Do you pay attention on advisors when choosing a good ICO project?

[inooll00]

Lately all the projects try to attract best faces onboard for their projects, I started noticing that they are almost the same everywhere. What things are more important for you? Are advisors one of the most significant criteria?

Advisory I dont really consider in an ICO project, I'm more concerned with seeing Whitepaper to be my consideration than advisor's project

[minivan]

This criterion is not determinative, but it is obvious that it is one of the most important. Well-known consultants are at least one of the signs that the project is not a fake. You can write to them by direct link and ask a question

[LancelotRay]

If they advise seems credible, sure, why not? But it's important to form your opinion first and then look for 2nd opinions.

You might have always missed something.

[awazieik]

Lately all the projects try to attract best faces onboard for their projects, I started noticing that they are almost the same everywhere. What things are more important for you? Are advisors one of the most significant criteria?

I don't look advisors when it comes to ICOs because most of them are not interested in the project and just want to make some bucks with advertisement. I focus on the team; they don't have to be that popular but they should have an experience.

[sserge009]

the development team and advisors are the most important selection criteria. if the adviser's last few projects were unsuccessful, then conclusions about the next can be done easily. on the other hand, past success does not guarantee anything

[kindbtc]

I personally do not check out advisors while analysing an ico but you are right the trend is changing and if a famius person is advisor the ico sells out quickly, we have seen john mcafee and mark cuban as advisor in some projects and they sold out quickly.

[jamesdean35]

Actually I am interesting in advisor becausef they have good carier they dont want to cheat people. I joined sether because of Mcaffea I trusth him

[unexecuted]

Lately all the projects try to attract best faces onboard for their projects, I started noticing that they are almost the same everywhere. What things are more important for you? Are advisors one of the most significant criteria?

I pay attention on advisors of course. Team and advisors are very important for me when I make choice. If these people are highly experienced I trust more

[valnd]

Yeah sure. Advisors matters to me. A project with good advisors will definitely end up doing well. So it is important for me to have a good advisor in a project i am looking to invest.

[grumpy619]

I always try to study the whole team of upcoming ICO and the success of previous projects, if any. But the presence of a good Advisor is not a 100 % guarantee that the project will be successful.

[aceat64]

Now there are so many fake news and FUD in the network, that it's hard for me to believe in something, there are a couple of resources that are verified, for example https://www.investopedia.com/

[lucemferrum01]

Lately all the projects try to attract best faces onboard for their projects, I started noticing that they are almost the same everywhere. What things are more important for you? Are advisors one of the most significant criteria?

All the criteria in the project are important and we must be careful in analyzing them. Project advisor is also important, but not an indicator that the project will be successful and for me the advisor is a complement to make potential investors believe and interested in the project.

Correct, since each ICOs were different and also is your preference as an investor each criteria or even a specific criteria may greatly affect the success of an ICO and your steps as an investor. I wouldn't say advisors are totally reliable in these matter but they are truly one to consider when choosing an ICO.

[Lerikaweb]

ICOs involve famous advisors to make people buy their tokens:) it is absolutely clear. A good advisor is a brand. A strong brand which advertises your campaign. An average investor will more likely trust an ico which is promoted by a famous person.

[Ninja Sword]

Everything will depend on the project and the impact that want to establish, there are projects that only a good Whitepaper is already enough to encourage investors, but there are projects with great detail and and great promises and consequently need an accessory to stimulate a demand.

[Stella27]

Actually first that I check in joining an ICO project are the developers. Also, their managers. Because there are a lot of managers that are really reliable and does not just choose any project to handle. They study the project very well before they will engage in such.

[Valzador]

Lately all the projects try to attract best faces onboard for their projects, I started noticing that they are almost the same everywhere. What things are more important for you? Are advisors one of the most significant criteria?

Of course, the composition of the team is one of the important things that we should consider in addition to the roadmap.

[KuromaYoichi]

Lately all the projects try to attract best faces onboard for their projects, I started noticing that they are almost the same everywhere. What things are more important for you? Are advisors one of the most significant criteria?

No i don't care much about advisor because i focus more on the team member as they are the one that will build the project. They contribute to the project but i don't think it's that much, the most significant criteria is their whitepaper and team background so you know they can build the project or not.

[andor.gellenhidi]

Of course, I pay attention to advisors, because they put their reputation on this project and if the project turns out to be a fraud. First of all, it will be the reputation of this person that strikes, as happens very often with the creator of the Waves coin, his reputation is already below the floor.

[BitcoinJuman]

Lately advisors are only for marketing hype as most of them are same for all project, but at least I recommend to check because if someone famous became advisor of certain project then Hype will increase and maybe you can generate profit from it.

[Huskarls]

actually, i dont care too much about the advisor behind in some ICO project, i think thats is only mere formality, nothing else.
even if they are ex-worker on the big famous company in the world or crypto company/project before, its only give me a little plus point for joining those ICO.

the important is, the project, core team, and other explanation of the project are clear