Well fuck me if this is allowed on this forum:
XarXymtroa, one of your
Sportsbet scam promoters claims that your other scam site has already more than 100 Bitcoin fraudulent results!
Supposedly before you start playing you should see people review about their site, already more than 100 bitcoin they have fraudulent results of people.
There are still many good gambling sites, you can see reviews using google search engine if you know it.
You can contact them about your complaint but I am not sure you will get a good response or you will not get a response.
sorry sir, i have to leave this campaign
Why?
XarXymtroa, one of your
Sportsbet scam promoters claims that your other scam site has already more than 100 Bitcoin fraudulent results!
Supposedly before you start playing you should see people review about their site, already more than 100 bitcoin they have fraudulent results of people.
There are still many good gambling sites, you can see reviews using google search engine if you know it.
You can contact them about your complaint but I am not sure you will get a good response or you will not get a response.
You are aware about the publicly proven
Bitcasino scam, but nevertheless promote their other
Sportsbet scam site?
Supposedly before you start playing you should see people review about their site, already more than 100 bitcoin they have fraudulent results of people.
There are still many good gambling sites, you can see reviews using google search engine if you know it.
You can contact them about your complaint but I am not sure you will get a good response or you will not get a response.
What are the names of the teams participating in your league?
What are the names of the teams participating in your league?
@ XarXymtroa
As you appear to be a gambling expert, can you please address the following:
Is it a scam to false and misleading claim to be authorized and regulated by the Government of Curaçao?
@ XarXymtroa
As you appear to be a gambling expert, one question please:
Is it a scam to false and misleading claim to be authorized and regulated by the Government of Curaçao?
@ XarXymtroa
As you appear to be a gambling expert, one question please:
Is it a scam to false and misleading claim to be authorized and regulated by the Government of Curaçao?
@ XarXymtroa
As you appear to be a gambling expert, one question please:
Is it a scam to false and misleading claim to be authorized and regulated by the Government of Curaçao?
@ XarXymtroa
As you appear to be a gambling expert, one question please:
Is it a scam to false and misleading claim to be authorized and regulated by the Government of Curaçao?
This is very much a work-in-progress. We've been incredibly busy with happenings on our websites, our goal isn't to start some sort of monopoly we're really just a group of likeminded individuals who think traditional online casinos are scams and want to do things differently. I don't want this initiative to morph into a for-profit thing (askgamblers), finding a trustee would be difficult but I like the idea. Right now though if we were to do anything controversial it would only be do-able by vote of all the members but as things stand the CGF is here for educational purposes at this point in time and we (PD/stake) cover all expenses for videos/articles etc. We get a ton of emails from people who want to join and we've set the bar at 1+ year of solid operation & significant volume (top 20 crypto casino).
If you want to educate the community on your expenses, why do you not inform about the
Curacao license scam 1668/JAZ, sub-licenses have no legal basis! you are financing with 10000s of Euro every year?
PD had been License free since 2013, and has taken more BTC betting volume than any Bitcoin gambling website that discloses stats with no issues.
You have stats of how much Bitcoin you have illegally taken? 5 Years is exactly the time frame players can demand their losses back.
The curacao license is something that costs near $0 and the reason we obtained it is so we can use google adwords and other advertising networks that require a "license" not to trick players into trusting us.
With a Costa Rica license you can not use google adwords and other advertising networks?
I never said that you pay for a fake license to trick players into trusting you.
Curacao license is indeed one of the easiest ones to obtain because Malta, UK, and other jurisdictions require RNG testing and guess what, Provably fair is not "RNG" it's deterministic.
It is easy to obtain because it is
no juridical valid license! Should be easy to understand.
As much as you think there is some major conspiracy behind the curacao licenses, all you have is a theory you don't have any actual proof.
Game Protect has proof that your claim to operate under the 1668/JAZ license has no legal basis. It is explained here
Curacao license scam 1668/JAZ, sub-licenses have no legal basis! and I already gave you the link.
Let me know which part you did not understand?
Have you seen the 1668/JAZ license you claim to operate under? Have you seen the sub-license contract?
Regardless of this entire fact, I can't see why you'd try and pick a fight with us or insist that we are no longer legitimate now because we picked up a license.
I missed the fact, can you please quote it?
Neither do I fight with you nor did I say that you are now no longer legitimate because you picked a license.
I inform that you finance organized crime with 10000s Euro every year!
If I wanted to fight with you, I would offer a 100% cashback assistance for the past 5 years for primedice and stake.
If you have a beef it should be with the licensors not the 1000s of casinos that have obtained this license for various reasons.
No, you and all the other casinos finance organized crime that killed the politician leader Helmin Wiels in Curacao!
If the casinos would not pay for a fake license, the licensors would have no business, simple.
This primarily feels like just a push towards self promotion for your own affiliation, if you want me to take your opinion seriously remove all the affiliate links from your website and PM me serious proof of your accusations against curacao egaming not just random circumstantial anecdotes.
Game Protect will neither stop offering to
Qualify cost free for our online gaming consumer protection service nor send you the hard proof that those sub-licenses have no legal basis.
The hard proof that those sub-licenses have no legal basis is worth $100,000s as I can offer a 100% cashback assistance for any of the 1000s casinos.
We can make it unlike easier: If you operate under the 1668/JAZ license, show us
your authorization?
The truth about gaming licenses is the legal basis of a gaming license pertains to that specific jurisdiction.
I am not able to understand what you are saying here as the Curacao licensed casinos operate worldwide?
Or did you say that the validity of a Curacao license rely on Curacao laws?
Anyone who trusts a gambling website because they are "licensed" is silly because when you sign up to a (traditional) online casino you agree to often iron-clad terms and conditions which legally give the casino the opportunity to mess you over.
The part you missed is that the civil laws of the jurisdiction where a casino is incorporated always stand above the terms and conditions of the casino. Hence, if a part of the terms and conditions are not in accordance with the local civil laws, then they are simply
not valid and a player could enforce his rights at the court.
This is very much a work-in-progress. We've been incredibly busy with happenings on our websites, our goal isn't to start some sort of monopoly we're really just a group of likeminded individuals who think traditional online casinos are scams and want to do things differently. I don't want this initiative to morph into a for-profit thing (askgamblers), finding a trustee would be difficult but I like the idea. Right now though if we were to do anything controversial it would only be do-able by vote of all the members but as things stand the CGF is here for educational purposes at this point in time and we (PD/stake) cover all expenses for videos/articles etc. We get a ton of emails from people who want to join and we've set the bar at 1+ year of solid operation & significant volume (top 20 crypto casino).
If you want to educate the community on your expenses, why do you not inform about the
Curacao license scam 1668/JAZ, sub-licenses have no legal basis! you are financing with 10000s of Euro every year?
PD had been License free since 2013, and has taken more BTC betting volume than any Bitcoin gambling website that discloses stats with no issues.
You have stats of how much Bitcoin you have illegally taken? 5 Years is exactly the time frame players can demand their losses back.
The curacao license is something that costs near $0 and the reason we obtained it is so we can use google adwords and other advertising networks that require a "license" not to trick players into trusting us.
With a Costa Rica license you can not use google adwords and other advertising networks?
I never said that you pay for a fake license to trick players into trusting you.
Curacao license is indeed one of the easiest ones to obtain because Malta, UK, and other jurisdictions require RNG testing and guess what, Provably fair is not "RNG" it's deterministic.
It is easy to obtain because it is
no juridical valid license! Should be easy to understand.
As much as you think there is some major conspiracy behind the curacao licenses, all you have is a theory you don't have any actual proof.
Game Protect has proof that your claim to operate under the 1668/JAZ license has no legal basis. It is explained here
Curacao license scam 1668/JAZ, sub-licenses have no legal basis! and I already gave you the link.
Let me know which part you did not understand?
Have you seen the 1668/JAZ license you claim to operate under? Have you seen the sub-license contract?
Regardless of this entire fact, I can't see why you'd try and pick a fight with us or insist that we are no longer legitimate now because we picked up a license.
I missed the fact, can you please quote it?
Neither do I fight with you nor did I say that you are now no longer legitimate because you picked a license.
I inform that you finance organized crime with 10000s Euro every year!
If I wanted to fight with you, I would offer a 100% cashback assistance for the past 5 years for primedice and stake.
If you have a beef it should be with the licensors not the 1000s of casinos that have obtained this license for various reasons.
No, you and all the other casinos finance organized crime that killed the politician leader Helmin Wiels in Curacao!
If the casinos would not pay for a fake license, the licensors would have no business, simple.
This primarily feels like just a push towards self promotion for your own affiliation, if you want me to take your opinion seriously remove all the affiliate links from your website and PM me serious proof of your accusations against curacao egaming not just random circumstantial anecdotes.
Game Protect will neither stop offering to
Qualify cost free for our online gaming consumer protection service nor send you the hard proof that those sub-licenses have no legal basis.
The hard proof that those sub-licenses have no legal basis is worth $100,000s as I can offer a 100% cashback assistance for any of the 1000s casinos.
We can make it unlike easier: If you operate under the 1668/JAZ license, show us
your authorization?
The truth about gaming licenses is the legal basis of a gaming license pertains to that specific jurisdiction.
I am not able to understand what you are saying here as the Curacao licensed casinos operate worldwide?
Or did you say that the validity of a Curacao license rely on Curacao laws?
Anyone who trusts a gambling website because they are "licensed" is silly because when you sign up to a (traditional) online casino you agree to often iron-clad terms and conditions which legally give the casino the opportunity to mess you over.
The part you missed is that the civil laws of the jurisdiction where a casino is incorporated always stand above the terms and conditions of the casino. Hence, if a part of the terms and conditions are not in accordance with the local civil laws, then they are simply
not valid and a player could enforce his rights at the court.
This is very much a work-in-progress. We've been incredibly busy with happenings on our websites, our goal isn't to start some sort of monopoly we're really just a group of likeminded individuals who think traditional online casinos are scams and want to do things differently. I don't want this initiative to morph into a for-profit thing (askgamblers), finding a trustee would be difficult but I like the idea. Right now though if we were to do anything controversial it would only be do-able by vote of all the members but as things stand the CGF is here for educational purposes at this point in time and we (PD/stake) cover all expenses for videos/articles etc. We get a ton of emails from people who want to join and we've set the bar at 1+ year of solid operation & significant volume (top 20 crypto casino).
If you want to educate the community on your expenses, why do you not inform about the
Curacao license scam 1668/JAZ, sub-licenses have no legal basis! you are financing with 10000s of Euro every year?
PD had been License free since 2013, and has taken more BTC betting volume than any Bitcoin gambling website that discloses stats with no issues.
You have stats of how much Bitcoin you have illegally taken? 5 Years is exactly the time frame players can demand their losses back.
The curacao license is something that costs near $0 and the reason we obtained it is so we can use google adwords and other advertising networks that require a "license" not to trick players into trusting us.
With a Costa Rica license you can not use google adwords and other advertising networks?
I never said that you pay for a fake license to trick players into trusting you.
Curacao license is indeed one of the easiest ones to obtain because Malta, UK, and other jurisdictions require RNG testing and guess what, Provably fair is not "RNG" it's deterministic.
It is easy to obtain because it is
no juridical valid license! Should be easy to understand.
As much as you think there is some major conspiracy behind the curacao licenses, all you have is a theory you don't have any actual proof.
Game Protect has proof that your claim to operate under the 1668/JAZ license has no legal basis. It is explained here
Curacao license scam 1668/JAZ, sub-licenses have no legal basis! and I already gave you the link.
Let me know which part you did not understand?
Have you seen the 1668/JAZ license you claim to operate under? Have you seen the sub-license contract?
Regardless of this entire fact, I can't see why you'd try and pick a fight with us or insist that we are no longer legitimate now because we picked up a license.
I missed the fact, can you please quote it?
Neither do I fight with you nor did I say that you are now no longer legitimate because you picked a license.
I inform that you finance organized crime with 10000s Euro every year!
If I wanted to fight with you, I would offer a 100% cashback assistance for the past 5 years for primedice and stake.
If you have a beef it should be with the licensors not the 1000s of casinos that have obtained this license for various reasons.
No, you and all the other casinos finance organized crime that killed the politician leader Helmin Wiels in Curacao!
If the casinos would not pay for a fake license, the licensors would have no business, simple.
This primarily feels like just a push towards self promotion for your own affiliation, if you want me to take your opinion seriously remove all the affiliate links from your website and PM me serious proof of your accusations against curacao egaming not just random circumstantial anecdotes.
Game Protect will neither stop offering to
Qualify cost free for our online gaming consumer protection service nor send you the hard proof that those sub-licenses have no legal basis.
The hard proof that those sub-licenses have no legal basis is worth $100,000s as I can offer a 100% cashback assistance for any of the 1000s casinos.
We can make it unlike easier: If you operate under the 1668/JAZ license, show us
your authorization?
The truth about gaming licenses is the legal basis of a gaming license pertains to that specific jurisdiction.
I am not able to understand what you are saying here as the Curacao licensed casinos operate worldwide?
Or did you say that the validity of a Curacao license rely on Curacao laws?
Anyone who trusts a gambling website because they are "licensed" is silly because when you sign up to a (traditional) online casino you agree to often iron-clad terms and conditions which legally give the casino the opportunity to mess you over.
The part you missed is that the civil laws of the jurisdiction where a casino is incorporated always stand above the terms and conditions of the casino. Hence, if a part of the terms and conditions are not in accordance with the local civil laws, then they are simply
not valid and a player could enforce his rights at the court.
This is very much a work-in-progress. We've been incredibly busy with happenings on our websites, our goal isn't to start some sort of monopoly we're really just a group of likeminded individuals who think traditional online casinos are scams and want to do things differently. I don't want this initiative to morph into a for-profit thing (askgamblers), finding a trustee would be difficult but I like the idea. Right now though if we were to do anything controversial it would only be do-able by vote of all the members but as things stand the CGF is here for educational purposes at this point in time and we (PD/stake) cover all expenses for videos/articles etc. We get a ton of emails from people who want to join and we've set the bar at 1+ year of solid operation & significant volume (top 20 crypto casino).
If you want to educate the community on your expenses, why do you not inform about the
Curacao license scam 1668/JAZ, sub-licenses have no legal basis! you are financing with 10000s of Euro every year?
PD had been License free since 2013, and has taken more BTC betting volume than any Bitcoin gambling website that discloses stats with no issues.
You have stats of how much Bitcoin you have illegally taken? 5 Years is exactly the time frame players can demand their losses back.
The curacao license is something that costs near $0 and the reason we obtained it is so we can use google adwords and other advertising networks that require a "license" not to trick players into trusting us.
With a Costa Rica license you can not use google adwords and other advertising networks?
I never said that you pay for a fake license to trick players into trusting you.
Curacao license is indeed one of the easiest ones to obtain because Malta, UK, and other jurisdictions require RNG testing and guess what, Provably fair is not "RNG" it's deterministic.
It is easy to obtain because it is
no juridical valid license! Should be easy to understand.
As much as you think there is some major conspiracy behind the curacao licenses, all you have is a theory you don't have any actual proof.
Game Protect has proof that your claim to operate under the 1668/JAZ license has no legal basis. It is explained here
Curacao license scam 1668/JAZ, sub-licenses have no legal basis! and I already gave you the link.
Let me know which part you did not understand?
Have you seen the 1668/JAZ license you claim to operate under? Have you seen the sub-license contract?
Regardless of this entire fact, I can't see why you'd try and pick a fight with us or insist that we are no longer legitimate now because we picked up a license.
I missed the fact, can you please quote it?
Neither do I fight with you nor did I say that you are now no longer legitimate because you picked a license.
I inform that you finance organized crime with 10000s Euro every year!
If I wanted to fight with you, I would offer a 100% cashback assistance for the past 5 years for primedice and stake.
If you have a beef it should be with the licensors not the 1000s of casinos that have obtained this license for various reasons.
No, you and all the other casinos finance organized crime that killed the politician leader Helmin Wiels in Curacao!
If the casinos would not pay for a fake license, the licensors would have no business, simple.
This primarily feels like just a push towards self promotion for your own affiliation, if you want me to take your opinion seriously remove all the affiliate links from your website and PM me serious proof of your accusations against curacao egaming not just random circumstantial anecdotes.
Game Protect will neither stop offering to
Qualify cost free for our online gaming consumer protection service nor send you the hard proof that those sub-licenses have no legal basis.
The hard proof that those sub-licenses have no legal basis is worth $100,000s as I can offer a 100% cashback assistance for any of the 1000s casinos.
We can make it unlike easier: If you operate under the 1668/JAZ license, show us
your authorization?
The truth about gaming licenses is the legal basis of a gaming license pertains to that specific jurisdiction.
I am not able to understand what you are saying here as the Curacao licensed casinos operate worldwide?
Or did you say that the validity of a Curacao license rely on Curacao laws?
Anyone who trusts a gambling website because they are "licensed" is silly because when you sign up to a (traditional) online casino you agree to often iron-clad terms and conditions which legally give the casino the opportunity to mess you over.
The part you missed is that the civil laws of the jurisdiction where a casino is incorporated always stand above the terms and conditions of the casino. Hence, if a part of the terms and conditions are not in accordance with the local civil laws, then they are simply
not valid and a player could enforce his rights at the court.
