Bitcoin Forum
May 23, 2024, 08:44:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BitFunder] IceDrill.ASIC IPO (235 Thash Mining Operation powered by HashFast)  (Read 378373 times)
DiamondCardz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 1112



View Profile WWW
May 18, 2014, 02:24:25 PM
 #1801

Stop messing your investors about and pay them their dividends. I've been watching this thread for quite a while and I'm so glad that I ended up not holding onto my ~1 BTC of IPO shares and sold them for a tiny loss.

BA Computer Science, University of Oxford
Dissertation was about threat modelling on distributed ledgers.
Kushedout
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1123
Merit: 1000


SaluS - (SLS)


View Profile
May 18, 2014, 05:28:32 PM
 #1802

Stop messing your investors about and pay them their dividends.

I really don't understand why this has not been done yet.

1. You have the confirmed list of addresses.
2. You have the BTC
3. You have the technical know how and ability.

Just push it through. 


If the next update post by you guys is not "Divs have been paid out", I am calling this whole thing an elaborate scam.

Please prove me wrong.

molecular
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019



View Profile
May 19, 2014, 06:22:41 AM
 #1803

Stop messing your investors about and pay them their dividends.

I really don't understand why this has not been done yet.

1. You have the confirmed list of addresses.
2. You have the BTC
3. You have the technical know how and ability.

Just push it through. 


I can only +1 this. I'm not filling out that insance cryptomex kyc form.

I was planning to trade the shares, but I can live without.

I don't understand why you don't pay dividends. The argument that some people might not be in control of the private keys can be solved by requiring them to sign some "yes, please pay dividends to the address used to sign this" message on the icedrill.io site, which you created - if I recall correctly - to be able to pay dividends.

PGP key molecular F9B70769 fingerprint 9CDD C0D3 20F8 279F 6BE0  3F39 FC49 2362 F9B7 0769
SimonBelmond
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 19, 2014, 07:00:28 AM
 #1804

Stop messing your investors about and pay them their dividends.

I really don't understand why this has not been done yet.

1. You have the confirmed list of addresses.
2. You have the BTC
3. You have the technical know how and ability.

Just push it through. 


I can only +1 this. I'm not filling out that insance cryptomex kyc form.

I was planning to trade the shares, but I can live without.

I don't understand why you don't pay dividends. The argument that some people might not be in control of the private keys can be solved by requiring them to sign some "yes, please pay dividends to the address used to sign this" message on the icedrill.io site, which you created - if I recall correctly - to be able to pay dividends.


We all already had to sign a message for siging up with this google site. And there it was mentioned already several times that you must be and stay in control of this address. And again, a message had to be signed. So there is no reason to not pay to those who signed up there.

@will: How will the differenciation between private and public investors be guaranteed on cryptomex.io? They are our insurance after all.
therustytrombone
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 129
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 19, 2014, 10:48:52 AM
 #1805

Change the title to Assdrill because we are all getting fucked in the ass with no lube here.
Hoofprint
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 428
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 19, 2014, 09:27:52 PM
 #1806

I prefer Licedrill as flashman said fkn parasites

Well unless we see some action, Licedrill would be good enough, denoting the kind of useless bloodsucking parasites the bitcoin community needs less of.

Start leaving negative trust for will and terra.
Soon as we drag their name's into the mud less chance they can scam more people in future.

I wonder if we could do a chapter 7 like they did for Scamfast.
See if we can get terra and will replaced since they obviously have no idea on what they are doing

pedrog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031



View Profile
May 20, 2014, 03:19:50 PM
 #1807

A new block at our solo mining address https://blockchain.info/pt/address/12ej4RUwoszmQoKYyFg6Ej27L82xhFS5Ao

Are we seriously solo mining?!

zebroid
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74
Merit: 10



View Profile WWW
May 20, 2014, 08:34:16 PM
 #1808

Hi Will

IF account activated and shares showing in cryptomex.io - How long before our
submitted KYC docs approved?

We can't do much on the site with KYC not verified status....

Will we receive some type of notice once verified or some status flag
showing in profile?
raskul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 20, 2014, 08:35:35 PM
 #1809

Hi Will

IF account activated and shares showing in cryptomex.io - How long before our
submitted KYC docs approved?

We can't do much on the site with KYC not verified status....

Will we receive some type of notice once verified or some status flag
showing in profile?

why is this increasingly looking like MTGOX fiasco??

tips    1APp826DqjJBdsAeqpEstx6Q8hD4urac8a
dunchy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 299
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 20, 2014, 10:46:58 PM
 #1810

Hi Will

IF account activated and shares showing in cryptomex.io - How long before our
submitted KYC docs approved?

We can't do much on the site with KYC not verified status....

Will we receive some type of notice once verified or some status flag
showing in profile?

why is this increasingly looking like MTGOX fiasco??

It's not mtgox, it's cognitive con copycat.
🏰 TradeFortress 🏰
Bitcoin Veteran
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043

👻


View Profile
May 20, 2014, 11:21:49 PM
 #1811

What a surprise, another mining security ending in a disaster. There has been what, 1-2 profitable mining security out of 20? People are so gullible.
will
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 21, 2014, 01:12:25 AM
 #1812

Hi All

Update from my side:

I spent the better part of last week @ the bitcoin2014 conference in Amsterdam where I met with Simon Barber, as well as other affected parties personally. The result of those conversations will become clear in the coming days. Apologies if the message is cryptic, the future outcome of our efforts there is as of yet uncertain, but we seem to be making progress.

Other points to address:

1. Rewards payments (previously known as dividends) based on PU assignments on CryptoMex should begin late this week, if not early next week. Please understand that you don't have to submit KYC information to be eligible for reward payouts.

2. Pool development work on ckpool neared a point of being able to invite a select few (larger) members to join it. We pushed 33Th of ID hashpower to it this morning @ 3am to try to work out any kinks with a possible block solution. A block was solved 15h later, thanks pedrog for highlighting it. This is slightly more than an order of magnitude luckier than expected for that amount of hash-rate. See Coinbase sig: ckpoolIce111 @
https://blockchain.info/tx/721478dc268dbcbd6f9dc772d0fd7cefe7137dda3b872326943b42be7d43b574. Probably better to target a separate wallet for that testing as the previous one was labelled for solo mining. Apologies for the confusion.
pedrog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031



View Profile
May 21, 2014, 02:44:31 AM
 #1813

Thanks for the update and clarification, looking forward for new developments.

ADgordo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 203
Merit: 10

The World’s First Blockchain Core


View Profile
May 21, 2014, 06:07:51 AM
 #1814

so am i correct in assuming i cannot see my shares on cryptomex because i have not signed that insanely large form that i have to give to some chineese company so that they can give to their goverment?

No, you're incorrect. Unverified accounts (form not submitted) can see their PU amounts.

I've made an account.  Token missing. 

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄ ■        SKYNET        ■ ▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▐▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬     PRIVATE SALE is LIVE     ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▌
Whitepaper   Bounty   Bitcointalk  ■  Facebook   Twitter   Telegram
babybonobo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 278
Merit: 250


#hardworkpaysoff


View Profile
May 21, 2014, 05:03:20 PM
 #1815

Any idea when the next batch of accounts will be opened and added?  I sent in my form a few days to a week ago.  Thank you!
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 21, 2014, 05:16:24 PM
 #1816

The result of those conversations will become clear in the coming days. Apologies if the message is cryptic, the future outcome of our efforts there is as of yet uncertain, but we seem to be making progress.
Are you going to buy from HF's garage sale? Or invest into them to save your debtor? I don't see many other possibilities.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 04:47:20 PM
 #1817

http://texasbiodefense.com/vanrooyen.pdf

Barber proposed to move assets out of the US (while under a bankruptcy petition) and Will screwed him.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
IPO Magic
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 138
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 22, 2014, 05:18:14 PM
 #1818

The result of those conversations will become clear in the coming days. Apologies if the message is cryptic, the future outcome of our efforts there is as of yet uncertain, but we seem to be making progress.
Are you going to buy from HF's garage sale? Or invest into them to save your debtor? I don't see many other possibilities.

I guess http://texasbiodefense.com/vanrooyen.pdf is a "nope."
will
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 09:20:56 PM
 #1819

The result of those conversations will become clear in the coming days. Apologies if the message is cryptic, the future outcome of our efforts there is as of yet uncertain, but we seem to be making progress.
Are you going to buy from HF's garage sale? Or invest into them to save your debtor? I don't see many other possibilities.

I guess http://texasbiodefense.com/vanrooyen.pdf is a "nope."

Added investment under a Hashfast+DigiMex joint-venture was proposed by HF, considered and denied. The second option (of a liquidation-sale supporting such a JV) was offered, and denied, even though the fully-deployed $/Gh price came down to as low as $0.78/Gh.

I took it upon myself to create a third possibility: that of banding together the creditors to form an entity under which these remaining assets may possibly be leveraged to make everyone whole. Appointing a trustee to oversee the unwinding of the Hashfast entity (the hearing tomorrow) should give vision into what assets are available to such an entity, if it should ever come into existence. This is a work in progress, but thus far everyone I have spoken to seem to think this is the most prudent way forward.
pedrog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031



View Profile
May 22, 2014, 09:34:21 PM
Last edit: May 23, 2014, 12:56:20 PM by pedrog
 #1820

Added investment under a Hashfast+DigiMex joint-venture was proposed by HF, considered and denied. The second option (of a liquidation-sale supporting such a JV) was offered, and denied, even though the fully-deployed $/Gh price came down to as low as $0.78/Gh.

I took it upon myself to create a third possibility: that of banding together the creditors to form an entity under which these remaining assets may possibly be leveraged to make everyone whole. Appointing a trustee to oversee the unwinding of the Hashfast entity (the hearing tomorrow) should give vision into what assets are available to such an entity, if it should ever come into existence. This is a work in progress, but thus far everyone I have spoken to seem to think this is the most prudent way forward.

Let us know how it went.

Pages: « 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!