Never invest no product ICOs

[Semen89]

I think that not all ICOs are so bad and in some of them you can invest money, but you need to carefully select a project and everything to check out, his team and other aspects.

[adolf512]

Of course, a project with a work product is a certain guarantee for your investments, but there are ICO projects in the market without a work product that can bring you profit, even in the short term. Everything depends on the specific project.

[laskybok]

If there is any ICO that does not have a product and i succeeds, the success does not usually last. Most times, those projects do not last more than  a year and the maximum we can have is 2 years. I have also noticed that most of them only survive for that short period based on hype. So, investing in a project with good product is the best.

[buhna]

It is good advice for a newbie, but if you have good experience and free money - you can have good profit with ICO. Like with Quarkchain - tokens made XXX. So it depend on situation.

[Humpert]

This is a good analysis. Before the ICO created the prototype, the company launched and discovered the investment, which meant it was really effective and experienced, knew the weaknesses of the project and would overcome them. ICO without a product is like a scam and it will not gain people's trust.

[Ravenangel]

To some extent, you do have a point, its safer to invest in ready made products as you are shielded from the uncertainties of the ICO success, and most of the times the ready made products have a proven record, But a gain  not all ICOs will fail, some of the ready made products you talk about were at an early development stage at some point and some had an ICO stage and they proved successful. It all comes to the amount of risk you are wiling to take, remember, high risks yields high rewards

[RajaCripto]

There are some ICOs that do not have real products, for example ICO bank, the ICO has no physical and real product, but until now the ICO is practically successful and good

[Mendy487]

I agree, I only invest into ICOs that have some sort of a working model as I can see what is going on. I would advise others to do this as well. Working product icos are the best to invest into

[fosco333]

Investing an ICO without a working product is like putting your money on something that uncertain.
MVP is required as a guarantee for investors that the ICO is really have some working platform to use by peoples.

[Samum]

I think that the availability of a product can not be considered a single indicator. Here, nevertheless, we need to consider the complex. A team of developers, agreements, and a minimum finished product including. It is clear that if there is a foundation and co -and is engaged in the development of what already exists. Then the chances of success are greater. But this is not always true. If the team is brilliant, they can and from nothing make candy. And we will add state support. As for example, a Gig Treks. I think the project will be in demand. Add more agreements on cooperation. We add intelligent investors with analysts. And this all can significantly outweigh the availability of the product.

[jpnl0006]

very good advice, there is every tendency that projects without products have little impact in the society and as such do not meet the needs of the majority of the cities in the world.  the products gives a sense of confidence to the investors.

[HoundRogerson]

Yes, investment is already in the finished products that went to the stock exchange is much safer. But everyone needs a big profit so we risk buying different tokens

[makerst]

You do everything right, you do not need to invest your money in projects that do not even have an alpha version, it's clear, but sometimes there are people who have a great reputation, so talking about the product does not matter.

[Nikolas_the_Wonderworker]

With a lot of current ico, we do not have time to study all the projects. Who have a real product attracts more investment. But in fact they are also not always successful.

[supernva]

I agree. Choose cryptocurrencies which are tied to a real sector. Today, you can see a large number of ICO projects. It became so popular and fashionable that ICO decided to go all out. There should be more projects which offer long-term investments. Because only financial pyramides can tell that you'll immediately become a millionaire after investing.  The best way to profit from ICO is to invest into ideas which are already turned into projects. 

[EricJones]

This is sound advice right here, some people are so keen on investing in icos that they are not even doing enough research to check if these icos have a valid product that they can offer which will be here for the long term. Without a product, then an ico is most likely to end up failing because people are not using the coin.

[thisau152]

I remember Electroneum branding themselves as the next Bitcoin. Started with $0.01 in their ICO last October 2017, launched around $0.10 in December 2017. They never had any working products, just pure paper. They only had a beta mobile miner in early January 2018.

[Sandra999]

In my opinion, The success of an ICO depends on the project structure the team of developers among other factors. just like not every ICO will succeed, not all will fail either, infarct some ICOs register high rates of success, it all depends on its focus, look keenly, compare and contrast and research well and you will know what works

[sirengutou]

Yes. I think now ICP. Technology is not important to the project itself. It is important that more people participate. Then the whale can eat small fish. The ICO market has changed. It was not the market of last year. So I do not recommend investing in ICO.

[Gabmot]

I think it's good to subscribe always to this, anytime anyone wanna invest in any ICO. This is because many of the project out now, seeks to just entice people with some fake promises, collect their money to finally run with it cos their ideas aren't such that can stand the test of time.