ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
October 18, 2013, 01:35:42 AM |
|
true, use those F14's for something! I did try to use them in front of the heatsinks briefly since they were bigger and suppose to be higher CFM but were terrible.. I guess without the shroud, or the smaller ones just have better pressure in the right targeted area here's the pics for the intake switch! http://imgur.com/a/NK3KQWhats your power source for all those extra-fans? Do you plug them onto the beagle or do you have some extra fan-controller?
|
|
|
|
DPoS
|
|
October 18, 2013, 01:49:48 AM |
|
yep nothing extra plugged in besides the top fan and a couple small crappy usb fans
if you do put exhaust fans on, you can just plug them in with 4pin molex adapters to the main powersupply. Good case fans come with all the extra adapters
|
|
|
|
Sitarow (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
|
|
October 18, 2013, 03:38:22 AM |
|
With all the activity on the thread, I have a bit of reading to do in order to catch up. However I just wanted to update on the status of the shipment that I have been waiting on. I will post the unboxing photos and a few preliminary results before I get down to 12hr and 24hr testing. These came packaged the same as the first unit back on October 4th. The same issues on this batch, cooler fans being detached during shipping, and one ASIC Cooler heatsink was bent. Apart from that nothing out of the ordinary. The units shipped with firmware v0.9.1 Here are the results after a few minutes. Doing a baseline on this new hardware with firmware v0.9.5 I have Jupiter 1 on an OCZ1250 Power Supply The others are on Corsair AX860i
|
|
|
|
|
Sitarow (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
|
|
October 18, 2013, 03:52:44 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sitarow (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
|
|
October 18, 2013, 05:44:32 AM Last edit: October 18, 2013, 07:43:25 AM by Sitarow |
|
1hr result with firmware v0.9.5 Not much different at this time. Only Jupiter unit 3 seems to be performing similar to Jupiter 1. I will swap out the intake fans on that unit and also apply the heatsink fan relocation trick that was posted by DPoS 2hr Results 3hr Results
|
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 18, 2013, 07:17:34 AM |
|
Kano you think That firmware of knc miners Have any big bug or problem?
I have no idea - I've never seen one (and I don't expect to ever see one either) Odd though that they don't put all those extra stats in the API stats ... but instead you have to run some extra program. Hi Kano here 'Orama said he sent the cgminer driver source code to Luke-jr and ckolivas, so I think you'll be able to see it easily https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg3358406#msg3358406
|
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
October 18, 2013, 07:24:52 AM |
|
Kano you think That firmware of knc miners Have any big bug or problem?
I have no idea - I've never seen one (and I don't expect to ever see one either) Odd though that they don't put all those extra stats in the API stats ... but instead you have to run some extra program. Hi Kano here 'Orama said he sent the cgminer driver source code to Luke-jr and ckolivas, so I think you'll be able to see it easily https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg3358406#msg3358406I was referring to a KFCminer
|
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 18, 2013, 07:33:54 AM |
|
Kano you think That firmware of knc miners Have any big bug or problem?
I have no idea - I've never seen one (and I don't expect to ever see one either) Odd though that they don't put all those extra stats in the API stats ... but instead you have to run some extra program. Hi Kano here 'Orama said he sent the cgminer driver source code to Luke-jr and ckolivas, so I think you'll be able to see it easily https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg3358406#msg3358406I was referring to a KFCminer now it's clear KFC...
|
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
r3animation
|
|
October 18, 2013, 07:46:32 AM |
|
Tried 0.96 for awhile and found it gave me a higher WU/m then 0.95.
However, 0.93/0.94 still gave me the higher WU/m so I'm back to the old firmware.
|
|
|
|
Sitarow (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
|
|
October 18, 2013, 07:50:03 AM |
|
Tried 0.96 for awhile and found it gave me a higher WU/m then 0.95.
However, 0.93/0.94 still gave me the higher WU/m so I'm back to the old firmware.
Thanks for that update. I am noticing that Jupiter 1 and Jupiter 3 are not at optimal performance. I will test them with firmware v0.9.6 in the next 21hrs.
|
|
|
|
Crypto_Cumbrian
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
October 18, 2013, 09:19:58 AM |
|
Results from My Sick Jupiter Test.
Running 0.96
sic Tests 10 to 20 mins hasing Board by Board.
Asic #3 (the 3 DC/DC Board) CGminer would not run came up with a lot of errors about bad config. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Asic #0 35 Degrees C Avarage 72.42Gh/s , A-14082 , R-78 , HW-3994 , WU:1168.9/m ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Asic #2 32.5 Degrees C Average 78.2Gh/s , A-5890 , R-72 , HW-5454 , WU:1294/m ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Asic #4 48.5 Degrees C Avarage 135Gh/s , A-22018 , R-372 , HW-5454 , WU:1921.1/m ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Asic #0,2,4 Average 284.5Gh/s , A-4558, R-264 , HW-8817 , WU: 4330.2/m -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@Jupiter-3B3:/config# pwd /config root@Jupiter-3B3:/config# more asic_test
ASIC board #0 has 4 DC/DC Found a KnC miner with 192 cores KnC ASICs: good cores: 53 from 192 KnC ASICs: good cores after re-test: 83 from 192 KnC ASICs: good cores after re-test: 105 from 192 Good cores map: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 C3 3C FB DD EF FE FF EE F3 FF FE FF FF
LM75 error: Bad ID 0xFFFFFFFF ASIC board #1 has 0 DC/DC MEGADLYNX[0] error: Bad PMBUS revision 0xFFFFFFFF MEGADLYNX[2] error: Bad PMBUS revision 0xFFFFFFFF MEGADLYNX[4] error: Bad PMBUS revision 0xFFFFFFFF MEGADLYNX[7] error: Bad PMBUS revision 0xFFFFFFFF I2C test failed! SPI detected, but no KnCminer cores SPI test failed! EEPROM read failed! EEPROM write failed!
ASIC board #2 has 4 DC/DC Found a KnC miner with 192 cores KnC ASICs: good cores: 85 from 192 KnC ASICs: good cores after re-test: 120 from 192 KnC ASICs: good cores after re-test: 133 from 192 Good cores map: EC B5 FE FD FE 3D 00 00 00 00 00 00 0C 32 C3 3C F0 CF 00 00 00 00 00 00
ASIC board #3 has 3 DC/DC MEGADLYNX[0] error: Bad PMBUS revision 0xFFFFFFFF I2C test failed! Found a KnC miner with 192 cores KnC ASICs: good cores: 57 from 192 KnC ASICs: good cores after re-test: 65 from 192 KnC ASICs: good cores after re-test: 74 from 192 Good cores map: 00 00 00 00 00 00 6C B3 E3 FF F3 FF 3E BE EB 3E BF FF BE FB FF FF FF FF
ASIC board #4 has 4 DC/DC Found a KnC miner with 192 cores KnC ASICs: good cores: 176 from 192 KnC ASICs: good cores after re-test: 188 from 192 KnC ASICs: good cores after re-test: 188 from 192 Good cores map: 00 00 00 00 03 0C 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
LM75 error: Bad ID 0xFFFFFFFF ASIC board #5 has 0 DC/DC MEGADLYNX[0] error: Bad PMBUS revision 0xFFFFFFFF MEGADLYNX[2] error: Bad PMBUS revision 0xFFFFFFFF MEGADLYNX[4] error: Bad PMBUS revision 0xFFFFFFFF MEGADLYNX[7] error: Bad PMBUS revision 0xFFFFFFFF I2C test failed! SPI detected, but no KnCminer cores SPI test failed! EEPROM read failed! EEPROM write failed! root@Jupiter-3B3:/config#
|
|
|
|
jelin1984
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
|
|
October 18, 2013, 09:27:49 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 18, 2013, 10:25:20 AM |
|
now anybody could look at knc cgminer source code http://www.kncminer.com/userfiles/file/cgminer_knc.tgzdriver-knc.c contains the knc driver
|
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
sickpig
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
|
October 18, 2013, 12:53:29 PM |
|
still to early they've just received the code and the miners are on their way....
|
Bitcoin is a participatory system which ought to respect the right of self determinism of all of its users - Gregory Maxwell.
|
|
|
il_minatore
|
|
October 18, 2013, 04:20:34 PM |
|
VRMs temp is veeeery hot I need RAM cooler
|
|
|
|
arorts
|
|
October 18, 2013, 06:06:03 PM |
|
Could someone please summarize their findings with the last firmware versions? Something like these data points:
- Firmware version - Power consumption - Hashrate - Temp - Errors, etc/
I think this would help distill some of the long discussion here.
|
|
|
|
AFox
|
|
October 18, 2013, 06:17:04 PM |
|
Could someone please summarize their findings with the last firmware versions? Something like these data points:
- Firmware version - Power consumption - Hashrate - Temp - Errors, etc/
I think this would help distill some of the long discussion here.
I'll post something in a few hours.
|
|
|
|
AFox
|
|
October 18, 2013, 07:51:31 PM Last edit: October 18, 2013, 09:10:55 PM by AFox |
|
-------------------- | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.96 | Average CGminer | 270Gh/s | 274Gh/s | 280Gh/s | Average Pool | 275Gh/s | 263Gh/s | 278Gh/s (link) | Consumption | 485 Watts | 305 Watts | 313 Watts | Temputure | 54 & 62°C | 42 & 47°C | 42 & 47°C | Rejected | 1.5% | 0.22% | 0.38% | HW | 2.81% | 0.79% | 1.08% | WU | 3975/m | 3717/m | 3933/m |
Anyways I'll stick to firmware 0.96. From the beginning I wanted to mine on Eligius and with firmware 0.90 to 0.95 I had the flushwork issue. It seems that 0.96 solved that issue; it's been 24 hours that I'm mining on Eligius.
|
|
|
|
DPoS
|
|
October 18, 2013, 08:14:07 PM |
|
Those are some low HW error % !!
|
|
|
|
|