Hash-Kings Profit Switching / Custom Coin Miner 1.15.3.0

[xlom]

Hmm, windows defender mentions that it quarantined this

\zpoolminer2\bin\ccminer_polytimos\ccminer

when it popped up originally I told defender to restore it and it's running that miner now. Perhaps the initial estimates were just over inflated and leveled out.

[cryptominer420]

Yea not sure why it flags polytimos miner and not any of the others but I can state that it is a false positive.

[jaggard]

I just grabbed 1.9, and am attempting to benchmark now, but it seems it's only using one of the 2 1606 3GB in this rig in the benches. Is this normal/expected behavior?

Edit: I also switched off hide miners in the setup, yet it is doing so, I'd much rather be able to see their output rather than having to read logs to help troubleshoot as I go.

[cryptominer420]

When benchmarking it will benchmark each card individually and automatically hides the mining window. Once benchmarking is finished and normal mining starts it will show the mining window.

If only one card is showing up direct message me on twitter (@MyCryptoCoinz)or discord and i would be glad to take a look over teamviewer.

[mineronfire]

Oh nice.  I just got two ti's with the same thought on resale potential.  The prices right now are crazy!  I was lucky to find a couple in stock for normal-ish prices, but it took a lot of looking...I think the price jumps/news in December will bring in a bunch of new hobby miners.  

I'll keep an eye on my setup and see if anything else happens.  I haven't had a change over to the dev address since the first one.    If you can't find anything, I can try out your 5 minute dev version (if you want)  and see if I can recreate anything.    

To what coin are you exchanging your profits? I'm using his miner since yesterday with 2x 1060 6GB and I'm pretty satisfied with the results it gives me. I used nicehash/awesome miner which gave me way less than zPool Miner does. Actually it's mining with phi, the only problem I had yesterday that it switched to nist5 and didnt gave any UI information and didn't mind, so I excluded nist5 and since them its working pretty fine, with an estimated value of $10.18 a day. I can't wait till he adds neoscrypt and maybe we will be able to get even more profit out of it.

At the moment I'm keeping them in BTC and exchange myself at a later date.  I also had the change to nist5 for a bit yesterday but it worked properly for me.  I've had it stay on 0 hashes for a minute or two but I believe that is due to either the API being worked on momentarily or the miner waiting for data from zpool.   

[mineronfire]

Preliminary neoscrypt testing on a single 1080 shows

CCminer Trpuvot 2.2.3 = 1.010 MH/s or 0.0039333 BTC/day
New Palgin HSR Neoscrypt = 1.065 MH/s or 0.00041457 BTC/day

Were the most profitable is PHI doing 23.83 MH/s or 0.00067773 BTC/day


So I have added Nvidia neoscrypt for the next release but it is not the most profitable to mine.

Still to do before the next release.
V2 of my error correcting, caching API - Working on this now - Possible downtime when the new api is pushed live but should only be 4 Min or less
Add more algo's and miners for AMD miners

Hope things are going well today!  I have had good success with the KlausT ccminer for neoscrypt as well.  I think neoscrypt in general hits a sweet spot for the 1070 mining power as my 1080 ti is only ~ 27% faster on that algorithm at ~50% more power.  Supposedly it has something to do with the GDDR5 (1060 and 1070's) vs GDDR5X (1080 and 1080 ti) memory latency, GDDR5 being more responsive.  All that being said, I guess profitability still just depends on current market prices. 

[mineronfire]

I just grabbed 1.9, and am attempting to benchmark now, but it seems it's only using one of the 2 1606 3GB in this rig in the benches. Is this normal/expected behavior?

Edit: I also switched off hide miners in the setup, yet it is doing so, I'd much rather be able to see their output rather than having to read logs to help troubleshoot as I go.

I think perhaps it benchmarks one card at a time?  So you have to wait on the first before the second starts?  I ran into the same thing and ended up just benchmarking them separately using the check boxes.   

[HanopkaH]

Okay i have a question. Since Zpool site from time to time is not showing for me and its reporting different hash rates then your miner which one is the correct ? Your miner or the site ? And if its your miner should i be worried that the zpool dont show the correct ones or just the site bugs fom time to time for me and they are synced ?

[cryptominer420]

Okay i have a question. Since Zpool site from time to time is not showing for me and its reporting different hash rates then your miner which one is the correct ? Your miner or the site ? And if its your miner should i be worried that the zpool dont show the correct ones or just the site bugs fom time to time for me and they are synced ?

This is not a simple answer.
OK so the speed reported by zpoolminer and the speed reported on zpool site are both right.

In zpoolminer it is estimating your speed using a 100% luck factor
   Meaning if everything is perfect you should expect this speed.
      This would mean
      a 0ms ping to the stratum server
      you have no stale shares
      you have no rejected shares

What the zpool site is showing you is actual speeds calculated over 5 Min which can fluctuate a lot but generally even out to 85-95% of what zpoolminer reports.

[ViridianHawk]

Looking forward to NeoScript. That's by far the most profitable for my system (oc'd 1060) on both NiceHash and AwesomeMiner.

[cryptominer420]

Looking forward to NeoScript. That's by far the most profitable for my system (oc'd 1060) on both NiceHash and AwesomeMiner.

Your most profitable on a 1060 should be either skein or Phi maybe Nist5
Neoscrypt is only leading for AMD cards for the last several days

But Neoscrypt will be in the 1.9.0.1 release with both ccminer and a beta addition of the Palgin hsr neoscrypt miner.

1.9.0.1 will also include a major improvement to available AMD algos to mine.

[xlom]

Phi seems to have dropped hard on btc/day since this weekend. nist5 is just eeking it out on my 980ti/1080ti combo. A shame, over the weekend it was hitting 0.0015-0.0016. Now it's barely hanging on to 0.0011

[cryptominer420]

Yea, crypto is dropping hard right now but just push through cause now is the time to hold.

[xlom]

Oh definitely. It isn't deterring me at all. I was hoping with btc dropping, it might mean we'd get a better exchange, but since everything is dropping that isn't happening.

That tencent info from last night will hopefully help things out again in the long run.

BTW, is it a good idea to re-bench from time to time or does it do that automatically while it's running?

[cryptominer420]

I re-bench once a month.

Also Development update .... Give it a min to load the Image.



Update 2: I broke something in prospector fixing that and looking for more algo's I can add.

[cryptominer420]

Tester release. Please only download if you wish to provide feedback and find bugs.

This version adds the following to AMD cards
Bitcore
HSR
Phi
Skein
Tribus
Xevan
Blake2s
Veltor

https://www.dropbox.com/s/qz8ufkvzl0vpcem/Dev-1.9.0.1%20Tester%20Release.zip?dl=0

[bobguy22]

Will this miner ever support segwit ltc addresses?

[cryptominer420]

Will this miner ever support segwit ltc addresses?

That would be up-to the pool owner I just made software to work with zPool.ca and it currently supports everything they support.

[bobguy22]

I'm pretty sure zpool accepts ltc segwit addresses but I'm not too sure thanks for the reply though! 

[begnme]

Great job with the miner guys. I have been looking for something to replace nicehash and I just found it!