Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
|
January 04, 2020, 06:38:23 PM |
|
Some people believe that global warming is just the conspiracy to control the development of industrial country. Sometime, I think so. What about you?
Scientists worldwide agree that global warming is happening, and that human activity causes it... No they do not. They typically may say something like human activity is a partial factor.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 1378
|
|
January 16, 2020, 06:06:26 AM |
|
Possibly the biggest thing is the sun. Sun spots are releases of energy into space, that when it hits the earth, it turns into heat. Sun spots are the fewest that they have been for 200 years. When you combine this with the ash from dozens of volcanoes around the world, odds are great that we are entering an ice age.
7 Major Earth Changes That Are Happening Right Now That Everyone Needs To Know AboutThe sun is behaving very strangely, freakishly cold weather is breaking out all over the world, ocean temperatures continue to rise, volcanoes all over the globe are shooting ash miles into the air, Australia is experiencing the worst wildfires that they have ever seen, and the north magnetic pole has been moving at a pace that is deeply alarming scientists. Could it be possible that all of this bizarre activity is leading up to some sort of a crescendo?
Sadly, most people don't even realize what is happening, and that is because the mainstream media only emphasizes stories that fit with the particular narratives that they are currently pushing.
But it has gotten to the point where nobody can deny that really weird things are happening. The following are 7 major earth changes that are happening right now that everyone needs to know about…
|
|
|
|
sovie
|
|
January 16, 2020, 06:20:36 AM |
|
Anything that goes unnoticed is harmful, same for carbon release in the air. For decades we are emitting carbon in the air without any check while cutting down the trees. Those who don't believe that global warming is real, can see the change of climate in there surroundings. We all are getting effected by this global warming, lets control it before it gets too late.
|
|
|
|
renuabened
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
January 16, 2020, 06:24:02 AM |
|
Yes, there is a hypothesis that this is all being promoted for making money on this. But there is also a theory that temperature is now recovering after a nuclear winter. According to this hypothesis, in the 50s and 60s, the USSR and the USA launched a mini nuclear winter on the planet. The temperatures that were before are hidden by governments. But it seems to me that this theory is not good at all, there is no logic in it. Well, the most famous hypothesis is that global warming is really happening. I don’t know what to believe. In addition, for me it is not so important what exactly is happening. In any case, we all don’t know much.
|
|
|
|
mickyy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2020, 09:29:15 AM |
|
yes, it is. I notice that in my country in Central Europe there are no snow during the winter and the temperatures are surprisingly high during the year. it's funny that people don't believe in global warming, it has small 'symptoms' but yes, it serious problem, climate gets worse every year
|
|
|
|
Negotiation
|
|
January 17, 2020, 12:55:49 PM |
|
I believe that global warming is real but it is not a conspiracy to control the development of industrialized countries. Global warming helps to predict the weather. Global warming is needed to control the sunshine of our country It is the effect of global warming and seasonal wind in our country.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 1378
|
|
February 08, 2020, 07:29:42 PM |
|
The question isn't about global warming. It isn't even about the fact that an ice-age is coming. The real question has to do with how we are going to prepare for ice-age devastation, personally.
Earth Is About To Enter A 30-Year "Mini Ice Age" As The Sun Hibernates, Scientist WarnsAccording to NASA, the Sun will reach its lowest activity in over two centuries in 2020. As a result of it going into a natural period of hibernation, Earth could see temperatures drop, resulting in food shortages on a global scale. The temperature could also drop by as much as one degree Celsius over a period of roughly 12 months—an incremental yet significant change in climate conditions that could have unpredictable results.
According to NASA, the Sun will reach its lowest activity in over two centuries in 2020. As a result of it going into a natural period of hibernation, Earth could see temperatures drop, resulting in food shortages on a global scale. The temperature could also drop by as much as one degree Celsius over a period of roughly 12 months—an incremental yet significant change in climate conditions that could have unpredictable results.
Valentina Zharkova, a professor at Northumbria University's department of mathematics, physics, and electrical engineering, told the Sun that the period will be an expanded version of the solar minimums that naturally occur every 11 years. However, rather than lasting only a few years, the "Grand Solar Minimum" could last for up to 33 years.
The professor, who has published multiple scientific papers on the subject, said:
"The Sun is approaching a hibernation period.
|
|
|
|
exemplaar
|
|
February 08, 2020, 08:55:47 PM |
|
You folks here are so outdated. It is so obvious hoax that the environmental cultists themselves renamed it now to CLIMATE CHANGE. It is no longer even called global worming, LOL Watch and enjoy - environmental socialist-cultist Greta crumbles without her script https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0IZlY8llMc
|
|
|
|
canamani
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 08, 2020, 09:55:41 PM |
|
Last year i thought is not, but with all winter that should come now and not come , yes global worm is real in my opinion and can be stopped only if pollution will stop.
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
|
February 09, 2020, 02:03:19 AM |
|
Last year i thought is not, but with all winter that should come now and not come , yes global worm is real in my opinion and can be stopped only if pollution will stop.
Global worm? I will have to think about that. That sounds really scary.
|
|
|
|
Negotiation
|
|
February 09, 2020, 03:00:42 PM |
|
Last year i thought is not, but with all winter that should come now and not come , yes global worm is real in my opinion and can be stopped only if pollution will stop.
I don't think it can be stopped because global warming will continue worldwide The temperature of these two seasons whether winter or hot, is controlled There will be no sunshine many times. It cannot pollute the environment but controls the temperature.
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
|
February 09, 2020, 05:46:47 PM |
|
Sun spots are releases of energy into space, that when it hits the earth, it turns into heat. ...
No, that is inaccurate.
|
|
|
|
TwitchySeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 2071
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
February 09, 2020, 10:10:39 PM |
|
Some people believe that global warming is just the conspiracy to control the development of industrial country. Sometime, I think so. What about you?
Scientists worldwide agree that global warming is happening, and that human activity causes it... No they do not. They typically may say something like human activity is a partial factor. It depends on semantics. There are many peer reviewed studies that calculate the global warming consensus differently. The main difference is how they handle studies that do not take a stance one way or the other. Another factor is whether the the authors self rate their study or if they are rated abstractly. In all cases, the % of studies with the stance that it's extremely likely that humans do not play a roll in global warming ranges from 0.4% to 2.1%. When taking into consideration studies that do not take a stance, 33%-38% have a stance that it's extremely likely humans do play a roll, 63%-67% have no stance. When only considering studies that take a stance one way or the other, ~97% of studies take a stance that it's extremely likely humans are the primary factor of global warming. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literatureWe analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991–2011 matching the topics 'global climate change' or 'global warming'. We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming. In a second phase of this study, we invited authors to rate their own papers. Compared to abstract ratings, a smaller percentage of self-rated papers expressed no position on AGW (35.5%). Among self-rated papers expressing a position on AGW, 97.2% endorsed the consensus. For both abstract ratings and authors' self-ratings, the percentage of endorsements among papers expressing a position on AGW marginally increased over time. Our analysis indicates that the number of papers rejecting the consensus on AGW is a vanishingly small proportion of the published research. Comment on 'Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature'Cook et al's highly influential consensus study (2013 Environ. Res. Lett. 8 024024) finds different results than previous studies in the consensus literature. It omits tests for systematic differences between raters. Many abstracts are unaccounted for. The paper does not discuss the procedures used to ensure independence between the raters, to ensure that raters did not use additional information, and to ensure that later ratings were not influenced by earlier results. Clarifying these issues would further strengthen the paper, and establish it as our best estimate of the consensus. Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warmingThe consensus that humans are causing recent global warming is shared by 90%–100% of publishing climate scientists according to six independent studies by co-authors of this paper. Those results are consistent with the 97% consensus reported by Cook et al (Environ. Res. Lett. 8 024024) based on 11 944 abstracts of research papers, of which 4014 took a position on the cause of recent global warming. A survey of authors of those papers (N = 2412 papers) also supported a 97% consensus. Tol (2016 Environ. Res. Lett. 11 048001) comes to a different conclusion using results from surveys of non-experts such as economic geologists and a self-selected group of those who reject the consensus. We demonstrate that this outcome is not unexpected because the level of consensus correlates with expertise in climate science. At one point, Tol also reduces the apparent consensus by assuming that abstracts that do not explicitly state the cause of global warming ('no position') represent non-endorsement, an approach that if applied elsewhere would reject consensus on well-established theories such as plate tectonics. We examine the available studies and conclude that the finding of 97% consensus in published climate research is robust and consistent with other surveys of climate scientists and peer-reviewed studies.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 1378
|
|
February 09, 2020, 10:46:25 PM |
|
^^^ But consensus isn't the only way. Political science is the other way. You know. Where the person who out-blabs the others is right. Like fake-news media, for example. Oh, wait. Isn't consensus all a part of that? Global warming is real or isn't real based on political science consensus blabbing. Wow! We can get rid of poverty, hunger, wars, even evil, by just blabbing a blabbing consensus into being. Good thinking.
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
|
February 09, 2020, 11:10:09 PM |
|
Some people believe that global warming is just the conspiracy to control the development of industrial country. Sometime, I think so. What about you?
Scientists worldwide agree that global warming is happening, and that human activity causes it... No they do not. They typically may say something like human activity is a partial factor. It depends on semantics.... No, none of that double talk is necessary at all. Human activity is simply one dimension affecting climate, and within that, there are regional issues such as the "brown cloud" over Asia, farming techniques, deforestation, and then in one corner a group of issues concerning co2. Of course politicians latch on these to attempt to exert control. So yes, conspiracies certainly exist.
|
|
|
|
TwitchySeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 2071
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
February 10, 2020, 01:54:36 AM |
|
Some people believe that global warming is just the conspiracy to control the development of industrial country. Sometime, I think so. What about you?
Scientists worldwide agree that global warming is happening, and that human activity causes it... No they do not. They typically may say something like human activity is a partial factor. It depends on semantics.... No, none of that double talk is necessary at all. Human activity is simply one dimension affecting climate, and within that, there are regional issues such as the "brown cloud" over Asia, farming techniques, deforestation, and then in one corner a group of issues concerning co2. Of course politicians latch on these to attempt to exert control. So yes, conspiracies certainly exist. Yes, there are other factors besides Humans. The consensus is that Humans are the primary factor, not that it is the sole factor. And yes, politicians are definitely exploiting the situation. Some are motivated by the money that is coming in from the fossil fuel industry or simply 'beating the left' , some are motivated by the renewable energy industry or the desire to 'beat the right'. All we can do is look at the research objectively, which shows that it's extremely likely humans are the primary cause of global warming.
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
|
February 10, 2020, 02:42:37 AM |
|
Some people believe that global warming is just the conspiracy to control the development of industrial country. Sometime, I think so. What about you?
Scientists worldwide agree that global warming is happening, and that human activity causes it... No they do not. They typically may say something like human activity is a partial factor. It depends on semantics.... No, none of that double talk is necessary at all. Human activity is simply one dimension affecting climate, and within that, there are regional issues such as the "brown cloud" over Asia, farming techniques, deforestation, and then in one corner a group of issues concerning co2. Of course politicians latch on these to attempt to exert control. So yes, conspiracies certainly exist. Yes, there are other factors besides Humans. The consensus is that Humans are the primary factor, not that it is the sole factor. And yes, politicians are definitely exploiting the situation. Some are motivated by the money that is coming in from the fossil fuel industry or simply 'beating the left' , some are motivated by the renewable energy industry or the desire to 'beat the right'. All we can do is look at the research objectively, which shows that it's extremely likely humans are the primary cause of global warming. The mathematical factor "climate sensitivity" is the technical way of describing effect of humans. This replaces vague words like "primary" "likely" blah blah with simple estimated constant.
|
|
|
|
TwitchySeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 2071
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
February 10, 2020, 03:09:21 AM Last edit: February 10, 2020, 08:44:22 AM by TwitchySeal |
|
Some people believe that global warming is just the conspiracy to control the development of industrial country. Sometime, I think so. What about you?
Scientists worldwide agree that global warming is happening, and that human activity causes it... No they do not. They typically may say something like human activity is a partial factor. It depends on semantics.... No, none of that double talk is necessary at all. Human activity is simply one dimension affecting climate, and within that, there are regional issues such as the "brown cloud" over Asia, farming techniques, deforestation, and then in one corner a group of issues concerning co2. Of course politicians latch on these to attempt to exert control. So yes, conspiracies certainly exist. Yes, there are other factors besides Humans. The consensus is that Humans are the primary factor, not that it is the sole factor. And yes, politicians are definitely exploiting the situation. Some are motivated by the money that is coming in from the fossil fuel industry or simply 'beating the left' , some are motivated by the renewable energy industry or the desire to 'beat the right'. All we can do is look at the research objectively, which shows that it's extremely likely humans are the primary cause of global warming. The mathematical factor "climate sensitivity" is the technical way of describing effect of humans. This replaces vague words like "primary" "likely" blah blah with simple estimated constant. Primary cause means the effect is greater than any other cause. ( https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/) The following are scientific organizations that hold the position that Climate Change has been caused by human action:Academia Chilena de Ciencias, Chile Academia das Ciencias de Lisboa, Portugal Academia de Ciencias de la República Dominicana Academia de Ciencias Físicas, Matemáticas y Naturales de Venezuela Academia de Ciencias Medicas, Fisicas y Naturales de Guatemala Academia Mexicana de Ciencias,Mexico Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Bolivia Academia Nacional de Ciencias del Peru Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal Académie des Sciences, France Academies of Arts, Humanities and Sciences of Canada Academy of Athens Academy of Science of Mozambique Academy of Science of South Africa Academy of Sciences for the Developing World (TWAS) Academy of Sciences Malaysia Academy of Sciences of Moldova Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Academy of Sciences of the Islamic Republic of Iran Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Egypt Academy of the Royal Society of New Zealand Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Italy Africa Centre for Climate and Earth Systems Science African Academy of Sciences Albanian Academy of Sciences Amazon Environmental Research Institute American Academy of Pediatrics American Anthropological Association American Association for the Advancement of Science American Association of State Climatologists (AASC) American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians American Astronomical Society American Chemical Society American College of Preventive Medicine American Fisheries Society American Geophysical Union American Institute of Biological Sciences American Institute of Physics American Meteorological Society American Physical Society American Public Health Association American Quaternary Association American Society for Microbiology American Society of Agronomy American Society of Civil Engineers American Society of Plant Biologists American Statistical Association Association of Ecosystem Research Centers Australian Academy of Science Australian Bureau of Meteorology Australian Coral Reef Society Australian Institute of Marine Science Australian Institute of Physics Australian Marine Sciences Association Australian Medical Association Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society Bangladesh Academy of Sciences Botanical Society of America Brazilian Academy of Sciences British Antarctic Survey Bulgarian Academy of Sciences California Academy of Sciences Cameroon Academy of Sciences Canadian Association of Physicists Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences Canadian Geophysical Union Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society Canadian Society of Soil Science Canadian Society of Zoologists Caribbean Academy of Sciences views Center for International Forestry Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Colombian Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) (Australia) Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research Croatian Academy of Arts and Sciences Crop Science Society of America Cuban Academy of Sciences Delegation of the Finnish Academies of Science and Letters Ecological Society of America Ecological Society of Australia Environmental Protection Agency European Academy of Sciences and Arts European Federation of Geologists European Geosciences Union European Physical Society European Science Foundation Federation of American Scientists French Academy of Sciences Geological Society of America Geological Society of Australia Geological Society of London Georgian Academy of Sciences German Academy of Natural Scientists Leopoldina Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences Indian National Science Academy Indonesian Academy of Sciences Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand Institution of Mechanical Engineers, UK InterAcademy Council International Alliance of Research Universities International Arctic Science Committee International Association for Great Lakes Research International Council for Science International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences International Research Institute for Climate and Society International Union for Quaternary Research International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics International Union of Pure and Applied Physics Islamic World Academy of Sciences Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities Kenya National Academy of Sciences Korean Academy of Science and Technology Kosovo Academy of Sciences and Arts l'Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal Latin American Academy of Sciences Latvian Academy of Sciences Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Madagascar National Academy of Arts, Letters, and Sciences Mauritius Academy of Science and Technology Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts National Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences, Argentina National Academy of Sciences of Armenia National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic National Academy of Sciences, Sri Lanka National Academy of Sciences, United States of America National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Association of Geoscience Teachers National Association of State Foresters National Center for Atmospheric Research National Council of Engineers Australia National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, New Zealand National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Research Council National Science Foundation Natural England Natural Environment Research Council, UK Natural Science Collections Alliance Network of African Science Academies New York Academy of Sciences Nicaraguan Academy of Sciences Nigerian Academy of Sciences Norwegian Academy of Sciences and Letters Oklahoma Climatological Survey Organization of Biological Field Stations Pakistan Academy of Sciences Palestine Academy for Science and Technology Pew Center on Global Climate Change Polish Academy of Sciences Romanian Academy Royal Academies for Science and the Arts of Belgium Royal Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences of Spain Royal Astronomical Society, UK Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters Royal Irish Academy Royal Meteorological Society (UK) Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research Royal Scientific Society of Jordan Royal Society of Canada Royal Society of Chemistry, UK Royal Society of the United Kingdom Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Russian Academy of Sciences Science and Technology, Australia Science Council of Japan Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research Scientific Committee on Solar-Terrestrial Physics Scripps Institution of Oceanography Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Slovak Academy of Sciences Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts Society for Ecological Restoration International Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Society of American Foresters Society of Biology (UK) Society of Systematic Biologists Soil Science Society of America Sudan Academy of Sciences Sudanese National Academy of Science Tanzania Academy of Sciences The Wildlife Society (international) Turkish Academy of Sciences Uganda National Academy of Sciences Union of German Academies of Sciences and Humanities United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole Research Center World Association of Zoos and Aquariums World Federation of Public Health Associations World Forestry Congress World Health Organization World Meteorological Organization Zambia Academy of Sciences Zimbabwe Academy of Sciences
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 1378
|
|
February 10, 2020, 03:40:35 AM |
|
^^^ Wow! You typed all that in this short of a period of time?
|
|
|
|
tvbcof
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4718
Merit: 1277
|
|
February 10, 2020, 08:14:07 AM |
|
^^^ Wow! You typed all that in this short of a period of time? Wonder how many of these entities run on grant money. Grant money which wouldn't be their unless they play ball on the climate change scam. I'll bet every last one of them. This reminds me of the 'big list' of formed a 'consensus' of U.S. 'intelligence agencies' who found that Russia hacked the election (or one similar idiotic assertion from that time.) It included entities who obviously had no reason or ability to look into the matter. e.g., the Coast Guard. It was obvious that they just signed some piece of paper which was thrust in front of the director's face. Totally meaningless and a joke.
|
sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
|
|
|
|