jakakxl (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2011, 01:46:29 AM |
|
Anyone have any experience in mining with 6950s?
I'm only getting 280m khash/s.
start poclbm.exe --user=x --pass=x --host=mining.bitcoin.cz --port=8332 -d 1 -v -w 128 -f 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Garrett Burgwardt
|
|
February 10, 2011, 01:48:45 AM |
|
'only' My 5870 only gets about 30m h/s more than that
|
|
|
|
jakakxl (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2011, 01:54:14 AM |
|
Yeah, I should at least be getting similar hashrates to the 5870... Or should I?
|
|
|
|
|
jakakxl (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2011, 03:10:33 AM |
|
Yeah, I guess I'll go unlock it soon.
|
|
|
|
twitcoins
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
April 30, 2011, 07:16:21 PM |
|
rbe, atiwinflash, gpu-z, and afteburner/rivatuner. My 5830 is pushing 300MHash/s, and I'm working on -under-volting it (to be more efficient on power). You can do some real magic with enough patience and research. Cheers!
|
|
|
|
TurboK
|
|
May 01, 2011, 12:55:29 AM |
|
~320mhash here with a sapphire 6950 2gb, with unlocked shaders (NOT 6970 bios, just unlocked shaders), @840mhz. Catalyst 11.3. Anything faster was unstable and I dislike experimenting. poclbm_py2exe_20110325\poclbm.exe --device=0 -v -f 2 -w 64
I say ~320mhash because it really depends on the -f switch. If I use -f 2, I get up to 328 mhash, but everything else lags this way, it's only really possible to use it during sleep. With -f 120 I get absolutely no lag ever, but the speed varies from ~290 to ~310, depending on how much "activity" is on the screen. If I'm running apps that update the screen often, even something like a visualizer in an audio player, the hashrate may fall more. Increasing the -f switch will keep the hashrate up, but then the screen will lags cause poclbm will hog all the videocard horsepower.
|
12zJNWtM2HknS2EPLkT9QPSuSq1576aKx7 Tradehill viral bullshit code: TH-R114411
|
|
|
JWU42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 01, 2011, 01:00:40 AM |
|
400 Mh/s
935/600 with unlocked shaders and phoenix 1.3
|
|
|
|
Shades
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
May 02, 2011, 10:20:23 PM |
|
350 Mh/s on my side. Couldn't unlock it though. Damn new Sapphire design!
|
|
|
|
samsarulz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
May 02, 2011, 11:42:28 PM |
|
352 Mhash/s => XFX CNFC HD 6950 2gb with unlock shaders 1.05v 820/310 Fan=45% PowerTune=0% Temps = 65°C
|
|
|
|
samsarulz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
May 02, 2011, 11:45:08 PM |
|
jakakxl: Use Guiminer instead of the poclbm command line Try using something that supports the new parameter BFI_INT, you will see better performance.
|
|
|
|
|