Seuntjies DiceBot -Multi-Site, multi-strategy betting bot for dice. With Charts!

[Nick7815]

are there any known issues by logging in with at bitvest? It wasn't a problem yesterday but today it doesn't work and i have no newyear-hangover and I've tripplechecked everything

[seuntjie]

Seuntjie, can you please tell me, how dicebot simulation are worked?!

in simulations, are taked effect like in allmoust all dice site, and taken out that 1% house edge from numbers?!

its like 100% same, and there is no difference, like i was playing in default dice game site with fixed 1% house edge?!

The simulations use the same provably fair methods as the site that is selected and are usually pretty accurate. It uses the same edge as the site. But since everything is random, a simulation might show you winning after a million bets but when you actually run it, it might bust after 100 bets.

are there any known issues by logging in with at bitvest? It wasn't a problem yesterday but today it doesn't work and i have no newyear-hangover and I've tripplechecked everything

Not that I know of. I was able to log in fine a few minutes ago. It's possible that there was an issue at the time you posted this, but if so, it has been resolved since.

[Nick7815]

Seuntjie, can you please tell me, how dicebot simulation are worked?!

in simulations, are taked effect like in allmoust all dice site, and taken out that 1% house edge from numbers?!

its like 100% same, and there is no difference, like i was playing in default dice game site with fixed 1% house edge?!

The simulations use the same provably fair methods as the site that is selected and are usually pretty accurate. It uses the same edge as the site. But since everything is random, a simulation might show you winning after a million bets but when you actually run it, it might bust after 100 bets.

are there any known issues by logging in with at bitvest? It wasn't a problem yesterday but today it doesn't work and i have no newyear-hangover and I've tripplechecked everything

Not that I know of. I was able to log in fine a few minutes ago. It's possible that there was an issue at the time you posted this, but if so, it has been resolved since.

You are right. They wrote me that they were under heavy load causing them to enable Cloudflare anti-DDoS protection.

[houseworx]

Seuntjie, can you please tell me, how dicebot simulation are worked?!

in simulations, are taked effect like in allmoust all dice site, and taken out that 1% house edge from numbers?!

its like 100% same, and there is no difference, like i was playing in default dice game site with fixed 1% house edge?!

The simulations use the same provably fair methods as the site that is selected and are usually pretty accurate. It uses the same edge as the site. But since everything is random, a simulation might show you winning after a million bets but when you actually run it, it might bust after 100 bets.

from my "view point" its not "random" RNG - random number generator has if it can call that "memory" (if numbers are not hitting-was downswing, after some time, depends on certain win percentage, they will hit very much-will be upswing, and in the end you will be 100% near deviation from normal), every winning percentage has "own" time/longrun when they will come back on +/- perfect deviation from normal. otherwise our "luck" number never been close to 100% correct (neitral), higher winning percentage=faster longrun hits, and deviation are back in normal, smaller winning percentage=can be long time to hit back on normal deviation from 0(neutral/100% luck)

give you a sample:
on 1% winning chance is normal to get 50 000 bets and your standard deviation from 0 will be -5%(50k bets, and your luck will be 95%)
on 98% you can't bet even 5 000 bets, and dont get near to 100% luck. (propably, not tested so much longruns on that percentage)

on 1% winning change you can get 5 000 bets and your luck will be 50%, but on 98% you cant bet eve 100 bets, without luck less than 95%(for 98% its from my mind, not tested)

[wpsimp]

I would love to build a CAT system, BUT, i know nothing of economics. if you are willing to give and explain algorithms of when to buy and when to sell, I will gladly build a CAT system when I get the time. I'm sure there are lots of people looking for one. Hopefully they will donate better than these gamblers do, hehe.

Still thinking about this, by chance? I would love to try it if you get something released. Great bot btw.

[houseworx]

on 15 january YOLOdice will add LTC on platform, when we can wait to LTC be playable from dicebot? or Ethan need to contact you about that things privately?!

[seuntjie]

I would love to build a CAT system, BUT, i know nothing of economics. if you are willing to give and explain algorithms of when to buy and when to sell, I will gladly build a CAT system when I get the time. I'm sure there are lots of people looking for one. Hopefully they will donate better than these gamblers do, hehe.

Still thinking about this, by chance? I would love to try it if you get something released. Great bot btw.

It's a very distant possibility. If it does happen, it likely won't be this year.

on 15 january YOLOdice will add LTC on platform, when we can wait to LTC be playable from dicebot? or Ethan need to contact you about that things privately?!

Some time in the future.

[houseworx]

Some time in the future.

its "wide concept" you are none interest to do it asap?! (idk how this things work, owners pay for every currency or overall)

[seuntjie]

Some time in the future.

its "wide concept" you are none interest to do it asap?! (idk how this things work, owners pay for every currency or overall)

It's difficult for me to give an exact time or date when I will release the bot, because it's not always in my hands, for example I need to wait for a site (usually more than one at a time) to finish changes to their API/Site. I am also sometimes given information by sites in confidence. Sometimes by specifying a date I could hint to information that is not intended to be public yet.

Do not confuse my deliberate vagueness with unwillingness to do the work or disinterest in the update. I have to be vague because I do not want to state a release date that I am not 100% sure I can achieve.

[JohnnyArmani]

Hey Seuntjies, I see you have BetKing as a dice option.  BetKing has a jackpot in play were "All you have to do to win is roll the dice twice in a row, containing five 5’s in the roll results" The only problem is that it looks like you have to keep track of this yourself and email them "If you win, please contact support@betking.io or our Bitcointalk, Facebook or Twitter pages with your account details and the IDs of the two bets."

Anyway you can put this in your bot for BetKing where it stops after twice in a row after rolling five 5's and alerts us to the win???

[seuntjie]

Hey Seuntjies, I see you have BetKing as a dice option.  BetKing has a jackpot in play were "All you have to do to win is roll the dice twice in a row, containing five 5’s in the roll results" The only problem is that it looks like you have to keep track of this yourself and email them "If you win, please contact support@betking.io or our Bitcointalk, Facebook or Twitter pages with your account details and the IDs of the two bets."

Anyway you can put this in your bot for BetKing where it stops after twice in a row after rolling five 5's and alerts us to the win???

No, you can use the programmer mode for that: https://bot.seuntjie.com/programmermode.aspx

[HCP]

alternatively, if you want to double check if you missed any jackpot winning rolls... you can open the DiceBot.db file with an SQLite Database Browser and check the bet results that way

[BreachOfEuphoria]

Nice job making this bot, thank you seuntjie

[chilly2k]

Hey guys I`m trying to run a script but it seems i have a mistake somewhere i can`t find it where can someone help me with that i will be very grateful i want to make it switch low/high every bet and to double on losses  and i also added another function to change % between 40 and 60  roll .

basebet=0.00000001
nextbet=basebet
chance=49.5
function dobet()

If Iwin then
nextbet=previousbet*2
else
nextbet=basebet
end

bethigh=bethigh
print(currentprofit)

if lastbet.roll > 40 and lastbet.roll < 60 then
chance=40;
else
chance=49.5
end


   if win then

--     switch high/low every win
--     bethigh = !bethigh

   What error are you getting? 
Is Iwin maybe !win? 
Also you have a ; after you set the chance. 

But my best guess is your missing an end statement for the function 

[B4RF]

Hey guys I`m trying to run a script but it seems i have a mistake somewhere i can`t find it where can someone help me with that i will be very grateful i want to make it switch low/high every bet and to double on losses  and i also added another function to change % between 40 and 60  roll .

basebet=0.00000001
nextbet=basebet
chance=49.5
function dobet()

If Iwin then
nextbet=previousbet*2
else
nextbet=basebet
end

bethigh=bethigh
print(currentprofit)

if lastbet.roll > 40 and lastbet.roll < 60 then
chance=40;
else
chance=49.5
end


   if win then

--     switch high/low every win
--     bethigh = !bethigh

   What error are you getting? 
Is Iwin maybe !win? 
Also you have a ; after you set the chance. 

But my best guess is your missing an end statement for the function 

wasn't the statement end ,either !win or ; I`ve try it it didn't work
That`s what happen if i put ! and what happen if i take it out -->

LUA ERROR!!
assignment statement expected, got '!'
start()
LUA ERROR!!
assignment statement expected, got 'win'

Besides the mistakes chilly2k already mentioned you wrote If instead of if and at the end of your script there is an additional "if win then" which should be removed.

[seuntjie]

same thing

basebet=0.00000001
nextbet=basebet
chance=49.5
function dobet()

if win then
nextbet=previousbet*2
else
nextbet=basebet
end

bethigh=bethigh
print(currentprofit)

if lastbet.roll > 40 and lastbet.roll < 60 then
chance=40
else
chance=49.5
end


   if win then

--     switch high/low every win
--     bethigh = !bethigh

end

I`ve try to remove if win then  before -- switch  not working again

LUA ERROR!!
'end' expected after function body, got ''

Can`t get from where that`s coming

Read the message again. It doesn't say it found two quotes, it's quoting what it found. In other words, it was looking for the word end and found nothing.

Hint: every function that is declared and every if-else statement has to be closed of with an end.

[seuntjie]

DiceBot 3.3.12 is now available for download! Get it from https://bot.seuntjie.com/botpage.aspx

Change Log

New Features
None


Changes
Added new currencies for Bitsler
Updated Bitsler login method - now requires Username, Password, API Key and 2fa code (if enabled).
Increased betting speed increased.


Bug Fixes
Bitvest betting speed set dynamically on login, should prevent (or at least reduce) number of stops when betting
Bitvest tipping fixed
Bitsler reset seed fixed
Simulation reset stats bug fixed
Nitrogen sports single bet bug fixed.

[BayAreaCoins]

Damn, I can't believe you are still doing this

Hope all is well.

[Agent009]

Hello guys!

Can anybody help me with a small script?

The idea is:
Base: 0.00000001
chance: 20
on lose: +0.00000001 (same bet as basebet)
on win: if profit on balance in +, so go back to basebet, if not, so go to next bet +0.00000001 (same bet as basebet)
and so until the balance it reaches a profit.

[B4RF]

Hello guys!

Can anybody help me with a small script?

The idea is:
Base: 0.00000001
chance: 20
on lose: +0.00000001 (same bet as basebet)
on win: if profit on balance in +, so go back to basebet, if not, so go to next bet +0.00000001 (same bet as basebet)
and so until the balance it reaches a profit.

I guess this short script does what you are looking for

Code:

basebet=0.00000001
nextbet=basebet
chance=49.5
highestBalance=balance

function dobet()

	if balance > highestBalance then
		nextbet=basebet
		highestBalance=balance
	else
		nextbet=previousbet+basebet
	end

end

It checks if you are in profit by using your highest balance throughout the run.

But if you have questions on the programmers mode then you should probably post that in this thread.