overwhelming consensus excludes Lauda, remains in DT2, went in2 buz w sold act

[Quickseller]

I also reviewed Lauda's sent trust over the past month, and identified ratings against 9 members in which the comment on the rating indicates that it was given because they publicly criticized. This makes it clear to anyone who is scammed by lauda, including anyone who doesn't fully agree with the outcome of a trade that they cannot voice their criticisms. It also makes it clear to anyone that disagrees with any of lauda's ratings that they should not speak publicly about this, removing any serious pressure for lauda to respond to any threads about his ratings with anything other than cat memes.
-snip-

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1717650

I don't see any evidence of this being the result of community feedback, nor do I see any evidence of any public discussion about this person's ratings.

[1714022288]

1714022288

[1714022288]

1714022288

[1714022288]

1714022288

[1714022288]

1714022288

[FFrankie]

Being new here, I have just finished my first extra-large bucket of popcorn and now I am left scratching my head as to whether Lauda is unemployed, has a severe pill addiction and is in dire financial straits, because he has neither denied nor confirmed these rumours.

If you are looking for someone in dire financial straits, you should take a look at OP who was scamming for pennies per escrow deal or the other one living in a shack.

Is he fit to practice his duties being on the Default Trust again, or his questionable mental faculties will cloud his fickle judgment till he is booted from the Big Boys' list once more?

My mental faculties are very fine, and far beyond those of the colluders. Thank you for asking.

Lauda never looks back in decision taken , never listens to convincing arguments, closes channel for appeal and will never revisit decision on his own. That has not been fair to certain cases of red neg by Lauda.

Wrong[1]. You are only stating these due to inherent bias from your own negative rating.
[1] I literally posted an example of a very old negative that I pulled a few days ago. Naturally, you didn't read this / chose to ignore it and spread lies.

Whats wrong with living in a shack? Some people choose to live within their means and if a shack is their only option than so be it

[Quickseller]

Being new here,

LOL. Since you very clearly intentionally are trying to create the false impression that you are new here, it is beyond even any unreasonable doubts that you are new here

[Lauda]

I also reviewed Lauda's sent trust over the past month, and identified ratings against 9 members in which the comment on the rating indicates that it was given because they publicly criticized. This makes it clear to anyone who is scammed by lauda, including anyone who doesn't fully agree with the outcome of a trade that they cannot voice their criticisms. It also makes it clear to anyone that disagrees with any of lauda's ratings that they should not speak publicly about this, removing any serious pressure for lauda to respond to any threads about his ratings with anything other than cat memes.
-snip-

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1717650

I don't see any evidence of this being the result of community feedback, nor do I see any evidence of any public discussion about this person's ratings.

Re, this:

Have you seen any examples of Lauda changing his behavior in reaction to feedback from the community? I have no examples of this, nor do I have examples of Lauda removing a single rating in response to community feedback.

Of course it was due to feedback of others, otherwise it would never have gotten removed. There was feedback about it from day one. Public discussion was unnecessary. I can handle my own stuff, without you and your alts interfering.

Whats wrong with living in a shack? Some people choose to live within their means and if a shack is their only option than so be it

Nothing. However, there is something very wrong in trying to insinuate that I'm solely financially desperate when one lives in a shack. Someone who is solely financially motivated would never work for this system (i.e. either never want to be in DT or only work on their own profit while the community suffers; a perfect example or two can be found in here).

Being new here,

LOL. Since you very clearly intentionally are trying to create the false impression that you are new here, it is beyond even any unreasonable doubts that you are new here

It's attempting to mock nullius, thus is very likely to be you rather than someone else.

[Quickseller]

Have you seen any examples of Lauda changing his behavior in reaction to feedback from the community? I have no examples of this, nor do I have examples of Lauda removing a single rating in response to community feedback.

Of course it was due to feedback of others, otherwise it would never have gotten removed. There was feedback about it from day one. Public discussion was unnecessary. I can handle my own stuff, without you and your alts interfering.

Being new here, and after reading through the archives of the forum I cannot find any evidence this is true, and a review of the tor logs, which I am an avid user of, it appears you are a dishonest person, so I am not inclined to believe you without specific citations.

[Lauda]

Have you seen any examples of Lauda changing his behavior in reaction to feedback from the community? I have no examples of this, nor do I have examples of Lauda removing a single rating in response to community feedback.

Of course it was due to feedback of others, otherwise it would never have gotten removed. There was feedback about it from day one. Public discussion was unnecessary. I can handle my own stuff, without you and your alts interfering.

Being new here, and after reading through the archives of the forum I cannot find any evidence this is true, and a review of the tor logs, which I am an avid user of, it appears you are a dishonest person, so I am not inclined to believe you without specific citations.

Yawn. When all of your lies get completely obliterated, you become so predictable.
Sigh. The other troll account should just be nuked by someone.

[Altered Bitcoin]

The 'good folks' frequenting the Meta and Reputation forums require a screenshot of your living quarters in order to make an accurate assessment of your 'shack' first. Until then - Lauda might be unemployed, has a severe pill addiction and is in dire financial straits. Because he has neither denied nor confirmed these rumors. Also, I am not sure that your mental faculties are sufficient for your duties, subpar at best they are. Clearly beginning to fail. I would implore theymos to run a careful background check on everyone currently present on the Default trust network and assess who among his higher-ups is fit to practice their duties and who isn't.

Did I mention that I am new here?

[FFrankie]

Whats wrong with living in a shack? Some people choose to live within their means and if a shack is their only option than so be it

Nothing. However, there is something very wrong in trying to insinuate that I'm solely financially desperate when one lives in a shack. Someone who is solely financially motivated would never work for this system (i.e. either never want to be in DT or only work on their own profit while the community suffers; a perfect example or two can be found in here).

I don't see how being on DT as anything to do with money. I don't think anyone decreases their standard of living and what they are accustomed too just to save some money unless they have a big lifestyle change such as losing a job or going to prison or losing some other type of income. You are still invlouded in a signature campaign it looks like? So I would assume your income has not changed

[OgNasty]

Being new here, I have just finished my first extra-large bucket of popcorn and now I am left scratching my head as to whether Lauda is unemployed, has a severe pill addiction and is in dire financial straits, because he has neither denied nor confirmed these rumours.

If you are looking for someone in dire financial straits, you should take a look at OP who was scamming for pennies per escrow deal or the other one living in a shack.

I think on top of affordability, living in a shack builds character.  Plus, Shaq is my all time favorite basketball player. 

[Quickseller]

Have you seen any examples of Lauda changing his behavior in reaction to feedback from the community? I have no examples of this, nor do I have examples of Lauda removing a single rating in response to community feedback.

Of course it was due to feedback of others, otherwise it would never have gotten removed. There was feedback about it from day one. Public discussion was unnecessary. I can handle my own stuff, without you and your alts interfering.

Being new here, and after reading through the archives of the forum I cannot find any evidence this is true, and a review of the tor logs, which I am an avid user of, it appears you are a dishonest person, so I am not inclined to believe you without specific citations.

Yawn. When all of your lies get completely obliterated, you become so predictable.
Sigh. The other troll account should just be nuked by someone.

Please don't post anything to indicate what I said is not true. I wouldn't want you to refute anything negative I say about you..

[Lauda]

Whats wrong with living in a shack? Some people choose to live within their means and if a shack is their only option than so be it

Nothing. However, there is something very wrong in trying to insinuate that I'm solely financially desperate when one lives in a shack. Someone who is solely financially motivated would never work for this system (i.e. either never want to be in DT or only work on their own profit while the community suffers; a perfect example or two can be found in here).

I don't see how being on DT as anything to do with money.

Then go talk to ShackNasty, who seems to think otherwise. Oh wait, that was just another pathetic smear attempt after falsely self-victimizing himself. Nevermind.

...You are still invlouded in a signature campaign it looks like? So I would assume your income has not changed

Have you ever considered that one of the major reasons behind this was the competition in the escrow business?
Average Joes tend to be predictable.

[OgNasty]

Then go talk to ShackNasty
Average Joes tend to be predictable.

You are on fire! 

[FFrankie]

...You are still invlouded in a signature campaign it looks like? So I would assume your income has not changed

Have you ever considered that one of the major reasons behind this was the competition in the escrow business?

Well not really because why would anyone use you as escrow where there is minerjones and OGnasty. I understand they cannot be online 24/7 and you might fill a niche.

But, like, people really use you as an escrow? and if people do what does it matter if you are on DT1 or DT2, I don't think being on the DT list makes you or anyone anymore trustworthy so if you are or aren't I don't see how you lose any business

[Gozie51]

Also who is the third member after OgNasty and Tomatocage?Theymos?

HostFat

But seriously why remove the most active DT member who is always on the verge to tag untrustworthy members from DT?

He is very shady, is not transparent in his ratings, ignores requests to appeal negative ratings, has questionable judgement....the list goes on.

He also does not leave negative trust against untrustworthy people (although some may be untrustworthy), he leaves negative trust for arbitrary reasons.

"he leaves negative trust for arbitrary reasons."

Even where it is obvious that you could be honest in your plea. Lauda never looks back in decision taken , never listens to convincing arguments, closes channel for appeal and will never revisit decision on his own. That has not been fair to certain cases of red neg by Lauda.

Now these account (which already got negged by Lauda) back to neutral trust again after s/he got removed from DT2 and these cheater will start to cheat again.

You are not in that shoe bro. Some of the red neg by lauda are not deserving. They are irrational acts especially where the mistake is pardonable and where the origin of the mistake is not from you or you are honestly ignorant of it. All ya should check this out and make your judgement if I shouldn't let go of the red neg by lauda after three months and counting. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2376140.msg24275694#msg24275694

I PM Str1x account after 80 days ,response after some time because I understand he is busy - PM lauda.

I PM hilariousandco , no response.

PM lauda after three months plus for the first time after the open thread appeal, no response.

I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?

What is then the place of retribution and pardon?

MY OPEN APPEAL AGAIN TO LAUDA, FORUM AND MODE. I HAVE BEEN ON THE REG NEG FOR MORE THAN THREE MONTHS.

Please take time to read through the links, check the dates I enter for the campaigns and you would see I was totally ignorant of the mistake of why I have been on the red . Thanks as you let me go off it.

[Lauda]

Well not really because why would anyone use you as escrow where there is minerjones and OGnasty. I understand they cannot be online 24/7 and you might fill a niche.

But, like, people really use you as an escrow?

Looks like you are completely uninformed. Volume wise, CET does more than anyone else around here, easily. minerjones is part of CET. A lot of collectors avoid OgNasty for obvious reasons. Pointless to talk to you apparently.

MY OPEN APPEAL AGAIN, TO LAUDA, FORUM AND MODE HAVE BEEN ON THE REG NEG FOR MORE THAN THREE MONTHS.

Please take time to read through the links, check the dates I enter for the campaigns and you would see I was totally ignorant of the mistake of why I have been on the red . Thanks as you let me go off it.

PM me once shorena removes my own negative. I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?

[FFrankie]

Well not really because why would anyone use you as escrow where there is minerjones and OGnasty. I understand they cannot be online 24/7 and you might fill a niche.

But, like, people really use you as an escrow?
[/quote]
Looks like you are completely uninformed. Volume wise, CET does more than anyone else around here, easily. minerjones is part of CET. A lot of collectors avoid OgNasty for obvious reasons. Pointless to talk to you apparently.





I have no idea what CET is, can you point me in the direction of the thread?

but again, if you are apart of CET why does it matter if you are on DT1 or DT2.

[Lauda]

I have no idea what CET is, can you point me in the direction of the thread?

but again, if you are apart of CET why does it matter if you are on DT1 or DT2.

CET. Who would use a NastyShack when they could use Blazed? That should intuitively answer the question.


That's what it is turning in to. I wonder who worked for that guy not that long ago. Hm.

[Gozie51]

PM me once shorena removes my own negative. I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?

I mean like tit for tat? Serving it back?

[TMAN]

But, like, people really use you as an escrow?

why would anyone serious about protecting funds use nastyshack? really? the most pretentious poster on the forum who "is better than multisig" ??

really - a single point of failure for for an ICO isnt an acceptable risk - hence why OG only gets the tiny escrow deals now - just check out his public escrow address.. its not what it once was, well there is that and the fact that he didn't pay the BTC he borrowed back in full.

Maybe that is what this is all about? he wants Lauda off DT as Lauda is stealing the escrow business from him?

[FFrankie]

But, like, people really use you as an escrow?

why would anyone serious about protecting funds use nastyshack? really? the most pretentious poster on the forum who "is better than multisig" ??

really - a single point of failure for for an ICO isnt an acceptable risk - hence why OG only gets the tiny escrow deals now - just check out his public escrow address.. its not what it once was, well there is that and the fact that he didn't pay the BTC he borrowed back in full.

Maybe that is what this is all about? he wants Lauda off DT as Lauda is stealing the escrow business from him?

because OGnasty holds like what 500 BTC of the fourms BTC, that makes him pretty fucking trustworthy to me