Support the discouraging of address re-use.
The exchange rate value of everyone's Bitcoins depends on killing the lists. Including you, me, spiccioli, and everyone mining, pooled, decentrally or solo.
spiccioli, please consider using the address re-use de-prioritising mining node. This will be a step along the way to preventing the public blockchain record from being used against us to devalue our Bitcoins.
Everyone at HHTT should familiarise themselves with the forthcoming HD wallets feature, keychains. You can create as many keychains as you wish, just like single addresses. This will let you lock reward payments to a sequence of crytographically determined keychain addresses instead of one address. It is a superior alternative to locking to a static address, you can gain more privacy with the same level of security.
HD wallets will likely be available in the 0.9 Bitcoin client.
Support the discouraging of address re-use.
So whatever this thread spam is aside, I've been thinking about that.
For example, if someone wanted to give me an electrum master public key, I could send payments for them to unused addresses on that chain. I'd be glad to support any other deterministic schemes I could find software for.
Example (not implemented, stated as an example):
A person mines with a username of an electrum master public key. In the suckers list and status pages HHTT would show something like HMAC(mpk, 'hhtt').substring(0, 20). That way, no one would be able to see the who mpk. Then when doing a payment, I would find an unused address on that mpk chain and send the payment to that. I would also stop posting transaction IDs to make it harder to figure out who each miner was in the payment transactions. Still possible, but hard after the fact. The transactions would of course still be visible, but not how much each miner was paid and which miner is which.
