BenTuras
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 05:31:58 AM |
|
Interested in same size order as Bitburner XX boards. (I was in Zefir B1 and I have received the Bitburner XX's) I also like the DIY approach, build a tower of 8 boards, hook it up, fiddle with the software. It's fun! And the disco show of the Bitburners boards, I want that back on the Furyburner boards!
|
|
|
|
eraziel
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 05:35:51 AM |
|
Even 50Ghash/board would be amazing with an early October shipping date. I hope there's going to be enough interest ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4578
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 05:42:52 AM |
|
Yeah and hopefully a proper designed use of the chip ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) The USB interface crap (and lack of anything marginally representing a protocol) coming from some others, with the ButFury chips, is horrendous ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) ... looking forward to it! Can you get more than 2.5Gh/s per chip from USB interface? just curious. cheers, kev I'm not sure what you mean ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) There's no USB limitation like that ... Do you mean the BitFury chip itself? Yeah the GPIO joy of the designs so far are really bad, a clean MCU USB interface would have no trouble. As for talking to a single chip over USB ... well the BFLSC chips are 4GH/s+ ... so no issue there either ... even with 256 or more of them on a single computer on USB ...
|
|
|
|
Walking Glitch
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Amateur Professional
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 05:43:56 AM |
|
I would probably buy one or two. I'd also be willing to be a US distributor/reseller if you need one.
|
|
|
|
madmax_ger
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 06:01:07 AM |
|
The Bitfury design i am working on is a 16 Chip board with the same form factor as the BitBurner. I think it makes sense that i will sell boards including the chips now - no more group buys. ... Price: ~470eur+vat (Complete module including chips)
+1, love you burnin
|
|
|
|
rebelrat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 06:33:08 AM |
|
If the 70% discount applies, I would be interested in two units. There should be no VAT as I live in US.
|
|
|
|
eraziel
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 06:54:54 AM |
|
There is no 70% discount. There is 70% money back. Meaning that if you paid for 2 bit burners and you choose to get a refund you get 2*105*0.7 = 147eur discount on your "furyburner" order. Not 2*470*0.7=658 eur discount.
|
|
|
|
superduh
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 06:58:48 AM |
|
boards run separately or is there a master board for them? compatibility with the official m-board?
|
ok
|
|
|
Sophokles
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 07:22:53 AM |
|
interested.
|
|
|
|
Unacceptable
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 08:06:40 AM |
|
There is no 70% discount. There is 70% money back. Meaning that if you paid for 2 bit burners and you choose to get a refund you get 2*105*0.7 = 147eur discount on your "furyburner" order. Not 2*470*0.7=658 eur discount.
![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I misread & thought......what the hell is a "furryburner" ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
"If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day long, you are the asshole." -Raylan Givens Got GOXXED ?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KiqRpPiJAU&feature=youtu.be"An ASIC being late is perfectly normal, predictable, and legal..."Hashfast & BFL slogan ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
jlsminingcorp
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 08:19:30 AM |
|
Hi Burnin, we're definitely interested, thanks for working on this ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) . We've already got a relatively early chip order in with bitfurystrikesback (not huge numbers, but enough for us), would you consider assembling boards with our chips or are you definitely only selling complete board + chips packages this time? A quick technical question, why did you decide to go for a 16-chip design for this board rather than the 20-chip design of your bitburner? I'd have thought that the extra density would be an advantage if it's possible to host that many chips on a board.
|
|
|
|
baloo_kiev
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 08:37:15 AM |
|
Go to a bank, get a 2 month loan, buy and build 1000 chips/boards and the community will support you with 10% deposit orders. This is how business needs to be done, like a business.
This is not how business needs to be done, unless it is a bitcoin bank and bitcoin-nominated loan.
|
|
|
|
Bicknellski
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 08:51:09 AM |
|
Go to a bank, get a 2 month loan, buy and build 1000 chips/boards and the community will support you with 10% deposit orders. This is how business needs to be done, like a business.
Not every business needs to be done like that surely?
|
|
|
|
glungnahund
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 09:18:52 AM |
|
I´m interested in BitFury boards and I have BitBurners on order.
The order of manufacturing with the Bitburners was: 1) batch number 2) order number (to determine the order within a batch)
@burnin: There won´t be any batches with the BitFury boards. How do you determine the order?
I´d suggest that those who´ve already paid for Bitburners and switch over to BitFury boards keep their order numbers.
|
|
|
|
chirale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 09:27:36 AM |
|
Interested! Always with you burnin! Until the end!!
|
|
|
|
fex
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 09:29:09 AM |
|
I'm most definitely interested in Furyburner XVI board ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I´m interested in BitFury boards and I have BitBurners on order.
The order of manufacturing with the Bitburners was: 1) batch number 2) order number (to determine the order within a batch)
@burnin: There won´t be any batches with the BitFury boards. How do you determine the order?
I´d suggest that those who´ve already paid for Bitburners and switch over to BitFury boards keep their order numbers.
I think if you convert an existing order to a bitfury-order, it seems fair to keep the order number. However, the group buy or batch number of the avalon chips should not play a role since the avalon chips are never going to be used. So - I'm not sure if this is what you meant - I'd suggest to keep the order number only.
|
|
|
|
glungnahund
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 09:32:00 AM |
|
I´m interested in BitFury boards and I have BitBurners on order.
The order of manufacturing with the Bitburners was: 1) batch number 2) order number (to determine the order within a batch)
@burnin: There won´t be any batches with the BitFury boards. How do you determine the order?
I´d suggest that those who´ve already paid for Bitburners and switch over to BitFury boards keep their order numbers.
I think if you convert an existing order to a bitfury-order, it seems fair to keep the order number. However, the group buy or batch number of the avalon chips should not play a role since the avalon chips are never going to be used. So - I'm not sure if this is what you meant - I'd suggest to keep the order number only. Yes, that´s exactly what I meant.
|
|
|
|
chirale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 10:02:01 AM |
|
Out of necessity a new thread for a new product: I want to test the waters if you would be interested in such a board
The Bitfury design i am working on is a 16 Chip board with the same form factor as the BitBurner. I think it makes sense that i will sell boards including the chips now - no more group buys.
Best demonstrated performance per chip is currently 2.7Ghash resulting in 42ghash/s per board. I am aiming for 5 Ghash per chip, i will be doing things differently then the competition which will hopefully allow us to squeeze more performance out of this silicon. Host interface and Controller / stacking will stay the same.
Price: ~470eur+vat (Complete module including chips) Delivery: early October if Punin delivers on time.
~470 eur+ vat or equivalent in BTC? just trying to work out how many unit I can get with the BTC refund from Yifu... Tnx burnin.
|
|
|
|
BenTuras
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 10:02:49 AM |
|
He just likes the name I gave the coming boards ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
bitcoiner49er
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 30, 2013, 11:38:07 AM Last edit: August 30, 2013, 01:20:09 PM by bitcoiner49er |
|
How long do we have to decide to "convert" our Bitburner orders to Bitfurys/Furyburners?
|
Homo doctus is se semper divitias habet
|
|
|
|