XMR-stak-JK 2.10.7 Compiled with no devfee (Updated: 2019-8-18)

[JaredKaragen]

@JaredKaragen   Did you ever compile XMR-STAK-2.4.8 ?  Thx

not yet... I guess its been releasing a lot of updates.

Im gonna hopefully try the VS2015 route later today... but I need sleep... havent slept yet... was a busy day yesterday.

[JaredKaragen]

snip / original message deleted.

this is not a thread for 4 post users to post a binary...

or harass people for donations.

get that crap out of here.

[DireWolfM14]

@JaredKaragen

Thanks for putting this together.  I still want to compile my own, but it's been years since I've done any coding.  I'm sure I'll get a wild hair on a rainy day come winter.

[lncm]

@JaredKaragen

Thanks for putting this together.  I still want to compile my own, but it's been years since I've done any coding.  I'm sure I'll get a wild hair on a rainy day come winter.

I don't do any coding also, and if you follow instructions on XMR-Stak Github, you'll get there.

Worst part is installing Gb's of software - VB Studio, CUDA and AMD OpenCL libraries.

[DireWolfM14]

@JaredKaragen

Thanks for putting this together.  I still want to compile my own, but it's been years since I've done any coding.  I'm sure I'll get a wild hair on a rainy day come winter.

I don't do any coding also, and if you follow instructions on XMR-Stak Github, you'll get there.

Worst part is installing Gb's of software - VB Studio, CUDA and AMD OpenCL libraries.

My workstation's .5tb ssd shouldn't mind, but yeah, mountain biking weather...  nobody got time for that.

[JaredKaragen]

@JaredKaragen   Did you ever compile XMR-STAK-2.4.8 ?  Thx

2.4.5 is all that fierce-uk has released thus far.....    is it another fork or something?




Update:
Im working on my 5th attempt on compiling 2.4.5.    VS 2017 is uninstalling as I type this, and Ill have to rip out all IDE's and start over by installing fresh... again.

Probably going to DL and install the latest version of the cuda toolkit as well.... hopefully they play nice.

[moonstruck]

@JaredKaragen   Did you ever compile XMR-STAK-2.4.8 ?  Thx

2.4.5 is all that fierce-uk has released thus far.....    is it another fork or something?




Update:
Im working on my 5th attempt on compiling 2.4.5.    VS 2017 is uninstalling as I type this, and Ill have to rip out all IDE's and start over by installing fresh... again.

Probably going to DL and install the latest version of the cuda toolkit as well.... hopefully they play nice.

Try CUDA 9.1, you'll slow it down with 9.2 unless you know what you're doing.

[JaredKaragen]

Try CUDA 9.1, you'll slow it down with 9.2 unless you know what you're doing.

Cuda 9 fail.

Right now im working on cuda 8:

Sneak Preview


Edit***

Fail again.

The dirty results

[gambera]

JaredKaragen, great work. Should I assume that you abandoned 2.4.5 or there isn't progress?

[JaredKaragen]

JaredKaragen, great work. Should I assume that you abandoned 2.4.5 or there isn't progress?

yeah.  for now, ive been focused on work... and every attempt so far at compiling 2.4.5 so far has failed.

I want to wipe the laptop Ive been using to compile, and try reinstalling everything fresh again and see where I can get.

I already have the doctored source to compile that removes all the devfee addresses and sets the devfee factor to zero.  I think the only thing I need to change is the build pull number (there's a giithub reference variable its compiled with that's linked to version,  I haven't changed that yet, but it really doesn't matter int he grand scope of things).

I did compile XTL stak at the same time I did 2.4.4... but it seems to not be a version people are after and Ill be ignoring it from now on.

[gambera]

JaredKaragen, great work. Should I assume that you abandoned 2.4.5 or there isn't progress?

yeah.  for now, ive been focused on work... and every attempt so far at compiling 2.4.5 so far has failed.

I want to wipe the laptop Ive been using to compile, and try reinstalling everything fresh again and see where I can get.

I already have the doctored source to compile that removes all the devfee addresses and sets the devfee factor to zero.  I think the only thing I need to change is the build pull number (there's a giithub reference variable its compiled with that's linked to version,  I haven't changed that yet, but it really doesn't matter int he grand scope of things).

I did compile XTL stak at the same time I did 2.4.4... but it seems to not be a version people are after and Ill be ignoring it from now on.

You seem close and thank you for that. I think it's a refreshment to this thread as there wasn't any posts since June 26th or so.

[Mohondoa]

Honesly i am not yet try this software. It is seem nice software for mining with no fee. But i still choose claymore with dev fee, because i think dev fee is important for developing the software. Anyway thank for sharing new mining software, and i waiting news for it's speed mining.

[onionpealer]

Honesly i am not yet try this software. It is seem nice software for mining with no fee. But i still choose claymore with dev fee, because i think dev fee is important for developing the software. Anyway thank for sharing new mining software, and i waiting news for it's speed mining.

I don't fundamentally begrudge the dev fee for the Claymore miner it's just the way it does it that results in a greater loss of mining than just the fee alone (time spent changing servers adds a significant loss).
Maybe longer periods between collecting dev fee and a lower dev fee (he must be loaded by now) would help.

[JaredKaragen]

I have tried this miner and it all went good. Thank you dev for this great miner. It is more easy and profitable to mine xmr now.

Yep, I thank the dev for releasing the source as well.

I'll be gone for the weekend; hopefully I can pick this back up next week when I'm less busy....

[onionpealer]

thanks for making this. I tried to follow instructions, but I had trouble with visual studio since I already have a few versions of it installed, the cuda downloader for visual studio integration failed.

Yours worked instantly! 2 ez 

you are welcome.


I have expeirenced a very strange connect error to nanopool on only one of my machines....  Anyone else getting this issue?

I'm not sure what the hell happens (because so far I have been asleep each time) but I have some issue which seems to crash three instances of the miner (2.4.4) running on two machines. Last night it was after running great for 16 hours, mining Loki (which has a very low difficulty right now which is good, but has taken a price hit - but I am HODLing anyway).

Did you manage to compile 2.4.5 yet? I was going to try to teach myself how sometime but it's like going back to f'ing school.....

no luck on trying with 2.4.5 yet.  Probably sometime tomorrow since Ill be at a location where I can uninstall and reinstall everything for the third time to try and compile it.

The issue was a fluke;  seems right before the completion of the new windows 18xx update.   I tried running 2.4.2, and it gave the same no connect error.

When I came home later that day my machine had rebooted itself automatically, and 2.4.4 launched no problems again.   It was an odd one.


Go into the CPU config, and remove the CPU threads.... leave it blank brackets {}.   See if stability comes back.   I have a LGA775 machine right now that gets TLS socket errors and reconnects every so often.  The auto emails from nanopool from that machine are quite annoying.

I got sick of windows sneaking in updates I had all my rigs running 10 pro with updates totally disabled and somehow they all updated so after playing on google for awhile I was able to find a win 10 pro stripped down with no apps or anything I haven't had one issue since

Do you have a link to this stripped-down version of Windows 10, I'd like to give it a go and see what happens.

[john1010]

I'm using 12 rx 570 nitro+ 8gb per rig and I only got 615H per card, is this hashrate power is okay or there is a way to increase it, I'm using the latest version of xmr-stak I hope somebody here put some help..

Thanks

[john1010]

Im getting errors about missing DLLs:

VCRUNTIME140D.dll
ucrtbased.dll
MSVCP140D.dll

I have basically all MS VC++ redistributables installed (from 2005 thru 2017). But since there is a D in the end of the file, i have the suspicion that these are debug-dlls. Any idea?

I got that same error too and tried installing visual ++c and nothing fix by doing that, I dunno why, I ask my friends about the error and they told me that I must uninstall and install the visual ++c but again, nothing happened.. I discovered that it will need to add more virtual memory to fix that error, I recently setting up the VM with 35K but after I add some VM to 55K and the error fixed.. This miner needs more Virtual memory to run smoothly.. Hope it helps.

[MagicSmoker]

I'm using 12 rx 570 nitro+ 8gb per rig and I only got 615H per card, is this hashrate power is okay or there is a way to increase it, I'm using the latest version of xmr-stak I hope somebody here put some help..

Thanks

Each card entry in your amd.txt file should look something like this:

{ "index" : 0, "intensity" : 800, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : false },
{ "index" : 0, "intensity" : 800, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : false },

With only the index number incrementing by 1 for each card. This gives 2 threads (why the lines are duplicated) with intensity of 800, etc. So, for example, the 2nd card would have entries like so:

{ "index" : 1, "intensity" : 800, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : false },
{ "index" : 1, "intensity" : 800, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : false },

Etc. up to the 12th card, which will have index of 11.

[john1010]

I'm using 12 rx 570 nitro+ 8gb per rig and I only got 615H per card, is this hashrate power is okay or there is a way to increase it, I'm using the latest version of xmr-stak I hope somebody here put some help..

Thanks

Each card entry in your amd.txt file should look something like this:

{ "index" : 0, "intensity" : 800, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : false },
{ "index" : 0, "intensity" : 800, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : false },

With only the index number incrementing by 1 for each card. This gives 2 threads (why the lines are duplicated) with intensity of 800, etc. So, for example, the 2nd card would have entries like so:

{ "index" : 1, "intensity" : 800, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : false },
{ "index" : 1, "intensity" : 800, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : false },

Etc. up to the 12th card, which will have index of 11.

I will copy this settings on the AMD config txt? Or only the intensity, worksize and memchunk? sorry totally nood using this miner, since when i was started mining I only using claymore eth base and phoenix miner.

[john1010]

I'm using 12 rx 570 nitro+ 8gb per rig and I only got 615H per card, is this hashrate power is okay or there is a way to increase it, I'm using the latest version of xmr-stak I hope somebody here put some help..

Thanks

Each card entry in your amd.txt file should look something like this:

{ "index" : 0, "intensity" : 800, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : false },
{ "index" : 0, "intensity" : 800, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : false },

With only the index number incrementing by 1 for each card. This gives 2 threads (why the lines are duplicated) with intensity of 800, etc. So, for example, the 2nd card would have entries like so:

{ "index" : 1, "intensity" : 800, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : false },
{ "index" : 1, "intensity" : 800, "worksize" : 8, "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2, "comp_mode" : false },

Etc. up to the 12th card, which will have index of 11.

I will copy this settings on the AMD config txt? Or only the intensity, worksize and memchunk? sorry totally nood using this miner, since when i was started mining I only using claymore eth base and phoenix miner.

Update of my result, seems that it increased from 614 - 630/645H Thanks for the help.. Oh by the way what is the hashrate of your card? I am using Sapphire RX 580 8GB and MSI Gaming X 570 4Gb..

Here's the screenshot: