jakakxl (OP)
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 10, 2011, 01:46:29 AM |
|
Anyone have any experience in mining with 6950s?
I'm only getting 280m khash/s.
start poclbm.exe --user=x --pass=x --host=mining.bitcoin.cz --port=8332 -d 1 -v -w 128 -f 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Garrett Burgwardt
|
|
February 10, 2011, 01:48:45 AM |
|
'only'  My 5870 only gets about 30m h/s more than that  |
|
|
|
|
jakakxl (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2011, 01:54:14 AM |
|
Yeah, I should at least be getting similar hashrates to the 5870... Or should I?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jakakxl (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2011, 03:10:33 AM |
|
Yeah, I guess I'll go unlock it soon. |
|
|
|
|
twitcoins
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
April 30, 2011, 07:16:21 PM |
|
rbe, atiwinflash, gpu-z, and afteburner/rivatuner. My 5830 is pushing 300MHash/s, and I'm working on -under-volting it (to be more efficient on power). You can do some real magic with enough patience and research. Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
TurboK
|
|
May 01, 2011, 12:55:29 AM |
|
~320mhash here with a sapphire 6950 2gb, with unlocked shaders (NOT 6970 bios, just unlocked shaders), @840mhz. Catalyst 11.3. Anything faster was unstable and I dislike experimenting.
poclbm_py2exe_20110325\poclbm.exe --device=0 -v -f 2 -w 64
I say ~320mhash because it really depends on the -f switch. If I use -f 2, I get up to 328 mhash, but everything else lags this way, it's only really possible to use it during sleep. With -f 120 I get absolutely no lag ever, but the speed varies from ~290 to ~310, depending on how much "activity" is on the screen. If I'm running apps that update the screen often, even something like a visualizer in an audio player, the hashrate may fall more. Increasing the -f switch will keep the hashrate up, but then the screen will lags cause poclbm will hog all the videocard horsepower.
|
12zJNWtM2HknS2EPLkT9QPSuSq1576aKx7 Tradehill viral bullshit code: TH-R114411 |
|
|
JWU42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 01, 2011, 01:00:40 AM |
|
400 Mh/s
935/600 with unlocked shaders and phoenix 1.3
|
|
|
|
Shades
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
May 02, 2011, 10:20:23 PM |
|
350 Mh/s on my side. Couldn't unlock it though. Damn new Sapphire design!
|
|
|
|
|
samsarulz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
May 02, 2011, 11:42:28 PM |
|
352 Mhash/s => XFX CNFC HD 6950 2gb with unlock shaders 1.05v 820/310 Fan=45% PowerTune=0% Temps = 65°C  |
|
|
|
|
samsarulz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
May 02, 2011, 11:45:08 PM |
|
jakakxl: Use Guiminer instead of the poclbm command line Try using something that supports the new parameter BFI_INT, you will see better performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
