klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
 |
September 21, 2013, 03:13:15 PM Last edit: September 21, 2013, 08:04:26 PM by klondike_bar |
|
hey what pool(s) are people using for bitfury?
Slush's is my [previous] preference, and has a 30day luck >100% Bitminter has fewer fees + namecoin (this is about a 4% bonus, correct?), but the luck recently has been around 90%
my slush pool with bitfury is reporting only about 1000Mh per worker (3Ghash) why?
|
|
|
|
Eric in TX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 21, 2013, 09:40:15 PM |
|
Same problem here. My miner is running at 25 ghash, but Slush's stats show just 1.5 ghash. hey what pool(s) are people using for bitfury?
Slush's is my [previous] preference, and has a 30day luck >100% Bitminter has fewer fees + namecoin (this is about a 4% bonus, correct?), but the luck recently has been around 90%
my slush pool with bitfury is reporting only about 1000Mh per worker (3Ghash) why?
|
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
 |
September 21, 2013, 10:01:18 PM |
|
Same problem here. My miner is running at 25 ghash, but Slush's stats show just 1.5 ghash. hey what pool(s) are people using for bitfury?
Slush's is my [previous] preference, and has a 30day luck >100% Bitminter has fewer fees + namecoin (this is about a 4% bonus, correct?), but the luck recently has been around 90%
my slush pool with bitfury is reporting only about 1000Mh per worker (3Ghash) why?
i noticed that in the last 2 days at some point they changed the accounts page and removed the ability to set a difficulty. perhaps that is related?
|
|
|
|
Eric in TX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 21, 2013, 10:35:07 PM |
|
It definitely seems to be a problem with Slush's pool. I tried BTC Guilld and my miner runs fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
 |
September 21, 2013, 10:57:58 PM |
|
I chatted with DrHaribo of BitMinter. After checking my logs and tracking performance he is thinking there is a problem with chainminer. He told me that he is going to contact BF to investigate further.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gmannn
|
 |
September 22, 2013, 12:59:59 AM |
|
Having a problem getting the miner to start, I changed the gateway and connected to the IP address of the pi through a browser. I setup my pool and hit start, but the noncerate is stuck at 0. I've tried different pools and stopping/starting the miner through the webpage but no luck. Here is the output of my stat log: 1 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:0] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:1] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:2] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:3] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:4] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:5] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:6] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:7] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:8] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:9] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:A] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:B] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:C] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:D] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:E] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 AIfDSo 55 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 [4:F] 756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 speed:880 noncerate[GH/s]:0.000 (0.000/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:0.000 good:0 errors:0 spi-err:0 miso-err:0 jobs:0 cores:0% good:16 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:0.000) Sun Sep 22 00:57:36 2013 4: 880 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 16 0 0(0.000/chip) 0%
So it looks like my chips are recognized, but aren't mining. Is there a way to see a log of errors? Any other suggestions? I just got the v2 august starter kit today. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Cablez
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...
|
 |
September 22, 2013, 01:03:05 AM |
|
It is possible you just aren't connecting to the pool. Remember that you do not need the preceding http:// for the pool URL. The port should be 3333 and double check the worker name and pass is correct. Lastly make sure all three sections of the proxy information is the same. That is not really to set up backup pools. That is a feature I would like to see in future versions though. 
|
Tired of substandard power distribution in your ASIC setup??? Chris' Custom Cablez will get you sorted out right! No job too hard so PM me for a quote Check my products or ask a question here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=74397.0
|
|
|
|
gmannn
|
 |
September 22, 2013, 01:09:32 AM |
|
It is possible you just aren't connecting to the pool. Remember that you do not need the preceding http:// for the pool URL. The port should be 3333 and double check the worker name and pass is correct. Lastly make sure all three sections of the proxy information is the same. That is not really to set up backup pools. That is a feature I would like to see in future versions though.  Oh thanks! I was putting port 8332 for the 50btc pool but changing to 3333 worked.
|
|
|
|
|
mwk13
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 22, 2013, 04:35:09 AM |
|
My kit has developed stability issues in the last few days. On power up or miner restart, it runs at full speed (around 40 gh/s) but then starts losing hashrate. Right now it only takes 10 minutes before the speed is down to 0. Any ideas on what i can do? Here's the stat log file just before i restart the miner: 1 AiFDso 55 0.429 0.687 30 594 24 8 65 [0:0] 565 2 2 2 2 3 0 1 1 1 2 2 3 4 1 2 2 39 43 35 32 38 42 39 39 35 37 20 40 30 43 41 41 2 AiFDso 55 0.258 0.602 18 445 12 10 57 [0:1] 549 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 26 30 29 31 33 26 28 28 29 23 32 30 25 23 28 24 3 AiFDso 55 0.329 0.624 23 450 17 4 59 [0:2] 570 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 31 33 15 29 21 31 25 29 31 29 36 27 28 27 32 26 4 AiFDso 55 0.401 0.550 28 438 12 6 52 [0:3] 566 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 1 1 2 1 1 29 32 28 23 34 19 17 32 17 28 33 24 35 32 24 31 5 AiFDso 55 0.229 0.613 16 411 13 6 58 [0:4] 550 1 0 0 2 2 2 4 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 30 26 26 29 23 20 26 21 26 23 30 24 21 30 27 29 6 AiFDso 55 0.000 0.687 0 543 24 2 65 [0:5] 753 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 33 31 35 32 32 36 29 27 35 37 33 34 33 35 44 7 AiFDso 55 0.415 0.602 29 492 16 1 57 [0:6] 540 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 2 25 37 21 32 36 19 29 29 36 39 35 33 31 29 30 31 8 AiFDso 55 0.401 0.539 28 439 5 10 51 [0:7] 532 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 23 30 29 23 27 28 35 32 27 32 28 22 24 28 27 24 9 AiFDso 55 0.372 0.560 26 434 7 5 53 [0:8] 546 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 0 25 31 24 29 30 17 22 28 27 23 31 30 31 31 21 34 10 AiFDso 55 0.344 0.624 24 384 15 8 59 [0:9] 555 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 23 29 21 28 19 21 24 25 27 23 23 24 20 26 23 28 11 AiFDso 55 0.415 0.634 29 501 14 3 60 [0:A] 542 1 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 0 3 2 1 2 2 3 31 34 31 27 36 27 36 30 31 35 34 23 32 34 30 30 12 AiFDso 55 0.401 0.507 28 425 4 9 48 [0:B] 534 2 2 1 2 3 3 0 0 1 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 29 30 21 27 30 29 30 26 29 30 23 24 29 20 21 27 13 AiFDso 55 0.344 0.550 24 480 9 1 52 [0:C] 558 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 0 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 35 31 16 29 33 33 31 35 31 33 33 23 31 33 32 21 14 AiFDso 55 0.258 0.687 18 465 21 5 65 [0:D] 546 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 23 32 24 32 34 24 34 28 36 27 29 24 21 31 32 34 15 AiFDso 55 0.286 0.602 20 485 12 0 57 [0:E] 521 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 36 31 34 33 34 39 36 37 12 26 26 25 21 36 33 26 16 AiFDso 55 0.401 0.592 28 369 10 12 56 [0:F] 551 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 20 20 23 28 23 16 23 24 29 24 24 18 27 25 26 19 17 AiFDso 55 0.315 0.624 22 451 12 2 59 [1:0] 554 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 34 29 31 33 31 24 35 13 31 27 29 27 30 20 34 23 18 AiFDso 55 0.315 0.634 22 406 15 7 60 [1:1] 558 1 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 31 25 26 25 24 12 26 27 22 27 29 28 29 27 28 20 19 AiFDso 55 0.429 0.571 30 403 11 2 54 [1:2] 550 3 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 24 18 25 28 24 22 24 24 29 25 26 26 28 27 28 25 20 AiFDso 55 0.072 0.444 5 368 8 4 42 [1:3] 671 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 25 20 29 24 28 25 23 20 22 27 26 25 18 8 20 21 AiFDso 55 0.043 0.497 3 339 5 3 47 [1:4] 745 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 19 20 18 25 15 16 18 15 25 21 28 24 26 24 19 26 22 AiFDso 55 0.487 0.518 34 293 6 6 49 [1:5] 545 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 2 2 18 21 17 22 11 20 15 16 13 15 20 22 17 24 18 24 23 AiFDso 55 0.472 0.592 33 390 13 0 56 [1:6] 532 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 4 3 3 2 2 2 21 26 21 29 28 29 22 26 28 15 26 25 27 25 24 18 24 AiFDso 55 0.344 0.560 24 257 7 13 53 [1:7] 560 1 1 1 2 0 0 2 1 2 1 3 3 3 3 1 0 13 16 17 19 17 15 18 18 14 16 15 14 18 19 14 14 25 AiFDso 55 0.315 0.634 22 338 15 1 60 [1:8] 545 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 1 2 2 2 1 0 23 20 21 14 23 24 21 17 26 25 22 26 22 22 15 17 26 AiFDso 55 0.372 0.550 26 310 11 6 52 [1:9] 549 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 16 18 22 12 18 20 22 20 19 22 21 20 15 23 22 20 27 AiFDso 55 0.515 0.581 36 314 10 7 55 [1:A] 545 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 18 24 13 22 12 24 18 26 18 20 18 20 20 21 23 17 28 AiFDso 55 0.272 0.645 19 392 16 1 61 [1:B] 550 1 1 0 2 1 2 2 2 2 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 7 27 25 27 20 20 21 23 27 29 26 26 25 29 29 31 29 AiFDso 55 0.472 0.528 33 321 7 8 50 [1:C] 526 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 22 26 22 16 22 20 22 22 19 21 22 18 18 17 18 16 30 AiFDso 55 0.215 0.539 15 297 4 6 51 [1:D] 535 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 18 21 19 16 15 20 15 15 21 19 19 20 14 20 21 24 31 AiFDso 55 0.344 0.454 24 308 3 5 43 [1:E] 557 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 17 21 18 19 18 22 13 16 18 20 23 19 22 23 23 16 32 AiFDso 55 0.315 0.581 22 309 7 3 55 [1:F] 522 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 21 21 20 20 18 15 17 21 22 15 22 23 17 22 17 18 speed:0 noncerate[GH/s]:10.580 (0.331/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:18.613 good:739 errors:12851 spi-err:365 miso-err:164 jobs:376 cores:26% good:0 bad:32 off:0 (best[GH/s]:41.489) Sun Sep 22 04:11:28 2013
|
|
|
|
|
cet
Member

Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
 |
September 22, 2013, 05:14:23 AM |
|
My kit has developed stability issues in the last few days. On power up or miner restart, it runs at full speed (around 40 gh/s) but then starts losing hashrate. Right now it only takes 10 minutes before the speed is down to 0.
Any ideas on what i can do?
Here's the stat log file just before i restart the miner:
looks like one of your chips is generating miso errors. you will need to find the chip and turn it off. try chip 24 first since that's the one with the most. /cet
|
|
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
 |
September 22, 2013, 06:59:29 PM Last edit: September 23, 2013, 02:11:06 AM by zurg |
|
Ok, something funky is going on.....
This is normal stats from BF: { "stats": {"speed": 1320, "noncerate": 46.071, "noncerateperchip":1.843, "hashrate":48.842, "good":3218, "errors":174, "spi-errors":0, "miso-errors":0, "jobs":297, "record":47.746 ,"boards": [ { "slot": "0", "speed": 880, "noncerate":29.592, "hashrate": 31.624, "good": 2067, "errors": 122, "spi-errors": 0, "miso-errors":0 } , { "slot": "1", "speed": 440, "noncerate":16.478, "hashrate": 17.218, "good": 1151, "errors": 52, "spi-errors": 0, "miso-errors":0 }
] } }
This is my stats from BitMinter: 4th column is my actual hashrate. (somehow the 10Gh/s difference is MIA somewhere?)
18196 2013-09-22 18:07 1h 28m 36,551.384 112,628,548 0.00049664 0.40054681 55,936 45,113,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
 |
September 22, 2013, 07:13:04 PM |
|
Also, those on BitMinter!
If you're experiencing drop in hashrate, go to Worker and set difficulty to 64. (My hashrate is 36Gh/s apparently)
Since setting it to 64, I haven't had any significant drops there (to like 20Gh/s) for nearly 48 hours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jddebug
|
 |
September 22, 2013, 07:46:40 PM |
|
Also, those on BitMinter!
If you're experiencing drop in hashrate, go to Worker and set difficulty to 64. (My hashrate is 36Gh/s apparently)
Since setting it to 64, I haven't had any significant drops there (to like 20Gh/s) for nearly 48 hours.
Wouldn't that put you at about 6 shares per minute? I'd expect you to see a greater variance in hash rate rather than a consistent one. The pool I mine with auto adjusts to 12 shares per minute. With my bitfury units at 200GH each that comes to about difficulty 200 it seems. They are rock solid and match the stats almost exactly. Almost no rejects either. .05% over the last week. Have you tried Difficulty 32? How did that work?
|
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
 |
September 22, 2013, 09:57:28 PM Last edit: September 23, 2013, 12:52:01 AM by klondike_bar |
|
Im using bitminter with difficulty of 16 for a starter and it works great. The card has a hashrate of 36.5GH with the noncerate (and pool reported) being 33.25GHash. help requested:
1) chip 6 is producing a few miso-errors (about 4%) plus the same number of hardware/stale errors. its pretty low, and only 2 other chips report miso-errors (1% and 2% rates). should i be concerned/fixing this? 2) a chip (varies time to time) has stopped a few times recently, usually in the first 5 minutes from reboot (if they start at all). Its running okay now after using stop miner/start miner via web gui, but is there a known reason for the issue or a solution? the chip is manually tuned at 54? 3) when tuning, what error rate should we go for to get the best result? Generally, ive tuned anything with <10% to run at 55, and over 10% i tuned to 54 or even 53. In most cases, tuning down to 54 seems to barely increase the effective noncerate from the drop in both hashrate and error rate. Is 10% errors a good threshold for tuning, or should i use lower (ie 5% or maybe 7%)?
The card is cooled somewhat aggressively, with tiny heatsinks on each chip (same size as chip) plus 5 slightly larger heatsinks (about 4x the surface area) centered on the back of the board, opposite the capacitor banks (that way, each sink is centered for the 4 nearest chips). a 120mm fan is aimed normal to the board about 5" away. nothing gets hot, just reasonably warm
|
|
|
|
woobone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 23, 2013, 01:57:48 AM |
|
Ok, something funky is going on.....
This is normal stats from BF: { "stats": {"speed": 1320, "noncerate": 46.071, "noncerateperchip":1.843, "hashrate":48.842, "good":3218, "errors":174, "spi-errors":0, "miso-errors":0, "jobs":297, "record":47.746 ,"boards": [ { "slot": "0", "speed": 880, "noncerate":29.592, "hashrate": 31.624, "good": 2067, "errors": 122, "spi-errors": 0, "miso-errors":0 } , { "slot": "1", "speed": 440, "noncerate":16.478, "hashrate": 17.218, "good": 1151, "errors": 52, "spi-errors": 0, "miso-errors":0 }
] } }
This is my stats from BitMinter: 4th column is my actual hashrate. (somehow the 10Gh/s difference is MIA somewhere?)
18196 2013-09-22 18:07 1h 28m 36,551.384 112,628,548 0.00049664 0.40054681 55,936 45,113,006 18195 2013-09-22 16:39 1h 28m 36,580.303 112,628,548 0.00049721 0.40192240 56,000 45,267,937 18194 2013-09-22 15:10 1h 29m 35,940.086 112,628,548 0.00047107 0.40053465 53,056 45,111,636 18193 2013-09-22 13:39 1h 30m 35,626.368 112,628,548 0.00052108 0.40027895 58,688 45,082,837 18192 2013-09-22 12:08 1h 31m 35,453.413 112,628,548 0.00048300 0.40060774 54,400 45,119,868 18191 2013-09-22 10:37 1h 31m 35,342.286 112,628,548 0.00053699 0.40147082 60,480 45,217,076 18190 2013-09-22 09:05 1h 31m 35,269.357 112,628,548 0.00050403 0.40086111 56,768 45,148,405 18189 2013-09-22 07:33 1h 30m 35,870.429 112,628,548 0.00054721 0.40079650 61,632 45,141,128 18188 2013-09-22 06:02 1h 31m 35,241.676 112,628,548 0.00050744 0.40032794 57,152 45,088,355 18187 2013-09-22 04:30 1h 31m 35,277.083 112,628,548 0.00054324 0.40073015 61,184 45,133,655 18186 2013-09-22 02:58 1h 32m 35,173.704 112,628,548 0.00051653 0.40173719 58,176 45,247,077 18185 2013-09-22 01:26 1h 31m 35,298.837 112,628,548 0.00048869 0.40105023 55,040 45,169,705 18184 2013-09-21 23:54 1h 31m 35,264.687 112,628,548 0.00050232 0.40073514 56,576 45,134,217 18182 2013-09-21 22:22 1h 30m 35,876.132 112,628,548 0.00050289 0.40086022 56,640 45,148,305 18181 2013-09-21 20:52 1h 30m 35,812.913 112,628,548 0.00047334 0.40067208 53,312 45,127,115 18180 2013-09-21 19:21 1h 29m 36,233.704 112,628,548 0.00045857 0.40043621 51,648 45,100,549
hey zurg the 4th column are total hashrate not your hashrate .
|
|
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
 |
September 23, 2013, 02:07:44 AM Last edit: September 23, 2013, 02:20:43 AM by zurg |
|
Ok, something funky is going on.....
This is normal stats from BF: { "stats": {"speed": 1320, "noncerate": 46.071, "noncerateperchip":1.843, "hashrate":48.842, "good":3218, "errors":174, "spi-errors":0, "miso-errors":0, "jobs":297, "record":47.746 ,"boards": [ { "slot": "0", "speed": 880, "noncerate":29.592, "hashrate": 31.624, "good": 2067, "errors": 122, "spi-errors": 0, "miso-errors":0 } , { "slot": "1", "speed": 440, "noncerate":16.478, "hashrate": 17.218, "good": 1151, "errors": 52, "spi-errors": 0, "miso-errors":0 }
] } }
This is my stats from BitMinter: 4th column is my actual hashrate. (somehow the 10Gh/s difference is MIA somewhere?)
18196 2013-09-22 18:07 1h 28m 36,551.384 112,628,548 0.00049664 0.40054681 55,936 45,113,006
hey zurg the 4th column are total hashrate not your hashrate . Err, opps... Well, I have bigger problems now, lol Just checked my hashrate and it took a dive again.. logged SSH 15 AIfDSo 55 2.004 1.998 140 2 0 0 189 [0:E] 52 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 8 9 8 9 0 0 0 $ 16 AIfDSo 55 1.818 2.008 127 4 0 0 190 [0:F] 43 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 7 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 $ 17 AiFDso 55 0.000 0.159 0 330 14 351 15 [1:0] 695 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 20 $ 18 AiFDso 55 0.000 0.814 0 996 84 20 77 [1:1] 754 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 22 $ 19 AiFDso 55 0.000 0.074 0 111 8 109 7 [1:2] 755 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 7 $ Looks like my chip 17 took a dump. Maybe my EOL card is 100% dead now instead of 50%. Guess I'll wait to mess with it until I get to work tomorrow. 20Gh/s overnight is way better then 0 if the SD card is popping errors again.
|
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
 |
September 23, 2013, 03:13:36 AM |
|
Ok, something funky is going on.....
This is normal stats from BF: { "stats": {"speed": 1320, "noncerate": 46.071, "noncerateperchip":1.843, "hashrate":48.842, "good":3218, "errors":174, "spi-errors":0, "miso-errors":0, "jobs":297, "record":47.746 ,"boards": [ { "slot": "0", "speed": 880, "noncerate":29.592, "hashrate": 31.624, "good": 2067, "errors": 122, "spi-errors": 0, "miso-errors":0 } , { "slot": "1", "speed": 440, "noncerate":16.478, "hashrate": 17.218, "good": 1151, "errors": 52, "spi-errors": 0, "miso-errors":0 }
] } }
This is my stats from BitMinter: 4th column is my actual hashrate. (somehow the 10Gh/s difference is MIA somewhere?)
18196 2013-09-22 18:07 1h 28m 36,551.384 112,628,548 0.00049664 0.40054681 55,936 45,113,006
hey zurg the 4th column are total hashrate not your hashrate . Err, opps... Well, I have bigger problems now, lol Just checked my hashrate and it took a dive again.. logged SSH 15 AIfDSo 55 2.004 1.998 140 2 0 0 189 [0:E] 52 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 8 9 8 9 0 0 0 $ 16 AIfDSo 55 1.818 2.008 127 4 0 0 190 [0:F] 43 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 7 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 $ 17 AiFDso 55 0.000 0.159 0 330 14 351 15 [1:0] 695 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 20 $ 18 AiFDso 55 0.000 0.814 0 996 84 20 77 [1:1] 754 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 22 $ 19 AiFDso 55 0.000 0.074 0 111 8 109 7 [1:2] 755 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 7 $ Looks like my chip 17 took a dump. Maybe my EOL card is 100% dead now instead of 50%. Guess I'll wait to mess with it until I get to work tomorrow. 20Gh/s overnight is way better then 0 if the SD card is popping errors again. use the webgui to stop and start the miner. sometimes that throws a 'stalled' chip back into gear. I sometimes find my unit running only 15 chips, and this fixes it
|
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
 |
September 23, 2013, 11:25:29 AM |
|
Ok, got to work. Tried to reboot the Pi and as expected the whole thing crashed out. Bad SD card. I bought 2 8GB Class 10 cards from Microcenter. Loaded one up and WOW the response is so much quicker! Back up hashing now no miso errors. Actually... there has always been that 1 miso error on chip 1, but it doesn't appear to propagate to the rest and eventually disappears when I pull logs. Yay 
|
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
 |
September 23, 2013, 04:41:50 PM |
|
What exactly are the miso errors? I usually get 3-5 of them in my stat.log file, and have seen a single chip stop hashing from time to time. Is it related to voltage mod, or something inherent to the board? Hash rate stays fairly stable.
Also, i ran the RPI's 'sudo shutdown' command to turn off the unit (previously I just powered off the psu), and on restart am unable to ssh to the pi. (I enter user, enter password, then get "server unexpectedly closed network connection" from the putty program). Did my shutdown method alter the ssh file or settings? The bitfury Web guide and bit miner both show normal hashing
|
|
|
|
|
zurg
|
 |
September 23, 2013, 04:48:16 PM |
|
What exactly are the miso errors? I usually get 3-5 of them in my stat.log file, and have seen a single chip stop hashing from time to time. Is it related to voltage mod, or something inherent to the board? Hash rate stays fairly stable.
Also, i ran the RPI's 'sudo shutdown' command to turn off the unit (previously I just powered off the psu), and on restart am unable to ssh to the pi. (I enter user, enter password, then get "server unexpectedly closed network connection" from the putty program). Did my shutdown method alter the ssh file or settings? The bitfury Web guide and bit miner both show normal hashing
Few are ok., last night I had like 400 on 1 chip and then it propagated to a 2nd onee at like 3XX some.. it rendered my 2nd card useless until I rebooted today.
|
|
|
|
|
|