25-100 KB. Am I missing something? spiccioli |
|
|
|
|
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
October 25, 2013, 07:52:05 PM |
|
just added my 80gh technobit bitfury miners Nice! Welcome onboard! spiccioli |
|
|
|
|
|
vulgartrendkill
|
|
October 25, 2013, 07:59:30 PM |
|
just added my 80gh technobit bitfury miners Nice! Welcome onboard! spiccioli Thats along with my 2 x blades and 10 erupters. Theoretical max of 103 gh Thanks I`m glad to be a part of a great pool |
|
|
|
|
Wave
Member
Offline
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
|
|
October 26, 2013, 01:12:14 AM |
|
Sig updated, thanks spiccioli!
-Wave
|
|
|
|
|
JorgePasada
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
October 27, 2013, 12:30:17 AM |
|
Sig updated, thanks spiccioli!
-Wave
Like the signature. I feel like most people assume all pool fees are 'about the same' |
|
|
|
|
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
|
|
October 27, 2013, 09:22:47 AM |
|
Sig updated, thanks spiccioli!
-Wave
Nice Just FYI I'd remove a few trailing spaces, on my ipad mini it gets wrapped on a new line near the end. spiccioli |
|
|
|
|
|
vulgartrendkill
|
|
October 27, 2013, 10:02:24 AM |
|
Could some one maybe make me a code for my sig? as Waves is? I`ve tried for ages to get something to work...
|
|
|
|
|
Wave
Member
Offline
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
|
|
October 27, 2013, 12:43:03 PM |
|
Here is mine. You can change colors if you like: [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=269042.0][size=24px][color=#FFFFFF][glow=#1620E1,2,300] I'm mining with less than 0.30% fee on HHTT, Join us! [/glow][/color][/size][/url] |
|
|
|
|
|
