I agree to you, I hate those participants who suddenly leave and join other campaigns just because of higher rewards. This is not only a bad habit but also shows disrespect to the campaign manager, their act only reflects that they didn't appreciate the trust they've got from the him/her.
Just a reminder for those "campaign jumpers" out there, always
think twice before joining. If you don't find contentment to the reward of a particular campaign then better for you to avoid applying and just wait for another one. (no offense at all
)
My question is, why do managers allow it? After all, if I was hypothetically a manager, I want to be able to rely on my participants. The participants also rely on their managers and demand loyalty. Should not the managers do something against it?
Your opinion?
I guess they think that it's not their loss already so they easily allow those kind of participants. Honestly, there's no rule stating that a participant don't have a right to leave a campaign if he wanted but at least they should learn to confront first the manager telling the reason behind it and show some gratitude.
I think what managers can do is to include them in their own SMAS blacklist for having a bad conduct during a campaign and refuse to accept them if ever they will apply again.