[CLOSED] batch #22/23 ASICMiner USB + Blade miners

[Swimmer63]

Swimmer63; 52.5; 5 Blades; 15Jy9oCQMMasvv2TdUFYQ7qqN8YZWWwiyw
TX f44987a98b59cdf03c464733dd250763b667acd5015ae2a50ddcf15dce08e71c

Email, Label, Signature sent.

Please verify.

[1713456539]

1713456539

[1713456539]

1713456539

[1713456539]

1713456539

[1713456539]

1713456539

[r7970]

r7970; 1; 10.5; 1C4VGs361gca9N8fxN8pb9bawRR59eqqB1

[CanaryInTheMine]

Canary,

Any word on the new blades which you mentioned may support usb?

from what I've heard, they should have a USB port on them too.
not over-clockable, a little bit smaller.  hashing wise, not any "better" (same chips, just repackaged differently I guess)

not released yet.

[CanaryInTheMine]

OK... I'm low on blades.  need to check inventory... I think I have 1 or two left.  any new orders for blades may not ship today...

[CanaryInTheMine]

Plenty of USB miners though!... 

[icecube]

Let me know when you get the new blades 

[Swimmer63]

Swimmer63; 7; 2.31; 15Jy9oCQMMasvv2TdUFYQ7qqN8YZWWwiyw
Tx; 12012078861ea9c76739cb4ccaff970e47887543f3d80373ed5fb198b39541b7


Swimmer63; 4; 1.32; 1MwW2ZxuBxR5MK2bzPRyxfwUMdhuWLAcRf
Tx; c83b3f1d592ed1c51b58be9f67eec8c15bad98a0f5ceba71945d21c06f962450

Emails, labels, signatures, PM's sent.

[CanaryInTheMine]

only 4 blades remain in today's inventory.

[MikeMike]

Canary,

Any word on the new blades which you mentioned may support usb?

from what I've heard, they should have a USB port on them too.
not over-clockable, a little bit smaller.  hashing wise, not any "better" (same chips, just repackaged differently I guess)

not released yet.

Are they more efficient to run?

[bitterdog]

One of 2 things are going to need to happen in the near future for BE sales to continue.

A) Another Price Cut ( No one will want to pay > $50 for a Block Erupter )
B) 25% Drop in the value of a Bitcoin

I would prefer B. Im sure most resellers of hardware also would.

[Plesk]

Canary,

Any word on the new blades which you mentioned may support usb?

from what I've heard, they should have a USB port on them too.
not over-clockable, a little bit smaller.  hashing wise, not any "better" (same chips, just repackaged differently I guess)

not released yet.

Are they more efficient to run?

I gather since Canary said they are the "same chips" that there is little that can be done to reduce power consumption. As far as I know the only way to reduce power consumption (in any meaningful way) would be to make newer chips will a smaller nm (nanometer) semiconductor process technology.

The current ASICMiner chips are 130nm which is 2000-2001 technology in terms of CPU architecture. There is a long way to go to catch up with Intel's current 22nm CPUs... But this explains why ASICMiner was one of the first to ship any meaningful amount of Bitcoin ASICs - because they used an older/cheaper semiconductor process.. the downside is these are by no means the most efficient ASICs possible. The upside is that as ASICMiner and others do come out with smaller nm ASICs, they will indeed tout improved efficiency.

References:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg1571278#msg1571278
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/130_nanometer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/22_nanometer

For now I guess we use what we got. The efficiency is still light years ahead of where GPUs are =)

[CanaryInTheMine]

USPS shipments have been dropped off. FedEx is next.

[mackstuart]

mackstuart; 1; 10.50; 1FqQ4epQphzB8b9tJZHgsPMxyZP5WtrVnu

9dead8e0b5f1b3f178de7e8154f84be3ca8f064b225fd17ca276ee721ee03679

[icecube]

Thanks mine shipped

[sbfree]

sbfree; 15; 4.95; 1Dg3PHHFLjbKfRVfzisjaKw3bp2eWiSvWS

[Swimmer63]

Swimmer63; 1 Blade; 10.5; 15Jy9oCQMMasvv2TdUFYQ7qqN8YZWWwiyw
Tx 2f9b2acec33ee4c6ec34b12a0b05754f019bd815f830a6d9c8783c050f727415

Email, label and signed message to follow.

[sbfree]

Canary, label has been emailed. Please let me know if all is well. Thanks.

[Spieder]

Spieder; 24; 7.92; 1EAxyEvAauJ9n8bA6QYg18fbzoHwnSJFCb
Transaction ID: c9b7432674d31291d577eb0253988560268e91ceaf8a2d9b58a1fdb97ef7eb59

Email Sent...

[Spieder]

Canary,

Any word on the new blades which you mentioned may support usb?

from what I've heard, they should have a USB port on them too.
not over-clockable, a little bit smaller.  hashing wise, not any "better" (same chips, just repackaged differently I guess)

not released yet.

Thanks for the update. I'm going to wait for the USB port option so I can run it off my Pi. Hope it doesn't take too long.

[CanaryInTheMine]

Canary,

Any word on the new blades which you mentioned may support usb?

from what I've heard, they should have a USB port on them too.
not over-clockable, a little bit smaller.  hashing wise, not any "better" (same chips, just repackaged differently I guess)

not released yet.

Thanks for the update. I'm going to wait for the USB port option so I can run it off my Pi. Hope it doesn't take too long.

No need to wait for that... Put a hub/switch and control the current blade from your pi with bfgminer
New blades won't be superior to current blades in terms of what they do.
But I do think USB interface will make it easier for less technically inclined/savvy