[PrimeDice] (Staff Only) Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting

[hilariousandco]

I've been wondering whether Stunna would stick to his promise of higher rates for next term, seeing as Ritz dropped off, btc price is up and there's been shitloads of new signups now. Getting those loyalty bonuses/rewards would be nice for long-term members though if he doesn't up them. Ref links would be great too. I don't think he needs to change to weekly payments either now.

Stunna keeps spreadsheets of users each month but it's well known really which users have been with him for 6+ months and counting.

[Cryptopher]

Whenever I calculate my monthly payout, I also calculate what I would have got on say UpDown (hypothetically and assuming payout), I then consider that as a potential loss, but then offset it by the risk of them not paying out.

I still consider PrimeDice to be the best deal, but clearly many others are not as compelled to stick around when another deal comes about.

[dadaas]

I like that idea about coefficients. That would make users loyal to one signature campaign but it would make older users post less for same money. I know that those coefficients have been plucked out of the air but max coeff shouldn't be over 1.2

[Cryptopher]

I like that idea about coefficients. That would make users loyal to one signature campaign but it would make older users post less for same money. I know that those coefficients have been plucked out of the air but max coeff shouldn't be over 1.2

But who wants same money, people want more But yes you raise a valid point. The coefficients I suggested were purely to illustrate the point, I agree that they needen't be so high, as it makes a dramatic difference.

Having said that, I believe that there should be a bigger jump for longer term users, to give people something to really work towards.

[Zyborg]

I like that idea about coefficients. That would make users loyal to one signature campaign but it would make older users post less for same money. I know that those coefficients have been plucked out of the air but max coeff shouldn't be over 1.2

But who wants same money, people want more But yes you raise a valid point. The coefficients I suggested were purely to illustrate the point, I agree that they needen't be so high, as it makes a dramatic difference.

Having said that, I believe that there should be a bigger jump for longer term users, to give people something to really work towards.

If it was done properly it would probably be more profitable for the campaign owner rather than increasing the standard rates to compete with the others.

[innocent93]

Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.

I like this idea,I have been a part of PD campaign for 5 months, even there are some other campaigns with higher rate.

[Acidyo]

Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.

I like this idea,I have been a part of PD campaign for 5 months, even there are some other campaigns with higher rate.

Same here, after I joined the campaign in early december (was allowed to join even though I had very low rank back then) and I haven't even considered switching campaigns.

I mentioned this earlier that there should be some sort of reward for those who stay with PD and not switch to the highest bidder immediately and then when that won't work they just come back and everything is fine again, doesn't feel as good for those that were loyal to PD, in my opinion. Also now it looks like there are hundreds jumping on the PD campaign since theirs didn't work out, I just hope Stunna has the time and patience to deal with everyone new.

[Justin00]

Starting posts: 629
Bitcoin address: 1QKnmephbuvuAA8BrXzgAQp3dvm9Z3RBgt

[MorpheWQ]

Starting posts: 370
Bitcoin address: 1GjypDgwZqtt9kB9BUkH66LMkACpbg8bw8

[Don007]

Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.

I like this idea,I have been a part of PD campaign for 5 months, even there are some other campaigns with higher rate.

Same here, after I joined the campaign in early december (was allowed to join even though I had very low rank back then) and I haven't even considered switching campaigns.

I mentioned this earlier that there should be some sort of reward for those who stay with PD and not switch to the highest bidder immediately and then when that won't work they just come back and everything is fine again, doesn't feel as good for those that were loyal to PD, in my opinion. Also now it looks like there are hundreds jumping on the PD campaign since theirs didn't work out, I just hope Stunna has the time and patience to deal with everyone new.

I really like that idea! I'm in here for about 8 months now I guess.

I think Stunna should somehow call a "stop!" for new participants soon or later. I think otherwise this advertisement is going to cost way too much BTC.  Sure, the new entrants also create more attention for Primedice and might attract more people to Primedice (so the profits might be higher), but I don't think the profits will rise with the same amount of BTC as he has to pay. 

[Zyborg]

Hmm, perhaps it would be better if there were a coefficient that Stunna could apply for longer-serving, loyal participants of the PrimeDice signature campaign.

I champion this idea because there is little incentive for users to stick with PrimeDice when a 'better' offer comes around. I've also been a part of the PrimeDice campaign for around six months, sticking through thick and thin. Yet some fair weather user can waltz on in and receive the same rate as me, despite them selling out PrimeDice in the past.

If there were a coefficient that could be applied to the final payout then that would be nice, for instance:

1 x new to two months
1.1 x two to three months
1.2 x three to five months
1.3 x six to 12 months
1.5 x 12 months +

Okay so I just plucked the coefficients out of the air, they aren't based on anything around profit and loss etc. But the principle is that people will think twice, perhaps thrice times before selling out PrimeDice for another, higher paying offer in future.

I like this idea,I have been a part of PD campaign for 5 months, even there are some other campaigns with higher rate.

Same here, after I joined the campaign in early december (was allowed to join even though I had very low rank back then) and I haven't even considered switching campaigns.

I mentioned this earlier that there should be some sort of reward for those who stay with PD and not switch to the highest bidder immediately and then when that won't work they just come back and everything is fine again, doesn't feel as good for those that were loyal to PD, in my opinion. Also now it looks like there are hundreds jumping on the PD campaign since theirs didn't work out, I just hope Stunna has the time and patience to deal with everyone new.

I really like that idea! I'm in here for about 8 months now I guess.

I think Stunna should somehow call a "stop!" for new participants soon or later. I think otherwise this advertisement is going to cost way too much BTC.  Sure, the new entrants also create more attention for Primedice and might attract more people to Primedice (so the profits might be higher), but I don't think the profits will rise with the same amount of BTC as he has to pay. 

I seriously doubt he's making profits from the advertising, rather than just establishing his good name and the site's good name even more.

[hilariousandco]

What do you mean by not taking profits? If it wasn't profitable for him then I doubt he'd spend all this money. These ads keep the PrimeDice name out there and fresh in the community. Without the ads where else would traffic likely come from?

[Zyborg]

What do you mean by not taking profits? If it wasn't profitable for him then I doubt he'd spend all this money. These ads keep the PrimeDice name out there and fresh in the community. Without the ads where else would traffic likely come from?

I don't think he's earning more than he's paying for the clicks from our signatures, that's what I mean. I've personally never clicked a forum signature but I've used primedice several times, due to it's good reputation.

[Don007]

What do you mean by not taking profits? If it wasn't profitable for him then I doubt he'd spend all this money. These ads keep the PrimeDice name out there and fresh in the community. Without the ads where else would traffic likely come from?

You're right, I think most of the gamblers are directed by these signatures / come from this forums otherwise

What do you mean by not taking profits? If it wasn't profitable for him then I doubt he'd spend all this money. These ads keep the PrimeDice name out there and fresh in the community. Without the ads where else would traffic likely come from?

I don't think he's earning more than he's paying for the clicks from our signatures, that's what I mean. I've personally never clicked a forum signature but I've used primedice several times, due to it's good reputation.

Yeah, that's what I meant to say too.

[hilariousandco]

What do you mean by not taking profits? If it wasn't profitable for him then I doubt he'd spend all this money. These ads keep the PrimeDice name out there and fresh in the community. Without the ads where else would traffic likely come from?

I don't think he's earning more than he's paying for the clicks from our signatures, that's what I mean. I've personally never clicked a forum signature but I've used primedice several times, due to it's good reputation.

So he's losing money by advertising here? The money he pays out in advertising a month, though quite a large sum, will probably only be a fairly small percentage of what he takes in (though I'm sure this number is going to grow over the next few months (but hopefully so will his sign-ups/profits)). I'm sure if he ceased advertising here new users and money gambled would dwindle quite remarkably.

[Acidyo]

What do you mean by not taking profits? If it wasn't profitable for him then I doubt he'd spend all this money. These ads keep the PrimeDice name out there and fresh in the community. Without the ads where else would traffic likely come from?

I don't think he's earning more than he's paying for the clicks from our signatures, that's what I mean. I've personally never clicked a forum signature but I've used primedice several times, due to it's good reputation.

So he's losing money by advertising here? The money he pays out in advertising a month, though quite a large sum, will probably only be a fairly small percentage of what he takes in (though I'm sure this number is going to grow over the next few months (but hopefully so will his sign-ups/profits)). I'm sure if he ceased advertising here new users and money gambled would dwindle quite remarkably.

The good thing for PD is that the more bitcoin gets mainstream, the more popular will his site become.

[Acidyo]

Starting posts: 629
Bitcoin address: 1QKnmephbuvuAA8BrXzgAQp3dvm9Z3RBgt

Also, I'm sorry but there is no way that is your starting post, seeing as you are now at 665 posts and 665 activity and I am not 100% sure but I think activity only goes up 14 every 2 weeks.

[hilariousandco]

Starting posts: 629
Bitcoin address: 1QKnmephbuvuAA8BrXzgAQp3dvm9Z3RBgt

Also, I'm sorry but there is no way that is your starting post, seeing as you are now at 665 posts and 665 activity and I am not 100% sure but I think activity only goes up 14 every 2 weeks.

What's the issue? It only goes up by 14 if your posts are 14 or more higher than your activity, otherwise it goes up 1 by each post. His starting posts check out. He just made 30+ posts pretty fast.

[onlinepro]

Starting posts: 629
Bitcoin address: 1QKnmephbuvuAA8BrXzgAQp3dvm9Z3RBgt

Also, I'm sorry but there is no way that is your starting post, seeing as you are now at 665 posts and 665 activity and I am not 100% sure but I think activity only goes up 14 every 2 weeks.

He looks fine for me.
And activity can go up faster than 14 per 2 week.

[Zyborg]

Starting posts: 629
Bitcoin address: 1QKnmephbuvuAA8BrXzgAQp3dvm9Z3RBgt

Also, I'm sorry but there is no way that is your starting post, seeing as you are now at 665 posts and 665 activity and I am not 100% sure but I think activity only goes up 14 every 2 weeks.

He looks fine for me.
And activity can go up faster than 14 per 2 week.

Eh, no it can't?