Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 12:40:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Joe's Signatureless Challenge Archives  (Read 10654 times)
Sellingaccs
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 50

Ask me for Pools, Nodes and Explorers.


View Profile
March 19, 2018, 05:07:07 PM
 #221

-snip-

I know it can be frustrating, but maybe Joe is just busy. Also as a merit source you can just merit the posts which you find useful rather than just giving them to BTCforJoe. This campaign does not guarantee that the participant gets paid which is alot different than most campaigns.

I can see that you are upset, but you should atleast wait for Joe's answer because he is a really reasonable person imo.

"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714567208
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714567208

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714567208
Reply with quote  #2

1714567208
Report to moderator
detector
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 484
Merit: 124




View Profile
March 19, 2018, 05:16:36 PM
 #222

... I mean what happens to 3 winners and 22 losers? would they delete their unqualified posts or they have just increased the amount of garbage posts?


So do you mean 22 losers can't join anymore ?

I got nothing because being losers but I try to improve myself (*as english is not my mother tounge)
At least Joe give me opportunity for me and I'm really appreciate it
Toughit
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 197


View Profile
March 19, 2018, 10:09:01 PM
Last edit: March 20, 2018, 01:25:18 AM by Toughit
 #223

For week 3 if not too late:

BitcoinTalk Username: toughit
Starting Post Count (including this one): 240
Current Rank: Full Member
BTC Address: roll it over this week
Toughit
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 197


View Profile
March 19, 2018, 10:09:31 PM
 #224

Hi Joe,  thanks for the win, I did not expect it, but I will take a second to Nullius any day.
I can’t believe how much work you are putting into this!!
These were my favorites for the week, If there are any merits, I don’t think putting them on any single would be right as it might look funny to someone in the future.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3153881.msg32604765#msg32604765
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3134342.msg32415785#msg32415785
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3114287.msg32250593#msg32250593
DarkStar_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2758
Merit: 3282


View Profile WWW
March 19, 2018, 10:13:39 PM
 #225

Hi Joe,  thanks for the win, I did not expect it, but I will take a second to Nullius any day.
I can’t believe how much work you are putting into this!!
These were my favorites for the week, If there are any merits, I don’t think putting them on any single would be right as it might look funny to someone in the future.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3153881.msg32604765#msg32604765 Gave 3
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3134342.msg32415785#msg32415785 Gave 3
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3114287.msg32250593#msg32250593 Gave 2

taking a break - expect delayed responses
Sellingaccs
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 50

Ask me for Pools, Nodes and Explorers.


View Profile
March 19, 2018, 10:23:19 PM
 #226

-snip-

You are a very hilarious guy, i give you that.
I don't think that theymos would react, but nullius does deserve his own rank kind of, because i have not seen so techinical as well as contributing poster ever before.

nullius
Copper Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 2610


If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!


View Profile WWW
March 20, 2018, 02:59:30 AM
 #227

For Week 3, at the eleventh hour last minute:

BitcoinTalk Username: nullius (#976210)
Starting Post Count (including this one): 907
Current Rank: Full Member
BTC Address: 32ZRRCFWoCn2hxqSfAHC36YcTvtea3xjJc






My apologies for the delayed response; some things IRL have been pulling me away from the forum of late.

Congratulations to Toughit!  Also to flip4flop.  I had not seen you before; I will must needs take a peek at your post history.  I think that drawing attention to worthwhile authors is one of the substantial benefits of this contest.  Blue Tyrant, cheers on your honourable mention.





Joe, have you thought of using Google forms for application processing? This way, spam can be reduced and it'll also reduce your work, and you won't miss any participants too. Things become much clearer then.

My god, why didn't I think of this beforehand. You, sir, are awesome.

I'll be setting up a google form for future rounds (starting with Round 4 applications). Thanks for this!

I agree that an alternate means of collecting entries would make the thread much more readable; but I must ask, do Google Forms require Javascript?  (Or worse, a Google account?)  If so, I may not enter an application.  I don’t know how Google Forms work, since I avoid Google services as much as practicable.





Round 3 Winners, will you please post links to the posts that you would like for the merit sponsors to award your merit to?

Since I seem to be a bit tardy here, I must thank bill gator for having applied my prize to my same Dev & Tech debut post as Darkstar_ and BossMacko applied my award last week.

To address the substance of your question:

Many of my posts this week were made in controversy-related threads, and/or dealt with forum abusers.  Those are important in their own right, but of limited interest.  Setting those aside, I think that my best posts of general interest this week were:






Round 3 Merit Stats: This round, a total of 47 Merits were earned by 10 participants. Great job on earning those merits this week!

Well, I think I’ll need to up my game here. <g>

legendster
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 764


www.V.systems


View Profile
March 20, 2018, 04:48:15 AM
 #228

@BTCforJoe Not sure if you updated my reward conditions on the main post.
I will be reviewing all the posts from the last round that was posted before 19 March midnight (Indian Standard Time) and hopefully choose the first recipient of my first merit point giveaway.
Its only 1 point as I am not a merit source, but I hope its worth it.

Quoting my original post here :

With due permission.

I would like to award 1 Merit to ONE Newbie &/or Jr Member per week. I have 12 sMerits available with me as of now, so I will be doing this for the next 12 weekly rounds at least (or till my sMerits last).

Who would I award?
Anyone that makes a constructive post where the intent is not to smooch off merit points.
I will never award and Merit points to you if you message me to review your post.
I will award only 1 Jr Member or 1 Newbie per week.
I may choose to not award any Merit point in any weekly round if I do not see a worthy post for that particular week's round.

Once OP approves this and if more of you want me to continue supporting this indefinitely, considering sending merit points to this post of mine, so I'll always have enough Merit points to give away each week.


   ██████████        ████████████
     ██████████        ██████████
       ██████████        ████████
         ██████████        ██████
           ██████████        ████
             ██████████        ██
               ██████████
                 ██████████
                   ████████
                     ██████
                       ████
                        ██
|
     ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█                 ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█
 ▄▀                ▄▀█             ▄▀                ▄▀█
 ██████████    █             ██████████    █
 █                █                   █                █    █
 █                █     ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█                █    █
 █                █  ▄▀             █                █  ▄▀
 ██████████▀                 ██████████▀
          █                                    █
          █                                    █
     ▄▀ █  ▀▀▀▀█                   ▄▀ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀█
 ▄▀             ▄▀█               ▄▀               ▄▀ █
 █████████   █               ██████████    █
 █              █   █               █                █    █
 █              █   █               █                █    █
 █              █  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  █                █  ▄▀
 █████████▀                  ██████████▀

Blockchain
Database
                             ▄▄▄
                         ▄▄▀  ▀▄▄
        ▄           ▄▄▀  ▄▀▄  ▀▄▄
      █▄█   █████████████████    █
        █     █                              █ ▄▀ ▌
        █     █        ▄    █   ▄         █▀ ▄▌
       ██    █      ▀▄   █    ▄▀       █▀█
       ▌ ▌   █            █                █  █
       ▌ ▌   █                              █  █
       ██    ███████████████████
                     ▀▀▄  ▀▄▀  ▄▀▀
                         ▀▀▄  ▄▀▀
                             ▀▀▀
Dev friendly
SDK Platform
                             ▄▄▄▄
                         ▄▄█    █▄▄
                     ▄▄█            █▄▄
                 ▄▄█       ▄▄▄       █▄▄
                 █       ▄▀      ▀▄       █
               █▀     █      █      █     ▀█
               ▀▀█  █   ▄█▀█▄   █  █▀▀
               █▀▀   █  ▀███▀  █   ▀▀█
               ▀▀█     █    █    █     █▀▀
                   ▀▀█   █  █  █   █▀▀
                       ▀████████▀
                           █▄▄▄▄█
                 █        █▄▄▄▄█      █
             ▄▀ █▄                   ▄█  ▀▄
            █   █▀▄         ▀      ▄▀█    █
           █   █  █  ▌      ▀   ▐  █  █    █
           █   █▄▀▄▌      ▀   ▐▄▀▄█    █
           █       █          ▀        █       █
        █▀▀▀▀▀▀█                █▀▀▀▀▀▀█
        ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀                ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
User-friendly
Token Creation
|
flip4flop
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 135



View Profile
March 20, 2018, 01:40:20 PM
 #229

For Week 3, at the eleventh hour last minute:

BitcoinTalk Username: nullius (#976210)
Starting Post Count (including this one): 907
Current Rank: Full Member
BTC Address: 32ZRRCFWoCn2hxqSfAHC36YcTvtea3xjJc






My apologies for the delayed response; some things IRL have been pulling me away from the forum of late.

Congratulations to Toughit!  Also to flip4flop.  I had not seen you before; I will must needs take a peek at your post history.  I think that drawing attention to worthwhile authors is one of the substantial benefits of this contest.  Blue Tyrant, cheers on your honourable mention.

Thanks Nullius I have always found your posts to be informative and create some great discussion. This has been a great challenge and a way to notice some other users that post quality information. 
Sellingaccs
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 50

Ask me for Pools, Nodes and Explorers.


View Profile
March 21, 2018, 05:29:40 AM
 #230

I'd like to sponsor 2nd consodalation price for this week, if still possible.
Will provide with 2 merit as well  Grin

Let me know if you accept this Joe, and i will save them.

draculaaa
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 233
Merit: 13


View Profile
March 21, 2018, 07:57:16 AM
 #231

Hi Joe, I'd like to apply for the third week round!  Wink

BitcoinTalk Username: draculaaa
Starting Post Count (including this one): 44
Current Rank: Jr. Member
BTC Address: 1LWDzN8YQa9fdVnH5Emms6VpHpfHzNYUW3

Hi Joe, I hope to be in for the 3rd round because of I don't find my name in the spreadsheet.

Thanks for your initiative and thanks to all that offer their merits.

PS: if you think to reward me, please give the prize to charity.

Bye!
bill gator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1123



View Profile
March 21, 2018, 03:51:51 PM
 #232

Either I'm being ignored or nobody could see my posts. I have merited the third winner.

I will not merit any of Chipmixer's participants from my source merits, I would have wanted to be accepted and treated like a really trusted man.

in my arrogant and insignificant opinion, what you are doing Joe, is producing more spam. I mean what happens to 3 winners and 22 losers?

I don't think you're being ignored or unseen. I think people are unsure how to respond to you most of the time if we're being honest. I laugh through most of your posts, but then I cringe at other parts of it. I'm interested in hearing more about why you refuse to merit ChipMixer participants from your source merits, potentially in PM so we don't clutter a thread. Just out of curiosity, because we seem to accumulate a good amount of merit even with your refusal; I'm just wondering if there is something worth knowing.

At least you admit your opinion is arrogant. Cheesy
Point out the participants that are producing more spam as a result of this competition.
Are any participants being rewarded to spam?

My apologies for the delayed response; some things IRL have been pulling me away from the forum of late.

Don't worry about it. Real life comes first, if something needs to be handled you handle it. You're still more active then me while being busy, so I wouldn't think much of it or feel the need to apologize.

I agree that an alternate means of collecting entries would make the thread much more readable; but I must ask, do Google Forms require Javascript?  (Or worse, a Google account?)  If so, I may not enter an application.  I don’t know how Google Forms work, since I avoid Google services as much as practicable.

I doubt Joe would do anything to alienate participants knowingly, but I agree that we should do something to optimize applications. I would offer my help in this area, but I'm not sure I can realistically watch this thread enough to handle that sufficiently.

Since I seem to be a bit tardy here, I must thank bill gator for having applied my prize to my same Dev & Tech debut post as Darkstar_ and BossMacko applied my award last week.

The implication being that you wouldn't thank me if you weren't tardy.  Wink
It seemed appropriate for it to be that post.

Many of my posts this week were made in controversy-related threads, and/or dealt with forum abusers.  Those are important in their own right, but of limited interest.  

I do my best to avoid the drama. Too much epeen measuring. If something needs my opinion I'll share it, but it seems my viewpoint is normally represented by one party or another. They are of very limited interest, for very limited reasons and the least of which is altruism or benevolence I'm afraid.

Well, I think I’ll need to up my game here. <g>

Turn it up to 11, ole' chap.

     ▄█
   ▄██▌
 ▄████
▀▀▀█████▀
  ▐███▀
  ██▀
  ▀
..
▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
▄▄█████████████████▄▄
▄███████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
██████████
███████████████████
██████████
█████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
██
███████████████████████████
██
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
▀▀█████████████████▀▀

▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
▄▄█▀▀███████████▀▀█▄▄
▄████▄▄███████████▄▄████▄
█████
███▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀████████
█████
██▀▄██████▀████▄▀███████
███████▀▄█████▀ ▐█████▄▀███████
██  ███ ████▀   ▀▀█████ ███  ██
██████▄▀█████  ▄█████▀▄██████
██████▄▀███▌▄██████▀▄██████
██
██████▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄████████
▀█
███▀▀███████████▀▀████▀
▀▀█▄▄███████████▄▄█▀▀
▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█████████
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████████████

██████████▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▄▄▄████████████████████▄▄▄
████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀██
█████████▀   ▀███████████▀
▀▀█████▀▀       ▀▀█████▀▀
.
..SPORTS  │  CASINO  │  ESPORTS..
...
..BET NOW..
DREWSKIE
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 2


View Profile
March 22, 2018, 04:06:01 AM
 #233

Hi! Can i join the next round if there any.

BitcoinTalk Username: DREWSKIE
Starting Post Count (including this one): 11
Current Rank: Newbie
BTC Address: 3LUJpeNuGEEfefwKVkAicfNmoRE2doZag1

Looking forward for quality posts...
BTCforJoe (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 976



View Profile WWW
March 22, 2018, 06:44:35 AM
 #234

BitcoinTalk Username: zangleerb

BitcoinTalk Username: DREWSKIE

Hello, @zangleerb and @DREWSKIE. Welcome to the challenge! Because you have missed the cutoff for Round 3, I have reserved you two spots for the next round (Round 4, beginning Sunday, March 25 6:00PM [GMT -6].

All other applicants have been accepted and added to the spreadsheet.

Unless I missed anyone (which could be the case, but I'll review the thread again), we are at 24 participants for Round 3. This means that there will not be a 3rd place cash prize. Sad

Because of the emotional roller-coaster for the last round, I've decided that if we have 25 valid participants at the beginning of the round, the cash prize for 3rd prize will be available, even if a participant is disqualified throughout the round. I will re-visit this if this is abused, but I don't expect that will happen.

I apparently missed some posts here, as given the slight drama in the forums, so I'm going to go back and address all the posts that I have not already. Sit tight.

MyIota
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41
Merit: 5

PM me to buy my sig space.


View Profile
March 22, 2018, 06:56:11 AM
 #235

BitcoinTalk Username: zangleerb

BitcoinTalk Username: DREWSKIE

Hello, @zangleerb and @DREWSKIE. Welcome to the challenge! Because you have missed the cutoff for Round 3, I have reserved you two spots for the next round (Round 4, beginning Sunday, March 25 6:00PM [GMT -6].

All other applicants have been accepted and added to the spreadsheet.

Unless I missed anyone (which could be the case, but I'll review the thread again), we are at 24 participants for Round 3. This means that there will not be a 3rd place cash prize. Sad

Because of the emotional roller-coaster for the last round, I've decided that if we have 25 valid participants at the beginning of the round, the cash prize for 3rd prize will be available, even if a participant is disqualified throughout the round. I will re-visit this if this is abused, but I don't expect that will happen.

I apparently missed some posts here, as given the slight drama in the forums, so I'm going to go back and address all the posts that I have not already. Sit tight.

It would really help if you could just delete the posts that aren't registrants. I mean, the debates mixed with registration just doesn't do anything but give everyone extra work.

I myself have to go back and find my original entry post just to sign up for round 4 later on.

I think maybe if you had a separate thread solely for registration purposes, it would make more sense. Like, maybe put a link in the first page to the registration thread.

I think that's more feasible actually, because everyone's deleting their registration posts anyway. So might as well ask everyone to delete & register @ other thread.

I would really be down for that, less work for everyone involved, including you, Joe.

PM me if you're interested in my signature space.
SHOWDENY
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 22, 2018, 07:20:02 AM
 #236

Can I try?

BitcoinTalk Username: SHOWDENY
Starting Post Count (including this one): 7
Current Rank: Newbie
BTC Address:
BTCforJoe (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 976



View Profile WWW
March 22, 2018, 07:35:40 AM
Last edit: March 22, 2018, 07:47:04 AM by BTCforJoe
 #237

Can I participate with my alt like nullius and others? you should pay people and ask them not to post at all. facking lol, there is a participant named Sellingaccs. OP's activity and merits are the same. account and merit farmer. second facking lol. you are literally selling merits. nullius with his godlike avatar could join with his alt and farm these merits. after having enough merits for a senior member rank, he could sell the accounts and share the profit.

First of all, the nature of this challenge makes it difficult for users to create quality posts from multiple accounts. While I have let alts join the challenge, @nullius hasn't enrolled in the challenge with his alt (@Meretrix). Because this issue was raised (sorry for just seeing this post; I must have missed it during the time it took me to create the next post after yours), I will create a rule that any participant that gets caught for joining with an alt account (simultaneously with their main account in the same round) will be disqualified and banned for the entirety of this challenge and all future rounds.

You have accused me of "farming" merits. I think that is a very irresponsible statement, and it shows that you have no regard for my intentions of making this forum a better place by spending HOURS (yes, hours upon hours) maintaining this challenge on a weekly basis. I have never asked anyone for merits, and I never will. I have no control over who decides to award me merits personally (here or in any other post of mine), but I'm willing to bet that none of them have questioned my ability to make great detailed posts, including within this challenge, which shows my overall commitment to the forums, its members, and the overall crypto community. The fact that you would make an accusation like this towards me makes me question your ability to properly identify and award merits as a source.

I am "selling merits"? Huh I would ask you to explain this in further detail, but I don't think you have the ability to do so. You will just use and portray your personal opinion, which has no factual basis to prove that I am taking any form of payment for providing this challenge. It started with me donating $25 and merits personally. I never asked anyone to donate any cash or merits to this challenge; they volunteered to do so. I have never asked for payments (cash, BTC, or merits) of any kind from any participants or sponsors, and I never will. So stating that I am selling merits is a blatant form of disrespect to me and the community members that have CHOSEN to be a part of this. They are not promised anything in return, and they never will be.

You seem to have a bone to pick with @nullius. That's fine, but don't criticize and make false accusations towards others because of your dislike for him. You're souring a great opportunity for members here to make some bitcoin and merits for avidly wanting to improve their posts. Yes, while a lot may simply see the $$$ behind this challenge, most of them are dedicated to wanting to improve their post quality. The ones that are in it just for the money obviously have not re-enrolled or met the requirements, as is openly evident in the public spreadsheet from week-to-week.

Quote
If you replace nullius with OP, you'll have a merit farmer who is also getting paid. if anybody on this campaign is receiving merit and money for the same post quality of other people who'd receive no merits for their posts. if they have substantial post quality, let them earn merits like everybody else with substantial post quality.

Again, how am I getting paid? I have never once asked for anything for my actions, and I am personally putting up my own merits and money to fuel this challenge. The winners of the first two rounds have had meritorious posts, and finding suitable posts to merit is a non-issue. If anything, this challenge is helping to create and identify more meritorious posts on the forums, and I don't anticipate that changing in the (hopefully) many future rounds to come.

Quote
If a merit source is enrolled in a signature campaign, he shouldn't merit any member from the same campaign. if you are not a merit source, apply to become one. if you haven't been selected as a merit source, don't act like one and don't create a service to have merit sources as sponsors. it is like being denied to become a source but then going and making a thread to tell merit sources what to do. doing it your way. (I know you are not forcing them to be your sponsors).

I have never applied to become a merit source, and don't plan on doing so. I am not acting like a merit source. I am giving away my PERSONAL sMerit for this challenge. Again, I have never asked for sponsors; each and every one of them have volunteered. Why, you ask? Because they have each identified with the true positive nature of this challenge and its efforts to clean up the forums. I ask you to please get off your high horse and stop talking down towards me and the donors of a good cause. There is no ulterior motive here. None of the sponsors, myself included, are expecting anything in return, so for them to get shit on by an almighty merit source who happened to get lucky enough to identify 10 good posts for their application is not a fair assessment and action towards them.

Come on Joe, announce the winners already. I was going to merit don DarkStar_ with 3 merits, since he is a campaign manager and I'm taking my job very seriously as a merit source, I have asked him to provide a username to me for 3 merits. he said: "beggar, if you insist, merit one of the little birdies of mine".

Your spite is unreal in this very statement alone. I was considering not even addressing it, but I will. But just the part about you taking your job as a merit source very seriously. Don't let that misconstrue your abuse of power by thinking that it actually gives you some sort of power to be demeaning towards others. Yes, you are taking your "job" (which implies that YOU are getting paid, not me, like you've previously stated Roll Eyes) very seriously. Too seriously. It's not a fucking job. You don't get compensated for it, but the fact that you have called it a job implies that you feel you deserve some sort of compensation. In this case, it seems as if your ego needs stroking or your back needs patting because you became a merit source. You won't get that from me, or anyone else you've insulted in this thread. You are a little shit, and you can shove your almighty merits up your ass.

Either I'm being ignored or nobody could see my posts. I have merited the third winner. you could thank the head of the family a.k.a don DarkStar_ those 3 merits were meant for him. it means that I shouldn't be treated specially and differently just because I'm a merit source.

And are you saying that you merited a user because of your spite towards another user? Is that a responsible method of awarding merit, especially as a merit source? I truly do not understand what you're trying to say here. Again, you must have let becoming a merit source get to your head. Because I have never considered treating you differently because you're a merit source. I personally don't give a shit that you are a source.

Quote
In the future I might need to join the family, however I will not merit any of the family members a.k.a Chipmixer's participants from my source merits, I would have wanted to be accepted and treated like a really trusted man. you might ask yourself, why would this beggar do this if doing it would probably get him nowhere? he might be playing a long game to earn the trust of the forum for hundreds of Bitcoins.

Now you're stating that you will not award merit solely for the purpose of one user's actions, just because he is a campaign manager of a signature campaign that has 58 members in it? You're blatantly admitting that 58 users of the forums, regardless of their substantial post quality, will never receive a merit from a merit source because of your disdain for one person. @DarkStar_ has absolutely no control over what or how I post, and if he were to tell me to change the way I post, I would tell him to fuck off. This just shows how irresponsible you are as a merit source, and I personally think that it is enough grounds to make theymos aware of your irresponsible behavior. It's obvious that time has shown that you are not worthy of being a responsible and fair source of merit. At least to me, it is. I don't speak for anyone else, but I will be making a personal complaint about your behavior to the staff of the forums. You're letting your personal emotions get in the way of your "job". For personal reference, if you were my employee and expressed this same type of behavior, I would terminate your employment immediately.

Quote
Not really. this is who I am, there has been no other cases in which somebody would invest a considerable amount of trust on me. this is the first time to be a merit source. bottom line, do not treat me differently, I'm not here to use the system for my own benefits. there is no benefits in 20 sMerits anyways right? in my arrogant and insignificant opinion, what you are doing Joe, is producing more spam. I mean what happens to 3 winners and 22 losers? would they delete their unqualified posts or they have just increased the amount of garbage posts?

Maybe you haven't taken the time to read the original post. Or taken the time to review the spreadsheet. Or the hours of commentary I have provided for each participant after reading EVERY SINGLE post that they have made. Or the critique that I give them in helping them to try to improve their post quality. Or the willing participants who have taken the time to read the comments and proceed to THANK ME for this service, and for the opportunity to improve their English and posting quality. Even if the "garbage posters" weren't a part of this challenge, they would still be across the forums posting "garbage" to get their post counts up anyways. At least here, they get constructive criticism and feedback. Whether they choose to heed my advice or not is up to them, not me. I don't force them to be a participant, and I don't make any personal guarantees that they will win. But thank you for at least prefacing your statement with your self-aware confession to your opinion being arrogant. If anything, however, you're the one producing spam in this thread.

I was thinking about addressing you privately regarding this matter, but because you have chosen to call me and a few members out publicly in this thread, I have shown you the same courtesy in reciprocating your own actions.

Quote
Don DS, note that everything I've just said above, is an act, lies. we all know that I'm a lier, beggar who would do anything to earn money. I will merit 1 at a time and wont merit the family members in rows. like 1 merit to a random nigger, 1 merit to one of the gang members of the don DarkStar_leone.
Disclaimer: I need merits, where is my supervisor a.k.a mexxer-2 to give me merits in bulk? don't make me beg, I'm trying to build a character here. just a single lol.

This is not worthy of a detailed response. But I'm just quoting it in order to reference it. Have fun deleting your posts; I've archived each individual page, as well.

Page 8Page 11Page 12



EDIT: Did I just get trolled? I think I've just come to realize that @digaran is not actually a merit source. Well, shit. Roll Eyes

BTCforJoe (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 976



View Profile WWW
March 22, 2018, 09:06:14 AM
 #238

BTC Address: 3ACcSBSDAoYK1MJHK6vku2YFyVk3FNYQ4c

Ps. Am i able to get the consolidation price for two weeks in a row?

Edit: I have changed the address to a segwit one.

Thanks for going SegWit! And yes, you are able to win the consolation prize repeatedly and consecutively. Only the first place prize has the stipulation that it cannot be awarded consecutively from round to round.



Again, I'll provide two merits for 3rd place on week 3.

Great, I have updated the top post. Thanks, Geraldo!



Thanks for running this and thanks for the nomination for 3rd place!  Looking forward to the next week! I think you forgot me in the roll up post for all the comments for everyone. It’s no biggie I checked the spreadsheet but just noticed when scrolling through this morning.

Yeah, lol. Apologies; I was in a rush. I'm hoping that I won't make the same mistake again in the future Tongue



Sorry that I have overlooked your application. You do qualify, so I will be including you in Round 2 results... This also means that we have 25 qualified participants for Round 2, so there WILL be a 3rd place cash prize!

What did I tell you about this emotional roller coaster? I'm finding this extremely amusing that 3rd place was implemented and revoked multiple times during this round.

I have sent nullius their merit, and sent you a PM informing you that I have done so as requested. I'm assuming my funds from last week were enough to cover 2nd place this week, but if not please let me know and I will cover the difference for you, Joe.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this now means that 1st place next week is competing for $50? Round 3 is going to be interesting.

Yup, the first place winner will receive $45 or $50! I have also decided that as long as the round begins with 25 valid participants, the cash prize for 3rd place will be available, even if users are disqualified during the round. The escrow should be fine for this week; I'm adding some more to it shortly. Thanks!



My god, why didn't I think of this beforehand. You, sir, are awesome.

I'll be setting up a google form for future rounds (starting with Round 4 applications). Thanks for this!

I agree that an alternate means of collecting entries would make the thread much more readable; but I must ask, do Google Forms require Javascript?  (Or worse, a Google account?)  If so, I may not enter an application.  I don’t know how Google Forms work, since I avoid Google services as much as practicable.

I will include a link to each round of applications in the top post. I will make an exception for you (and any other user that displays similar privacy and personal concerns) whereas you can PM me your application directly.



@BTCforJoe Not sure if you updated my reward conditions on the main post.
I will be reviewing all the posts from the last round that was posted before 19 March midnight (Indian Standard Time) and hopefully choose the first recipient of my first merit point giveaway.
Its only 1 point as I am not a merit source, but I hope its worth it.

Quoting my original post here :

With due permission.

I would like to award 1 Merit to ONE Newbie &/or Jr Member per week. I have 12 sMerits available with me as of now, so I will be doing this for the next 12 weekly rounds at least (or till my sMerits last).

Who would I award?
Anyone that makes a constructive post where the intent is not to smooch off merit points.
I will never award and Merit points to you if you message me to review your post.
I will award only 1 Jr Member or 1 Newbie per week.
I may choose to not award any Merit point in any weekly round if I do not see a worthy post for that particular week's round.

Once OP approves this and if more of you want me to continue supporting this indefinitely, considering sending merit points to this post of mine, so I'll always have enough Merit points to give away each week.

Perfect! I have added you to the list of sponsors. Thank you for doing this.



I'd like to sponsor 2nd consodalation price for this week, if still possible.
Will provide with 2 merit as well  Grin

Let me know if you accept this Joe, and i will save them.

Of course! So this week, we will have 2 Consolation Prizes. OP and Sponsor list updated.

digaran
Copper Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 899

🖤😏


View Profile
March 22, 2018, 02:39:59 PM
 #239

Jet Cash style.

You are not a source, why are you encouraging people to post in order to earn merits? I'm not on a high horse, you are. enrolled in a campaign yourself and looking down on people and their contribution like you are doing a charity. you do know that many of the members here would participate in anything for a few bucks? you are literally paying people with merits and money.

You have literally one of the top merited members participating here, we all know that he has the ability to participate with several accounts and win the prizes, you do have the same ability as well as any other Chipmixer members.  why don't you read through boards and pages to merit the good posts if you want to contribute? the whole merit system is a challenge for everybody, why would you create a mini challenge to do the same but with a big difference, you are producing more unnecessary content.

I wanted to merit DarkStar_ for something he provided me with. I told him that I wont merit him with my source, because he is a campaign manager, I shouldn't send any merits to a manager while I'm enrolled in signature campaign.

Why don't you remove your signature and post constructively, then wait for others to evaluate your contribution and give you merits? you have turned this to an opportunity to make your paid job easier for yourself. you are posting with a paid signature and claim that you are helping. you are asking people to come to you for merits. 25 participants and 3 winners, that means you have made 22 other members to post garbage, they are getting paid with money and yet they are posting garbage, do you think earning merits could be a better motivation?

How many members are posting with a substantial quality and get no merits? if you are indirectly making other members and merit sources to spend their merits on a member with the same post quality of another unmerited member, you are by definition allowing a selected few to farm merits.
If I have said "job" is because I have a limited vocabulary. don't expect a third world terrorist to know everything.

Btw, why didn't you apply to become a source? if you had the intentions of helping, you didn't volunteer why? you didn't want to help or spend time? what you are doing now is not spending time right?

Thanks before and god bless.

🖤😏
Blue Tyrant
Copper Member
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 65

IOS - The secure, scalable blockchain


View Profile
March 22, 2018, 03:29:15 PM
 #240

You are not a source, why are you encouraging people to post in order to earn merits?

I dont feel you need to be a merit source be allowed to encourage people to post quality content, even non merit sources have freely encouraged people in meta (read: the mods, DTs, veteran users, etc who aren't necessarily sources but still want the betterment of the forum)

Quote
You have literally one of the top merited members participating here, we all know that he has the ability to participate with several accounts and win the prizes, you do have the same ability as well as any other Chipmixer members

I have no clue what the link to Chipmixer is and pretty sure that the one of the top merited members statement refers to Nullius, pretty sure there's tons of people willing to pay him much more than the average 2nd and 3rd price here per week to post (the prizes are 5-10$ if I'm not forgetting which is much much smaller than the average payout for a full members account). He has no reason to alt and post quality content to get like what is 15$ extra a week.

Quote
why don't you read through boards and pages to merit the good posts if you want to contribute? the whole merit system is a challenge for everybody, why would you create a mini challenge to do the same but with a big difference, you are producing more unnecessary content.

IDK about the others, I'm surely not posting exclusively for the prizes, if I were then I'd be participating in the millions of low effort bounty programs that "bounty hunters" love. I do not understand why you feel that we're producing unnecessary content, even if we were I'd say how is it bad that some productive content is being posted to balance out the utter garbage the aforementioned bounty hunters spew to fund their shill money filled pockets.

Quote
I wanted to merit DarkStar_ for something he provided me with. I told him that I wont merit him with my source, because he is a campaign manager, I shouldn't send any merits to a manager while I'm enrolled in signature campaign.

Again doesn't relate to this campaign in anyway

Quote
you are asking people to come to you for merits. 25 participants and 3 winners, that means you have made 22 other members to post garbage, they are getting paid with money and yet they are posting garbage, do you think earning merits could be a better motivation?

What? Why would garbage posters even bother for a campaign which is more or less a competition? (I mean I agree some idiots exist who just join thinking this is some run of the mill campaign but those don't even participate a second time and are dropping as the rounds are passing from the looks of the registrants). I also don't understand what you mean by what 22 people posted garbage? Participating in a signature campaign = posting garbage? That's not how stuff works.

Quote
if you are indirectly making other members and merit sources to spend their merits on a member with the same post quality of another unmerited member, you are by definition allowing a selected few to farm merits.

I'm not upto date on merit sources but isnt Darkstar the only merit source who's sponsoring the merits? And that too he seems to be doing so willingly on a volunteer basis. Most of the the other merits are from regular users. Besides how is the campaign different from what many merit sources run where they audit your posts? This is just a more "fun" way to do the same thing

Quote
Btw, why didn't you apply to become a source? if you had the intentions of helping, you didn't volunteer why? you didn't want to help or spend time? what you are doing now is not spending time right?

Just wondering on this one, Joe and Bill why not apply aswell?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!