[PrimeDice] (Staff Only) Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting

[galbros]

After last month's payment Stunna left some positive trust for me (and many others).  However, I now see it is gone.  Is this just the trust system being wonky or did Stunna delete it?  I'm cool either way, just curious, is it discussed anywhere?

No doubt this signature campaign is the best, thanks Stunna!

Its discussed a few pages back, Stunna did remove it.

Back on page 306.  Here is the link if anyone else is curious: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291387.msg7053782#msg7053782

Sorry to see it go, but probably a good call!

[1715418418]

1715418418

[Malin Keshar]

Starting posts: 432
Bitcoin address: 1Lo9X3SvXmEV8Xc98eXEGEf7DQqzmqMDsb

[Zyborg]

After last month's payment Stunna left some positive trust for me (and many others).  However, I now see it is gone.  Is this just the trust system being wonky or did Stunna delete it?  I'm cool either way, just curious, is it discussed anywhere?

No doubt this signature campaign is the best, thanks Stunna!

Its discussed a few pages back, Stunna did remove it.

Back on page 306.  Here is the link if anyone else is curious: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=291387.msg7053782#msg7053782

Sorry to see it go, but probably a good call!

Definitely was the right choice, for the reasons he described himself. The trust system is tricky, and has to be used properly.

[monbux]

After last month's payment Stunna left some positive trust for me (and many others).  However, I now see it is gone.  Is this just the trust system being wonky or did Stunna delete it?  I'm cool either way, just curious, is it discussed anywhere?

No doubt this signature campaign is the best, thanks Stunna!

Its discussed a few pages back, Stunna did remove it.

Yes, there was debate upon whether participating in a signature campaign warrants any trust...it was decided that putting a logo in your signature doesn't deem you any trust here...

He paid people 5 BTC who had posts on the official Ripple thread to edit their posts to "Ripple is a scam" or something like that, and yeah.. he was a very influential person

And I once again plan to join stunna's campaign for the month..    Thanks!

[monbux]

Starting posts: 3970
Bitcoin address: 1Q2CupiU5DfWupRGBQ66QYRqvxoNxGZCcn

[Skoupi]

Starting posts: 123
Bitcoin address: 16B3bnrgKYc9BBM5x3wUg8VEXUdhxm6zG9

[Hesham_3del]

Is there max post per month/week restriction ?

[alani123]

Is there max post per month/week restriction ?

There is a monthly limit of 2.4 BTC but I think that that's it. Besies that, you should be careful not to get banned for spamin. Yeah, that's a thing too.

[Parazyd]

Starting posts: 732
Bitcoin address: 152KxdQdNfEmEjbs7YHTr2NaN7nTqeiBJc

[faiza1990]

Is there max post per month/week restriction ?

But you are not allowed to join this campaign until you have rank of Member for more details you can read post 1

[oli123123]

Starting posts: 355
Bitcoin address: 15ywjmXiGdKBeHGN4Pgg4LMmGWAELoNs1V

[dadaas]

Starting posts: 255
Bitcoin address: 1ELuGSK1qyNLPChHhPX1yja6iQ4x9jdEdQ

[nishtrip15]

Starting posts: 171
BTC address: 1QHtYLPMGuXDcBZZuwBPMRdEEpUukJ5bUL

[mladen00]

posts: 693
BTC address: 1EQ7zx9HLdmBdfUUwkA2fnCiKF2M5bEzwd

ty

[ljudotina]

Starting posts: 138
Bitcoin address: 1DnmUN4v6udwxmDuddbE3a6fn3CL98yT89

[Cryptopher]

Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.

[Zyborg]

Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.

I like this idea, however it might make it harder to keep track of all payments, you'd have to know each time a user changes his signature, and so on. Would be hell to keep track of, I think.

[Parazyd]

Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.

I like this idea, however it might make it harder to keep track of all payments, you'd have to know each time a user changes his signature, and so on. Would be hell to keep track of, I think.

Probably would, yeah. I find the current system pretty fair to everyone. And it really seems like it's the best signature campaign around.

[Zyborg]

Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.

I like this idea, however it might make it harder to keep track of all payments, you'd have to know each time a user changes his signature, and so on. Would be hell to keep track of, I think.

Probably would, yeah. I find the current system pretty fair to everyone. And it really seems like it's the best signature campaign around.

Definitely. I was tempted by the other campaigns' promises of higher rates and whatnot, but in the end they're all having problems paying out, confirming people and so on.

[Cryptopher]

Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.

I like this idea, however it might make it harder to keep track of all payments, you'd have to know each time a user changes his signature, and so on. Would be hell to keep track of, I think.

Maybe it needs to be considered as consistent payouts - Stunna will keep a record of who has payouts, you can then identify who has two months of payouts at-a-glance.

It is extra work, but what it means is that people think twice before moving. I suppose you could say "but what is to stop other campaigns from implementing the same mechanism?"