HobbyMiner1122
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 03, 2018, 03:03:15 PM |
|
Miners Join Us 0.1% Fees XHV Haven Mining Pool Available Fast Reliable Servers We Have A Code Of Conduct For The Pool Join Our Discord Channel |
|
|
|
|
|
big_daddy
|
|
August 05, 2018, 05:00:24 PM |
|
|
If you don't believe it or don't get it, I don't have the time to try to convince you, sorry.
|
|
|
Zer0Sum
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1588
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 06, 2018, 12:07:10 AM |
|
Haven is an electronic currency that can "combine standard market prices and stable fiat storage values" . If this is achieved then Haven will definitely be the choice for all payments and investors. Can you please share how you do to achieve this great feature?
If they can pull that one out, it would be awesome. If they can pull that one out...... Short answer to your question: It is still vaporware. They got a nice Monero fork working, but that's it. The "stablecoin algo" looks like something an 18 yo college freshman drew up on a napkin... It's full of circular logic that would flunk you out of Econ 101 or Stats 101 or CompSc 101, lol It's obvious that @notsofast did not get very far in university. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miningpool_id
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
August 06, 2018, 09:00:24 PM |
|
Haven Pool Mining 0.3% Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
Mihawk
|
|
August 08, 2018, 04:32:06 PM |
|
XHV is one of the rare projects with a great team and things are developing and a great time! This morning I bought some XHV and I'll be doing it until the end of this month! Waiting for good things here. Haven applications will be very interesting and more interesting will be the market reaction, the Top 100 CMC will be a simple reality.
|
|
|
|
|
choriori86
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
August 09, 2018, 01:04:13 PM |
|
It is similar to ETN exchanging with USDT at cryptopia
Cryptopia doesn't require identity verification, and ETN is a non-traceable coin.
It can keep anonymity.
It is also possible to exchange USDT for coins other than ETN.
|
|
|
|
|
Petiyashaket
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
August 10, 2018, 03:41:55 AM
Last edit: August 10, 2018, 04:07:34 AM by Petiyashaket |
|
Hello, I'm having problems with the restoration of access to the wallet.
A home computer writes: Please check your purse log and daemon for errors. You can also try to run havend.exe manually.
Then I decided to restore the purse on another computer with the help of seed phrases
I write a new wallet: ---------------------------
Error
Characters not from the ASCII table are not allowed in the path to the wallet or account name
When I specify the path without Russian symbols, the wallet to me writes:
---------------------------
Error
---------------------------
failed to save file "C: /Users/Юлия/AppData/Local/Temp/haven.Uh3472.keys"
---------------------------
OK
---------------------------
It turns out that whichever way I indicated the purse will still try to write the file in the way with Russian characters
|
|
|
|
|
|
ttookk
|
|
August 10, 2018, 10:23:37 AM |
|
XHV is one of the rare projects with a great team and things are developing and a great time! This morning I bought some XHV and I'll be doing it until the end of this month! Waiting for good things here. Haven applications will be very interesting and more interesting will be the market reaction, the Top 100 CMC will be a simple reality.
I think their heart is in the right place, but unless I missed something and the way they plan to implement their stable coin changed, there are some serious problems with their approach. I'm not even going back to the oracle problem again, which I still think is mostly unsolved (not only for XHV, but for any project). Here is what I wonder and what hasn't really been explained well enough: The main preimse is that if I "offshore", say, 500 XHV and when I want to "onshore" them and the XHV price halved, I get 1000 XHV back. To actually extract the value, I would need to market sell them, but this only works if there is enough liquidity. XHV is critically dependent on becoming a high marketcap, highly traded cryptocurrency, because if they are not, there is no way to onshore decently big funds without losing most of their value. And this means that one of their main premises, that users are able to safely store value without the risk of volatility simply doesn't work. I mean, if I offshore XHV, I am essentially taking a bet that XHV will stay relevant in the future. And, well, if I buy any coin, I am making the exact same bet. I realize that they now have a two tokens approach, but I assume the way the stable tokens are backed hasn't changed. Which keeps all the issues they had before still intact. As I said, maybe I missed something, so if I did, feel free to correct me. But don't gat back with the usual "team is working on it, no worries" nonsense. |
|
|
|
|
promotionuser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 143
Merit: 0
|
|
August 10, 2018, 10:25:16 AM |
|
My big concern with Haven is the small amount of coins they pre mined. There is really only one dev and I’m not sure how they going to fund this massive task at hand. It’s far too much work for one dev.
|
|
|
|
|
choriori86
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
August 12, 2018, 10:15:52 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
luxxun89
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
August 13, 2018, 09:06:35 AM |
|
Nice. Honestly, I wouldn't keep huge balances on TradeOgre but damn that site is nice. No bullshit, just coins and trades, low fees, and it just works
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kissmarx
|
|
August 20, 2018, 11:32:31 PM |
|
I just downloaded the wallet. And I have a question: Should I start a local node? or should I need to start it with a remote node? Which is better between the two? Which will make the wallet synchronize faster? If a remote node is better, can anybody direct me on where to fine the remote node? or should the remote node needs also to be my node? I don't have much idea about this. Thanks for any help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buzhou
Member
Offline
Activity: 199
Merit: 10
|
|
August 23, 2018, 12:45:03 AM |
|
It's a great opportunity to get some XHV! For some reason people are selling, but they should know that they will hardly have a chance to find Haven at these prices in the near future.  |
|
|
|
|
littleboy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
August 23, 2018, 04:54:59 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zer0Sum
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1588
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 23, 2018, 07:53:35 PM |
|
XHV is one of the rare projects with a great team and things are developing and a great time! This morning I bought some XHV and I'll be doing it until the end of this month! Waiting for good things here. Haven applications will be very interesting and more interesting will be the market reaction, the Top 100 CMC will be a simple reality.
I realize that they now have a two tokens approach, but I assume the way the stable tokens are backed hasn't changed. Which keeps all the issues they had before still intact. As I said, maybe I missed something, so if I did, feel free to correct me. But don't get back with the usual "team is working on it, no worries" nonsense. They are addressing the hardest problems in crypto with juvenile solutions... The whole things is based on circular logic a college freshman would spot in 30 seconds... Just apply semi-extreme scenarios to their "ideas" and you get KABOOM.. But, somehow, they've got big time spec miners Twitter shilling... it makes you wonder about the education system. "Working on it" = bolting shit on to a mathematically unsound solution does not improve it... Frankly, I don't think Maker is much better... there IS a better approach to stability staring people in the face. |
|
|
|
|
|
ttookk
|
|
August 24, 2018, 10:52:05 AM |
|
XHV is one of the rare projects with a great team and things are developing and a great time! This morning I bought some XHV and I'll be doing it until the end of this month! Waiting for good things here. Haven applications will be very interesting and more interesting will be the market reaction, the Top 100 CMC will be a simple reality.
I realize that they now have a two tokens approach, but I assume the way the stable tokens are backed hasn't changed. Which keeps all the issues they had before still intact. As I said, maybe I missed something, so if I did, feel free to correct me. But don't get back with the usual "team is working on it, no worries" nonsense. They are addressing the hardest problems in crypto with juvenile solutions... The whole things is based on circular logic a college freshman would spot in 30 seconds... Just apply semi-extreme scenarios to their "ideas" and you get KABOOM.. But, somehow, they've got big time spec miners Twitter shilling... it makes you wonder about the education system. "Working on it" = bolting shit on to a mathematically unsound solution does not improve it... Frankly, I don't think Maker is much better... there IS a better approach to stability staring people in the face. Yes, the math doesn't make sense at all. "If the price goes down, we simply produce more tokens." I mean... What? It's sad to see that this isn't addressed more here. I don't know, I have the feeling that the whole forum is kinda going to shit. Back when I started in 2016, there were endless technical discussions. Now, you have 3 bot posts, one guy asking how much collateral you need for a masternode, another when the ICO is and the rest is mining pool advertisements. I don't like Slack, Telegram and Discord. I think for a meaningful conversation, they are too noisy. That' what forums should be for... I haven't looked too much into Maker. Isn't the idea that they are heavily overcollateralized or something? I mean, I somewhat agree with you and honestly, I fing the idea of a stablecoin completely overrated. Get to mass adoption and it shouldn't be a problem anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mythul
|
|
August 24, 2018, 01:19:10 PM |
|
Anonymous cryptocurrencies are truly trans-regional, secure COINS,
XHV is an untraceable cryptocurrency with standard market pricing and a stable store of legal value
|
|
|
|
|
|
