Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 10:43:35 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: 2013-10-26 forbes.com - fbi-says-its-seized-20-million-in-bitcoins-from-ross-ulb  (Read 5007 times)
drawingthesun (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
October 27, 2013, 03:07:23 AM
 #61

Bill Gates should buy them, he has already said that Bitcoin is cool and I would prefer Gates to win such an auction vs some dirty wall street pump and dump firm...
casascius
Mike Caldwell
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1136


The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)


View Profile WWW
October 27, 2013, 01:50:31 PM
 #62

I'd imagine that like other seized items, they would auction them off, even though presumably selling them off slowly would maximize their value. 

Lot 6 6 6, a bitcoin wallet in pieces.  Some of you may recall the strange affair of Satoshi Nakamoto, a mystery never fully explained.  We are told, ladies and gentlemen, that this is the very wallet which figures in the famous Dread Pirate Roberts website seizure.  Our workshops have decrypted it and sectioned it off into 324 BTC chunks, so that we may spread them and shed light on how it feels to transact in money created by the people for the people.  Perhaps we may frighten away the ghost of so many years ago with a little illumination, gentlemen?

Companies claiming they got hacked and lost your coins sounds like fraud so perfect it could be called fashionable.  I never believe them.  If I ever experience the misfortune of a real intrusion, I declare I have been honest about the way I have managed the keys in Casascius Coins.  I maintain no ability to recover or reproduce the keys, not even under limitless duress or total intrusion.  Remember that trusting strangers with your coins without any recourse is, as a matter of principle, not a best practice.  Don't keep coins online. Use paper or hardware wallets instead.
drawingthesun (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
October 27, 2013, 01:52:07 PM
 #63

I'd imagine that like other seized items, they would auction them off, even though presumably selling them off slowly would maximize their value. 

Lot 6 6 6, a bitcoin wallet in pieces.  Some of you may recall the strange affair of Satoshi Nakamoto, a mystery never fully explained.  We are told, ladies and gentlemen, that this is the very wallet which figures in the famous Dread Pirate Roberts website seizure.  Our workshops have decrypted it and sectioned it off into 324 BTC chunks, so that we may spread them and shed light on how it feels to transact in money created by the people for the people.  Perhaps we may frighten away the ghost of so many years ago with a little illumination, gentlemen?

That is kind of epic.
shawshankinmate37927
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


Bitcoin: The People's Bailout


View Profile
October 27, 2013, 04:49:32 PM
 #64

The Federal Reserve will probably be the first ones in line to snatch these up with a big batch of freshly printed dollars.
Provided they really manged to get their greedy fingers on them, i think thats something the foundation should get involved with, because it would be catastrophic to have the feds holding and dropping such a large amount on the market. Afterall its just freshly printed bucks, so they dont really care.

I don't think the Fed would dump them on the market.  They would hoard them like they supposedly do with gold in order to remain somewhat solvent when the dollar inevitably collapses.  This seizure could potentially allow them to obtain BTC without causing a large sudden disruption in the exchange rate that would occur if they purchased BTC in the open market.

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."   - Henry Ford
giantdragon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 05:23:48 PM
 #65

I don't think the Fed would dump them on the market.  They would hoard them like they supposedly do with gold in order to remain somewhat solvent when the dollar inevitably collapses.  This seizure could potentially allow them to obtain BTC without causing a large sudden disruption in the exchange rate that would occur if they purchased BTC in the open market.
+1. I think govts around the world will finally realize that Bitcoin can be used to back fiat currencies like other commodities (gold, oil, natural gas, rare-earth elements etc).
darkmule
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 05:36:55 PM
 #66

I don't think the Fed would dump them on the market.  They would hoard them like they supposedly do with gold in order to remain somewhat solvent when the dollar inevitably collapses.  This seizure could potentially allow them to obtain BTC without causing a large sudden disruption in the exchange rate that would occur if they purchased BTC in the open market.

They're required to dispose of seized assets in some way.  These are the Guidelines on how they do that.  They're only guidelines, but based on past behavior and guessing, I'd think they'll auction them off.  I'd hope they wouldn't do the worst possible thing, which would be to dump a giant chunk of them on some exchange, but I don't think they'd even want to mess with that.

I could also see them keeping some chunk of them for sting purchases, perhaps after mixing them first (since even a somewhat dim Bitcoin-accepting illegal vendor might just be suspicious of getting paid in coin directly from seized DPR funds).  The agency itself might have no clue, but there certainly are feds who know enough about Bitcoin to handle it as they have so far.  The question is whether they'll have the sense to listen to them if they suggest this, since it's a good idea.  For example, seized drugs are sometimes used subsequently in sting purchases by some agencies, which might be a good reason to be suspicious of the guy who always has the best drugs and always in whatever quantity wanted immediately.

Generally, though, the agency responsible for seizing the assets is not permitted to keep them, especially if they decide to treat BTC as "cash."  (My guess is they treat it as "personal property" which would give them somewhat more flexibility in what they do with it.)
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 06:02:18 PM
 #67

Wasn't anyone paying attention to how the apparatchik behaved during the final days of the USSR?

Those bitcoins will quietly end up in the personal wallet of somebody well-connected.
darkmule
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1005



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 06:13:05 PM
 #68

Wasn't anyone paying attention to how the apparatchik behaved during the final days of the USSR?

Those bitcoins will quietly end up in the personal wallet of somebody well-connected.

I'd like to see how that could "quietly" happen seeing as it's the most watched Bitcoin address on the network.
shawshankinmate37927
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


Bitcoin: The People's Bailout


View Profile
October 27, 2013, 06:21:09 PM
 #69

They're required to dispose of seized assets in some way.

The federal government could dispose of the bitcoins by selling them to the Federal Reserve.  The Federal Reserve is certainly in cahoots with the federal government, but technically isn't part of the federal government.

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."   - Henry Ford
tom.hashemi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 169
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 06:23:34 PM
 #70

Wasn't anyone paying attention to how the apparatchik behaved during the final days of the USSR?

Those bitcoins will quietly end up in the personal wallet of somebody well-connected.

I'd like to see how that could "quietly" happen seeing as it's the most watched Bitcoin address on the network.

+1
Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3074



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 08:37:58 PM
 #71

Wasn't anyone paying attention to how the apparatchik behaved during the final days of the USSR?

Those bitcoins will quietly end up in the personal wallet of somebody well-connected.

I'd like to see how that could "quietly" happen seeing as it's the most watched Bitcoin address on the network.

Giving them the wallet file and whatever passphrase the private key is encrypted with. That's damn near silent.

Vires in numeris
tom.hashemi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 169
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 27, 2013, 08:45:09 PM
 #72

Wasn't anyone paying attention to how the apparatchik behaved during the final days of the USSR?

Those bitcoins will quietly end up in the personal wallet of somebody well-connected.

I'd like to see how that could "quietly" happen seeing as it's the most watched Bitcoin address on the network.

Giving them the wallet file and whatever passphrase the private key is encrypted with. That's damn near silent.

I think the issue is more around how someone 'well connected' could use the contents of the wallet 'quietly'. As soon as btc started flowing out, people would realise.
SPC_Bitcoin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


Coffee makes it all better!


View Profile
October 27, 2013, 11:22:27 PM
 #73

I would be interested to know which exchange they will use to cash out.

NEVER GOT PAID.
Arvicco
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 501


Please bear with me


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2013, 07:07:27 PM
 #74

Al Jazeera weighs in: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=320392

DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
October 30, 2013, 02:41:42 AM
 #75

I would be interested to know which exchange they will use to cash out.

None. 

If it is anything like the billions of other forfeited assets they will announce ahead of time a day for an auction.  They will auction off the coins and purchasers will wire money TO THE US TREASURY and only then will they send the sold coins. No counterparty risk, no waiting 180 days for MtGox to get their act together, no risk of an exchange getting "hacked" and the US government losing their $20M in BTC.

No possible way the US government using a quasi-illegal Bitcoin exchange.
mrb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1027


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2013, 05:50:17 AM
Last edit: October 30, 2013, 06:19:57 AM by mrb
 #76

The FBI now owns so many coins that they could take us to single digits with a single dump.

No. A single dump on a single exchange like MtGox (a stupid thing to do) would bring us roughly around $100/BTC

Over 2 million coins have been sold over the top 3 exchanges in the last 30 days: http://bitcoinity.org/markets/list?currency=ALL&span=30d and yet the exchange rate rose from $130 to $200. So it would be relatively easy for the FBI to sell 174,000 coins on 2-3 exchanges over 30 days and not significantly impact the exchange rate in any way. But most likely they wouldn't even sell on an exchange, they would auction the coins as explained by others.
drawingthesun (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
October 30, 2013, 06:40:19 AM
 #77

The FBI now owns so many coins that they could take us to single digits with a single dump.

No. A single dump on a single exchange like MtGox (a stupid thing to do) would bring us roughly around $100/BTC

I feel stupid, I looked at http://bitcoinity.org/markets and 144,000 Bitcoins takes the price on Gox down to $26.

Obviously I am confusing something here?

TheButterZone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3010
Merit: 1031


RIP Mommy


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2013, 06:48:49 AM
 #78

http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/mtgoxUSD_depth.html

Scroll down, use the calculator. I got Sell 174000 BTC for 15591452.58 USD

Also, using the gribble (on #bitcoin-otc) command "market sell 174000" it replied:
A market order to sell 174000 bitcoins right now would net 15593348.9834 USD and would take the last price down to 10.2000 USD, resulting in an average price of 89.6169 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0078 seconds

Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
drawingthesun (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
October 30, 2013, 07:02:12 AM
 #79

http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/mtgoxUSD_depth.html

Scroll down, use the calculator. I got Sell 174000 BTC for 15591452.58 USD

Also, using the gribble (on #bitcoin-otc) command "market sell 174000" it replied:
A market order to sell 174000 bitcoins right now would net 15593348.9834 USD and would take the last price down to 10.2000 USD, resulting in an average price of 89.6169 USD/BTC. | Data vintage: 0.0078 seconds

So the price would end up down around $10 - $30? I doubt anyone could take advantage of this though, unless it was their orders that got filled.

So if you had an order set at xbtc for $40 you would be smiling after the FBI made such a bad move. Afterwards no one will follow suit and sell into that hole and the price would recover quite quickly.

Anyway, never going to happen.
mrb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1027


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2013, 10:34:40 AM
 #80

You guys are right, I was trusting what an article said without double checking the MtGox market depth myself.

Regardless, it would be easy to spread the sale of 174k BTC over 2-3 exchanges and a month to not impact prices.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!