FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest

[BADERO]

To be honest. I did not expect Binance to go nuclear and decide to nuke FUNtoken, even after what has happened to Freebitcoin and their investors, there are literal shitcoins which are pretty useless, like TerraUSD which continue to be given support by the team of Binance.

This is probably one (if the the last) nail on the coffin of this project... It is very difficult for a token to be taken seriously enough to be listed on Binance and get access to liquidity, it is a completely different story when comes to getting delisted and liquidity cut from main stream sources...

I wonder what people within FUN and Freebitcoin think of all of this... If anything, this will just bring more attention to this on going scam.

They look at trading volume, order book depth, and liquidity the Terra ecosystem collapsed, it still maintains a massive amount of daily speculative trading volume and thet volume generates consistent trading fees for the exchange and FUNtoken, has seen its organic trading volume drop below Binance’s minimum threshold for profitability  from this perspective, removing trading pairs that no longer cover their infrastructural maintenance costs is a standard operational decision

You are right, there are still many projects whose fundamentals are not very strong. However, in the case of binance the main reason for delisting is not just being a shitcoin, but if the trading volume of a coin drops so much that it cannot cover the exchange's server maintenance costs and if there is no depth in the order book, which is risky for large traders. On the other hand, in the case of FUN, the organic trading volume may have fallen below a certain threshold, which is a big problem for platforms like freebitcoin that use FUN.

For the FUN token, even if Binance completely delists it and Uniswap liquidity dries up, the casino is a cash cow if FUN’s open market value crashes, they could easily internalize the market, offer a fixed in house exchange rate, and run the liquidity themselves they don't need Richard Teng's permission to keep their ecosystem running

[Hispo]

...
For the FUN token, even if Binance completely delists it and Uniswap liquidity dries up, the casino is a cash cow if FUN’s open market value crashes, they could easily internalize the market, offer a fixed in house exchange rate, and run the liquidity themselves they don't need Richard Teng's permission to keep their ecosystem running

And don't you think this lack of liquidity in the market won't affect the perceived trust people have on this project?
For any project to be considered reliable in the long term, they always need to a steady volume of users (in the case, gamblers) for the project to fund itself.

If Binance does not offer a market for people to get tokens, then there will be less people interacting with FUN games and it's entire ecosystem.

The project itself continue to run, that is true, but it would be dumb to downplay what just happen to FUN and it's delisting off one of the most important liquidity providers on the crypto ecosystem.

[STT]

Presuming Bitcoin continues another ten years which I think is fair to plan for in a normal business plan, the enterprise and audience in development the website has, could have far outweighs even its previous revenue and value.
   The reason that's true is because BTC is built and is shooting up like an upside down pyramid its impossible in its growth yet it keeps on doing it.  What is today is gigantic compared to how we started off a decade ago.   We were throwing pennies against the wall ten years ago, so anyone who knows that cannot be thinking right.

  They are throwing away the future, the most valuable thing even if Bitcoin were not growing the world certainly is and to just shut it down is not just short sighted but self destructive, its pointless waste.   They could still do anything at this point, I just think they lack imagination perhaps the ability to do any skilled endeavor so laziness then I guess explains it all quite simply.

[Kelvinid]

In the main time, Freebitcoin is yet to provide any refund and fulfill their promises...

Of course, we don't hope the hard-earned money from people who trust FUN will turn to nothing. But I don't think FreeBitco.in will do it. Besides, there is nothing important left for them to protect because their reputation has already been ruined. It is going to be a bad day of FUN token holders.

They would rather not think about it anymore or, better yet, forget about it. It is another lesson for some of us. Yeah, it reminds us that crypto investment is too risky. That is why we should prepare ourselves for whatever the outcomes of our investment may be.

[dwyane36]

The project itself continue to run, that is true, but it would be dumb to downplay what just happen to FUN and it's delisting off one of the most important liquidity providers on the crypto ecosystem.

The project may continue to operate, but will it remain in demand among users? Personally, I doubt it, since two unfortunate incidents have recently occurred involving the FUN token: The first is the freebitcoin scam, which has had a very negative impact on them, given that the majority of the token supply is concentrated on the freebitcoin website. And the second is the recent announcement of delisting from Binance, which will also have negative consequences, especially in the long term.
p.s.
I feel sorry for the FUN token holders, but their situation is hopeless.

[BADERO]

...
For the FUN token, even if Binance completely delists it and Uniswap liquidity dries up, the casino is a cash cow if FUN’s open market value crashes, they could easily internalize the market, offer a fixed in house exchange rate, and run the liquidity themselves they don't need Richard Teng's permission to keep their ecosystem running

And don't you think this lack of liquidity in the market won't affect the perceived trust people have on this project?
For any project to be considered reliable in the long term, they always need to a steady volume of users (in the case, gamblers) for the project to fund itself.

If Binance does not offer a market for people to get tokens, then there will be less people interacting with FUN games and it's entire ecosystem.

The project itself continue to run, that is true, but it would be dumb to downplay what just happen to FUN and it's delisting off one of the most important liquidity providers on the crypto ecosystem.

that FUN Token is deeply integrated into FreeBitco.in, which has tens of millions of registered users and as we know FUN acts as a premium membership token there, granting players free spins, interest bumps, and cashback and that utility doesn't magically vanish because Binance decided to axe the spot pairs next week
, the ecosystem has a self sustaining loop because it relies on actual platform utility