Why are bounty hunters guilty?

[srmecdes]

I do not have same idea. Rules are very clear. Bounty hunter is not guilty but multi participation is guilty!

[janelleshepard]

I think bounty hunters are not guilty, they're working for the projects , make the marketing becoming effective and gain the tokens from that projects.
Bounty hunters only are guilty if they're using many accounts and it violated the forum's rules. Noone in this forum supports for using many accounts at all.

[SergiOLa]

I supporting this opinion, because serious project will buy their tokens after ICo end and stabil their currency, and it dont depend from hunters or investors.. also serious project of course always in demand

[Ecex.Exchange]

Last two days to participate in our last airdrop. All participants who have bought at least 100 ZIG (0.015 ETH) will get
additional 100 tokens on 24.02.2018 (Estonia 100) https://ecex.exchange/

[ETHtotheMOON1]

Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!

it is true that bounty hunters mostly, not always, just sell the tokens immediately when they get for no matter what price. They claim they need the money desperately, but if they managed to hold for some time, they could getter good profit and help the project short term.

[nakamote]

We arent guilty,because it is a strategy to get more profits,dumping shit tokens after getting listed to exchanges isnt a crime which is why you shouldnt be saying that,hunters deserves and has the right to do whatever they want to their rewards,they arent the cause of the problem,the token itself do you think hunters will dump quality tokens ?no.

[Monkeyseemonkeydo]

The problem is not with some fantastic "lowering the rates" but with that kind of bounty hunters that came on thatforum for bounty rewards only and has no knowledges about that sphere. And they start spamming here giving a wrong ridiculous advice to investors just to hit the bounty score. That is the real problem.

[Haunebu]

Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!

it is true that bounty hunters mostly, not always, just sell the tokens immediately when they get for no matter what price. They claim they need the money desperately, but if they managed to hold for some time, they could getter good profit and help the project short term.

You do realize that they earned those coins or tokens and it is up to them what they wish to do with them, don't you? Why do people forget such simple things? There is nothing wrong about bounty hunters selling their rewards whenever they want since it is their money at the end of the day. No matter what anyone says, almost any hunter would sell their rewards as soon as they receive them in order to convert it into FIAT as quickly as possible. Personally, I have done this many times myself and this does not make anyone guilty. If someone feels that way, it is best to ignore such people.

[Catch-22]

Although some bounty hunters are guilty of selling their tokens are a lower price,  I think it will not affect much on the projects token price since what goes to bounty hunters are only a small portion of the whole investment that a project got during the ICO. Bounty hunters only get 1-2% and approximately 98-99% are ICO investors.

[GandiwaSF]

guilty? no, they only get the most prize of 8% of total supplay, and they work to promote the project here not bounty the guilty, but because of demand and supply market. so this win- win solution for cheap marketing 

[Jimmy palumbo]

Without any problem, the bounty thread can get better publicity for the project.
So this is obviously a win-win situation.

[Rammygold]

Bounty hunters guilty?
I won't believe or accept that how can you tell me that the people creating awareness, exposing it to the public are guilty  only a fake team that doesn't want to pay would say such

[Ramtapsbtc]

Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!

We can't avoid this situation because bounty hunters upon receiving their bounty they will sell that right away though not all but most the them will do. Usually if you are an investor, you will hold your investor for years before selling it.

[orssonlack]

I don't agree with your point. It's part of the marketing efforts of ICO's, gaining exposure and attracting more potential investors. What's being said about bounty hunters selling off their gains once the token hits the exchanges can also be implied to normal ICO investors. It's not an issue with the bounty hunters, just different people have different objectives with their investments. In the end it's a part of the game.

If the project is successful the remaining investors will still see gains eventually. If you're not out to keep the coins for longer terms I suggest you to invest in projects with a working product.

Here's a good topic for finding suggestions of such projects: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2451482.0

[carlisle1]

Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!

it is true that bounty hunters mostly, not always, just sell the tokens immediately when they get for no matter what price. They claim they need the money desperately, but if they managed to hold for some time, they could getter good profit and help the project short term.

I dont think this must he an issue,or maybe OP is one of those whos "Guilty"that he has claiming.
Bounty hunters are use to this,and they know what they are doing so wheres the guilt there?
Sad to say maybe they ate just a noob bounty hunters thats why they are crying about this issue when they can find good ico project to gain what they really need o earn

[bering]

i understand why called bounties hunters are guilty because bounties hunters usually will sell their tokens immediatelly after get paid and automatically the price of those token will fall because most of them are more likely to dumped the price and that's why some of ICO project only alocated 10% or less from total tokens supply for bounties program to ensure the price at the exchange more stable and not fall to the deep

[ambisyon]

Why are bounty hunters guilty?
Why do they say that bounty hunters have lowered the rate, and investors can not even return the money they invested? I think that if the project is honest, this situation is unacceptable, since hunters get a percentage from ICO, and the project team must redeem their token or coin!

it is true that bounty hunters mostly, not always, just sell the tokens immediately when they get for no matter what price. They claim they need the money desperately, but if they managed to hold for some time, they could getter good profit and help the project short term.

I dont think this must he an issue,or maybe OP is one of those whos "Guilty"that he has claiming.
Bounty hunters are use to this,and they know what they are doing so wheres the guilt there?
Sad to say maybe they ate just a noob bounty hunters thats why they are crying about this issue when they can find good ico project to gain what they really need o earn

Guilty for those bounty hunters who had multiple accounts in a certain ICO signature bounty campaign which I think is greedy to earn much profit than the others. I also agree that after the ICO campaign, instead of investing in such ICO, most of the hunters will just have to claim the token reward and change to fiat money but you cannot blame them for that because earning profit is what bounty hunters do for a living.

[Mr.Freeman]

Firstly, investors get their coins of bounty hunters. Secondly, investors get from 40 to 80% of the total pool of released tokens, and bounty hunters - 1-2% of the sold. Are the above points not a proof of the fact that bounty hunters can not affect the exchange rate of the coin?

[big kid]

I also think that the organizers should support the course of their project. It is possible not to immediately give a reward for a bounty campaign, while investors do not have the opportunity to sell a coin.

[admtall]

Bounty hunters do a great job to promote the ICO. the only problem is, there are so many ICO that already reached the hardcap and decided to run away, like Envion.