Help with 430 000 more gwx yes votes for verification quorum
Token market cap went in 2 months from less than $10k to $400k+
https://coincodex.com/crypto/marquise-museum/?period=1YThere is not alot of retail supply left and the market cap can become perhaps $500 million with only a few thousand waves in pump capital.
https://w8.io/top/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpBThis token is an NFT vault which can be swapped 20m:1 with a max supply of 30 artworks plus another 20-30 unpublished from the original collection created in 2016.
The image art was crypto integrated in 2017 and there is proof. This is the bitcointalk link to the complete book with all of the available artworks.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2966730.msg30480040#msg30480040And here are the technical screenshots with all the token info from 2017 that heavily references the book named "Pimp Fashion":
https://docdro.id/fbY6USOThis proves causality between the art and tokens but there is a premium because it is offchain provenance. The only on-chain reference is the
www.MarquiseMuseum.com hyperlink in the token descriptor which was included in both the waves and ERC-20 mint.
This art was ported to NFT in 2021 (opensea) and 2022 (rarible). Opensea performed optimization which caused significant downscaling of the images that are very large 6000x9000 pixels. For this reason they were migrated to IPFS on Rarible.
The art was appraised to $2m in 2021 when punks were trading at $10k floor (today $90k):
https://docdro.id/d42ND6gThis is not however vintage NFT it is a "vintage" ABT backed by art instead of gold or fiat as is commonly the case:
https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/asset-backed-tokensIt is the only token backed by art from 2017 except a handful of similar NFTs which are worth between $100m (mooncats) up to $4 billion (cryptopunks).
Considering the unique metrics of this asset the estimated valuation of the ERC-20 vault in a coming bull market is $30m USDT and waves vault a few million USDT.
It is the progenitor of NFTx vaulting:
https://tc.prv.se/aktinsyn/servlet/akt/?lang=sv&ansnr=18001404If this token can become verified it will be organically visible to new buyers on waves exchange which will generate traffic and trading volume. Instead of manually inserting token ID in search bar it will automatically display in the token list and this provides alot of exposure value.
What will then follow is possibly CMC activation if daily volume is consistent at $300+:
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/marquise-museum/However it must be stated that retail exposure is of limited value because both token vaults are 90% and 100% in Museum custody and for this reason it is much better to sell this OTC to one or a consortium of institutional buyers who are better positioned to monetize $30m from this asset.
The monetization methods are: gallery partnership and international art circuit exhibition (such as artbasel) to build establishment provenance / cmc and waves verification / Christies partnership to include it in future NFT auctions which are hosted a few times yearly / possibly IEO partnership with top 20 cex although this is not required because it is already trading on good dexes like uniswap and waves.
Beyond the request in this message to help upvote with 430k gwx I will include another proposition to a potential buyer or group of buyers:
The waves vault is for sale at 90% of active supply ~440m tokens in exchange for $200 000 USDT or 100kwaves equivalent (when $1.8 per waves). From this money I will stake 50 000 waves to generate $800 per month in liquidity and then pump the market cap from $400k to $30m, $500m whatever you choose although my advice is $30m fair value at the moment. This will cost a few thousand waves at most because there are no big retail sellers left.
This $800 monthly exit liquidity at $30m on $200k invested can grow if waves goes from $1.8 to $10-$20. There is also downside risk which is why I will not maintain 100% of the $200k in crypto under present market conditions.
Some of the money will be used for charity to gypsies as is already the case since 3 years back:
https://opensea.io/collection/indian-nations-community-fundThere are no further development costs associated with this project in the crypto integration because all the USP and wealth was created in 2017 as a pioneering art category. There are many historical examples of future price trajectories with class defining artists such as Picasso, Warhol, Dali, Pollock etc. Warhol 35 year growth outperformed index 3:1 with x15 000 parabola from $1k in 1960 to $15 million in 1995 for his orange marilyn.
This is no guarantee of future gain but it is safe to consider a $200k price tag in exchange for immediate $30m-$500m paper profit along with $800-$8000 monthly exit liquidity is very good risk/reward. Especially considering the metrics of this asset and market cap of nearest competitors starting at $100m.
The ERC-20 vault is also for sale, price $3m USDT. Monetization method is indentical to the waves vault with the difference that the verification process will be through uniswap token lists (coingecko) and configuration of exit liquidity because uniswap is AMM. It is possible to raise paper value from $3m to $30m/$500m but it is better to create a new eth/m2 pool for this purpose instead of pumping the old usdt/m2 pool although this is also possible. However the erc vault does not contain any consistent price tracking history unlike the waves vault (
https://h2ox.io/waves/asset/MarquiseMuseum/trades) so any pump method is more flexible. The bigger issue on eth is generating exit liquidity because ethereum is quite high value and medium term price risk of eth may be greater than waves which will impact liquidity provisions. Only a fraction of $3m would be stored in eth.
It appears to me as the founder of this project and category of art movement after 6 years of uninterrupted examination that this is a unique and once in a generation opportunity for institutional art collectors or well connected private buyer to gain a significant market share in the vintage category of crypto art at a very low cost compared to options. While maintaining concrete venues to x250-x10 000 monetization, some near term and others through generational growth.
It needs a buyer to legitimize the value. Unfortunately I was born out of wedlock to one of the richest dynastic noble houses in europe so the difficulty of entering the elite top 1% was not expected during time of creation in 2017 as I had not yet understood the ramifications of being a bastard. The thematic of this art is precisely the topic of bastardy and jet set parodization but at the time I still believed in the concept of free market but this is simply not true in the global top 1% which is still monarchical with impassable gatekeepers in crypto and legacy industries like the art market.
Although establishment partnership due to my birth status is out of the question, I do think savvy new money with insiders at christies NFT department and such will find this a very easy flip in the end. I will not be privy to anything near $30m or $500m whatever but I can sell it to someone who will be capable of generating this level of wealth. My price is $200k for the waves vault and $3m for the erc-20.
Pay up before I die of old age I don't want a legacy of the artist who became worth billions after death. There is no free meal here if no one buys it before I die I will destroy it, drives, tokens, website - every trace of this artifact will be dusted so no one else will stand to profit if I did not.
