I gathered some general information about the situation and even used AI to help with the search

What law enforcement already has Initial information: FreeBitco.in itself lists FBC B.V. as the site operator
Moreover, this isn’t just an anonymous site without a legal entity. In the Curaçao registry, FBC B.V. is registered as a company with the number 157945, established in 2021. TripleTrust B.V.
is listed as the local representative. And there have already been official actions by government agencies:
- In 2024, Australia’s ACMA conducted an investigation into FBC B.V.’s activities and officially determined that FreeBitco.in was providing prohibited/unlicensed gambling services to Australian users;
- in December 2024, the Dutch Kansspelautoriteit issued an order to FBC B.V. to cease its illegal gambling operations, with a potential fine of €280,000 per week, up to a maximum of €840,000;
- Furthermore, the Dutch regulator conducted a follow-up inspection and found that, even after the order’s deadline had passed, users were still able to log in and play.
In other words, FBC B.V. is already officially under scrutiny by government authorities. This is a completely different situation compared to a classic anonymous crypto scam.
However, there is an interesting point regarding the evidence of fraud
If the investigation establishes a sequence of events roughly like this: the service continued to accept funds -> management was already aware of their inability or unwillingness to fulfill their obligations -> users were told that their funds were “safe” and would be paid out -> at the same time, assets were withdrawn or transferred -> the service shut down without refunding funds, then this is potentially a completely different story than mere bankruptcy or cessation of operations. And here, the blockchain is more of an asset to the investigation than an advantage for the criminals.
Bitcoin leaves a very clear trail: FreeBitco.in ->known deposit/hot wallets ->subsequent transactions ->exchange/currency converter/custodial service ->KYC ->a specific individual.
This is exactly how law enforcement agencies have repeatedly identified the operators of cryptocurrency scams.
Moreover, even if the final coins have passed through several intermediate addresses or mixers, this does not mean the trail has disappeared...
P.S. The ideal scenario would be if information emerged showing that even just 1 satoshi from the platform had been used, for example, to fund drug trafficking, illegal organizations, etc. Then certain agencies would show significantly greater enthusiasm for investigating! Yes, that’s a hint
