merit hole: 30 accounts more than 500 merits

[Husires]

Group A:

ivanst776: merit source for these accounts

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=333242

Bitcoin is not our future,

http://archive.is/L9Ljw
20 merits were sent to this user and

bitcoin really go high in the past

http://archive.is/YYqwc
10 merits were sent to this user and

Bitcoin is mother of all coins.

http://archive.is/Ncqkd
50 merits were sent to this user

Bitcoin is very volatile while FAIT is at on their foot.

http://archive.is/Z05wT
10 merits were sent to this user and

Bitcoin is widely use

http://archive.is/Eypaj
15 merits were sent to this user, 1 merits Received from anjho.ace and

bitcoin is not a pyramid scheme as no one really owns bitcoin!

http://archive.is/4bJzF
10 merits were sent to this user, 5 merits Received from santino11, 10 merits Received from  jpoker272727 and

bitcoin is bitcoiin!

http://archive.is/tO3Y1
10 merits were sent to this user and

Bitcoin is

http://archive.is/MJrY8
5 merits were sent to this user,1 merits Received from ace9989  and

bitcoins value is now recovering

http://archive.is/AXrM9
5 merits were sent to this user,

Bitcoin is the best mode of payment since

http://archive.is/dprpb
5 merits were sent to this user, 10 merits Received from santino11, 15 merits Received from anjho.ace and

bitcoin is a huge amount of money..

http://archive.is/er6pS
10 merits were sent to this user and

bitcoin BTC will still be the only one!

http://archive.is/D5qPe


Group B:
jpoker272727: merit source for these accounts
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=36641

santino11 : mentioned above
8 merits were sent to this user and

Bitcoin fluctuation is normal

http://archive.is/QT51U
10 merits were sent to this user and

Bitcoin is on its way to bullish the market.

http://archive.is/3ILeA
10 merits
kram31: mentioned above
50 merits
anjho.ace: mentioned above
5 merits were sent to this user and

Since bitcoin is volatile,

http://archive.is/9F0eo


Group C:
gunhell16: mentioned above
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1101424

4 merits Received from

Bitcoin is just a part of it and just a medium,

http://archive.is/aIFe5
15 merits Received from
anjho.ace: mentioned above
16 merits Received from

Bitcoin is one of the safest among all,

http://archive.is/bLkfM
10 merits Received from

Bitcoin is the real number 1 and most of the people believe on that,

http://archive.is/NaEQ7
10 merits Received from

Bitcoin is special as it was created with a low number of supplies.

http://archive.is/cNZgt
10 merits Received from
santino11: mentioned above
4 merits Received from

TRUE! BITCOIN is everything in this crypto community,

http://archive.is/pCEs9
5 merits Received from
ivanst776: mentioned above

Group D:

anjho.ace

lovesybitz: mentioned above
4 merits Received from

Bitcoin is always the best Cryptocurrency.

http://archive.is/pCEs9
2 merits Received from

Bitcoin is going to change the problem of monetary system,

http://archive.is/dQEha
10 merits Received from

Do you think bitcoin is dangerous in the future? In my opinion, Bitcoin is backedup by currencies and vice versa, Bitcoin is backup by different companies that more valuable than gold but Technology innovation is part of it's union. Bitcoin is the mother of all cryptocurrencies and behind everything there's what we call Blockchain.

http://archive.is/pCEs9
1 merits Received from

Bitcoin cash is always the fake bitcoin or the replicate bitcoin.

http://archive.is/Ka9CF
50 merits Received from
 jpoker272727 : mentioned above
4 merits Received from

Binance is up now and start their exchange again,

http://archive.is/tuzrz
4 merits Received from
kram31: mentioned above
1 merits Received from

Yes bitcoin is really a bitcoin machine that's why there are 21millions supply in circulation

http://archive.is/GjeEf
1 merits Received from
cherryganda:mentioned above

Group E:
ynatopak14 Send 11 merit to cherryganda

bitcoin is the new currency that any government can't control.

http://archive.is/S7TQV
Nellayar Received 5 Merits from gunhell16, 1 Merits from lovesybitz  and

Bitcoin is volatile because there is a limited supply only and it is just 21 million bitcoins.

Gibreil  Received 4 Merits from Bobby park, 1 Merits from Nellayar  and

Bitcoin is not a fiat current.

[1714800789]

1714800789

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I noticed ivanst776 has been sending a lot of merits for posts that were basically shitposts, but I'm still on the fence about how much of a transgression it is to do so, and I never said anything.   

Glad you started this thread--ironically, I would give OP some merit but I ran out of them. 

I would totally not be disappointed if a DT member tagged all of these users. I feel strongly that shitposters should not "earn" enough merit to rank up, and certainly that these shmucks didn't deserve even 2 merits for any of their posts, much less 10 or 20.  That's insane.

[Toughit]

I can see why ivanst776 awarded 50 merit points for the post below, after all it does mention Bitcoin three times and never mentions merit...


'Bitcoin is a risk, but we must remember that the best profit comes from the riskiest decision we can make.
Bitcoin security is not perfect and it always depends on the internet and we have lots of hackers all over the world.
so better put some money on bitcoin and not take the risk of giving all you have. just a part of it."

[ericunc95]

Damn...all that merit for those posts.  I am struggling to get to 10 to rank up to member but at least I know I am doing it the right way.  I know not all of my posts are merit worthy but hopefully some of them continue to earn from time to time.  I hate seeing this system abused even though I might not like it.  Thanks for your hard work in identifying these transgressions.  I am sure after a while that they will be easier to spot and hopefully they can get addressed and the issue be remediated.

[Wheelige]

I noticed ivanst776 has been sending a lot of merits for posts that were basically shitposts, but I'm still on the fence about how much of a transgression it is to do so, and I never said anything.   

Glad you started this thread--ironically, I would give OP some merit but I ran out of them. 

I would totally not be disappointed if a DT member tagged all of these users. I feel strongly that shitposters should not "earn" enough merit to rank up, and certainly that these shmucks didn't deserve even 2 merits for any of their posts, much less 10 or 20.  That's insane.

Considering that the whole point of the 'system' is to decrease and at the very least discourage posts like this, I dont think its too much of a stretch to say that this is a transgression. 50 Merits for a post that could be written by a 6yr old and tries to explain risk/reward by saying take a massive risk is bat shit insane. Do people honestly think that this post adds to the community and that this poster deserves the respect that goes along with a higher rank? Great work OP for point this out, and some the merit you've earned.

[RamonBTC]

I’m not sure what they’re willing to do because they look so desperate, that end up doing something ridiculously obvious. They’re fooling they’re own kind and giving a shit of legitimacy on complaining afterwards. This is the reason why we badly need someone like lauda to clean this place.

[icopress]

I noticed ivanst776 has been sending a lot of merits for posts that were basically shitposts, but I'm still on the fence about how much of a transgression it is to do so, and I never said anything.   

Glad you started this thread--ironically, I would give OP some merit but I ran out of them. 

I would totally not be disappointed if a DT member tagged all of these users. I feel strongly that shitposters should not "earn" enough merit to rank up, and certainly that these shmucks didn't deserve even 2 merits for any of their posts, much less 10 or 20.  That's insane.

I will send a "merit" on your behalf, I agree that he made a good analysis.By the way, I learned that the exchange and chat of telegrams on the anonymous sale of "merits" is already working. I'll try to make an announcement about this on the weekend. I feel that there will be many new contenders for negative labels.

[krishnaverma]

Damn...all that merit for those posts.  I am struggling to get to 10 to rank up to member but at least I know I am doing it the right way.  I know not all of my posts are merit worthy but hopefully some of them continue to earn from time to time.  I hate seeing this system abused even though I might not like it.  Thanks for your hard work in identifying these transgressions.  I am sure after a while that they will be easier to spot and hopefully they can get addressed and the issue be remediated.

It is really funny to see members repeating the abuse even after so many cases being reported. Looks like they are not worried of consequences and have multiple accounts or so. It is time for harsh decisions like banning such accounts abusing merit repetitively.

[Husires]

standards Sent 20 merits to snowfu199 and

I don't think there will be any bounty.

I don't care the short term dip. Actually I will take advantage of this to grasp more KEY.

I don't like the way the ICO is handled.

I don't see any reason any decent exchange will list it at this stage.

[partysumo]

I noticed ivanst776 has been sending a lot of merits for posts that were basically shitposts, but I'm still on the fence about how much of a transgression it is to do so, and I never said anything.   

Glad you started this thread--ironically, I would give OP some merit but I ran out of them. 

I would totally not be disappointed if a DT member tagged all of these users. I feel strongly that shitposters should not "earn" enough merit to rank up, and certainly that these shmucks didn't deserve even 2 merits for any of their posts, much less 10 or 20.  That's insane.

I agree with your sentiment, but doesn't the necessity to report posts that have earned merits for no reason mean that the merit system is not working? If we still have to manually report shitposts, why do we have merits then?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I will send a "merit" on your behalf, I agree that he made a good analysis.By the way, I learned that the exchange and chat of telegrams on the anonymous sale of "merits" is already working. I'll try to make an announcement about this on the weekend. I feel that there will be many new contenders for negative labels.

I do appreciate that, and I was gifted enough since I wrote my post here to give OP a point, which he deserves for starting the thread. 

I agree with hilarious here--some of these idiots may not even realize they have to get merits, and that churning out the shitposts isn't enough these days.  No surprise there, since none of them read and may not have read all the merit threads.  Who knows.  Thanks to hilarious for nuking him.  It's probably only one account of many that that guyuses, but it's still helpful that it's banned.