More from today
10/12/2013
TECSHARE: I understand Johns position, but he is underestimating these issues and thinks people will not notice or he can just skim over it with some PR maneuvers
makeitsnappy391: yer i really hope it works out for him and us
BitJohn: I dont disagree with TECSHARE as far as the fact it sucks he lost money due to lag but cant fix that as I have said before I cannot replace opportunity costs
JackΘfÅLL: Ok NASCAR it is then
INeedCoins704: @8k5yw605: oh come on, now dont tease a bro.
makeitsnappy391: u cant beat amanzons scalability and reliability and internal network latency and bandwidth
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: what issue would you like addressed name one that is something that can be done for the future?
BlueStang: @JackΘfÅLL: yep!
JackΘfÅLL: @BitJohn:I have lost lots of opportunities I even literally lost coins but my dumb ass still comes back for more...lol
TECSHARE: right now ending the endless string of new coins is not in anyones interest except for a small group of people intending to suck this community dry.
JackΘfÅLL: So if you are paying out ... put me on the list
makeitsnappy391: pay a lil more to get much more..my point here is i feel like vern has sat there trying to do it as cheap as he can with to many other things going on and to much leaning on this sites income for far to long
TECSHARE: How about raising the minimum trade amount, people have been asking for that for a long time
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: well I have already stated you can hide the coins
TECSHARE: or maintenance announcements
makeitsnappy391: i hope he makes some better desitions soon and hope it all works out cause if it dosnt people wont have trust in crypto
JackΘfÅLL: @makeitsnappy391: Shit it is almost done.. he said 90% you can wait 2 or 3 more days.
TECSHARE: hiding the coins doesn't help me when you add acrappy one thats failing and it causes negative banalce
Koontas: @BitJohn: We appreciate your openness. Glad to hear the new hardware is coming along!
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: we have on numerous coins to 1 I know it generated 100's of tickets
Dcypher: @JackΘfÅLL: hehe same here
But I know the risks. And really see all this as one huge experiment. I am just happy to be part of something that might turn out to be pretty damn nice
makeitsnappy391: especially if its representing the dev talent...cause this is terrible and you poor mods all day long are on ground zero
Mullick: @TECSHARE: If you never traded it its impossible for you to get negative balance
BitJohn: @makeitsnappy391: they will lose trust in crypto because just like every large crypto exchange we had to wait for FedEx?
8k5yw605: the theory that when many coins are made, would make all the coins wothless, except for bitcoin; doesn't seem to be going that way
JackΘfÅLL: @makeitsnappy391: you think mcxnow had them big servers overnight? or how about btc-e that fast trade engine they just installed they were slow for months
Dcypher: @JackΘfÅLL: was to your comment about keep coiming back dispite problems
BitJohn: @makeitsnappy391: dont feel sorry for me I work here
TECSHARE: then when the coin fails and causes exchange failures you blame the coin rathetr than copping tot he fact that the system could be designed better or perhaps you are adding coins too flippantly
makeitsnappy391: lol then thats all gud
8k5yw605: i see lots of coins here, that are not worthless, and yet more and more coins being made all the time
JackΘfÅLL: @Dcypher:I have been here from the beginning. I have always donr this for fun.
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: coisn fail? example?
Dcypher: @JackΘfÅLL: +1
makeitsnappy391: @BitJohn: have you ever tried showing any mainstreamer this site and how the trade sytem works
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: they are like commodities your investing in the developer mostly
8k5yw605: @TECSHARE: you don't own the exchange
makeitsnappy391: at least 20 people ive shown and everytime something is broken
JackΘfÅLL: I was prob one of the first 50 complaints in the support tab
makeitsnappy391: but meh it will change id just like to see its standard lift quite alot
Dcypher: @JackΘfÅLL: XD
TECSHARE: for example, the other day starcoin had chargebacks or whatever you want to call them here... this resulted in several users having a negative balance... those users some of them then bought IFC, which then resulted in my balance being negative and prevented a lot of people from buying because of negative balances
BitJohn: @makeitsnappy391: I can only repeat that its on the way so many times
TECSHARE: I never bought starcoin, but I am still suffering from your poor choices of coin additions
makeitsnappy391: @BitJohn: /paste
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: so your blaming a rush on IFC due to a Starcoin fork?
JackΘfÅLL: @TECSHARE: vern was reembersing NEG balances
8k5yw605: @TECSHARE: I think you are frustrated
BitJohn: we only reimburse for bugs on cryptsy side not for reversals that is a different animal
TECSHARE: try reading what I said again. This time try looking for how you might possibly culpable rather than instantly refractory with me,.
TECSHARE: you asked me for an example I gave you one... now you are making it about another subject....
Mullick: @TECSHARE: Starcoins failure had nothing to do with the ifc negative balances
8k5yw605: @TECSHARE: we all have to play by the rules, and cryptsy makes the rules
regtable69645: anybody have any idea if you can solo mine on a bit erupter? if so how? iv spent a while trolling google and found nothing that works
BitJohn: your balance was negative because people bought IFC?
JackΘfÅLL: @BitJohn:reversal? like if a coin that gets sopent after a roll back and fork?
TECSHARE: thats not what mullick said
Mullick: @TECSHARE: When did i say that?
JackΘfÅLL: spent**
BitJohn: @JackΘfÅLL: so you send ocins in then it forks and the chain rolls back but you already sold coins that is a reversal
TECSHARE: so why exactly were people getting errors when trying to buy IFC even after balances were fixed?
Stephen: is there another exchange with more responsive devs or customer service?
JackΘfÅLL: @BitJohn: ahhh gotcha
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: most likely trust score
TECSHARE: @Mullick: Remember when i asked you bout the guy complaining of not being able to buy 30 seconds after you banned me... you said it was because of starcoin
Mullick: @TECSHARE: That one pperson had an error that lasted 5 minutes. Dont believe he had a negative balance even
BitJohn: if you go negative your trust score takes a big hit
8k5yw605: @Stephen: cryptsy is top of the alt coin food chain. else there is btc-e but it is a protectionist snob
BitJohn: he had negative trust due to a reversal which can also be a doudblespend
gnode: @TECSHARE: your arguments make no sense, you assume you know how every coin will perform. So why are you here and not a true millionaire?? because you don't know what you are talking about
JackΘfÅLL: damn where di I see my trust score?
Mullick: @TECSHARE: Yes becasue he had a starcoin reversal that froze his account 1 user
Stephen: and btc e devs aren't responsive... at all.
BitJohn: so trust score adjusts based on various fraud protection algorithms
Dcypher: @JackΘfÅLL: thinking the same thing lol
BitJohn: so a guy goes negative it take a big hit in trust
BitJohn: if its a newer account this can make him a negative trust score
JackΘfÅLL: mine is prob low.. i had two neg in the last week
BitJohn: and he will get that error
8k5yw605: protectionist snob or allowing lots of coins? Currently cryptsy has lots of coins. If you don't like it, well, that is the way it is anyways
BitJohn: well there is way more to it then I am going to explain JAck
BitJohn: the point is this system prevents many 51% type attacks
BitJohn: or at least severely limits the affect they can have on the exchange
gnode: @JackΘfÅLL: two negs in the last week and a fake shooting last month, trust must be negative big time, LOL
8k5yw605: some people want to limit the number of coins, because they know that if they allow some coins more time, they will take a piece of the pie later on as they grow
JackΘfÅLL: @BitJohn: so can we see this score?
JackΘfÅLL: @gnode: right
8k5yw605: magnifying their own coins, while depressing other peoples coins. hypocrites
BitJohn: Mullick is new to support and only vern knows the whole algorithm but I can tell you Mullick doesnt know much about it yet as its a cryptsy secret
BitJohn: @JackΘfÅLL: ill tell you your score if you like
JackΘfÅLL: @gnode: seems neg trust just follows me around..lmao
TECSHARE: or perhaps that adding too many coins limits the time they have to work on critical exchange errors while they are spending time on pump and dumps
BitJohn: @JackΘfÅLL: 24 trusat
JackΘfÅLL: @BitJohn: ok
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: adding coins are like apps its a snap in
Mullick: @JackΘfÅLL: That not bad mine is around 30
gnode: @JackΘfÅLL: I think neg trust is coin worthy NTC neg trust coin!
JackΘfÅLL: cool up from the 10 I had last month.
TECSHARE: lol is that why it takes days to fix them?
BigJohnson124: hey ya'll
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: cryptsy doesnt fix the coins developers do that
Mullick: @TECSHARE: Days to fix them? You mean suspensions?
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: think of coins as commodities or companies
Stephen: wot's my score john?
JackΘfÅLL: @gnode: I like it. and make it loose value in your wallet the longer you hold it ..
BitJohn: when a coin breaks its a snap freeze like say the peach harvest froze over
8k5yw605: some people misinterpret support for a coin, as though it is a 'pump and dump'. perhaps it may be hard to tell the difference at times? Expert wiseman, please tell us when it is support or pump and dump
gnode: @BigJohnson124: Gee you finally back from that your birthday bash, what did that last a month??
JackΘfÅLL: @gnode: like a hot fucking potato
BitJohn: @Stephen: 17
BlueStang: @Mullick: do me, do me (score that is!)
Stephen: ty
BitJohn: so the crop is lost your only chance is the farmer has enough time to make the harvest
Stephen: lol
gnode: @JackΘfÅLL: That is even better HFP a new innovative coin
Mullick: @BlueStang: one sec
BitJohn: @BlueStang: 20
JackΘfÅLL: @gnode: +1
gnode: @JackΘfÅLL: you should be the coin name guru
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: or a company has a fire at a factory and has to little insurance to make full replacement cost the investor will take a big loss
JackΘfÅLL: we will get r3wt to build it.
BitJohn: so we dont readd coins until the developers fix them we dont fix the coins
BlueStang: @BitJohn: hehe, try
BigJohnson124: @gnode: been working.
TECSHARE: you can give me analogies all day, in the end its just PR fluff... you have problems with system failures here no matter how much you deny it. In addition you are facilitating an environment of insider trading and fraud know it or not.
BlueStang: @BlueStang: *ty
JackΘfÅLL: @gnode: and no one will touch it. like a hot fucking potato
8k5yw605: coins that released few coins, but got lots of 'suport'? but later on seems people are 'dumping'? when more coins are released
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: well coin issues and exchange issues are a big difference you should understand if you trade cryptos
8k5yw605: what is pump and dump?
BitJohn: the anolgoies are simply to break it down
BitJohn: FTC suffered this and both us BTC-e and MCXNOW had to wait
BitJohn: so it can happen to any
TECSHARE: Ye I understand very well, but it seems it is always some one else's fault.... never anyone in your company's
Mullick: @TECSHARE: If thats your stance the same can be said about any exchange. We may have more failures but btc as a whole is open to insider trading
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: no I told you we take total fault for the lag and delays
JackΘfÅLL: @BitJohn: I understand John how many times you gonna tell me the same damn thing. I know I am dense sometimes but shesh ok you dont have control over the coin issues I get it...lmao
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: no I told you we take total fault for the lag and delays
JackΘfÅLL: @BitJohn: I understand John how many times you gonna tell me the same damn thing. I know I am dense sometimes but shesh ok you dont have control over the coin issues I get it...lmao
BitJohn: but coin suspensons are a protection mechanism not a faulty
8k5yw605: a major problem is people 'dumping' coins or selling their coins period. If people would buy their coins with the intent of keeping them longer-term, say 2-3 years, then .... (um, then what?)
TECSHARE: more failures = more opportunity for insider trading.
BitJohn: not a fault*
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: of all the exchanges I assure you in the staff the insider trading here is very minimal
TECSHARE: so you don't think just maybe you should be researching additions more carefully? iI have seen some real garbage come onto this exchange.
BitJohn: I say minimal because we hear more from folks but most of us dont have very deep pockets in the exchange
JackΘfÅLL: Long and short of the fucking story.......What the fuck you gonna do about it?
TECSHARE: who said it was your staff?
JackΘfÅLL: it is what it is
8k5yw605: @TECSHARE: watchdog of the gates to cryptsy
Franko988: Tool - jimmy is now playing.
JackΘfÅLL: @8k5yw605: lol
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: well that is anywhere in the investment world I cant stop folks from planning a pump secretly in the shadows
Franko988: Tool - jimmy is now playing.
JackΘfÅLL: @8k5yw605: lol
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: well that is anywhere in the investment world I cant stop folks from planning a pump secretly in the shadows
BlueStang: @JackΘfÅLL: thought you started watching the race
8k5yw605: @TECSHARE: based on what standards, do you think to judge the coins?
8k5yw605: @TECSHARE: based on what standards, do you think to judge the coins?
TECSHARE: yes you can, by not adding so many immature coins prone to failure
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: every major crypto has had at least one major issue or fork
Mullick: @TECSHARE: You said more failures = more insider trading nobody knows when a failure is going to occur
BlueStang: @BitJohn: can you secretly pump CAPS
TECSHARE: this is an insider traders DREAM here
Mullick: @TECSHARE: You said more failures = more insider trading nobody knows when a failure is going to occur
BlueStang: @BitJohn: can you secretly pump CAPS
TECSHARE: this is an insider traders DREAM here
TECSHARE: and you are happy to take a slice
8k5yw605: @TECSHARE: new coins have little else going for them, except to be on an exchange and traded on an exchange
BitJohn: there are more immature coins that have not had issues than say FTC or BTC
TECSHARE: soon the pie will be gone and there wont be any slices left for you.
Jagrapolite: @BitJohn: whats mine?
Mullick: @Jagrapolite: 92
Jagrapolite: oops lag
BitJohn: @Jagrapolite: 92
JackΘfÅLL: I got stuck on football
Mullick: @Jagrapolite: 92
Jagrapolite: oops lag
BitJohn: @Jagrapolite: 92
JackΘfÅLL: I got stuck on football
Jagrapolite: nice
TECSHARE: @8k5yw605: Thats exactly my point, if they have nothing going on WHY ADD THEM?
8k5yw605: @TECSHARE: new coins gain exposure by being on an exchange
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: actually every category is trending upwards
JackΘfÅLL: And I am waiting on a secret pump
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: nothing breaking not nothing going on
BitJohn: and why in the world do you trade them if you dont like them
TECSHARE: Past alts had to grow past this point on its own merit, now you give it instarep by adding it. Its a systematic pump and dump operation.
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: ok ehre is my question to you why did you buy IFC? was it the future of all coins?
8k5yw605: @TECSHARE: oh, if they have nothing at all going on, and no one supporting the coin? Ok, I see, I agree, in that case, no point in adding them
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: or did you buy it to make a profit?
Mullick: @TECSHARE: People want to trade coins we give them the opportunity is all
BitJohn: we dont set the price or buy the coins traders do
BitJohn: so if a coin has nothing going on then why does anyone buy it?
darkproton: @TECSHARE: dude dont buy 'em. Seriously. SImple
TECSHARE: Enjoy slanging your crack while it lasts John.
8k5yw605: what coin has nothing going on?
TECSHARE: Enjoy slanging your crack while it lasts John.
BitJohn: If you want safe trade BTC, LTC, XPM, PPC, NVC
BitJohn: if you want risky they are there too
darkproton: @BitJohn: +100. I like the ability to buy just about any crypto saafely and not thru a sketchy trade by google docs.
BitJohn: if you want risky they are there too
darkproton: @BitJohn: +100. I like the ability to buy just about any crypto saafely and not thru a sketchy trade by google docs.
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: see what about that is constructive?
JackΘfÅLL: @darkproton: +1
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: Im trying to have a good conversation I have spoken my piece on altcoin copy coins myself
JackΘfÅLL: Ok I know we are talking coin but this last batch of weed that I got is really good.. they call it AK-47
darkproton: people complain about the number added and that it dilutes the market. However, no one is making you or anyone else buy them. Do some homework when buying.
BitJohn: I dont like many I trade pretty much in the coins I just listed and dabble in others
8k5yw605: @BitJohn: I looked at the xpm thread, but did not see any mention of block rewards, but apparently there is no limit to the number of coins. The fact the coins are being released slowly, is this true? but how slowly are they being released?
BitJohn: @8k5yw605: there is no limit on the US dollar either well there might be in a day or two we shall see
BitJohn: @8k5yw605: noone knows its all prime numbers
Mullick: @8k5yw605: xpm block reward is based on moores law. The block reward halves on scale with every 16x the network dfficulty
8k5yw605: the slow steady stile of block rewards? it remains to be seen if this works or not, or whether this is just another con job
Mullick: The faster mining hardware gets the smallert the block reward is. There is no hard cap
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: anyhow I respect your opinion and have no issue talking about it whenever you wish
8k5yw605: personally, I am not sold on sunny kings theories that remind me of David Suzuki preaching
Mullick: @8k5yw605: PPC / NVC use the same alogrithm
BitJohn: heck I bought caps at .006
and lots of them
8k5yw605: In fact, I tried to download ppcon wallet, and it was infected
BitJohn: @8k5yw605: Im a sunny fan lol
Mullick: @8k5yw605: Some like it some dont. It open to opinion.
8k5yw605: ppcon is part of the btc-e protectionist racket
Mullick: I dont like the early adopter advantage it gives becasue the difficulty is so low but i like the concept
BitJohn: @8k5yw605: well BTC-e is trying to branch out in other ways
JackΘfÅLL: @BitJohn: speaking of wallets ANONCOIN is coming out with a new wallet I think soon
BitJohn: we will have BTC-e codes on cryptsy soon
8k5yw605: i suspect many of the rudest people have been people who support sunny kings theories, as they continually accuse others of being 'pump and dump' when they are trying to squash the hope of the new coins
BitJohn: and BTC-e will have cryptsy codes
Mullick: Oh he just opened the flood gates.
BitJohn: @8k5yw605: I like some POW's as well heck I just changed my skype DGC pic today haha
8k5yw605: i also am suspicious that ppcoin comes from china. but us people in north america we support coins like goldcoin which is supported by north americans
Franko988: @BitJohn: OH DAMN! NICE!
JackΘfÅLL:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=227287.0Franko988: @8k5yw605: You forgot frk, we are red white and blue
BitJohn: @Franko988: we have had to delay it due to the server upgrades being needed
8k5yw605: @Franko988: I was raised french and english in canada, and I support red white and blue too
Franko988: @BitJohn: Man, that is amazing, it will give the ability to freely move coins between servers. As if they are an extension of each other. Bravo!
8k5yw605: There was some people who tried to invent cars that run on water; but the gas companies showed them a thing or two
Franko988: by servers i ment exchange.. sorry, my fingers are happy too obviously.
BitJohn: @Franko988: they contacted us
BitJohn: @Franko988: so no fees on that as well
***break because of buffer***
Mullick: @8k5yw605: I personally like the steady productioon such as FRK but its all opinion
BigJohnson124: @8k5yw605: i hope i have a few could use more
JackΘfÅLL: @8k5yw605: I dont like a coin that has a lot mined up front. we need one like this.. start off 0 reward for like 100 blocks and then it goes to one coin and then two and so on until the block hits 100 coin reward then it starts decreasing by 1 coin until it gets back to 1 coin again and so on and so on until it reaches 50 million. have difficulty change every 3 blocks.
8k5yw605: I reason that people who are worried about coins with lots of coins early on, fail to realize that other coins end up with large coin-holders anyways, so there is no difference(its just a redistribution of wealth is all). but some people want to opppress the hopes of the poor and only want to retain the riches of the rich man
Franko988: @JackΘfÅLL: hot fucking potato.. is that like two Dicktaters being made into mash potatoes?
8k5yw605: @JackΘfÅLL: one of the main problems for investors with coins with few coins at first, and some hype or support, is that the investors drive the price too high at first, but later on, as more coins are found, then the price comes back down alot and the early investors lose their shirt
8k5yw605: whereas with the large early release of coins, the price gets depressed, and the accusers might actually make it go down more; but then later on, there is less coins, and some things might start happening for the coin, and bingo, we win the lottery and the coin goes way up
JackΘfÅLL: @8k5yw605: see that is the beauty of the coin I am talking about the variation of reward changing all the time evenly and coming back down ends up like an ebb and flow
BitJohn: ok name the coins you guys dont like and want to see go
JackΘfÅLL: ALF
NightVision931: IFC
NightVision931: ;-)
JackΘfÅLL: hold on
8k5yw605: @JackΘfÅLL: can you explain this for me more. i am interested. i wonder about this but don't know much about this
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: you go first what coin do you hate most?
JackΘfÅLL: @8k5yw605: I have put my idea out there to he coin makers but no one wants to try it
8k5yw605: seriously? don't let the chatters decide what coins should be here?
BitJohn: @8k5yw605: its for the poll
JackΘfÅLL: @8k5yw605: do you IFC?
8k5yw605: I won't name any coin to be taken off
8k5yw605: they would hate me for sure
BitJohn: haha
BitJohn: where is really's list?
8k5yw605: i have no hatred for any coin really
JackΘfÅLL: @BitJohn: all the coins that dont have a dev with the exception of hobo
BitJohn: @JackΘfÅLL: youd be suprised how many contacted me when I said I needed contact info to list the coin lol
8k5yw605: @BitJohn: have you considered making a 'second page' or 'back page' for coins with no dev, sort of thing? that way, you could still keep them here
JackΘfÅLL: @8k5yw605:yea that was what I was thinking.
JackΘfÅLL: @BitJohn:do you IRC?
8k5yw605: or does that take too much broadband?
idigz: Whens Maples going to added here?
JackΘfÅLL: or just skype?
idigz: and Cloudcoin
BitJohn: @8k5yw605: lol thats no different than hiding them
BitJohn: @JackΘfÅLL: just skype
BitJohn: @idigz: go vote for them
TECSHARE: I don't hate any coins, i hate the lack of planning involved in stacking them all together in a room to sell before they have matured to handle it. This is an altcoin slaughterhouse.
JackΘfÅLL: @BitJohn: what if someone wanted to tell you a secret and they dont use skype?
BitJohn:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=309977.0 delisting thread
TECSHARE: And additionally before your exchange can handle it...
BitJohn: @JackΘfÅLL: email me
bitjohn@cryptsy.comBitJohn: @TECSHARE: coin additons dont slow the exchange
BitJohn: users do
idigz: @BitJohn: thats no good, people will use fake accounts to vote for teh coins they want removed or added
8k5yw605: the bingo effect won't last forever, but i suspect that it is still quite early in the bitcoin or altcoin thing, so it might continue for some time yet
TECSHARE: and adding more coins doesn't create more engine lag? Seriously? Please....
BitJohn: @idigz: Im using it for feedback not for the final word
JackΘfÅLL: @BitJohn: I mean private chat
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: nope not really
idigz: y not run the poll here?
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: they dont weigh anything
8k5yw605: @TECSHARE: being on an exchange is needed for a new coin, as it is one of the only ways to maintain interest in the coin
BitJohn: @JackΘfÅLL: skypes all I got
Harbinger: @BitJohn: "Die Shitcoin die!" lol
BitJohn: @Harbinger: haha
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: you cant really make a technical evaluation of our issues when you have zero knowledge about how the system works
JackΘfÅLL: ok I am gonna have to check into this skype thing. I am afraid of it bloating my laptop and slowing it down.
TECSHARE: @8k5yw605: EXACTLY, if the coin is so special it GETS on an exchange because the market cap cant be ignored any longer....
idigz: make easier for cryptsy to verify users are "mostly" unique
BigJohnson124: everthing not a shitcoin..lol
jestronix714: playing blackjack i prefer people to play against, not someones computer they dropped off to take their place, id be happy with an exchange to dropped bots and autosell, but its an age old debate that one
darkproton: @BitJohn: add as many as you can. Keep up the good work!
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: those are other exchanges that cater to that group
TECSHARE: @BitJohn: I can make the valid conclusion that as you add more coins you are spending less time maintaining what is already here. You are after all one person.
BitJohn: we cater to a larger audience
TECSHARE: you cater to addicts and parasites
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: I am one person the company is more than that anyhow
JackΘfÅLL: Is Vern on that skype thingy?
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: careful keep it civil personal attacks are not allowed
JackΘfÅLL: is it like group chat as well?
BitJohn: @JackΘfÅLL: yes
TECSHARE: its not a personal attack...
TECSHARE: but I am sure youd be happy to keep me quiet for any reason you can think of.
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: callign customers addicts and parasite is an attack
8k5yw605: bitcoin is still pre-nasdaq in its development. Just wait and see what happens as bitcoin gets more companies and trading on stock exchanges, and see these coins fly
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: yes your points are compelling seriously I have given you hours to make a point
JudeAustin: Here we go again...
BitJohn: and now your just trolling
8k5yw605: YA GOT TO BELIEVE (in jesus christ)
TECSHARE: You are catering to gambling addicts, and parasites that want nothing but to take resources from the alternate coin community. That is not a personal attack that is an observation of your company's business strategy. Exploiting the worst in humanity for profit at the expense of forward movement of cryptocurrency.
BitJohn: so keep it constructive or move on
*** TECSHARE has been banned from chat for 1 day ***
BitJohn: @TECSHARE: see you tomorrow
8k5yw605: bitcoin is still pre-nasdaq in its development. Just wait and see what happens as bitcoin gets more companies and trading on stock exchanges, and see these coins fly
BitJohn: I am heading to bed
JudeAustin: Night.
Goldshredder: Night. No dreaming about techshare.
8k5yw605: BELIEVE
BitJohn: anyhow TECSHARE your at this point just here to spread FUD I have made every chance to solve your issue
BitJohn: its best if you move on at this point
Goldshredder: @BitJohn: the term 'reasonable' is highly applicable
BitJohn: its obvious at this point there is some agenda
cryptocoin40jks758: BitJohn: thanks for all your hard work
8k5yw605: ripple released too few coins for the demand early on, and price went way up; now they are faced with the dilemma of releasing more coins and causing the early investors to all lose thier shirts
cryptocoin40jks758: BitJohn: looking forward to TEK
BitJohn: @cryptocoin40jks758: thansk I try
BitJohn: my head hurts though lol
cryptocoin40jks758: haha
BitJohn: @cryptocoin40jks758: needs some votes
cryptocoin40jks758: ok
Goldshredder: @BitJohn: don't let a troublesome individual bother you, not worth it
Goldshredder: just put them on the business-only shelf and deal with them as such
Goldshredder: i.e. without emotion and thus stress.
cryptocoin40jks758: BitJohn: where is the link to voe *for* coins?
pr9me: that guy is persistent for sure :\