gmerk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 20, 2017, 06:22:06 AM |
|
Is this new version compatible with the previous one 1.6.2 ?
I mean, can we use 1.6.2 alongside 1.7 ?
BTW, thanks vlad9vlad for helping out...
|
|
|
|
romeshomey
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 20, 2017, 07:24:06 PM |
|
If anyone has a client connected to the network, please share peers and client version.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
edgar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2017, 05:10:34 AM |
|
v1.6.2.0-Bokrug (32-bit)
144.76.91.109:20000
|
|
|
|
romeshomey
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2017, 05:56:32 AM |
|
v1.6.2.0-Bokrug (32-bit)
144.76.91.109:20000
Still nadda.. Need a bootstrap or copy of the blockchain.... edit, nm, found the one linked back in the thread. will try that
|
|
|
|
romeshomey
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2017, 06:29:34 AM |
|
No go. Both of my clients are 'stuck' and won't download any blocks.
|
|
|
|
gmerk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2017, 06:42:02 AM |
|
Version 1.6.2 should work with 144.76.91.109
My offerings.conf has: addnode=108.61.170.22 addnode=144.76.91.109 addnode=54.89.21.44
Let it work for a while, sometimes it just needs time to connect...
|
|
|
|
romeshomey
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2017, 07:38:23 AM |
|
Haha, thanks.. You helped me see my problem.
I had my .conf file named Offering.conf instead of offerings.conf.
Syncing again now..
|
|
|
|
romeshomey
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2017, 08:13:12 AM |
|
I still haven't been able to get the new 1.7 client to download blocks though.
There seems to be some descrepency between Offering and Offeringcoin and I have been unable to figure out how to resolve it as of yet.
|
|
|
|
gmerk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2017, 01:31:53 PM |
|
Haha, thanks.. You helped me see my problem.
I had my .conf file named Offering.conf instead of offerings.conf.
Syncing again now..
That's exactly what I thought after I wrote my reply... ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
romeshomey
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2017, 05:55:59 PM |
|
Haha, thanks.. You helped me see my problem.
I had my .conf file named Offering.conf instead of offerings.conf.
Syncing again now..
That's exactly what I thought after I wrote my reply... ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Heh, ya, I laughed at myself for that one. If anyone is able to solve the mystery with the 1.7 client, post your findings.. I'm baffled.. It's possible its just the compiled windows version that has an issue and needs recompiled but I haven't tried the compiled MAC wallet or the linux wallet to know for sure.
|
|
|
|
romeshomey
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2017, 06:52:01 PM |
|
This is the descrepency I see when I look at the debug file. The wallet wants a default directory of \Roaming\Offeringcoin instead of \Roaming\Offering Then when the wallet is executed, it only looks in \Roaming\Offering\offeringcoin.conf When connected to a peer I see... [ { "id" : 3, "addr" : "144.76.91.109:20000", "services" : "0000000000000000", "lastsend" : 1498071114, "lastrecv" : 0, "bytessent" : 125, "bytesrecv" : 0, "conntime" : 1498071114, "pingtime" : 0.00000000, "version" : 0, "subver" : "", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : -1, "banscore" : 0, "synced_headers" : -1, "synced_blocks" : -1, "inflight" : [ ], "whitelisted" : false } ]
|
|
|
|
PeterTheGrape
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 21, 2017, 11:14:10 PM Last edit: June 23, 2017, 01:56:29 AM by PeterTheGrape |
|
this is my only coin thats not on coinmarketcap
Does anyone know of an OFF explorer with a coin supply api? Then we can get OFF back on coinmarketcap. The current block explorer listed at coinmarketcap http://23skidoo [dot link broken / leads to malware] info/cthulhu/block_crawler.php has something malicious. The domain was never dropped Domain Name: 23SKIDOO.INFO Registry Domain ID: D51760084-LRMS Registrar WHOIS Server: Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.comUpdated Date: 2017-04-24T17:01:11Z Creation Date: 2014-02-23T04:18:49Z Registry Expiry Date: 2018-02-23T04:18:49Z Registrar Registration Expiration Date: Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC so whoever first had it may have either been serving malware from it or had it hijacked and not fixed it. The nameservers seem to all be PARKLOGIC.COM and if you google 'PARKLOGIC.COM malware' it seems like enough shady stuff is served there that it is not a place to park a domain. add / If that is not correct, or a person knows otherwise, please say so. When I clicked on that I got sent to a page that looked like a cpanel login but froze my browser and prevented the browser from closing. Fairglu just made an explorer https://chainz.cryptoid.info/off/ but it has not started synching yet. If somebody has a suggestion they could message him. That explorer should give better info about the coin's history during the recent coin lull.
|
|
|
|
|
Mutoid
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 5
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2017, 03:48:40 PM |
|
so whoever first had it may have either been serving malware from it or had it hijacked and not fixed it. The nameservers seem to all be PARKLOGIC.COM and if you google 'PARKLOGIC.COM malware' it seems like enough shady stuff is served there that it is not a place to park a domain. add / If that is not correct, or a person knows otherwise, please say so. When I clicked on that I got sent to a page that looked like a cpanel login but froze my browser and prevented the browser from closing.
It belonged to the coin creator Blazr2 at one point, but perhaps the domain expired and got picked up by domain squatters (a.k.a. carrion eaters).
|
|
|
|
PeterTheGrape
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2017, 04:57:57 PM |
|
so whoever first had it may have either been serving malware from it or had it hijacked and not fixed it. The nameservers seem to all be PARKLOGIC.COM and if you google 'PARKLOGIC.COM malware' it seems like enough shady stuff is served there that it is not a place to park a domain. add / If that is not correct, or a person knows otherwise, please say so. When I clicked on that I got sent to a page that looked like a cpanel login but froze my browser and prevented the browser from closing.
It belonged to the coin creator Blazr2 at one point, but perhaps the domain expired and got picked up by domain squatters (a.k.a. carrion eaters). It looks like it was never dropped, but it has been parked at one of those sites that pays you maybe 0.0001 cent per click. It's not malware being served by the owner of the domain. It's somebody who goes to the parking company and says "I am selling xyz product and will pay such and such per click", then when traffic starts they redirect. Here are the links served ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FDkGkXt6.png&t=665&c=TO1B2SaS2XA-VQ) which then redirects to ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FlcVyeYr.png&t=665&c=NxyPvntsi4hAlg)
|
|
|
|
PeterTheGrape
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 23, 2017, 11:30:09 PM Last edit: June 25, 2017, 02:41:11 PM by PeterTheGrape |
|
Explorer still synching, a thousand days to go. It seems a little worrisome that only one node is supplying the chain, https://chainz.cryptoid.info/off/#!network If anybody sees a problem with the history that node is supplying they should say so. add The first 6 months before the halving would have produced about 1m coins not including special blocks. Explorer at block 721800 898 days ago shows about 2.2m coins Roughly 200,000 coins on Cryptopia, over half for sale. I don't notice any problems anywhere, aside from that there is only one node. added Synched addnode=85.236.188.28 addnode=144.76.91.109 addnode=172.104.156.182 addnode=184.164.129.202 addnode=24.225.155.33 addnode=51.254.45.117 addnode=72.241.235.204
|
|
|
|
gmerk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2017, 03:42:15 PM |
|
These nodes work with the new client (1.7) also?
|
|
|
|
PeterTheGrape
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2017, 05:11:53 PM Last edit: June 26, 2017, 12:05:21 AM by PeterTheGrape |
|
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/off/#!networkHe wasn't able to get the explorer to synch with 1.7 I believe, though the explorer is listed as using 1.7. The nodes listed are using 1.6.2 and a person might have to use that version until 1.7 is figured out. add If you use the oldest wallet it synchs a little then stops. If you use the newest wallet it doesn't synch at all. Only 1.6.2 works for now. https://github.com/thegreatoldone
|
|
|
|
zeewolf
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 236
Merit: 100
In dreamland; he awaits you.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2017, 08:13:09 PM |
|
Anyone tried to compile new wallet on Debian ? I have no luck. PM me.
|
|
|
|
bkbirge
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 02, 2017, 08:50:06 PM |
|
If I add those nodes in the wallet the correct syntax is "addnode xx.xx.xx.xx add" , is that right?
|
|
|
|
|