Why does a purchased account farm all have Lauda on their trust list? lauda alts

[Lauda]

I would also point out that none of these purchased accounts have a negative rating from lauda, even after seeing they are all purchased. Most (all?) of the accounts have neutral ratings from others indicating the accounts have been sold with references/proof.

I will not tag anything on your request given that you have zero credibility, and are a known liar and scammer. You can forget about it. I suggest asking Shorena to do your bidding. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[1715390412]

1715390412

[nullius]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I suppose that leaves one question:  What the heck was your dastardly scheme supposed to achieve for you?

Would somebody please enlighten us poor fools who lack the Brainpower to understand this plan for Lauda to TAKE OVER THE WORLD by adding herself to the trust lists of obscure alleged alt accounts?

Pathetic.  Like accusing a wealthy tycoon of counterfeiting Monopoly money so as to “look more rich”.

[Lauda]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I suppose that leaves one question:  What the heck was your dastardly scheme supposed to achieve for you?

Would somebody please enlighten us poor fools who lack the Brainpower to understand this plan for Lauda to TAKE OVER THE WORLD by adding herself to the trust lists of obscure alleged alt accounts?

I've been thinking about it, and I need enlightening too. I couldn't come up with any (not even a small) benefit in adding yourself to the trust list of random (apparently) purchased alt accounts.
Maybe I just forgot because of the alleged pills, which were previously proven by the undeniable words of a friend of a friend reliable unidentified source.

-snip-

Nice picture. I remember that.

[nullius]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I suppose that leaves one question:  What the heck was your dastardly scheme supposed to achieve for you?

Would somebody please enlighten us poor fools who lack the Brainpower to understand this plan for Lauda to TAKE OVER THE WORLD by adding herself to the trust lists of obscure alleged alt accounts?

I've been thinking about it, and I need enlightening too. I couldn't come up with any (not even a small) benefit in adding yourself to the trust list of random (apparently) purchased alt accounts.
Maybe I just forgot because of the alleged pills, which were previously proven by the undeniable words of a friend of a friend reliable unidentified source.

Well, it’s just the quality of evil-mastermind plan which Quicksy himself would use to TAKE OVER THE WORLD.  Which is why he hasn’t.  Also why he subconsciously assumes that it would make a plausible accusation against you.

-snip-

Nice picture. I remember that.

I was afraid a “Pinky & the Brain” image would get your claws out.  But evidently, you are having too much fun playing cat-and-mouse with Quickseller.


/.

0. Add self to trust lists of obscure alleged alt accounts.
1. ? ? ?
2. Profit!

[Quickseller]

I would also point out that none of these purchased accounts have a negative rating from lauda, even after seeing they are all purchased. Most (all?) of the accounts have neutral ratings from others indicating the accounts have been sold with references/proof.

I will not tag anything on your request given that you have zero credibility, and are a known liar and scammer. You can forget about it. I suggest asking Shorena to do your bidding. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It shouldn't be difficult to verify this information yourself.....unless of course there is another reason why you don't want to leave these accounts negative trust

[Lauda]

It shouldn't be difficult to verify this information yourself.....unless of course there is another reason why you don't want to leave these accounts negative trust

I am going to do pro bono work for you because ...? Cute little rodent.

0. Add self to trust lists of obscure alleged alt accounts.
1. ? ? ?
2. Profit!

Sounds plausible.

[Quickseller]

So in other words, lauda makes a name for himself for leaving negative trust for what he says are sold accounts, and not listening to arguments of those that say he is wrong. But when the sold accounts have lauda on their trust list, lauda refuses to leave negative ratings.

I believe a reasonable, neutral person would see this as fairly clear evidence that lauda is leaving negative trust only on certain "sold accounts" in order to help his own account selling business.

[Lauda]

...and not listening to arguments of those that say he is wrong.

Que

I believe a reasonable, neutral person would see this as fairly clear evidence that lauda is leaving negative trust only on certain "sold accounts" in order to help his own account selling business.

In preponderance of evidence, and some other-unrelated stuff, Lauda is guilty of this. Yeah, yeah we know your trolling drill already. Once a pest, always a pest.

[TMAN]

So in other words, lauda makes a name for himself for leaving negative trust for what he says are sold accounts, and not listening to arguments of those that say he is wrong. But when the sold accounts have lauda on their trust list, lauda refuses to leave negative ratings.

I believe a reasonable, neutral person would see this as fairly clear evidence that lauda is leaving negative trust only on certain "sold accounts" in order to help his own account selling business.

If someone other than you proves these are farmed accounts I bet Lauda would tag them.

Don't you see that Lauda thinks you are lower on the food chain than a cancerous cockroach

[Quickseller]

Is anyone able to give an explanation as to why lauda is unable to give negative trust to so many clearly purchased accounts besides that these are his sockpuppets?

[TMAN]

Is anyone able to give an explanation as to why lauda is unable to give negative trust to so many clearly purchased accounts besides that these are his sockpuppets?

Hey quickspazzer.. I would imagine it is because you bought it to everyone's attention.. that and you are a cunt

[Quickseller]

Is anyone able to give an explanation as to why lauda is unable to give negative trust to so many clearly purchased accounts besides that these are his sockpuppets?

Hey quickspazzer.. I would imagine it is because you bought it to everyone's attention.. that and you are a cunt

That would not explain why lauda has failed to leave negative trust against these accounts.

The only explanation I can give is that these belong to lauda....

[TMAN]

Is anyone able to give an explanation as to why lauda is unable to give negative trust to so many clearly purchased accounts besides that these are his sockpuppets?

Hey quickspazzer.. I would imagine it is because you bought it to everyone's attention.. that and you are a cunt

That would not explain why lauda has failed to leave negative trust against these accounts.

The only explanation I can give is that these belong to lauda....

It's a perfect explanation. If I were Lauda and I had 301 things to do and 1 thing was associated with you princess.. guess what would be done last. Yep that's right the thing that is tainted by quickspazzer

[nullius]

That would not explain why lauda has failed to leave negative trust against these accounts.

The only explanation I can give is that these belong to lauda....

Perhaps that may be because you fail to understand the explanation that no intelligent person would bother with repetitious back-and-forth over charges so nonsensical on their face as to be cartoonish.

But put that aside.  Didn’t you see the news?  Lauda has confessed guilt on the substantial essence of all your charges!

Guilty;

Feel better, now?  Is your craving thus satisfied?

[criptix]

What if...

Lauda = Quickseller??

 

Im 200 iq.

[nullius]

What if...

Lauda = Quickseller??

 

Im 200 iq.

You were so close to the truth:

There are only two users on this forum: Quickseller and Lauda. Everyone else is a sockpuppet of one of those two.

(And the two cases of sockpuppet can be clearly differentiated based on intelligence.)

[criptix]

What if...

Lauda = Quickseller??

 

Im 200 iq.

You were so close to the truth:

There are only two users on this forum: Quickseller and Lauda. Everyone else is a sockpuppet of one of those two.

(And the two cases of sockpuppet can be clearly differentiated based on intelligence.)

 

[Quickseller]

Perhaps that may be because you fail to understand the explanation that no intelligent person would bother with repetitious back-and-forth over charges so nonsensical on their face as to be cartoonish.

But put that aside.  Didn’t you see the news?  Lauda has confessed guilt on the substantial essence of all your charges!

Guilty;

Feel better, now?  Is your craving thus satisfied?

Actually you are quoting a nonsense post by lauda

[nullius]

Perhaps that may be because you fail to understand the explanation that no intelligent person would bother with repetitious back-and-forth over charges so nonsensical on their face as to be cartoonish.

But put that aside.  Didn’t you see the news?  Lauda has confessed guilt on the substantial essence of all your charges!

Guilty;

Feel better, now?  Is your craving thus satisfied?

Actually you are quoting a nonsense post by lauda

Where’s the sarcasm shill with that fancy paid /s signature ad?  I fear that I myself may be incapable of explaining this to Mr. Quickseller.

But let me try:  My quote provided exactly the answer your accusations are worth.  It should also satisfy you, given how determined you evidently are to find Lauda guilty of something—no matter how nonsensical.  Well, I suppose that Lauda must be guilty of something—behold the confession!  Happy now?  Everybody wins.  Don’t thank me; I’m just happy to help.

[Quickseller]

Perhaps that may be because you fail to understand the explanation that no intelligent person would bother with repetitious back-and-forth over charges so nonsensical on their face as to be cartoonish.

But put that aside.  Didn’t you see the news?  Lauda has confessed guilt on the substantial essence of all your charges!

Guilty;

Feel better, now?  Is your craving thus satisfied?

Actually you are quoting a nonsense post by lauda

Where’s the sarcasm shill with that fancy paid /s signature ad?  I fear that I myself may be incapable of explaining this to Mr. Quickseller.

But let me try:  My quote provided exactly the answer your accusations are worth.  It should also satisfy you, given how determined you evidently are to find Lauda guilty of something—no matter how nonsensical.  Well, I suppose that Lauda must be guilty of something—behold the confession!  Happy now?  Everybody wins.  Don’t thank me; I’m just happy to help.

I have already shown lauda to be guilty of extortion....